12/06/18 Zoning Appeals Board Meeting


TO THE CASES IN IN THEIR PREPARATION FOR THE HEARINGS. IN TODAY’S HEARING STAFF WILL MAKE A PRESENTATION OF THE SITE PLANS MAPS PHOTOGRAPHS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS THAT COMPRISE THE FORMAL CASE RECORD. AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE STAFF’S PRESENTATION THE APPELLATE WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT HIS OR HER CASE BEFORE THE BOAR. AT THE PALACE PRESENTATION THE BORDER FROM THOSE WHO WISH TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT OF THE APPEAL. WITH CONTESTED CASES OPPONENTS WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT AFTER THOSE SPEAKING IN SUPPORT AND FINALLY AFTER OPPOSITION PRESENTATION IN A PALO WHAT HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO COME FORWARD. AND GIVE A LIMITED REBUTTAL PROOF TO THE BOARD AS WELL. UNDER THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS. BCAAS RULES OF PROCEDURE THE APPELLANT HAS FIVE MINUTES FOR PRESENTATION IF THERE IS NO OPPOSITION PRESENT. CONTESTED CASES EACH SIDE HAVE TEN MINUTES TO MAKE THE DESIRED PRESENTATION. AGAIN THAT’S TEN MINUTES PER SIDE THAT’S NOT TEN MINUTES PER PERSON. SURE THE APPELLATE WHICH PROVIDE REBUTTAL TESTIMONY THAT TIME WOULD COME OUT OF THE ORIGINALLY ALLOCATED TEN MINUTES. AT THE CONCLUSION OF EACH OF THESE HEARING SUPPORTER DELIBERATE AND THEN VOTE ON THE CASE BEFORE THEM. THE BORDERS VESSEL THE POWER ACT ON THESE CASES UNDER THE PROVISIONS THE METRO ZONING CODE NAMELY SECTION SEVENTEEN POINT FORTY POINT. ONE EIGHTY EACH OF THE SECTIONS TO WHICH WE REFER TODAY IN THESE HEARINGS. WILL COME FROM THE METRO ZONING CODE SUPPLIES THE ENTIRE JURISDICTION OF THE METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT. ZURICH IT WAS ADOPTED BY THE METRO COUNCIL LOOKING EIGHT ALL INTRODUCE THE ENTIRE ZONING CODE TO MAKE IT PART OF TODAY’S RECORD. THE METRO CODE REQUIRES A RECORD OF THESE PROCEEDINGS. BECAUSE BCA MEETINGS ARE — RECORDED. FOR THE METRO NASHVILLE NETWORK AND LATER UPLOADED TO YOUTUBE AS WELL IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT ANYONE WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD COME FORWARD SIT AT THE FRONT TABLE SPEAK INTO THE MICROPHONE AFTER INTRODUCING YOURSELF BY NAME AND ADDRESS. ONLY THOSE COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD ONLY THOSE COMMENTS WILL BE PART OF THE CASE RECORD. ANY COMMENTS FROM THE GALLERY WILL NOT ONLY BE NOT PART OF THE RECORD BUT ALSO BE POTENTIALLY GROUNDS ABOUT WHICH WE POLITELY ASK YOU TO LEAVE THE BUILDING. LEST YOU INTERFERE WITH OR OTHERWISE INTERRUPT OUR PROCEEDINGS AGAIN SPEAKER SHOULD IDENTIFY THEMSELVES BY NAME ADDRESS BEFORE MAKING ANY DESIRED PRESENTATION. THE METRO CODE REQUIRES FOUR OF OUR BOARD MEMBERS OUT OF THE SEVEN BOARD MEMBERS WERE TO ESTABLISH QUORUM. THE CODE ALSO REQUIRES AT LEAST FOUR AFFIRMATIVE VOTES IN ORDER TO GRANT AN APPEAL. IN THE EVENT THAT FIVE OR MORE MEMBERS ARE PRESENT AND AN APPEAL FAILS TO RECEIVE FOR AFFIRMATIVE VOTES. IN THE CASE AT HAND WILL REMAIN ON THE BOARD’S AGENDA FOR THE NEXT THIRTY DAYS. APPLICATIONS THAT FAILED TO RECEIVE FOR FROM THE VOTES WITHIN THAT THIRTY DAY WINDOW. SHALL BE DEEMED DENIED BY OPERATION OF LAW. IN THE EVENT THAT THE BOARD LOSES ITS QUORUM MEANING FEWER THAN FOUR MEMBERS ARE STILL PRESENT THE MEETING ENDS IMMEDIATELY BECAUSE WE WILL NOT HAVE LEGAL AUTHORITY TO CONTINUE TO TAKE ACTION ON THOSE CASES. IN THAT UNLIKELY EVENT ALL CASES OF WHICH IS SET FOR DECEMBER THE TWENTIETH. TWENTY EIGHTEEN PURSUANT TO BOARD RULES AN AGGRIEVED PARTY MAY APPEAL BOARD DECISIONS TO THE CHANCERY COURT BY A WRIT OF CERTIORARI ARI WITHIN SIXTY DAYS OF THE ORIGINAL HEARING DATE. ADDITIONALLY AN AGGRIEVED PARTY MAY FILE A MOTION FOR REHEARING WITHIN SIXTY DAYS OF THE ORIGINAL HEARING DAY PURSUANT TO THE TERMS OF THE BCA RULES OF PROCEDURE. AFTER THAT SIXTY DAY WINDOW OF TIME ELAPSES NO FURTHER ACTION CAN BE TAKEN IN THE BOARD’S DECISION BECOMES FINAL. FOR THE APPELLANTS IF YOUR APPEAL IS GRANTED YOU ARE IN FACT REQUIRED TO OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR WHICH YOU HAVE APPLIED. FOR A PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED WITHIN TWO YEARS FOR A BORDER — BOARD APPROVAL TO REMAIN VALID. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT IF ANY FALSE OR MISLEADING TESTIMONY IS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD ANYMORE APPROVAL COULD BE REVOKED AT A LATER DATE BY MEANS OF A SHOW CALLED HEARING BEFORE THE BCA. MISTER CHAIRMAN I SUBMIT ALL THE CASES HAVE BEEN FILED IN THE PROPER ORDER. ALL APPELLANTS BEEN NOTIFIED BY CERTIFIED MAIL NO LEGAL NOTICE REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN FULFILLED FOR THESE CASES TODAY. WE HAVE A NUMBER OF CASES MISTER CHAIRMAN THAT HAVE BEEN EITHER WITHDRAWN OR DEFERRED TO A LATER DATE SOME OF WHICH HAVE ONLY BEEN DEFERRED IN THE LAST FEW MINUTES OF LIKE TO READ THOSE INTO THE RECORD HERE AT THE OUTSET IF WE MAY. BRING FIRST CASE TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH FIVE TWENTY TWO INVOLVING THE PROPERTIES SEVENTEEN OH FOUR CARVILLE. DEFERRED ONE MEETING TOWARD DECEMBER THE TWENTIETH DOCKET. NEXT CASE TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH FIVE SIX ZERO INVOLVING THE PROPERTY AT THIRTY ONE THIRTY FOUR DICKERSON PIKE. THAT CASE HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN. CASE TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH SIX FORTY FOUR INVOLVING THE PROPERTY AT TEN FORTY FOUR SECOND AVENUE SOUTH. THAT CASES BEEN DEFERRED ONE MEETING TO DECEMBER THE TWENTIETH. TWENTY EIGHTEEN CASE TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH SIX SIXTY FOUR THAT CASE HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN THAT’S THE CASE INVOLVING THE PROPERTY AT TWENTY SEVEN OH FIVE TWELFTH AVENUE SOUTH. CASE TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH SIX SIX EIGHT INVOLVING THE PROPERT- FOR NINE GALLATIN PIKE. WITHDRAWN. AND THEN FOR THE SECOND HALF OF OUR DOCKET MISTER CHAIRMAN A NUMBER OF WITHDRAWALS FOR RATHE- DEFERRALS AS WELL. FIRST CASE TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH. SIX TWENTY SEVEN ABOVE THE PROPERTY AT EIGHTEEN TWENTY TWO EIGHTY NINTH AVENUE NORTH THAT CASE HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN. NEXT CASE TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH SIX THIRTY SIX INVOLVING THE PROPERTY AT ONE THOUSAND NINE BATTLEFIELD DR. DEFERRED ONE MEETING. APARTMENT. THREE MEETINGS TO THE SECOND MEETING IN JANUARY. NEXT CASE TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH SIX SIX TWO INVOLVING THE PROPERTY AT TEN FOURTEEN BE WEST GROVE AVENUE. DEFERRED. NEXT CASE TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH SIX SIX SIX WHICH STAFF WILL NOTICE A SHORT TERMINAL CASE. THE FIRST TO A LATER DATE. I BELIEVE THAT COMPLETES THE LIST OF THE WITHDRAWN AND DEFERRED CASES MISTER CHAIRMAN FROM TODAY’S REGIONAL BACH. GOOD. POST BEFORE WE GET STARTED I WANT TO WELCOME OUR NEWEST MEMBER OF THE BOARD BCA ROSS PEPPER OVER HERE. THANK YOU FOR SERVING — YOUR CITY — THIS WAY AND THANK YOU MAYOR BRILEY. FOR POINTING ROSS ROSS IS A LONG TIME ACTUALLY BEEN VERY INVOLVED IN COMMUNITY AND WE ARE WELCOMING HIM TO THE BCA HE’S TAKING THIS SPOT THE KING WITH THEM FOR MANY MANY YEARS. WHO WE LOST EARLIER THIS YEAR AND — WE JUST LIKE THAT WELCOME ABOARD THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. AND WHILE WE’RE MENTIONING MAYORS ARE WOULD LIKE TO MENTION ONE OF OUR GREAT MAYORS THE LAST FIFTY YEARS AND WE’VE HAD MANY GREAT PLAYERS LAST FIFTY YEARS HERE NATURAL. RICHARD FULTON RECENTLY PASSED AWAY — THIS COMPLEX IS NAMED AFTER AND WHEN I JOINED THE BCA WE WERE IN ANOTHER ROOM OVER HERE. AND IN THE BACK OF THE ROOM JOHN MICHAEL WILL PROBABLY REMEMBER WE HAD PICTURES OF FORMER MAYORS OF NATIONAL INCLUDING. RICHARD FULTON’S BIG PICTURE WAS IN THE BACK. AND RICHARD FULTON WAS CONGRESSMAN WHO’S THE MAYOR AND REALLY. FAMOUS FOR VOTING FOR THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF NINETEEN SIXTY FOUR ONLY ONE OF THREE SOUTHERN CONGRESSMEN TO DO IT — IN HIS FIRST TERM IN OFFICE TO SELECT IN. NINETEEN SIXTY TWO AND WHEN HE BECAME MAYOR OF NASHVILLE SERVED THREE TERMS AS MAYOR HE REVITALIZE DOWNTOWN. BUILT CONVENTION CENTER RIVERFRONT PARK THE SKIN OF NATIONAL DECLINING DOWNTOWN WAS STOPPED DURING HIS ADMINISTRATION IN THE LATE SOME OF THE GROUND WORK THAT WE ENJO. TODAY OF THIS CITY SO — WE SEND OUR CONDOLENCES TO THE FULTON FAMILY AND ALL OF HIS FRIENDS AND FAMILY AND COLLEAGUES AT WORK WITH HIM — AND IT’S AN HONOR TO BE IN THIS COMPLEX IS NAMED IN HIS HONOR WHICH WAS DURING. HIS LIFETIME. AND WITH OUR NEW — LAWYER HERE ROSS’S LAWYER IF WE NOW HAVE A COUNT OF FOUR LAWYERS ON THE BVA. WE STILL HAVE OUR FREE DAVID’S. WE HAVE TWO ARCHITECTS MY GUEST OF PARTRIDGE IN A PEAR TREE. TO WRITE. SO JOHN MICHAEL TICKETS TICKETS AWAY MISTER CHAIRMAN ONE OF THE PRELIMINARY ANNOUNCEMENT THAT I FAILED TO MAKE ON THE ORIGINAL LIST THAT’S INVOLVING CASE TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH FIVE SIXTY SIX INVOLVING THE PROPERTY OF FIFTEEN OH SIX CHURCH STREET. THAT CASE WILL HAVE TO BE DEFERRED ONE MORE MEETING TO THE DECEMBER TWENTIETH DOCKET. AGAIN THAT’S FIVE SIXTY SIX ABOVE THE PROPERTY FIFTEEN OH SIX DEFERRED ONE MEETING ODAY DECEMBER THE TWENTIETH DOCKET. HOPEFULLY BEFORE HE JUST — IF I MAY TAKE SIXTY SECONDS SURE MAY MAY I ASK THE CHAIRMAN SOMETHING THE REST OF THE FOUR OF COURSE — AT THE LAST MEETING — WE ENDED SUDDENLY BECAUSE OF THE EMERGENCY ALARM SOME OF YOU WERE HERE FOR THAT. AND I WANTED TO SEE IF THOSE CASES THAT WERE THE EMERGENCY ALARM COULD BE MOVED TO THE TOP OF THE DOCK. OKAY — THERE’S BEEN A REQUEST JOHN MICHAEL TO REMOVE THE ONE CASE THAT WE HAD. A SIX I THINK IT WAS THE CASE AND THERE ARE ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE CERTAIN RENTALS. SO — THE SIDEWALL OUT A LIST OF CASES WE HAVEIN FRONT OF US AT THIS POINT WE DO HAVE THE ONE THAT WE CAN CORRECTLY IDENTIFY AS THE ONE THAT WAS MIDSTREAM ONLY DEPARTED — STAB AT NO PROBLEM QUEUING UP THAT CASE FIRST AS TO THE OTHER. BECAUSE OF THE KNICKS DOCKET FROM LAST TO THIS WE JUST DON’T HAVE A CLEAN LIST OF THOSE I’M SORRY FOR THAT I MADE A LIST BUT I GUESS I’M NOT METRO SO. BUT I THINK I WISH DOESN’T WE CAN TAKE THE SIDEWALK [inaudible] OKAY [inaudible] JOHN MICHAEL. OF THE PERSON WITH THE BOARD MEMBERS TO CONSIDER WHETHER TO TAKE ACTION WITH REGARD TO THE REARRANGING OF THE DOCKET IN THE MEANWHILE I’LL PRESENT DAY BOARDS CONSENT AGENDA HERE AT THE HOUSE OF THE MANY OF COURSE- FOR THE MEMBERS THE PUBLIC ARE BORED UTILIZES A CONSENT AGENDA AT EACH OF ITS MEETING IN THAT SCENARIO ONE FOUR MEMBER REVIEWS THAT RECORD FOR EACH CASE PRIOR TO THE HEARING. AND IDENTIFY THOSE CASES WHICH MEETS THE CRITERIA FOR THE REQUESTED ACTION FROM THE APPELLANT. IF THEY’RE VIEWING BOARD MEMBER DETERMINES THAT — TO SWING THE CASE WOULD NOT ALTER THE MATERIAL FACTS IN ANY SUBSTANTIAL WAY IN THE CASE IS RECOMMENDED TO THE BOARD FOR APPROVAL. WILL ENTER INTO THE RECORD THOSE CASES THAT HAVE BEEN SO RECOMMENDED AND IF ANYONE IS HERE IN THE AUDIENCE IN OPPOSITION TO WIN THE CASE IS IDENTIFIED FOR CONSENT AGENDA. JUST RAISE YOUR HAND MAKE SURE THAT I SEE YOU AND WE’LL REMOVE THE CASE FROM CONSENT AGENDA AND HAVEN’T HEARD IN ITS REGULAR ORDER. MISTER CHAIRMAN THESE IN THE CASES OF BEEN RECOMMENDED FOR CONSENT AGENDA FIRST CASE TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH SIX THIRTY TWO BUT OF ALL THE PROPERTY AT THIRTEEN FIFTEEN GREENWOOD AVENUE. LONG A VARIANCE FROM FENCE HEIGHT FOR A FRONT FITZ IS THERE ANYONE HERE IN OPPOSITION TO CASE NUMBER. SIX THIRTY TWO SITTING ON THE NEXT CASE ON PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA IS SIX THIRTY FIVE THAT’S TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH. SIX THIRTY FIVE INVOLVING THE PROPERTY AT NINE TWENTY SEVEN WOODLAND STREET BOARD MEMBERS MAY RECALL THAT THIS PROPERTY CAME BEFORE YOU SOMEWHAT RECENTLY WITH REGARD TO A PARKING VARIANCE. INVOLVING A LIMITED NUMBER OF SPACES AT THE FRONT OF THE PROPERTY. THIS IS A REQUEST FOR A SIDEWALK VARIANCE WHICH WILL HELP PRESERVE THOSE PARKING SPACES THAT YOU CARVE OUT WITH THE PRIOR VARIANCE — IS THERE ANYONE HERE IN OPPOSITION TO CASE NUMBER. SIX THIRTY FIVE YES. THAT CASE WILL BE HEARD IN ITS REGULAR ORDER. THE NEXT CASE ON THE PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA IS TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH SIX THIRTY EIGHT INVOLVING THE PROPERTY AT TWELVE EIGHTY ONE THIRD AVENUE SOUTH A SIDEWALK VARIANCE REQUEST. IS THERE ANYONE HERE IN OPPOSITION TO CASE NUMBER. SIX THIRTY EIGHT SITTING ON THE NEXT CASE ON THE CONSENT AGENDA IS NOT HIS CASE TWENTY EIGHTEEN AT SIX FORTY FIVE INVOLVING THE PROPERTY AT NINE THIRTY FIVE EAST TRINITY LANE. A SIDEWALK VARIANCE REQUEST. AS WITH CASE SIX THIRTY BEFORE IT CASE SIX FORTY FIVE ALSO AGREES TO MEET PLANTINGS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CASES OR ANYONE HERE IN OPPOSITION TO CASE. SIX FIVE SEEING NONE THE NEXT CASE ON THE PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA IS CASE TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH. SIX FORTY NINE INVOLVING THE PROPERTY AT TWELVE OO NINE NICKEL LANE INVOLVING A REDUCTION INSIDE SET BACK IN A VARIANCE THERE. TOO THERE ANYONE HERE IN OPPOSITION TO CASE NUMBER. SIX FORTY NINE SEEING NONE THE NEXT CASE ON THE PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA IS TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH. SIX FIFTY FOUR INVOLVING THE PROPERTY IN NINETEEN FIFTY FOUR UNION HILL ROAD. A VARIANCE REQUEST FOR REDUCTION SIDE SETBACK IS THERE ANYONE HERE IN OPPOSITION TO CASE. SIX FIFTY FOUR SEEING NONE THE NEXT CASE ON THE PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA IS TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH. SIX FIFTY SIX INVOLVING THE PROPERTY AT THIRTY FIVE OH NINE B. REDWOOD DR. A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FROM SIDE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. IS THERE ANYONE HERE IN OPPOSITION TO CASE. SIX FIFTY SIX THAT’S ON THE SIX INCH VARIANTS VERY WELL CASE SIX FIFTY SIX WILL BE HEARD IN ITS REGULAR ORDER. THE NEXT CASE ON THE PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA IS TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH. SIX SEVENTY EIGHT INVOLVING THE PROPERTY AT FIVE TWO ZERO WEEKLY AVENUE A VARIANCE REQUEST FROM FRONT SETBACK REQUIREMENTS IS THERE ANYONE HERE IN OPPOSITION TO CASE. SIX SEVENTY EIGHT SITTING ON THE NEXT CASE ON THE PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA IS TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH. SIX EIGHT ZERO INVOLVING THE UN NUMBERED PROPERTY ON SHARK AVENUE IN EAST NASHVILLE. INVOLVING — VARIANCE REQUEST FOR FRONT SET POSITION TWO K.. SIX EIGHT ZERO THE CASE WILL BE HEARD IN ITS REGULAR ORDER. AND FINALLY THE LAST ITEM ON THE PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA IS TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH SIX EIGHTY SEVEN INVOLVING THE PROPERTY AT SIX ONE NINE ROSEBANK AVENUE. ASIDE WHAT BRINGS REQUEST IS ANYONE HERE IN OPPOSITION TO CASE. SIX EIGHTY SEVEN SEEING NONE THE REMNANTS OF THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE AS FOLLOWS MISTER CHAIRMAN CASE. SIX THIRTY TWO K. SIX THIRTY EIGHT K.. SIX FORTY FIVE CASE. SIX FORTY NINE K.. SIX FIFTY FOUR CASE SIX SEVENTY EIGHT IN CASE SIX EIGHTY SEVEN STAFF WOULD RESPECTFULLY SOLICIT A MOTION FROM THE BOARD AT THIS TIME K. THOSE CASES HAVE BEEN PROPERLY MOVED TO THE SENT ENGINE IT IS THERE A SECOND POSSIBLE. MOTIONS IN MAINE AND PROPERLY SECONDED ANY DISCUSSION ABOUT THE CONNECTION SEVEN NOTE THAT MANY OF THOSE SUBTLE CASES — ON CONSENT BECAUSE THEY AGREE TO PLANNING THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT’S RECOMMENDATIONS THAT’S EXACTLY RIGHT IN EACH OF THE APPROVALS ARE CONDITIONED UPON MEETING THE PLANNING. RECOMMENDATIONS THANK YOUS CARBON OKAY. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION. SEEING NONE ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE CONSENT AGENDA SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE AYE THOSE PASSES UNANIMOUSLY JOHN MICHAEL MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC IF YOUR CASE WAS JUST APPROVED ON THE CONSENT AGENDA YOU’RE DONE HERE TODAY GIVE OUR STAFF UNTIL MONDAY IN ORDER TO PROCESS ALL THE DOCUMENTATION ASSOCIATED. WITH YOUR APPEAL INCOME IN THE IN THE PROCESS OF PURSUING THE PERMIT FOR WHICH YOU HAD ORIGINALLY APPLIED ALTHOUGH YOU’RE WELCOME TO STAY YOU ARE ALSO WELCOME TO GO. WE WILL PRESENT ALL OF THE OTHER CASES IN JUST A FEW MOMENTS HOWEVER HERE AT THE OUTSET OF THE MEETING WE LIKE TO USE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO RECOGNIZE ELECTED OFFICIALS WERE IN ATTENDANCE WITH US. I KNOW — COUNCILMEMBER KATHLEEN MURPHY FROM DISTRICT TO AT THIS POINT. WELCOME TO THE VVA COUNSELING MURPHY. THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. DIDN’T BRING US ANY OF YOUR COLLEAGUES TODAY FOR SOME REASO. I GUESS THE ONLY WITHERS COMES FROM DAVID WELL THEY THEY PROBABLY HEARD YOU HAD A REALLY LONG DOCKET SO — I DREW THE SHORT STRAW REPRESENT US ALL I’LL GO THROUGH THE ENTIRE DOCKET NOW WITH Y’ALL AND GIVE YOU MY OPINIONS I’M KIDDIN- I JUST WANTED TO TOUCH ON A FEW CASES BECAUSE I’M NOT ABLE TO STAY — SO I KIND OF LOST TRACK WHERE WE ARE BUT IT IT’S CASE. TWENTY EIGHTEEN FIVE NINETY THIS IS ONE THAT I THINK A NUMBER OF MY CONSTITUENTS HAVE SAID THE ADDRESS IS FORTY FOUR OH FOR A WEST LAWN. THIS IS — THIS CAME BEFORE YOU ALL BEFORE I BELIEVE AND A NUMBER OF OF CONSTITUENTS HAVE WRITTEN IN. THERE KIND OF TORN OVER THE FACT THAT — FIRST THERE IS SOME ISSUE ABOUT THE DUPLEX PART I THINK THAT THAT WORKED OUT BUT THERE THERE’S SOME CONCERN OVER HOW. BIG IS THIS ADDITIONAL BUILD IS GOING TO A WATER PIPE BURST SEWER PIPE — AND SOME EASE IN IT EASEMENT — THINGS WHICH IS CREATING A HARDSHIP AND THAT KIND OF THING SO I JUST WANT TO REMIND YOU THAT I’VE GOT SOME CONSTITUENTS WHO THEY WERE AGAINST THIS. AND NOW THEY’RE A LITTLE BIT TORN OVER LIKE WHAT’S GONNA BE BETTER LIKE LET THEM BUILD SOMETHING. OR WHERE WHERE THEY IT WITH THE VARIANCE OR LET THEM BUILD SOMETHING TOTALLY NEW SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU ALL REVIEWED. THE CORRESPONDENCE FROM MINE TO HAVE AN OPINION ON THIS CASE — I’M A LITTLE TORN BECAUSE I HAVEN’T SEEN THE THE SITE PLAN WITH THE WATER PIPE AND SO I DON’T KNOW IF THAT WATER PIPE RUNS THROUGH MULTIPLE PROPERTIES OUR WEATHER’S THIS JUST THIS ONE I THINK IT MAY BE JUST THIS ONE THERE. FOR IT DOES CREATE A VARIANCE HARDSHIP BUT IF IT RUNS TO THE OTHER PROPERTIES AND THAT’S WHEN THE ONLY. TO BE DETERMINING AND I THINK THAT THE THE LAST HEARING WE HA- THEY HAD TALKED ABOUT. THE LACK OF HARDSHIP FOR ANY TYPE OF SIDE SET BACK BUT WE’RE REALLY KIND OF LEFT IT IS. THERE THERE WAS AN ADEQUATE BUILDING ENVELOPE EVEN OUTSIDE OF THE PIE — TO BUILD WHAT THEY SAID THEY WERE GONNA BILL LAST TIME AND IT WAS WHAT KIND OF REAR SETBACK WHICH THEY SEEM TO HAVE A HARDSHIP BECAUSE OF THE PIPE AND THEN THAT WAS A NEGOTIATION WITH THE NEIGHBORS IS IT TEN FEET IS AT FIVE THIRTY TO FIFTEEN FEET – IF IT WAS GOING TO BE LESS THAN THE TWENTY FEET. BY CODE BUT THAT THAT’S JUST KIND OF WHAT I THINK WHERE WE LEFT IT WAS. THE THE THE OPEN QUESTION WAS NEGOTIATING THAT. POTENTIAL WE’RE SET BACK OKAY AND FIRM THAT CORRESPONDENCE THAT I’VE HAD WITH THE NEIGHBOR. AS OF TODAY IN TEXTING WITH THEM JUST YESTERDAY. I’M NOT SURE IF THAT WAS I DON’T THINK THEY KNEW THAT THEY COULD. SAY ONE WHERE THERE ARE YOU KNOW KIND OF HAD THAT NEGOTIATION OWNERS I MEAN THAT YEAH OKAY SO THEY THEY CAN CERTAINLY STAY HERE I MEAN AND IF SOME I KNOW IN THE NEWS. OR NOT HERE TODAY. SO NONE OF THE MORE I’D I DON’T I MEAN WE CAN OFFER IS A HANSON WHO I WAS TALKING WITH YESTERDAY THEY HAD SAID THAT THEY WOULD THEY THEY’RE NOT COMING TODAY S- THEN I ALSO WANTED TO TOUCH ON CASE TWENTY EIGHTEEN SIX ONE SIX WHICH IS TWO TO ONE THIRTY EIGHTH AVENUE NORTH WHILE I AM ALWAYS GOING TO BE ADVOCATING FOR SIDEWALKS. THIS IS ONE WHERE THEY THIS PROPERTY IS ON A DEAD END STREE- THE LIKELIHOOD OF METRIC GETTING TO SIDEWALKS ON A DEAD END STREET IS GOING TO BE MULTIPLE GENERATIONS FROM NOW IF EVEN THEN — AND THERE’S A HISTORIC WALL HERE AND SO I AM LEANING THAT I AM I AM TOTALLY OKAY WITH THEM NOT. HAVING TO TEAR DOWN A HISTORIC WALL TO BUILD A SIDEWALK THAT WITH THIS ONE IS MOST LIKELY GOING TO BE ASSIGNED TO NOWHERE FOR ANYTIME SOON SO I’M OKAY WITH YOUR GRANTING THAT BEER AND WHAT ABOUT THE PHONE. THAT’S SOMETHING THAT I JUST CAN’T ADVOCATE ON AND I HAVEN’T WATCHED AND PAID ATTENTION UP TO HOW YOU ALL DONE THAT — BUT I THINK THIS IS ONE THAT WOULD BE COSTLY FOR THEM TO BUILD OR NOT BUILD AND SO. ARE YOU SAYING THEY SHOULDN’T HAVE TO PAY INTO THE FUND OR YOU’RE NOT HAVING AN OPINION ON THAT. IT IS VERY HARD FOR ME NOT TO ADVOCATE THAT ANYBODY NOT PAY INTO THE FUND WHEN THEY’RE NOT BUILDING BECAUSE I WILL REMIND YOU AND OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS OF THE EWING DOCTOR. COUNCIL PERSON COMES OUT HERE AND PERSONALLY SAYS SOMEONE SHOULD HAVE TO BILL SIDEWALK OR PAY INTO THE FUND THAT MEANS A LOT FOR ME RIGHT AND I AM SO PEOPLE USE THAT MORE THAN OTHERS YES. I’M DEFINITELY SAYING THEY DON’T THEY SHOULD FIND IT STILL OKAY. I DON’T THINK I SHOULD SAY ANYTHING ON THAT OKAY PART OF I. LEAVE YOU ALL THE THE THE HEAVY WEIGHT OF FIGURING THAT OUT AND THEN I THINK I HAVE ONE OR TWO MORE IN MY DISTRICT I’M SORRY — I THINK IT’S INTO YOUR SHORT TERM RENTALS — PORTION OF YOUR EVENING — THE TITANS WILL PROBABLY BE PLAYING BY THE HOPEFULLY. THERE’S A TIGHT KNIT LIVES IN THIS AREA THAT I’M GOING TO BE DISCUSSING. OKAY SO IT IS CASE NUMBER I THINK IT’S ON MY LAST PAGE OF YOUR DOCKET CASE NUMBER — TWENTY EIGHTEEN SIX SEVENTY THREE SO SHORT AND SO THIS AREA OF MY DISTRICT — THIRTY SEVEN THIRTY SIX AVENUE IT’S IT IS AN AREA THAT IS OVER RUN WITH SHORT TERM RENTALS AND WE’VE HAD TAKEN MANY TO ENVIRONMENTAL COURT. THERE HAVE BEEN STOP ORDER WAS STOP WORK ORDERS ON MANY OF THEM IN THIS AREA THAT HAVE CONTINUED TO RENT IT SEEMS TO BE JUST LIKE AN ATTRACTION FOR BAD SHORT TERM RENTAL OWNERS — TO COME INTO YOU AND SO. JUST IN DISCUSSION WITH NEIGHBORS IN GENERAL IF THERE’S A SHORT TERM VIOLATION A SHORT TERM RENTAL VIOLATION I JUST DON’T THINK THAT ANY EXCEPTIONS SHOULD BE GIVEN — I HAVEN’T HEARD OF OF A REASON FROM — ONE THAT THEY SHOULD AND THIS IS JUST AN AREA THAT HAS BEEN OVERRUN AND TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF AND SO I ASK THAT YOU. DO NOT GRANT ANY EXCEPTIONS ON IT’S ONE THAT GOT FROM CAN SENS. IN MY DISTRICT. SIX SIX FIFTY SIX I CAN’T FIND ON HERE IT’S ONE WHERE A GARAGE WAS BUILT WITHOUT A PERMIT. ON OUR MIND YOU THAT I’VE COME BEFORE YOU’LL BEFORE AND KIND OF GIVE IN A LITTLE BIT OF A LECTURE ABOUT HOW YOU’RE NOT THE BOARD OF FORGIVENESS — YOU HAVE VERY STRICT GUIDELINES FROM THE STATE — AND FOR METRO I THINK THAT KIND OF TELL YOU WHEN YOU CAN GRANT VARIANCES AND NOT PRINT VARIANCES. AND ESPECIALLY WHEN SOMEBODY HAS BUILT SOMETHING WITHOUT A PERMI- THAT IS A RED FLAG IN CONCERNING AND THEN TO COME AND ASK FOR FORGIVENESS AND I APPRECIATE THAT THERE ARE NEIGHBORS HERE TODAY WHO HAVE IT VERY WELL& DOCUMENTED WHAT THEIR CONCERNS ARE WITH THIS. AND SO THEY’LL BE PRESENTING — WHEN THE CASES BEFORE YOU BUT I WANTED TO LEND MY SUPPORT TO THEM AND ENCOURAGE YOU TO TO DENY THE VARIANCES BECAUSE AGAIN YOU’RE NOT? IT’S IT’S VERY IT’S IT’S NOT FORGIVENESS AND WHEN YOU DON’T PULL PERMIT THEIR THEIR CONSEQUENCES FOR THAT. DID WE GET THAT RIGHT CASE NUMBER. SIX FIVE SIX REMOTE OKA. RIGHT WRITTEN ANY QUESTIONS FOR COMPLETE MURPHY. THANK YOU THANK YOU AND YOU DO HAVE A COLLEAGUE THAT SHOWED UP. COUNCILMAN DAVIS AS I KNOW ABOUT MISTER CHAIRMAN THAT’S RIGHT ACCOUNTANTS GOT NEIGHBORS INDUSTRY FIVE IS PRESENT COUNCIL DAVIS YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE BOARD. VERY WELL IN A WAY TO THE CASES ARE CALLED — WITH THAT ABSENT ANY OTHER ANNOUNCES SISTER CHAIRMAN. WILL PROCEED WITH THE FIRST NUMBER CASE WHAT THE BOARD DECIDE IF THEY WANT TO TAKE ANY CHANCES ARE WE WOULD LIKE TO TAKE A SIX TWENTY NINE SO. THAT INDIVIDUALS HERE IN CASE SIX TWENTY NINE PLEASE COME FORWARD AND WE WILL. FINISH THIS UP [inaudible] YEAH [inaudible] YEAH — THIS JOHN MICHAEL THERE’S A QUESTION- TO ME WHAT THE CURE FOR THE CASE SO CAN SHE PARTICIPATE. IF THE BOARD WISHES TO REHEAR THE CASE FROM SCRATCH YEAH LET’S HEAR OTHERWISE KNOWN AS WE WERE. WITH START THISIS JUST FOR THE BENEFIT OF OUR RECORD LET ME KNOW THAT THIS WAS OF COURSE THE CASE THAT ENDED MID STREAM INTO BEFORE IT ENDED AS WE HAD A LITERAL FIRE ALARM THE CALLS AN EVACUATION OF THE BUILDING — WELL INTO THE EVENING AT OUR LAST — BEEZY A MEETING AS A RESULT THIS CASE NOT ONLY WAS NOT VOTED ON THE CASE WAS NOT HEARD IN ITS ENTIRETY DOES SEEM PRUDENT FOR THE BOARD HERE FROM SCRATCH ALLOW THE APPELLANT TO PRESENT EVERY DOCUMENT EVERY ARGUMENT IN THE OTHER COMMENTS THAT HE MIGHT WISH. IN SUPPORT FOR HIS APPEAL REQUEST YOU HAVE — CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE DISTRICT COUNCIL MEMBER BRETT WITH THEIR SHIN DISTRICT SIX SENIOR — FILE ALREADY WITH THE SIMPLE STAFF PRESENTATION OF THE MAP SITE PLANS ETCETERA. I GIVE YOU A CHANCE TO BE IN HERE THE CASE HERE’S THE OVERVIEW OF CASE. IN DASH SIX TWENTY NINE THIS TEN BEFORE IT GETS ALL THE WAY UP TO FATHER. ONE THERE’S A PHOTOGRAPH GIVES YOU A SENSE OF THE HOUSES ALONG THAT STRETCH OF TEN STREET BEFORE YOU KNEW A LITTLE BIT MORE OF A COMMERCIAL AREA. THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED SHOWS A PROPOSAL OUT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THAT’S INTENDED AT THIS LOCATION. AND OF COURSE THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU IS A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FROM SIDEWALK REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ARE SIX ZONING DISTRICT. VIEW UP AND DOWN THE STREET IN ITS CURRENT CONDITION WITH THE EXISTING SIDEWALK SHOWN HERE AGAIN YOU HAVE THE WRITTEN RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH REGARD TO THIS PROJECT. GET ACCOUNT SOMEONE’S INPUT — THE APPELLATE WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE HIS DESIRED PRESENTATION SIR IF YOU’LL JUST INTRODUCE YOURSELF ONCE AGAIN BY NAME AND ADDRESS AND THEN TAKE IT UP WITH THE BOARD. HI MY NAME IS CHRIS RIGHT TWO TWO O. FOUR EASTON AVENUE THAT – THREE SEVEN TWO SIX SO I I’M JUST ASKING — THIS WITH THE SIDEWALK — BECAUSE THERE’S CURRENTLY A SIDEWALK THERE AND A GRASP OF FOR WAS JUST ASKING IF WE COULD KEEP THE SIDEWALK WITHOUT HAVING TO PAY THE IN LIEU OF FEE. IF THOSE ARE THE ONLY TWO OPTIONS THAT WE HAVE — BUILDING THE SIDEWALK IS GOING TO BE. LESS THAN HALF THE COST OF THE IN LIEU OF FEES GO AHEAD AND PUT THE SIDEWALK IN. BUT A SIDEWALK THERE WILL BE MISALIGNED AND THAT’S THAT’S THE IMAGE THAT ARE PRESENTED. TO THE BOARD. SO IT IF THOSE WERE THE ONLY TWO OPTIONS WE WOULD WE WOULD BE BUILDING THE SIDEWALK MISALIGNED THIRD OPTION THERE WAS A CASEA- THAT WAS HEARD BEFORE MINE LAST MONTH. CASE TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH SIX TWO FIVE AND IN THAT CASE THERE WAS AN EXISTING SIDEWALK IN THE THE APPELLANT OFFERED TO MAINTAIN A REPAIR THE SIDEWALK. IN FRONT OF IN FRONT OF THAT STRUCTURE AND THE BOARD THROUGH THAT AND WITH NO IN LIEU OF FEE. SO IS THAT THE RECOMMENDATION PLANNING AND THAT WAS PROBABLY A NEWER SIDEWLKS AND THIS ONE RIGHT HERE. BUT I MEAN IT QUIT WHAT WOULD WHAT WOULD MAINTAINING THIS ONE INVOLVING A THIS IS IN DISREPAIR OR IS IT. AD IT LOOKS LIKE IT’S IN GREAT SHAPE I MEAN YEAH THIS SEEMS TO BE THE KIND OF EXAMPLE THAT. WE’RE STRUGGLING WITH ALL ALONG IS THAT YOU GOT IT AND HAVE A NICE SIDEWALK THE GOES. FOR MANY MANY BLOCKS AND YEAH THE CODE IS CHANGE AND AND YOUR CARD TO DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT AND IT’S CHEAPER FOR YOU TO DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT THAT SCREWS UP THE THE FLOW OF THE SIDEWALK THAN IT IS TO TO PAY THE FINE SO YES SIR — I MEAN IT KIND OF PUTS US IN A BIND BUT I THINK AND I’M I DO REMEMBER SOME OF THOSE CASES SO THE THAT WHEN THEY RECOMMEND MAINTAIN THE EXISTING SIDEWALK THERE IS AN EIGHTY EIGHT THAT. ADAPTABILITY YOU KNOW THAT THEY THE CORNER LOT THEY SAY WILL BRING IT UP TO EIGHTY A STANDARDS AND SO THERE’S AN EXPENSE SOME SOME OF THE SIDEWALKS THAT WERE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT SAYS YOU DON’T TO PA. THAT — BY MAINTAINING IT AND FIXING IT UP YOU KNOW THE APPLICANT. YOU KNOW — EXCEPT SO I MEAN IT. IT’S IT’S NOT. USUALLY A TOTALLY KIND OF FREE RIDE SO TO SPEAK FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUT SO IN THIS CASE IT’S AWFUL DIFFERENT YOUR COUNCIL PERSON IS AGAINST IT. SO AS I MENTIONED TO THE LAST HEALTH PERSON WAS A UP IN FRONT OF THIS. THAT CARRIES A LOT OF WEIGHT WITH ME YES SIR COUNCIL PERSON BASICALLY SAYS YOU SHOULD EITHER PAY INTO THE FUND OUR BILLING CYCLE YES SIR. CAN. LAST TIME ALSO PRESENT THE OPTION OF IF WE CAN KEEP THE SIDEWALK AS IT IS. IS THERE IS THERE AN OPTION TO PAY INTO THE IN LIEU OF FEE THE AMOUNT THAT IT WOULD COST US TO BUILD THE SIDEWALK THE JOHN MICHAEL THE CASINO HERE BUT THE IN LUCY IS SET BY. THE METRO COUNCIL WE BELIEVE IT’S ABOUT PUBLIC WORKS AND IT’S EVALUATING ONLY BUILT IN SO WE DON’T HAVE ANY CONTROL OVER THE AMOUNT OF THE IN LIEU OF BEING WE HEAR FROM. DEVELOPERS ALL THE TIME THAT THEY SAY THE BILL THE SIDEWALK AND THEN PAY IN THE MOVIE BUT YOU KNOW. THAT’S KIND OF WHERE WE ARE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT. WELL THE COUNCILMAN WROTE. QUITE A A LOT I DON’T KNOW IF YOU READ IT WAS I HAVEN’T SEEN – NOVEMBER THIRTIETH SO IT WAS AFTER THE LAST HEARING AND HE MENTIONED HE WOULD ACCEPT AS A COMPROMISE DEDICATING RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTS SIDEWALKS WITH ALTERNATIVE DESIGN WHERE THE EXISTING TO FIT PLANNER STRIP OLDER MEN AND PLEASE. THE APPLICANT WOULD CONSTRUCT NEW EIGHT FOOT SIDEWALKS ACROSS THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE. IS THAT SOUND LIKE A A VIABLE OPTION TO YOU — GET GETTING RIGHT OF WAY THAT THAT WOULD THAT’S SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD AGREE TO FOR SURE BUT THE OTHER PIECE OF THAT CAN YOU CAN SO. AS YOU SAY YOU WANT TO KEEP THE LISTING SIDE WALKIE SAYING KEEP THE TWO FOOT STRIP STRIP AND THEN IF YOU’RE GONNA BUILDING SIDEWALK MAKE IT EIGHT FEET WID. FOR HIS EXTEND THE THE CURRENT ONE THAT THEY LIKE WELL I THINK YOU NEED TO I DON’T THINK YOU COULD EXTEND I THINK YOU HAVE TO TEAR IT UP AND WE’LL SEND YOU. A NEW I THINK YOU’RE RIGHT. OKAY SO IS KEEPING THE EXISTING SIDEWALK AND JUST ADDING ANOTHE. EXISTING KEEPING TWO FOOT GRASS STRIP AND THEN BUILDING AN EIGHT FOOT SIDEWALK. SO YOU DON’T GET THE ZIGZAG OF WHAT YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT I SAY — YEAH I I THINK I THINK THAT’S SOMETHING. THAT WERE OPEN [inaudible] TO OKAY — VERY GOOD WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. ACTUALLY. OKAY — I’LL MOVE THAT THE APPLICANTS TO BUILD THE ALTERNATIVE SIDE ALONG WITH. AN EXISTING CARPET PLANNING STRIP. BUILDING THE NEW. EIGHT BUT WIDE SIDEWALK. AND DEDICATING THE RIGHT AWAY. MOTIONS WERE MADE IS OUR SECOND. SO MOTIONS AND MADE HIM SECOND IN ANY DISCUSSION. THING NONE ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE SIGN POST PASSES JOHN MICHAEL LET’S GET — REGULAR [inaudible] TALK. OKAY MISTER CHAIRMAN THAT’LL BRING US BACK TO THE TOP OF THE ORDER TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH FIVE NINE ZERO THIS AS YOU WILL RECALL VERY THOROUGHLY AND ALSO PROPERTY FORTY FOUR OH FOUR A IS AN ADAM WEST LONG DRIVE THE CANCELLATION OF THE TWENTY FOURTH. DESERVING COUNCILMEMBER MURPHY ON THIS CASE MISTER CHAIRMAN I NEED TO STOP WE WERE JUST JOINED A FEW MOMENTS AGO BY COUNCIL MEMBER TO THAT BLAYLOCK. MISSING OVER TWENTY SEVEN EXTENDING THE SAME COURTESY THAT WE HAVE THE OTHERS WOULD LIKE TO INVITE HER FOR TO ADDRESS THE BOARD BEFORE WE TAKE THIS NEXT CASE IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO DO SO. CASTMEMBER BLAYLOCK COMPLETELY LOCKED WELCOME TO THE V. EASY PLEASE TELL US WHICH CASE YOU’RE HERE. FOR ACTUALLY OUR FIRST [inaudible] THANK. MISTER CHAIRMAN IT’S TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH SIX THIRTY NINE INVOLVING THE PROPERTY OF TURNER SEVENTY SIX MCMURRAY DRIVE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH SO THIS PARTICULAR CHURCH — AND HAS HAD A LOT OF THINGS BEFORE YOU AND WE HAVE HAD SEVERAL MEETINGS AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD WE JUST HAD A MEETING THE OTHER DAY. HAD A PRETTY GOOD ATTENDANCE THERE’S A FEW ISSUES THAT THE NEIGHBORS HAD AND WE ADDRESSED OLIVE AS WIND WISE THE PARKING – THEY HAVE A LOT OF THEY HAVE A LOT THESE AGREEMENT WITH THAT. BUT THE PARKING ON THE STREET ON BOTH SIDES WAS AN ISSUE FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD SAID THEY JUST DIDN’T WANT ANY EXPANSION. AND GIVEN THE FUTURE OF POTENTIALLY MORE PARKING SO EVERYBODY INCLUDING THE CHURCH AGREED THAT JUST NO PARKING ON THE STREET RED SATISFY THAT SO – WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT AND GET IN THERE AND HE HAS — THE CHURCH HAS GONE AHEAD AND HIRED A LIKE A SECURITY GUARD TO ADDRESS THAT — TRAFFIC FLOW IN THE BEGINNING IN THE IN THE SERVICE AND AND I SAID THEY HAVE FINDS OUT ON THE STREET ON THEIR OWN IN A PARKING ON THIS SIDE — ATTACK TRAFFIC AND THEY’VE ALREADY ORDERED THEN I’VE ALREADY ORDERED THE NO PARKING SIGNS TO LOOK AT IT JUST HASN’T BEEN AND AS A AND IS THERE IS A MEMORY STREET. MARY DRIVE THAT. CHERRY WOOD. YES BUT THE CONDITION OF THE THAT IS. THAT THEY WILL ACCEPT THE FRUIT. OF IS IS WHATEVER REASON THAT PORTION OF PARKING OR THREE AND THAT WOULD BE WONDERFUL THAT WOULD BE WONDERFUL. AND THERE IS TREE WAYS THEY’VE GOT A LOT OF PROPERTIES AROUND THERE THAT THEY THEY RAN OUT — LEASED OUT OR YOU KNOW WHATNOT AND THERE WAS THE RISK BRUSH — YOU KNOW AT SOME OTHER ISSUES JUST VIOLATIONS JUST A LITTLE BIT OF TRASH IN. IN A LITTLE FRESH IN THERE PROBABLY NOTHING THAT THEY WOULD HAVE GOTTEN A CODE VIOLATION FOR BACK. NEVERTHELESS IT WAS. THE LEANING TOWARDS THAT THEY HAVE THEY HAVE I UNDERSTAND THAT NOW THE IT’S BEEN BROUGHT TO THEIR ATTENTION SEVERAL TIMES THIS PASSED MEETING THERE WAS A MEMBER OF THEIR FORWARD THERE. SO I THINK AND THAT WAS A REALLY GOOD ADDITION TO THEIR THEIR MEETING — IF WE IF WE HAVE THOSE CONDITIONS ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF THIS MAN. YES OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS FOR COMFORTABLE A LOT. THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE THANK YOU THANK YOU GET TO SEE OUR MISTER CHAIRMAN WITHOUT WILL PICK UP AT TWENTY EIGHTEEN FIVE NINE ZERO AS SHOWN HERE ON THE ZONING MAP THE SYMBOLS OF PROPERTY AT FORTY FOUR OH FOUR WEST LONG DRIVE ALTHOUGH WE SAID AT LAST TIME WILL. SAY IT AGAIN THE ORIGINALLY FILED ITEM A CASE INVOLVING THE QUESTION OF LEGALLY NONCONFORMING USE HAVING TO RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON THE SAME PROPERTY. HAS BEEN RESOLVED MINISTRY LEE BASED UPON REVIEW OF MORE RECENTLY SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS DEMONSTRATING SUCH LEGALLY NONCONFORMING USE. AS A RESULT THE CASE BEFORE YOU TODAY FOR THE PROPERTY SHOW HERE ON THE AERIAL MAP INVOLVES TWO VARIANCE REQUESTS. FIRST THE SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE FROM REQUIRED FIVE DOWN. TO THREE AND THEN A REAR SETBACK VARIANCE AND REQUIRE TWENTY ALSO DOWN TO THREE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE INTENTION TO CONSTRUCT THE SECOND RESIDENTIAL UNIT THERE IN THE X. TO THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY. SITE PLAN SUBMITTED AT LEAST MOST RECENTLY SOME. THE SITE DOES IT FROM STAFF A FEW WEEKS BACKSHOWS THE FACE THE PROPERTY IN ITS CURRENT CONDITION. VIEW OF THE DOWNSTREAM. THE BELL TO PRESENT — MR MRS PARKS PLEASE COME FORWARD INTRODUCE YOURSELF FOR MORE TIME MISTER CHAIRMAN ALTHOUGH YOU HAVE HEARD THIS CASE ALREADY I KNOW THERE WAS SOME INTEREST IN HAVING THEM HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO TALK WITH NEIGHBORS MORE COUNCIL MEMBER. SO WE’LL LEAVE IT TO THE BOARD TO DETERMINE TO WHAT EXTENT YOU WISH TO REFER PUBLIC HEARING TAKE ANY DIFFERENT TESTIMONY OR MERELY FOLLOW UP ON YOUR PRIOR QUESTIONS. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOURSELF FOR THE RECORD IN THE DRESS AND WHY YOU’RE HERE GOOD AFTERNOON — BRAD BARS — PROPERTY OWNER FOR FOUR FOUR WEST LAWN DRIVE. ALSO FOR FOUR OH FOUR WEST. ONE ALL WERE REQUESTING NOW IS JUST THE REAR FIVE FOOT SETBACK FOR NO LONGER REQUESTING THE SIDE OR THREE FEET OFF THE BACK WERE JUST REQUESTING FIVE FEET – AS YOU PREVIOUSLY REQUEST REQUESTED WE SUBMITTED SITE PLANS — WHICH YOU SHOULD HAVE IN FRONT OF YOU — THAT WE’VE GOTTEN JOHN OF OUR ARCHITECT DAVID YOU — MARGOLIN. AND AS PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED WHAT WE’VE TRIED TO DO IS WORK THAT ARE — TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION WHAT THE NEIGHBOR SUGGESTIONS ARE AND WORK WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF OUR BACKYARD CONCERNING THE SEWER LINE THAT GOES THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF THAT. AND AND SO — BUT NOW THINK LAST TIME YOU SAID THAT YOU WERE THINKING ABOUT JUST DOING A GARAGE WITH AN APARTMENT OVER IT NOW YOU’VE GOT A ONE CAR. GARAGE LITTLE HOUSE YES SIR. JEFF PLANS AND ELEVATIONS WHICH IS MORE THAN YOU HAVE I MEAN YOU’VE DEVELOPED THE THE A LOT MORE THAN YOU HAD WHEN WE FIRST. HEARD FROM YES SIR WE MET WITH MARKLAND HE’S DESIGNED A LOT OF STUFF AND SO ON PARK AND HE LAID OUT A FEW OPTIONS AND THIS IS WHAT HE RECOMMENDED THAT WOULD KEEP THE YOU KNOW INTEGRITY THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND AND LOOK NICE AS WELL — SO. ONE OF THE ANOTHER THING THAT WAS REALLY IMPORTANT WAS TO ME WITH OUR NEIGHBORS AND SO WHAT WE’VE DONE IS THAT — WE MET WITH OUR NEIGHBORS ON MULTIPLE OCCASIONS SINCE THE LAST MEETING GETTING THEIR INPUT SUGGESTIONS AND CONCERNS. AND THAT’S A LOT HOW WE COME UP WITH THESE PLANS — ONE OF THE BIGGEST CONCERNS OF THE NEIGHBORS WAS THE HEIGHT — OF THE STRUCTURE SO WHAT WE’VE DONE IS WE TRY TO LIMIT THE HEIGHT — WHICH YOU CAN SEE IN THE DRAWINGS AS WELL WITH THE FORCE- OTHER SUGGESTIONS THAT WE TOOK INTO CONSIDERATION WAS THE NEIGHBOR ON THE RIGHT WAS CONCERNED ABOUT PARKING. SO WE’VE — YOU KNOW PUT ON RECORD THAT WE WANT TO SHE WANTS US TO PROVIDE TO PARKING PASS HUTCH COME UP WITH FIVE FEET — WE CAME UP WITH FIVE FEET BECAUSE WE THOUGHT IT WAS FAR ENOUGH AWAY. FROM THE NEIGHBOR SIDE AND ALSO- KEPT THE FOOTPRINT WHAT THE NEIGHBOR SUGGESTED — AND WE WERE ALSO IN THE FRONT THAT TALKING TO OUR NEIGHBORS THEY WANTED SOMETHING THAT IN A RECENTLY IN HEIGHT — SO GIVE IT FIVE FEET STILL CLOSE OR IS EVERYONE HAPPY WITH FIVE FEEDERS ARE STILL ONE OR TWO PEOPLE IN ON YOUR NEIGHBOR IN THE VERY BACK WE’VE YOU KNOW WE’VE ALL OF THESE — NEIGHBORS ARE TOUCHING OUR PROPERTY WE MET. LET ME ASK YOU KNOW THE THE THE REAR SO. YOU CAN ON YOUR BILLING AND BUT YOU HAVE — IT LOOKS LIKE ON THE THE PLANS THAT YOU SUBMITTED — THAT YOU’VE GOT. THIRTY TWO FEET OF DEATH. TO THE HOUSE THAT YOU PLAN TO BUILD BUT THE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE SITE PLAN THAT YOU GAVE US HAS — IT LOOKS LIKE YOU GOT A POSSIBLE TWO MORE FEET. WHAT IS WHAT IS THE MAXIMUM — IF YOUR IF YOUR REAR NEIGHBOR. IS OPPOSED AND AND WORKS SYMPATHETIC. TO THAT OPPOSITION WHAT IS THE MAXIMUM WE’RE SET BACK YOU CAN HAVE WITH THE BUILDABLE INVALID BUT YOU HAVE GIVEN WITH THE PIE SITUATION — THAN THE MAXIMUM IS — THIRTY TWO FEET AND THIRTY TWO POINT — FOUR SEVEN AND I THINK IT WAS THIRTY FOUR POINT FOUR SEVEN BUT THAT WAS WITH THE THREE FOOT. SO WITH THE TWO FEET. IT’S WHERE I I HAVE THIRTY SIX POINT FIVE FIVE IS THE BUILDING ENVELOPE WITH THIS WITH THE AND THEN. THERE THAT INCLUDES A THREE FOOT SETBACK THAT PHONE. THIS BUT YOU ALL SUBMITTED. THE FIRST — OR THE THE GARAGES THERE AND YOU HAVE THE SATISFACTION YOU HAVE A FORTY ONE POINT SIX FOOT WIDE BUILDING ENVELOPE IN A THIRTY SIX POINT FIVE FIVE D. [inaudible] AND TO ME IF YOU YOU KNOW IF YOU IF YOU. AT THAT THIRTY SIX TO IN THE THREE FOOT SET BACK THAT’S AT THIRTY NINE AND A HALF FOOT FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. AND YOUR YOUR BUILDING IS THIRTY TWO SURE SEEMS LIKE YOU GOT MAYBE SEVEN FEET TO PLAY WITH. ON THE BACK IS THAT RIGHT OR DO YOU HAVE MORE — NO I THINK THAT’S CORRECT. SO SO SEVENTH SO SO SEVEN WOULD BE THE THE THE IF YOU’RE GOING TO BUILD A THIRTY TWO FOOT DEEP HAUSSER CARRIAGE HOUSE THAN SEVEN WOULD BE THE THE WOULD BE PUSHING IT ON THAT. YES SIR OKAY SIR. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT AND THIS MAY HAVE BEEN TESTIFIED BEFORE BUT I DON’T RECALL IS THERE OF REQUIREMENT TO STAY TEN FEET AWAY FROM THIS THE LINE. YES ON THOSE SITES. BUT IS THAT A REQUIREMENT THAT SOMEONE REQUIRE YOU — TO THEY JUST SAID THAT WITHOUT A TEN FOOT SETBACK ON EACH SIDE OF THE SIXTH OF THE SERIES MOTHER AND THAT WAS SOMEONE FROM METRO OR TWO YES MA’AM. IS THERE A TEN FOOT BACK ON THI. SIDE THE RIVER SIDE TWENTY ON THE REAR WE ARE ABOUT THE SIZE. FOR YOU CONFIRMING FROM THE CENTER LINE THAT THERE’S A REQUIRED TO FIT YOUR PHARMACIST WINNING ON THE REAR OF JUST THE REAR PROPERTY LINE. THAT I UNDERSTAND THAT THE CENTER LINE I WAS WONDERING IF THERE IF METRU MADE THEM STAY A CERTAIN DISTANCE METRO DOES ALLOW YOU TO BUILD ON TOP OF A SEWER LINE. BUT THERE TEN FEET AWAY FROM IT I WAS WONDERING HOW GENTLY OVER BY THE WATER AND SEWER DEPARTMENT WE TYPICALLY DON’T. INTERFERE I GUESS WE ARE I WOULD SAY THAT. ADVISERS THE BEST [inaudible] YEAH. OKAY WELL THAT BEING SAID — ANY OTHER QUESTIONS [inaudible] ANYTHING ELSE [inaudible] OKAY [inaudible] THERE. OKAY WE’RE GONNA SEE IF THEIR OPPOSITION HERE PRESENT. OKAY WE’RE GONNA CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. DISCUSSION. THROUGH THE FIFTH TWENTY FEET THERE AT FIVE WELL I MEAN THAT. YOU KNOW THERE WAS SO THAT THE THERE’S A LOT OF OPPOSITION. TO IT BEING A POTENTIAL DUPLEX WITH THAT THE CITY ESTABLISHED THAT IT WAS A GRANDFATHER DEFLECTION THEY’RE ALLOWED TO HAVE TWO UNITS ON THE PROPERTY – I DO THINK THERE’S A LEGITIMATE HARDSHIP WITH [inaudible] THE SEWER LINE — I DO THINK THAT. AND I GUESS THE QUESTION. THEY ARE ONLY THE WHOLE HE ARCHITECT ON THE BOARD NOW IS I MEAN. IT DOESN’T YOU KNOW IT IT DID LOOKS LIKE IT’S A FOUR BEDROOM – CARRIAGE HOUSE — AND WHICH IS OF A PRETTY LARGE CARRIAGE HOUSE BUT IT’S A YOU KNOW THIRTY TWO FEET. DEEP [inaudible] HOME AND YEAH THAT’S THAT TO ME IS THE QUESTION IS YOU KNOW SAI. DID YOU KNOW IS THAT. APPROPRIATE OR NOT BUT IT. YOU KNOW GIVEN THAT THE NEIGHBORS. THE THE REAR NEIGHBORS OPPOSITION I THINK IT BEST IT SHOULD BE THE THE FURTHEST BACK IS POSSIBLE I MEAN IF IT COULD BE IF IT CAN BE SEVEN FEET I THINK IT NEEDS TO BE SEVEN FEET. TO ME TENNIS KIND OF THE THE BALL PARK I WISH. I HAD MY HEAD TO THINK WELL THAT WOULD BE YOU KNOW REASONABLE BUT BUT I UNDERSTAND. THAT THE HOME. THAT I’M OKAY WITH SEVEN IF — AT THE END OF THE FIVE MAYBE TOO MUCH. IF YOUR VACATION I’M CLOSER TO YOU. WELL I’M UNCOMFORTABLE WITH THE REAR NEIGHBORS STILL BEING IN OPPOSITION IN THIS DIRECTLY AFFECTS THEM. SO — AS FOR THIS IT’S HARD. TO DETERMINE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE HOME IT MIGHT REMEMBER WE HEARD FROM A CALIFORNIA MURPHY IN THE TOP OF THE MEETING AND I ASKED HER IF SHE WAS. I HAVE OPINION ON THIS PARTICULAR PARDON. SHE SAID SINCE IT WAS NOT CLEAR FROM WHAT THE PERCENTAGE SHE WASN’T REALLY SURE WHERE THEY’RE GOING TO BUILD. I THINK IT AND IT’S A FAIRLY IT’S PROBABLY SIXTEEN HUNDRED SQUARE FEET I’M GUESSING THIS IS AFFECTING OTHER THINGS WORK WITH TOTAL HEATED — BUILDING THE THE FIRST FOUR BUT FRANCE SEVEN SEVENTY SIX SECOND FOR LIVING IS A FORTY INCH THAT’S ON THE HEAD THINGS THAT INTO THE PLAN UNTIL TODAY. THE READING GLASSES AND DOES THAT CHANGE ANYTHING WORKING. THE WHAT WOULD YOU BE WILLING. TO I DON’T KNOW MS OF LIKE TO HEAR IT EVERYONE ELSE HAS TO SAY ACTUALLY. BUT I THINK I’VE HEARD OF SOME. THE NEIGHBOR. I HAD VERY STRONG OPPOSITION AND IT OBVIOUSLY BACKS UP TO HER PROPERTY VERY CLOSE SO [inaudible] HELLO. THEY ALL SHOWED UP LAST TIME AND NO ONE SHOWED UP FORWARD AN ADDITIONAL LETTER SO. NOW THAT YOU HAVE TO SHOW UP BUT I I DO GET THAT. I THINK IT’S BEEN HER THREE TIMES YEAH THERE’S GOING TO BE THE YOU KNOW TO ME I MEAN THERE. THEY’RE STAYING STAYS — YOU KNOW THE APPLICANT TAK TO THE NEIGHBORS AND I ASKED SPECIFICALLY ABOUT THE REAR NEIGHBORING THEY’RE STILL IN A POSITION — TO THE UNIVERSITY SAYS TWENTY FEET. SO THEY’RE ASKING US FOR MUCH LESS THAN THAT SO THE QUESTION IS WHERE IS THAT. WELL AND AND YOU KNOW I YOU KNOW THAT THE BED THAT I DO THINK THERE IS A LEGITIMATE HARDSHIP WITH THE DRAIN PIPE. AND SO THAT. THAT IS WHAT WOULD PUSH IT BACK AND THEN LOOKS AT MATT THAN THAN THE IN NEIGHBORS MATTER YOU WERE I MEAN YOU’RE RIGHT — I MEAN IT’S LIKE I SAID I HAD I HAD. YEAH. I HAD TEN IN MY HEAD — BUT I’VE. AS I SEE THE PLANE WITH ROOM WITH. TWO THE TEN MEANS YOU HAVE. TO HEAR READ YOU HAVE TO KIND OF RE. DO THE HOUSE I MEAN YOU HAVE TO HAVE A PLAN BUT IT’S BETTER THA. TWENTY YES. BETTER TWENTY HORSES — SO YEAH BUT I MEAN I’M I’M YEAH I GET IT — SINCE INDIA. IN THIS. SENSE ROSS IF YOU WEREN’T HERE THE THIS ORIGINAL CASE YOU KNOW I THINK YOU HAVE TO STAY OUT OF THE VOTING BUT CINDY TELL US. WHICH IS A RELATIONSHIP [inaudible] LIKE. I WAS VERY CLEAR I WAS BORED. I THINK PART YOU CAN YEAH — SO — SOMEWHERE BETWEEN THE SEVEN HE’S ASKING FOR A NOTE A TEN FOOT SETBACK BUT I DO THINK HE’S ESTABLISHED A HARDSHIP ON THAT ISSUE COMPOSER MOVE NOW IT SEEMS LIKE WE’RE DECIDING BETWEEN SEVEN AND TEN WHAT’S THAT NUMBERS AND I HAVE A MOTION. WHY AM I ACTUALLY I WAS LEANING- FOR TO NOT GRANT THE REQUEST BUT I COULD GO WITH THE TEN SOMEONE WANTS TO MAKE A MOTION — MAKE A MOTION THAT WE GRANT A VARIANCE — DOWN TO ATTEND BUT SENT BACK. OKAY MOTIONS REMAINS OUR SECOND. YEAH I’LL I’LL SECOND IT DIDN’T THEN THAT IS YOUR ONLY THE REAR SIT BACK AND KNOW THAT THAT THERE’S THE ORIGINALLY AFTER SUNSET BUT THERE’S NO SUCH [inaudible] IF. MOTIONS RELATED PROPERLY SECONDED ANY DISCUSSION. SEE NONE ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE AYE CLOSE. PASSES FOR MISTER CHAIRMAN AN EXCUSE TO BE CONSIDERED THE BORDERS TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH FIVE NINETY SEVEN INVOLVING THE PROPERTY AT ELEVEN AT LUCILLE’S TREATING COUNCIL DISTRICT NUMBER FIVE AS NOTED PREVIOUSLY WERE JOINED BY. COUNCILMEMBER SCOTT DAVIS WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON THIS AND OTHER CASES IN HIS DISTRICT I’M SURE. REQUEST HERE IN OUR IN TWENTY A ZONING DISTRICTS SHOWN HERE ON THE ZONING MAP SHOWING HERE ON THE AERIAL. IS FOR PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND THE VARIANCE REQUEST IS FOR A DECREASE IN DRIVE WAY SIZE REQUIREMENTS. YOU HAVE DISCUSSED IN THE PAST MISTER CHAIRMAN ANYMORE THE FAMILY CONCEPT TYPICALLY TRIGGERS A REGULAR COMMERCIAL DRIVE WAY WHICH IS A TWENTY FOUR FOOT WITH HERE WITH A FIFTY FOOT DRIVE WAY THAT WE CAN PRODUCE COMPOSE APPROXIMATELY 40% OF THE ENTIRE FRONT EDGE OF THE STREET. AS A RESULT THE REQUEST DISTRIBUTION. TWENTY FOUR TO TWELVE THE PHOTOGRAPH THE PROPERTY IN ITS CURRENT CONDITION THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER ACROSS THE STREET THE UPPER LEFT TO MOVE THIS IS NEAR THE END OF THE& DEVELOPER TION OF LUCILLE ST. THE UP AND DOWN THE ROAD IS SHOWN HERE — EARLIER PROPERTIES AS THE APPELLANT IN — THEY ARE REPRESENTING CAPABLE HERE AT THE BOARD TODAY COUNCILMAN DAVIS DID YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE A. B. C. A. AT THE OUTSIDE OF THE MAY HAVE STEPPED OUT FOR A MOMENT. SO WITH THAT WILL INVITE YOU TO INTRODUCE YOURSELF BY NAME AND ADDRESS MAKERS ARE PRESENT A LINE WITH MY CAR TO COUNCILMAN DAVID HERE IS ABOUT TO GIVE COUNCILMAN DAVIS IS SPEECH TOWNSON DAVE IF YOU WANT TO COME UP AND TALK ABOUT THE LUCILLE PROPERTY. I HAVE YOUR SPEECH DOWN YOU KNOW YOU’RE FOR EVERYBODY IN YOUR DISTRICT THEY’RE GOING TO DO GOOD THINGS AND GOOD PEOPLE. HI INDIVIDUALS A BIG DEVELOPERS WERE THERE BE. HAVE A FANCY LAWYER ENOUGH. TALKING TO ANY OF THESE THINGS TO BE EASY A WHICH IS VERY NICE. WELL. TELL THING TO BE EASIER BECAUSE AND CO STAFF BECAUSE YOUR WORK MALL YOU VOLUNTEER [inaudible] YOU KNOW. AND YOU DON’T GET PAY YOUR LAST REPAIR ANYTHING. AND SOMETIMES YOU’LL STAY HERE LATE. AND SO WE UNDERSTAND THAT YOU DON’T DO THIS JUST BECAUSE YOU GET KICKS OUT OF THE DO FOR LOVE THE CITY. HELLO SEE THE TYPE OF GAME TONIGHT SO YEAH. I’M IN SUPPORT. APOLOGIZE I WAS OUT THERE. ON MY NEXT CASE WITH THE HOMEOWNER AND SOME OF THE NEIGHBORS WILL GET ALL FIGURED OUT — I’M SUPPORT YOU KNOW LUCILLE IS A VERY. WEIRD STORY LOVE TO POVERTY ISSUES TRANSACTION BOARD. TO BRING THEIR AND YOU KNOW. NOR LOU FREE. AND GRANT THEIR REQUESTS PLEASE AND I’M IN SUPPORT. AND SO PLEASE DO IT WE CAN TO HELP THIS YOUNG MAN. THANK YOU COME THROUGH IN A WITHIN QUESTIONS FOR THE COUNCI. OKAY THANK YOU PLEASE IDENTIFY YOURSELF FOR THE RECORD IN DRESS AND WHY YOU’RE. CUT OFF TO NOON — JAMES RICHARDSON FROM ALONG THE PROPERTIES — FROM TEN TO ELEVEN MISSILE STREET — THREE SEVEN TWO ZERO SEVEN I DON’T HAVE MUCH TO ADD AND ACTUALLY TO THE EXPERTS AND THAT IN THE PRIMARY REASON FOR A TWELVE FOOT WIDE A DRIVEWAY WOULD ALLOW US TO KEEP THE POVERTY GOOD TWO BEDROOM — ONE BOSTON PROPERTY THIS ON THE LOTTO READY. BOARD MEMBER AND THIS IS A DEAD END STREET HERE. HOW MANY UNITS ARE YOU BUILDING? SUED THE PLAN FIRST ONE IS ON THE SCREEN BUT IT STILL IN — IT’S STILL BEING WORKED OUT TO THE TO THE FINAL PLAN BUT WE WANT TO PUT ONE RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE THE BOX SHOULD HAVE THREE UNITS IN. SEE HOW MANY WOULD YOU HAVE IN THE WHOLE PROPERTY — EITHER FULL OR FIVE DEPENDING ON WHETHER THIS EXISTING HOUSE WAS TURNED INTO TWO MARKER UNIT SOLDIERS CAPTORS ONE HOUSE. SO WE WANT. TO BE A BIG PARKING SPACES AS WHAT WAS CONFUSING TO ME. SO WE WERE WE STILL A PARKING SPACES FOR FOUR UNITS IF THEY’RE SMALLER UNIT THIRTY EIGHT ALL TWO BEDROOM UNITS ARE. NOT — THEY’RE NOT ACTUALLY SO. THE IF THERE WERE TWO IN THE FRONT HOUSE THIRD EACH FROM OF THE ONE UNIT RIGHT AND THEN THE UNITS OF THE BACH EACH FROM WOULD HAVE THREE BEDROOMS AND I KNOW THIS — START WITH THEM WHAT WITH THE MOST NUMBER UNITS BE THAT YOU HAVE THE MOST TO BE. FIVE YEAH WE MIGHT AS IT AND THEN THE ONLY YOU KNOW THE AND AND I THINK HE I GET THE HARDSHIP ON I GET IT BUT THE ONLY CONCERN I HAVE IS A WEEK WE HAD ANOTHER. CASE SIMILAR TO THIS I WANTED A TWELVE FOOT. DRIVEWAY AND BUT THEY HAD AN ALLEY BEHIND THEM. YEAH WE WERE ASKING WELL HOW DOES A FAR TO GET TO THE BACK UNIT YOU KNOW SO MUCH PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY. THEY’RE LIKE OH THERE’S AN ALLEY BEHIND IT AND THINK I’M AN ALLEY WAS LIKE OTHER PLACES WE GAVE IT TO THEM AND PLAYED AN I. STRANICE AND EVERY TIME I DRIVE BY TO THINK. HAS THAT FAR TO GET BACK TO THAT BACK HOUSE SO I’LL ASK YOU HAS IT PARKER DON’T GET TO THE BACK HOUSE IF IF YOU HAVE A A SAFETY ISSUE. SURE SO SO WE’VE BEEN WORKING WITH THE DEVELOPMENT GROUP ON THE PLAN WHICH IS PRELIMINARY AS I SAID AT THIS STAGE AND WE’VE BEEN ADVISE THAT. YOU KNOW WE ALL BELIEVE THAT TWELVE FEET. WIDE. EXCUSE ME. SULFUR AND TWELVE FEET WIDE WOULD BE SUFFICIENT FOR A FIRE TRUCK TO GET BACK IN. THEY’RE GONNA BENO PARKING ALL THE WAY BACK. ON THE TRUCK DRIVE WAY SELF THIRTY NO PARKING IT’S JUST THE SPACES OF BEING ALLOCATED. AND WITH NO IMMEDIATE MORE I MEAN THAT’S IT FOR THE REASONS YOU HAVE A EVEN IF THEY HATE SPACES IS MORE THAN YOU NEED FOR FOUR UNITS. THEY’RE ALL — WANTED TO BETTER UNIT SO YOU’VE GOT SPACES FOR ALL THE RESIDENTS OF THE WOODEN THERE’S NOT AN ACTUAL PLACEMENT PEOPLE APART BUT IT DOESN’T MAKE SENSE TO YOU YEAH MAKES SENSE WOULD LIKE BUT THAT [inaudible] GOOD. IT’S REALLY A GOOD. OKAY CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING [inaudible] DISCUSSION. HELLO TO ME THAT THAT’S ON THIS ON THE THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED — KNOWLEDGE AT THE LEVY A SECOND TERM BUT I DO THINK OF THE LADY IS A SAFETY CONCERN. YEAH AND YOU HAVE A SAFETY CONCERN IN TERMS OF OF NOT — DISSIPATING SITUATION WOULD PROBABLY WALK IN BUT I DO THINK IT — IF WE IF WE APPROVE THE VARIANCE IT WOULD BE I THINK HE SAID THREE UNITS IN THE BACK MAYBE TWO IN THE FRONT THAT WOULD SHOW YOU — THE VARIANCE OF THE PREVIOUS OWNERS NO MORE THAN FIVE YEARS OLD PROPERTY OKAY ONE THING I KNOW WE DIDN’T CALL FOR OPPOSITION THERE SIR ANYONE HERE IN OPPOSITION SPACE. NO OKAY — SO YOU’RE FINE WITH IT AS LONG AS IT’S JUST FIVE INCISORS NO MORE THAN FIVE UNITS ON THE PROPERTY THAT IF IF IF YOU WANT TO PUT MORE UNITS ON IT IT’S GOT TO COME BACK THAT’S ABOUT IT. FORTIES AND I THINK IT’S FINE AS LONG AS MAYBE WE CAN GET PUBLIC WORKS TO SIGN OFF ON IT I DON’T KNOW IF THEY’RE PART OF A SIGN OF SUBMISSION. IF THEY WOULD BE PART OF THIS GOVERNMENT THEY WILL THAT MEAN SERVICING WOULD HAVE MOTION [inaudible] WELL. I’LL MOVE THAT WE APPROVE THE VARIANCE REQUEST — AND DROP WAIST SIZE — PROVIDED THAT THERE — THE APPLICANT — HAS BEEN MORE THAN FIVE UNITS ON THE PROPERTY. AND PROVIDES THE TED PARKING SPACES THAT SHOW ON ON THE WITH A TWO MILLION YEAH WELL THERE’S TWO IN THE FRONT. GOT THREE SPACIOUS FOSS BASICS OKAY. FIVE EIGHT TEN OKAY. MOTIONS TO MADE PROPERLY SECONDED ANY MORE DISCUSSION. SING NONE ALL THOSE IN FAVOR MOTION SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE TIME. THOSE PASSES UNANIMOUSLY COULD LOOK. LIKE IF IT ON JOHN MICHAEL. THE NEXT CASE IS. TWENTY TWO CHELSEA HANNAH IS THE APPELLANT ON BEHALF OF URBAN WELL HOMES THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY THIS IS IN OUR IN TWENTIES ON PROPERTY JUST LIKE. A SIMILAR TO THE LAST ONE NOT IN A DISTRICT IN OUR IN TWENTY DESTRUCTION HERE ON THE ZONING MAP. SHOW HERE ON THE AERIAL AT THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH NINTH STREET AND SMILEY STREET IN EAST NASHVILLE. THE REQUEST IS FOR A SIDEWALK VARIANCE YOU HAVE IN YOUR PACKET THE RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WE’RE JOINED AGAIN BY COUNCILMAN SCOTT DAVIS WHO COUNTED ISSUE NUMBER. FIVE THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED SHOWS THE PROPOSAL LAY OUT HEAVY CONSTRUCTION AT THIS LOCATION. THE PHOTOGRAPHS TO RESA SITE VISIT SHOW THE FACE THE PROPERTY VIEW COUNSELING DAVE IF YOU’RE UP AGAIN IF YOU UP AND DOWN. IS THERE ANY OPPOSITION TO THIS CASE. OKAY WERE CALVIN DAVIS DO YOU WANT TO SAY ANYTHING ABOUT THIS. CASE ON NINE THE FLOOR IS YOURS. WE HAVE A SIDEWALK REQUEST. COMMISSIONERS — I BELIEVE THIS ONE THE CASES. THAT WE HAD. FUEL TO THE FIRE BECAUSE WE WER. SHORT MAMMY HI MEMBER BECAUSE OF OUR PASSING ONE GOOD FRIEND — I WOULD SUPPORT — CERNER IS A SIDEWALK TO OLDER. OTHERS PARTS OF THIS AREA AND THE SIDEWALKS ARE. A LITTLE BIT A LITTLE BIT NEWER. I’M DAVID FIFTH LOOKS LIKE SIDEWALKS BUILT IN THE LATE. MAYOR FULL TO THE MILITARY. WE HAD A DISCUSSION LAST TIME WE GO TO THE SECOND FIRST LINE. THERE’S THERE’S ON THEM WERE BUILT IN THE AND THE DEAN AND BARRY MINISTRATION ARE EITHER. OKAY. YOU KNOW BUT ALSO. THE THE WALL. MAKES VERY DIFFICULT. AND NEIGHBORS DON’T WANT A WALL REMOVED. YOU KNOW SO. HE’LL JUST BE FAIR SO YOU’RE ASKING US TO APPROVE THIS VARIANCE AND KEEP THE SIDEWALK AND NOT PAY INTO THE FUND YES SIR. TESTING THAT EWING DOCTRINE K. ANYTHING ELSE TO ADD. WITH THE PLAYING RECOMMENDATION THAT HE WOULD HAVE TO MAINTAIN – THE EXISTING SIDEWALL CAN REPLACE ANYTHING THAT IS NOT ADA COMPLIANT — BOWL. STUDENT CARD. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM COUNSE. THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE AGAIN PLEASE IDENTIFY YOURSELF FOR THE RECORD NAME ADDRESS WHILE YOU’RE HERE. I AM THE COOL PARTS I RESIDE AT TWO SEVEN ONE SEVEN SATURN DR — I AM THE ENGINEER ON THE PROJEC- JODY AND THEN SO WE’VE HEARD ABOUT THE WALL WHAT KIND OF SHAPE FOR THE SIDEWALKS AND WHAT YOU’RE PROPOSING — JUST AS IT WAS SAID IN THE AND WE DON’T WANT. TO AFFECT THE SIDEWALKS OR THE WALL THAT’S THERE — YOU KNOW. IF IT COMES DOWN TO THEM NEEDING TO BE MAINTAINED A WAY. I DON’T THINK WERE POSTED ON MY BOARD MEMBER OVER HERE IS PROBABLY NOT GOING TO VOTE FOR YOU UNLESS YOU HAVE SOME SORT OF COMPROMISE OR SOMETHING THAT YOU’RE GOING TO ADD TO THIS SITUATION SO. JUST PAYING NOTHING IT’S NOT GONNA BE ACCEPTABLE OVER THERE ANYTHING YOU HAVE TO ADD I DO NOT. OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS OF THE AFRICAN [inaudible] DID YOU — I THINK AT ONE POINT THE THERE’S SOME QUESTION ABOUT THE ADA COMPLIANT — BURDEN OF REQUEST AND YOU KNOW ABOUT THE WHOLE GROUP SO THAT IT DID YOU ALL DO ANY — FATHER RICHARD. A LOT OF HEARING AND HEARING ABOUT — WHAT MIGHT BE INVOLVED IN BUT I KEEP THE ROLE OF THE? MAKE THIS — THAT I THINK THE CORNER FOR A COMPLIANCE — I HAVE NOT — HEARD ANYTHING ON ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT. OKAY MUGHAM CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING [inaudible] DISCUSSION. WELL THAT THAT. THAT’S APPRECIATE THE WE HAD THE EWING — PERSPECTIVE DOCTOR IN WHATEVER YOU WANNA CALL IT — I DO TEND TO THINK THAT IF IN THE CASE LIKE THIS WHERE. AND THE PLAY IMPORTANT RECOMMENDS THAT THEY MAINTAIN THE CURRENT — SHUT OFF AND BRING. IN THE CORNER AND ADA COMPLIANCE THAT — THAT THAT EXPENSE TO ME IS IS ENOUGH TO TURN. MORE TO THE TO WAIT THEN LUCY THREE OPENNESS CAN’T. IN MISTER ENGINEER HERE. ALL PLANNING IS SAYING JUST JUST MAKE THIS CORNER EIGHTY YEAR. A LOT OF MONEY OTHER ISLAND AND THEY’RE ALSO SAYING THEY WANT TO RUN AWAY ON FOOT. IF YOU WANT TO GO VOTE OVER HER. YOU GO THROUGH SOMETHING HERE — REALLY WILLING TO MAKE THAT IDE- THOUGH I DON’T THINK THAT WOULD BE THAT WOULD BE IS NOT A PROBLEM TO MY CLIENT AT ALL OKAY VERY GOOD BE WILLING TO SUPPORT. VARIANTS — PROVIDED THEY MAINTAIN THE EXISTING SUBTLE AND REPAIR IT IS NEEDED — MAINTAIN GOOD CONDITION AND MAKE THE CLEANER EIGHTY IF YOU’RE ANY GOOD I THINK THAT WHAT THE THE SPECIFIC ANY PORTION OF THE EXISTING SIDEWALK ON THE PROPERTY PRICES NOT AT COMPLIES BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH — IN KIND [inaudible] MPW DETAIL. SEVERAL BILLION AT THE BASE. LITTLE KIND OF I THINK LUZ DE ELLOS STRIPS OF THE DATSUN AND THAT’S WHAT I HAVE IN MY MIND. I THINK THAT’S WAT THAT IS OKAY SO I THINK THAT’S WHAT THAT IS. THAT YOUR MOTIONS IS OUR SECOND. OKAY MOTION BEEN MADE IMPROPERLY SECOND MEANS FASHION. THING NONE ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE AYE. CLOSE. CLOSE WOULDN’T GIVE HER FOOD [inaudible] I KNOW. WE GAVE ME A PHONE. CALL CONGRATULATIONS THANKS THANK YOU GO FOR JOHN MICHAEL. MISTER CHAIRMAN NEXT CASES TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH SIX ONE SIX ABOVE THE PROPERTY AT TWO TWENTY ONE THIRTY EIGHTH AVENUE NORTH AND CANCEL DECEMBER TWENTY FOUR YOU WERE FROM COUNCILMEMBER MURPHY WITH REGARD THIS PROPERTY EARLIER. IN OUR S. SEVEN POINT FIVE SINGLE FAMILIES OWN DISTRICT. JOHN STANDARDS IS THE APPELLANT. FOR A SIDEWALK VARIANTS ON THIS CASE AS DISCUSSED PREVIOUSLY ABOUT COUNCILMEMBER. AS YOU SEE HERE FROM THE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH IS THE NEXT TO LAST PRESIDENTIAL OUT BEFORE YOU GET TO THE WRONG ROAD ON THE SECTION THIRTY EIGHTH. THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED SHOWS PROPOSE LAY OUT FOR THE RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION. THE REST OF THE RECENT SITE AS IT SHOWS THE AREA BOTH — THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION THE DIRECTLY ACROSS THE ON THIRTY EIGHT AT THAT LOCATION WHICH IS NOTED TO HAVE NO SIDEWALK AS IT HEADS CAREENING — TOWARD THE DEAD AND ETERNAL HERE OPPOSITION TO CASE NUMBER. SIX ONE SIX SITTING ON THE APPEAL HAVE FIVE MINUTES TO MAKE THE DESIRED PRESENTATION JUST PLEASE INTRODUCE YOURSELF BY NAME AND ADDRESS. BUTTONS ON THE PGA THANK YOU FOR HEARING ME TODAY MY NAME’S JOHN STOPPARD’S I LIVE IT TO TWENTY ONE THIRTY EIGHT SEVENTY NORTH ON THE PROPERTY OWNER. I’M HERE TODAY BECAUSE I DON’T HAVE TO TEAR DOWN THE HISTORIC STONE WALL — DEBT IS A IT’S A BEAUTIFUL WHILE IT’S BEEN THERE FOR A LONG TIME AND WE BUILT OUR GARDEN AROUND THAT WALL — I HAVE A QUOTE IN HAND FROM MASON WHO SAYS I CAN TEAR DOWN THAT WALL WHICH IS I’M GONNA HAVE TO DO IN ORDER TO BUILD A COMPLAINT SIDEWALK HE SAID THAT’LL COST. FIVE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS FOR HIM TO DO THAT — WE HAVE BEEN ASKED IN LIEU OF FEE OF NINE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS SO I I AM FACED WITH TWO OPTIONS I CAN TEAR DOWN THAT WALL. AND BUILD A COMPLIANT SIDEWALK FOR FIVE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS I CAN PUT A LITTLE IFFY SO I’M HERE TODAY TO ASK YOU FOR A REDUCTION FROM THE BOARD FROM THE NINE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS. TO FIVE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED DOLLAR FEEWOULD MATCH WHAT MY COST WOULD BE TO REMEDY THE SIDEWALK DISSATISFACTION PLAY OKAY WE FROM HERE DULY ELECTED COUNCILLORS AGO FLAMER FOR YOU EARLIER AND SHE SAID THAT YOU SHOULD NOT HAVE TO BUILD IN THE SIDEWALK SHE DID NOT HAVE A OPINION. ABOUT NOT PAYING THE HE SAYS HE DOES NOT WANT. TO TEAR DOWN THE WALL BUT HE SAYS HIS QUOTE TO TEAR DOWN THE WALL AND ON THE SIDEWALK AS FIVE THOUSAND THEN LOU FEEL. NINE THOUSAND SO. HE’S ASKING NOT TO PAY THE LEAFY [inaudible] FOR LESS. WHAT DO YOU BUILD A SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF THE WALL? SO IF I’M NOT SURE IF IT’S IF IT’S VISIBLE FROM THIS PHOTOGRAPH IT MAY BE MORE VISIBLE FROM THE SITE PLAN. BY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT — IN RECREATING THE THE STRIP OF GRASS THERE THAT WE HAVE TO LEVEL THAT WHEN WE TAKE THE DIRT OUT THE SUPPORT FOR THE WALL WOULD BE GONE THERE WOULD BE NO AFTER TO HOLD THAT LONG ANYMORE. AND SO IS THAT FOUNDATION CRUMBLES BALL IT WOULD BASICALLY HAVE TO BE TORN OUT AND RECONSTRUCT IT [inaudible] QUESTION — THIS IS OUR BASED OUT. OF SO THE WALLACE IN FRONT OF THE CAR THAT BLACK CAR HERE YES SIR. THE WALL ALSO IS VISIBLE IT’S LIKE A A LIGHT COLORED STRIP. WHAT WHAT WAS THAT ALL ABOUT? WHAT MAKES? ONE WITH A WALL BUILT. IT’S A PRE WAR WALL THAT THE HOUSE REGIONAL HOMES BUILT IN NINETEEN FORTY I’M I’M. IT’S NOT BUT IT’S NOT THE WHOLE STREET SPECIFIC TO YOUR MIND IT’S THERE THERE IS A MATCHING WALL THAT HIS — AND THE ART SO ACTUALLY TO GO BACK THE PHOTOS WE JUST SAW — SO TO THETHERE’S A HOUSE IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER YOU SEE A SMALL WHITE HOUSE YOU SEE HALF OF THAT HOUSE. THERE THREE OF WHAT’S THERE TO SIXTEEN OF THIRTY EIGHT IT RUNS ACROSS THOSE THREE PROPERTIES — OF MANY YEARS AGO THERE WAS ONE HOUSE THAT SAT ON THOSE THREE PROCTOR OUGHT TO OUGHT TO SPLIT AND THERE IS ACTUALLY ONLY ONE HOUSE ON OUR LOT IN THE ONE NEXT TO IT OURS WAS A SINGLE LOT. IT WAS SPLIT LONG BEFORE OUR TIME. OKAY SO WHAT. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE FOR MEMBER. SO YOU’RE SAYING IF YOU IF YOU LEFT THE WALL THERE AND BUILT THE SIDEWALK THE WAY YOU O HAVE TO BUILD THE SIDEWALK THE FOUNDATION OF THE WALL WOULD NOT BE SUPPORTED. WITH METAL OF ENGINEERS WHO LOOKED AT IT MISTER. OKAY — ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT. OKAY I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING SO DISCUSSION LET’S START OFF SO JOHN MICHAEL CAN YOU PUT THE OVER HEAD SHOT UP. SO THIS IS A DEAD END TO A RAILROAD TRACK WHICH OBVIOUSLY TO REROUTE THOUGHT MOVING ANYWHERE. AND YOU KNOW THEY’RE TALKING ABOUT BUILDING SIDEWALKS SO. COUNSELLEAD DOESN’T WANT HIM TO HAVE TO BUILD A SIDEWALK BUT WAS SILENT ON THE ISSUE OF THE LOU FUND — GIVEN THE DEAD END STREET IN A STORE WALL I WOULD BE LEANING TO LET HIM OUT IN THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING CYCLE FOR YOUR BOSS. THE TRUTH IS THAT [inaudible] WELL. I TEND TO AGREE WITH THAT HOWEVER IT IS — SOMEWHAT OFFENSIVE TO ME. COUNCIL PERSON HE WILL NOT TAKE A POSITION ON WHETHER OR NOT THIS PERSON SHOULD HAVE TO PAY INTO THE INLET FIND AND PUTS IT ON US WHEN THE COUNCIL HAS PASSED THAT — UNANIMOUSLY THAT YOU IF YOU ARE NOT GOING TO BUILD THEN YOU HAVE TO PAY INTO THE FUND. AND I HAVE. SET THOSE FEES IN A WAY THAT BUILDING IS TYPICALLY MORE PALATABLE THAN PAYING INTO THE POND. SO IF I THINK REALLY PUTS US IN A FINE TIME GREE WITH PRESERVING THE HISTORIAN ENSURE I DON’T LIKE IF IT SHOULD HURT INDIVIDUAL BUILDERS. BUT IF YOU MAKE A MOTION I WILL TEND TO AGREE WITH YOU. HUNGER FOR ALL MAKE A MOTION THAT. WITH YOUR WITH YOUR OPINION ALL- I’LL MAKE A MOTION THAT SO — TO GIVE THEM A VARIANCE OF THE SIDEWALK REQUIREMENTS AND BECAUSE OF THE HISTORIC NATURE OF THE WALL. AND THE FACT THAT IF A SIDEWALK WAS BUILT IT WOULD. UNDERMINE THE STRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING OF THE WALL AND THIS IS LITERALLY ONE HOUSE AWAY FROM A DEAD END STREET. AND SO. AND SO THEREFORE I WOULD ALSO SAY THAT THEY GET A CLEARANCE FROM PAYING INTO THE SIDEWALK FRONT. THAT’S MY EMOTIONS ARE SECOND — SECOND WHICH IS THE MAIN PROPERLY SECONDED ANY DISCUSSIO. SEEING NONE ALL THOSE IN FAVOR MOTION SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. AYE. POSE. FORTY ONE OKAY GOOD LUCK THANK YOU [inaudible] JOHN MICHAEL [inaudible] SO [inaudible] OKAY. MISTER CHAIRMAN ONYX CASES TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH SIX THIRTY FIVE THE SYMBOLS OF PROPERTY AT NINE TWENTY SEVEN WOODLAND STREET THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU TODAY IS FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE SIDEWALK REQUIREMENTS IN THIS THE COMMERCIAL SERVICE REALLY I’M NOT GOING TO SIX THIRTY FIVE PLEASE COME FOR NOW. JESSE BUSHNELL’S THE APPELLANT ON BEHALF OF THE OWNERSHIP GROUP THAT OWNS THIS PROPERTY AS NOTED PREVIOUSLY. THIS IS A PROPERTY THAT WAS BEFORE YOU I WANT TO JUST A FEW MONTHS AGO WITH REGARD TO REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIRED PARKING COUNT MAINLY. THERE WAS AN ATTEMPT TO PRESERVE THE ELEVEN I BELIEVE IT’S ELEVEN PARKING SPACES SHOWN THERE AN AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH HERE ON THE SITE PLAN. AND IN THE UPPER LEFT HAND CORNER HERE. FOR THE POLLEN PARKING AT THAT LOCATION. NOW BECAUSE THE SIDEWALKS ARE TRIGGERED AS WELL FOR THIS PROJECT THE SIDEWALK TO NECESSARILY GO RIGHT IN PLACE OF THOSE ELEVEN PARKING SPACES WHICH ARE THE SUBJECT OF YOUR LAST APPEAL BUS THE REQUEST FOR YOU TODAY. DURING THE WAR THIS WOULDN’T WHICH OCCURRED BEFORE — WHAT POLITICAL SPEAKER THAT MISTER MISTER VICE CHAIRMAN — AGAIN JESSE BUSHNELL’S THE APPELLANT IS THERE ANY OPPOSITION PRESENT FOR K. SIX THIRTY FIVE AND OTHERS ONE GERMAN PREVIOUSLY THAT YOU GOT. A BODY ELSE. THAT’S IT AS A RESULT WILL HAVE TEN MINUTES FOR THE PRESENTATION FROM THE APPELLANT’S THEY’RE WELCOME TO SAY BACK ANY PORTION OF THAT TIME THAT MY WISH FOR THE REBUTTAL THEN WE’LL HEAR FROM THE OPPONENTS THERE AFTER THEY’LL BE TEN MINUTES FOR THE OPPONENTS. TO BECAUSE WELL I DO IS INTRODUCE YOURSELVES BY NAME AND ADDRESS PLEASE [inaudible] FROM. HI THERE I AM — JESSE BUSH NOW AND I AM DID AGENT AND WORKING YOUR ADDRESS WHAT’S THAT WHAT’S YOUR ADDRESS- FOUR ZERO ONE VALERI COURT OKAY [inaudible] IN. YOU YES I’M PETER OBERMEYER NINE TWENTY SEVEN WOODLAND STREET PROPERTY OWNERS THREE SEVEN TWO OH SIX MORE YOUR HERE. WELL FIRST OF ALL I WANT TO THANK THE BOARD — FOR APPROVING THE PARKING FOR NINE TWENTY SEVEN WOODLAND STREET VARIANCE LEFT IN SEPTEMBER — WE’VE GOT A VERY LRGE BUILDING – AND ONLY HAVE ELEVEN PARKING SPACES — IF WE LOST SOCIAL LEVIN PARKING SPACES FOR A BILL SIZE IT WILL BEEN OPPRESSIVE SO HE BUILT THE SIDEWALK AS THE CITY’S REQUIRING HOMELY SPACES WOULD YOU LOSE ALL OF THEM. ALL OF THEM YES HOUSE AT SERVI IT JUST BE BECAUSE THEY’RE ALL OUT FRONT POKER AND IF YOU PUT A KERR ABOUT THERE THERE WOULD BE NO. YOU YOU WOULDN’T BE ABLE TO PULL INTO THE PROPERTY. AND WHY WAS THIS NOT PART OF THE ORIGINAL. THE BILL AND YOU KNOW I GOT YOUR BUILDING FOR MATTER WE WITH YOU AS YOU SHOULD HAVE BEEN I DON’T I DON’T KNOW WHY. WE DIDN’T HAVE IT AS IF IT WAS A SPLIT YOUR SITUATION ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT. MR WERE BAR I THINK ARE REPRESENTED YOU SEVERAL YEARS AGO DID A LOT. OF WHAT I’M SORRY FOR I’M ROSS PEPPER WERE YOU A CLIENT OF MIN. YES HI HELLO WRONG SHOW PROBABLY CONGRATULATIONS ON BEING A BETTER STAY OUT OF THIS. ONE LOCATE YOUR APPROVAL ON MISTER CHAIR AWAY AND WILL COME TO THE NEXT. THANK YOU — THERE’S OPPOSITION SO WHAT I RECOMMEND THAT YOU GO BACK IN THE AUDIENCE AND COULD YOU HAVE EIGHT MINUTES AND THIRTY SECONDS A REBUTTAL WE’RE GONNA HEAR FROM THE OPPOSITION AND YOU’LL COME BACK AND WHAT DO I DO I HAVE A CHANCE TO SORRY COUPLE THINGS YEP SURE OKAY. I DON’T KNOW IF YOU ALL HAVE COPIES WHICH YOU PROBABLY SHOUL- THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT HAS RECOMMENDED — YOU DO HAVE THAT AND YOU HAVE THE THE THE LETTER FROM — THE COUNCILMAN — MR WEATHER’S. YES WE DO OKAY VERY GOOD I JUST WANNA MAKE SURE GOOD VERY GOOD THOUGH PLEASE GO BACK TO THE AUDIENCE OPPOSITION PLEASE COME FORWARD STATE YOUR NAME ADDRESS FOR YOUR BUSINESS REQUEST. GOOD AFTERNOON RAIN AND BROWN ARE PRESENT OF THE TENNESSEE DISABILITY COALITION AT NINE FIVE FIVE WOODLAND STREET — OUR OPPOSITION TO THE VARIANCE REQUEST — HERE IS — BECAUSE WE ARE JUST REALLY ORGANIZATION WE CERTAINLY HAVE – CONCERNS ABOUT — ADA COMPLIANCE WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT IN EVERY SITUATION UP VERTICALLY THIS CASE SINCE IT’S RIGHT DOWN THE STREET FROM OUR OFFICES WERE MANY PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES — PATRON THAT — YOU KNOW WE’RE PROVIDING EVERY AND AND THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF ACCESSIBILITY — I WOULD SAY THAT INCLUDES NOT ONLY ON WOMEN STREET BUT DOWN AT THE CORNER OF MCFERRIN AS WELL – WHERE THEY’RE NOT YOU KNOW WE WANT — MAINTAINED AND THAT THERE ARE NO OBSTRUCTIONS — IS SO YOU KNOW WE WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT IN WHATEVER CASE- IN THIS CASE PARTICULARLY THAT THE SIDEWALK IS EITHER — BUILT TO CODE. THAT THEY’RE PAYING INTO THE FUND OR THEY’RE WILLING TO MAINTAIN IT AS IS BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT NEEDS TO BE HAPPENING AND I WOULD SAY. JUST AS AN ASIDE THAT NEEDS TO HAPPEN IN ALL SIDEWALK SO WHEN. WHEN YOU SAY WE — AND IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT IS IS. RECOMMENDED THAT WE APPROVE THE REQUEST IN PART BECAUSE THE THE THE CASE BEFORE THAT WE HAD PREVIOUSLY WHICH IS SET IN THE WHAT THE WAY THIS BUILDING IS SAID IT’S JUST IT’S A STRANGE — THE SITTING ON THE LINE IT’S RIGHT UP ON THE THE SIDES AND BACK IN THE ONLY SPARKING THAT HAS IS THE EXISTING PARKING AND AND I THINK EVERYBODY. IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD THE COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDED BEFORE THIS YEAR WE ALLOW THEM TO KEEP IT WHICH WE DID. AND SO NOW WHEN THEY ARE ACTUALLY DOING THE WORK THEY’RE HAVING. TO YOU KNOW. CHANGE THE SIDEWALK AND THAT’S WHY WE’RE HERE AND IT’S BASICALLY A SECOND TIME. BUT THE PLANE APARTMENTS AS YOU KNOW PROVE IT BUT THE ASSUMPTION WOULD BE THAT THEY WOULD HAVE TO MAINTAIN IT THEN. IN JUST ONE YEAR OPTIONS WAS SAYING YOU YOU’RE ALL OR YOU’RE OKAY WITH IT IF. IF A YOU KNOW. MAINTAINING GOOD AS IT IS IN GOOD. IT’S NOT SO IT WORKED GREAT IT’S ABOUT HAS A SAY HAS CONCRETE UNLESS IT HAS A CONCRETE SIDEWALK BEFORE GOES IN TO SEE IT RIGHT THERE SAYS FROM THE FOUR LEAST. THIS KIND OF SIDEWALK BUT BUT YOU CAN CROSS INTO. ONE BIG GROUP CODE EXCEPT ONE THAT ONE LITTLE SECTION HERE WITH THE ONE WAY SO ON AND SO THAT’S JUST ONE BIG CREEK I MEAN I GUESS I GUESS THE QUESTION IS IT IS. IS THIS — IS THIS PROPERTY. RECENTLY IN GOOD SHAPE NOW OUR SERVER IS OUR WORK THAT THEY WOULD NEED TO DO TO IMPROVE THE SIDEWALK — WELL I I WOULDN’T I WOULD MENTION THAT THERE’S ONE LARGE – UTILITY POLE — THAT — IS AN OBSTRUCTION OF THAT MAKES IT LESS THAN THIRTY SIX INCHES ACROSS — RIGHT IN FRONT OF THEIR PROPERTY SO I I WOULD NOT SURE IF THAT’S THAN THE PURVIEW OF THIS COMMITTEE OR NOT BUT I WOULD SAY THAT THAT AND CERTAINLY DOESN’T MEET — THE STANDARDS OF ADA COMPLIANCE — AGAIN AS LONG AS THOSE COMPLIANCE STANDARDS ARE IN FORCE AND IT SHOULD NOT TAKE A BACKSEAT. TO YOU KNOW THE THE SITUATION OF HOW THE PROPERTY IS SITUATED — THAT’S SOMETHING THAT WE CAN BE IN FAVOR OF WINDOWS COMPLIANCE STANDARDS ARE — GIVEN VARIANCE BECAUSE OF A SITUATION — RIGHT OUT OF THAT THAT’S SOMETHING WE CAN ALL BE IN TROUBLE WITH THIS CURB CUT THAT BASICALLY RUNS THE LENGTH OF THE BUILDING. THE WAY IT IS TODAY. WELL I I THINK THERE’S THERE’S A QUESTION OF COMPARABILITY OR OR WHAT IS — PART OF CODE. BECAUSE THE CURB CUTS ON THE SIDE WALL YOU UNDERSTAND I DO IT’S JUST COMING IN AND OUT. AND SO WHAT THE CITY WOULD REQUIRE. UNDER THE NEW SIDEWALK ORDINANCE IS FOR THEM TO BILL SIDEWALK. IN THE WIDE AND THEY WOULD LOSE EVERY SINGLE PARKING SPACES. IN THIS BUILDING. SO IS THERE SOME SORT OF COMPROMISE THAT YOU SEE. THE IMPROVING AND STRENGTHENING THIS FOR ADA WITH ALLOWING THEM KEEP PARKING SPACE. I I THINK THAT WOULD BE A A QUESTION AND FOR NOT ONLY PLANNING BUT ALSO IN CONSULTATION WITH THE ADA COMPLIANCE OFFICE — AT MY I WONDER I WONDER IS PART OF THIS PROCESS AND THAT’S SOMETHING I I I ASK YOU ALL IS IS IF. THE ADA COMPLIANCE OFFICES SIGNED OFF ON THIS SORT OF A SIGN OFF ANY OF THE THESE KIND OF REQUEST I DON’T BELIEVE THEY DO SIR JOHN FOR THE THE POLL THAT YOU MENTIONED IS NOT OWNED BY THE APPLICANT I’M ASSUMING IT’S IN THE US — FOR EIGHTEEN T. JOURNAL IT LOOKS LIKE THERE’S ANOTHER HAPPENS A LOT AND IN THAT AREA MYSELF SO YOU KNOW I’M NOT SURE WHERE THAT WHOLE COULD BE MOVED. YOU KNOW GIVEN THAT IT’S KIND OF NOW PART OF THIS NETWORK AND IT IS SORT OF CLOSE TO THE THREE AND IT DOES NOT SEEM IF YOU COULD KIND OF MOVE THE POLE CLOSER IN THE ON THE PROPERTY GIVEN THE KIND OF THE WAY THE LINES WORK SO. I’M NOT SURE IF WE HAVE A LOT OF SAY IN THAT A USER. AND YOU MAY NOT IT MAY NOT BE THE PURVIEW I I JUST WANT TO MAKE MENTION OF THAT — AS AN ISSUE. TO BEING HERE AND IN RAISING THOSE KIND OF QUICK QUESTION BECAUSE THAT’S VERY IMPORTANT TO YOU KNOW. ACCESSIBILITY WALKABILITY EVERYTHING THAT THE U. I’M THE ONE THAT YOU KNOW ASKED THAT THEY BRING THAT CORNER UP TO FULL ADA COMPLIANCE. WITH THAT SOMETHING THAT. LOOKS LIKE AND BE DONE WITH IT REASONABLY MINIMAL HERE WOULD BE ABSOLUTELY. THE ONE WAY SIGN THAT COULD HAVE KIND OF AN EIGHTY EIGHT CUT CORNER AND THAT SIGN LOOKS LIKE IT’S KIND OF OBSTRUCTING SO THAT PHONE COULD BE SHIFTED OVER YES AND MAKE A LITTLE BIT BETTER ACCESS. TO CROSS THE STREET THERE I THINK THAT’S A THE THANK YOU FEAR FOR ME AFTER THE GOOD. THIS IS REBUTTAL TIME YOU GET TO RESPOND TO WHAT YOU HEARD. AND LIKE I SAID I THINK IT’S A REASONABLE REQUEST TO WORK WITH THE CITY TO MOVE THAT STREET SIGN AND THEN. DO IT — EIGHTY EIGHT CURB CUT THERE ON THAT LITTLE SIDEWALK. AREA THAT DOESN’T AFFECT YOUR PARKING WITH ANYTHING ABOUT PARTIAL. ONE SORRY. I JUST IN THE END AND A A COMPLIANT CORNER RIGHT. FIRST OF ALL. THERE’S NOTHING ABOUT. ANYTHING WE DO THERE THAT WOULD WE WOULD BE AGAINST A A COMPLIANCE — THAT’S SOMETHING THAT’S IMPORTANT TO ME — I’VE HAD FAMILY MEMBERS AT A FILM THE THE CORNER PROPERTY I’M SURE WOULD BE NO PROBLEM — AS WELL AS I WOULD POINT OUT. THAT THE DRIVE PARKING EXCUSE ME I’VE GOT A BIT OF A COLD. THE PARKING AREA IN FRONT OF THAT — POLL IS A DEEP PORTION OF THE PARKING LOT. AND IT’S ALSO SMOOTH AND LEVEL TO THAT — SIDEWALK AREA SO THERE’S NO REASON THAT SOMEONE CAN’T SWERVE INTO THAT PARKING AREA THERE — WHICH GIVES IT WITH EVEN THOUGH IT’S A DIFFERENT COLOR IT IS LEVEL. SO I DON’T KNOW HOW. THESE WHEN YOU REDO THIS PARKING LOT IT LOOKS LIKE THERE MIGHT BE SOME TRACES OF A HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACE THERE BUT THERE’S A GUN THE LEAST PROBABLY ONE HANDICAP ON SHORE AND ALL I’M CONFIDENT AND ACTUALLY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT. WHO CAN THANK YOU YES OF? COURSE I MEAN THAT THE PLANNING TO MOVE WITH BY ONE WE’VE ALREADY WE’VE ALREADY ADDRESSED THE PARKING PIECE OF IT IN ANOTHER HEARING. AND YEAH I THINK THAT GIVEN THAT IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT’S RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL — AND ESPECIALLY IN THE THE THE NEIGHBORS — YOUR I THINK LEGITIMATE REQUEST AMOUNT I’LL MOVE THAT WE APPROVE THE PARKING VARIANCE OF WITH — NO PAYMENT INTO THE FUNDS ON THE ADVICE OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROVIDED THAT THE APPLIQUE — BRINGS THE CORNER — OF THE PROPERTY TO FULL ADA COMPLIANT RIGHT AND IF THAT MEANS MOVING THE STREETS ON TO WORK WITH PUBLIC WORKS TO DO THAT TO US WELL. OKAY — MOTION TO ME THEN I’LL SECOND THAT — DISCUSSION. WELL THERE YOU ALL ARE PROBABLY GONNA WONDER HOW I’M GOING TO VOTE. USUALLY VERY CONSISTENT WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. AND THE VERY RARE OCCASION THAT THEY RECOMMENDED APPROVAL AND I APPRECIATE THAT YOU’RE WORKING YOU’RE SUGGESTING TO GET SOME MEDIATE COMPLIANCE. IN THIS AREA SO THAT MEANS APPLICANTS DOING SOMETHING THE BETTER — THE PUBLIC GOOD. BECAUSE ANYMORE DISCUSSION. THING NONE ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SIGNIFY BY SAYING AY. THOSE PASSES GOOD LUCK AND THANK YOU SO MUCH TO THE NEIGHBOR THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE AND SPEAKING OUT. FOR THE EIGHT BECAUSE THAT’S VERY IMPORTANT IN IN YOUR NEIGHBOR AND WE NEED TO HEAR MORE AND PLEASE WORK WITH YOUR COUNSEL PEOPLE BECAUSE WHEN WE RE RE WRITE THE SIDEWALK RULES OF ALL THIS ADA NEEDS TO BE. FRONT AND CENTER PRESTON GREAT – TO DEAL WITH — SHE’S REALLY SUPER AND HE’S BEEN VERY. WE’VE DONE EVERYTHING YOU KNOW WITH HIS GUIDANCE THANK YOU THANK YOU OKAY GIVE JOHN MICHAEL NEXT IF. MISTER CHAIRMAN AN EXCUSE TO BE PRESENT TO THE BOARD OF TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH SIX THIRTY SEVEN THIS INVOLVES A PROPERTY AT TWENTY TWO FIFTY ONE WINFORD AVENUE IN COUNCIL DISTRICT NUMBER. SEVENTEEN TWO PART REQUEST FIRST FOR A VARIANCE AND SIDEWALK REQUIREMENTS HAND FROM CERTAIN AMONG THE BUILDING REQUIREMENTS FOR ANIMAL BOARDING FACILITIES IN THIS AN ITEM UTILITIES ONLY WORKED. PROPERTY SHOWN HERE RIGHT AT THE END OF ONE FOR AS IT CROSSES OVER LONG VIEW RIGHT BEFORE. FOR FORTY IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY THE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH GIVES YOU A SENSE OF THE LAY OUT OF THE PROPERTY IT’S CURRENT CONDITION. THE PROPOSAL WOULD BE TO LOCATE AT THAT LOCATION ARE RATHER TO A DEVELOP THE ANIMAL BOARDING FACILITY — PROJECT AT THAT LOCATION. DESCENDED PROPERTY HERE — LORRAINE CORNER I BELIEVE IN THE VIEW ACROSS THE STREET THE UPPE. VIEW OF INDUSTRY AT THIS LOCATION SO AGAIN IT’S A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE IN THE SIDEWALK REQUIREMENTS IN THIS THE IDENTITIES OWNING DISTRICT CONVERTED THE SPACE INTO AN ABORTED FACILITY. BUT ALSO FROM CERTAIN OF THE BUILDING REQUIREMENTS UNDER SEVENTEEN POINT SIXTEEN POINT — OH SEVEN B. AS IN BOY PART. ONE IN ORDER TO GET THAT APPROVAL AS WELL. AGAIN THE APPELLANT’S KATHERINE RANDOLPH — UNITS TO SIX THIRTY SEVEN PRESENT TODAY. MY SCORES AND EVERYONE INSIDE THEIR PRESENTATIONS THIS IS A SIDEWALK CASE AND WHAT ELSE ARE WE DETERMINED [inaudible] TO CONTROL. WELL HE’S LOOKING AT THAT PLEASE INTRODUCE YOUR NAME NAME ADDRES. OR YOUR JACK BERKMAN NATO TO LONG VIEW AVENUE OKAY AND I’M KATHERINE RANDOLPH SAITO TOO LONG YOU AVENUE WHICH IS PROPERTY. ADJACENT TO THIS CORNER PROPERTY OKAY MAY I ASK WHAT DO YOUR SHIRT SAY A CANDY FROM [inaudible] WE I’M JUST HERE — WE’RE WANTING — TO OPEN UP A CAN A DOGGIE DAYCARE. DOGGIE DAYCARE WHAT DOES THAT MEAN AND HOW WELL IT WOULD BE A PLACE WHERE YOU COULD BRING YOUR DOG — THERE THE DAY. TO ARMY THE OVERNIGHT OR JUST TO HAVE MORE YOU KNOW SO YEAH. AND HOW MANY AND WHAT KIND OF FACILITY YOU’RE GOING TO HAVE. TOP NOTCH — RIGHT NOW WE HAVE LIKE TWENTY NINE CANDLES THAT WE BOUGHT — WE’VE GOT PLENTY ROOM WE’RE GOING TO HAVE — AS FOR TURF ALL OVER THE PLACE [inaudible] SWIMMING POOLS — WE ARE WAITING ON THE THE EXISTING STRUCTURES AND AND NO NO NO THIS IS THE EXTENDED THE STRUCTURES DOWN WE’RE RENOVATING INSIDE — I HAVE A DENTAL LAB — THERE NOW. AND I’M I’M READY TO QUIT DOING THAT. FIFTY FIVE YEARS SO — SO THIS IS IN AN INDUSTRIAL AREA SO THERE’S NOBODY HERE IN OPPOSITION TO WHAT DO YOUR NEIGHBORS THINK OF THIS PROPOSA- WE DON’T HAVE NEIGHBORS RATHER THAN INDUSTRIAL — LOWER NOISE — WE’VE WE REFUSE TO KNOW WHAT KIND OF NOISE YOU HAVE OVER THERE. WOULD BACK UP TO FULL FORTY FOUR ON LEWIS I CAN LISTEN WE CAN SIT IN THE BACKYARD OF THIS TO THE RACES OKAY WHATEVER AND OTHER NOISE MAKERS YOU GOT OVER THERE- GO AHEAD. THAT ARE JUST ACROSS LONG VIEW AVENUE — AND THAT’S A PLACE WHERE THEY COME IN AND OUT WITH TRUCKS ALL THE TIME AND AND LOADING AND UNLOADING I DON’T KNOW WHAT FRONT LOADERS BACK LOOSE. YOU CAN ALWAYS SAVE YOU FROM THIS PROPERTY FOR AWHILE YES. AND YEAH I MEAN THE I MEAN THERE WERE THERE WERE TWO LETTERS OF OPPOSITION ONE WAS. FOR THAT THINK SIDEWALKS — THE KIND OF A GENERIC SIDEWALK OPPOSITION OR THE OTHER ONE WAS- I SAID I’M REQUESTING THAT THE THE THE PLAN AREN’T UNDERSTOOD THE PLAN USES. OF THE PROPERTY FOR ANIMAL BOARDING. AND I’M ASKING YOU NOT TO ALLOW THAT THE PROPERTY CAN BLIGHTED CONDITION IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD. SO. AND I’M CURIOUS TO KNOW JUST KIND OF WANT TO PRETTY MUCH YOUR PLAN AND ON THE PROPERTY IN COMMAND FROM HERE. WE USE A LOT OF TRUCKS AND OTHER THINGS IN THE PROPERTY. HOWEVER YOU CAN IMPROVE THE PROPERTY. WILL THE TRUCKS WE DON’T WE’RE NOT WE’RE TRAILER SHE’LL BE GONE HERE WOULD BEEN RAINING AT TWO AGAIN DEATHS — RIGOR OF CALLS FOR IMPRESSIONS AND STUFF. SO HE’LL BE GONE — ACTUALLY WE’RE GONNA HAVE AS TOOK HER FROM THE BACK WHEN I HAVE EIGHT FOOT FENCE IS ALL AROUND — THE BUILDING ITSELF IS PRETTY BIG LECTURE I HAVE A DENTAL LAB. NOW AND HALF OF IT. AND THAT’LL BE GONE — OR THAT DOWN. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT JOHN MICHAEL DID YOU GET THE ANSWER TO WHAT THIS CASE REALLY IS YEAH AS NOTED IN YOUR DOCK AND IT’S THE SECTION OF APPLICABLE LAWS SEVENTEEN POINT SIXTEEN POINT OH SEVEN NO. WHICH HAS TO DO WITH — PERMIT CONDITIONS USES IN. THE COMMERCIAL NATURE SPECIFICALLY SECTION BE DEALS WITH THESE ANIMAL BOARDING FACILITIES. THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS GET INTO — THE DISTANCE FROM RESIDENCES AND OF COURSE WE SEE IN THE AREA HERE YOU’VE GOT ANOTHER A NUMBER OF THE COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES NEARBY BUT AS WE CAN SEE HERE. POINTED OUT BUYERS ONLY EXAMINER ONE OF OUR PROBABLY ARE. MOST EXPERIENCE WAS THERE IS ANY EXAM OR THAT YOU HAVE A NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL PLOTS YOU — A LOT TO THE IMMEDIATE AREA LOT NUMBER TO TUNE MY NUMBER — TO THIRTEEN ALL WITHIN TWO HUNDRED FEET SO THE NEED FOR THE VARIANCE IS FROM THAT SPECIFIC CONDITION UNDER SEVENTEEN SIXTEEN NO — SEVENTY ONLY WITH THAT VARIANCE WITH THEY DIDN’T MEET THE REQUIREMENTS. AS FAR AS THAT SECTION OF THE BECAUSE WE’RE GIVING YOU A VARIANCE TO OPERATE THIS KIND OF FACILITY AND THEN THEY’RE ASKING FOR A SIDEWALK ANSWERS AS WELL – MENTIONED SOMETHING COMMENTS LET ME AND LET ME TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION IS THAT — GRANTING THAT VARIANCE WOULD GIVE THEM PERMISSION TO OPERATE THE FACILITY CLOSER TO A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY AND WHAT OTHERWISE BE ELEVEN THERE ALSO ASKING FOR SIDEWALK. CORRECT OKAY. I DON’T KNOW OF ANY — RESIDENCES WE WE LIVE NEXT DOOR WILL WANT US TO OUR FEET AWAY. AND WENT ON SO WHAT’S OVER THERE IS IT MAINLY INDUSTRIAL BUT SOME ARE ZONED RESIDENTIAL AFTERWARD. THERE’S THERE’S A HOUSE THAT’S A HUNDRED AND SIXTY NINE FEET AWAY AND YOU’RE SAYING THAT YOUR HOUSE WE LIVE THERE RIGHT NOW. WE’RE IN THE ALMOST BROKER WOULD RESTORE THERE’S NO OPPOSITION IN BUT WE’RE THAT’S ONE OF THINGS WE HAVE TO CONSIDER AND I WANT TO ASK ABOUT THE VERY — THEIR TRAINING RELATION PAY INTO THE FUND WILL NEED IT WILL NEED SO YOU WANT TO START OFF YES WE WILL. WELL WE WANT TO OWN OPENING ON EITHER SIDE WE’RE GONNA HAVE DROP OFF TODAY OKAY ONCE I COME UP ON THE OTHER ONE YOU KNOW YOU’LL BE WALKING DOGS I IMAGIN. TO YOU KNOW INSIDE THE INSIDE TO FETCH WE WILL HAVE A DOG RUN OKAY — ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT. THE PLAYING IS RECOMMENDING THAT YOU MAINTAIN A LONG WINFORD AND YOU CONSTRUCT ON LONG VIEW AVENUE A THEN YOU’RE AGREEABLE TO THAT YES MA’AM. I WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO SOMEONE THAT I REALLY DON’T KNOW HOW LONG THE SIDE WILL HAVE TO BE WE NEED OPENINGS FOR CARS TO COME IN AND OUT — BUT WHATEVER SAID WHAT WE HAVE TO PUT UP WILL DO IT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT REGARDLESS BECAUSE PUBLIC. SESSION. WELL THE THE BIGGEST DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THIS CASE AND OTHER. ANIMAL BOARDING SLASH KENNEL CASES IS THAT THE THE HOMEOWNER TO IS IMPACTED IS THAT OKAY IF THERE’S NO OPPOSITION THE AND THERE THERE’S NO OPPOSITION. AND IT SOUNDS LIKE THE THE THEY HAVE JUST AGREED. TO THE PLANNING RECOMMENDATION FOR DISPLAYING DIDN’T HAVE TO PAY IF THEY JUST HAD A BILL MAINTAIN ONE SIDE AND ON THE OTHER. SO TO EMOTION. WELL — MOVE THIS WE APPROVE THE VARIANCE — THE DISTRESS REQUIREMENT FOR THE ANIMAL BOARDING FACILITY — YES. AND THE THE SIDEWALK VARIANCES ALSO PROVED [inaudible] GIVEN THE THE CONDITIONS OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT OKAY MOTIONS WE MADE A THIRTY SECOND ARE YOU ARE YOU WILLING TO ADMIT THAT TO SAY THAT WE FOR THE NATION VARIANTS INCLUDE THE FACT THAT. WE DON’T HAVE OPPOSITION. WE ARE AND THERE ARE NO OTHER RESIDENCES ALL THERE ARE THERE ARE SOME ZONED RESIDENTIAL AREAS AND IT’S IN THE MAIL ABOUT FOUR FORTY WHERE I THINK THE NOISE EVEN IF FOR TO BE AN ISSUE IT. WELL I THINK ALL THE ALL THOSE ARE IMPORTANT AND SHOULD BE INCLUDED APPRECIATE THAT ND THE THE IS SPECIFICALLY THAT THE TESTIMONY THE THE HOME THAT IS. NEEDING THAT THIRTY ONE FOOT VARIANCES THE APPLICANT’S HOME WHAT THE THE THEY’RE HOME IS ONE THAT TRIGGERED THAT — THAT DISTANCE REQUIREMENT AND THEN THAT MAKES US UNIQUE THE LESS MOTION TO SECOND. BUSH’S RELATED PROPERLY SECONDED ANY DISCUSSION. THING NONE ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SIGNIFY BY SAYING AY. AYE THOSE PASSES UNANIMOUSLY GOOD LUCK THINKING REMAIN [inaudible] JOHN WINGER. FOR THE FOUR OH ONE JOHN MICHAEL. MISTER CHAIRMAN TWO ANNOUNCEMENTS WITH REGARD TO CASES APPEARING LATER ON OUR DOCKET FIRST CASE TWENTY EIGHTEEN AT SIX FORTY FIVE INVOLVING THE PROPERTY AT NINE THIRTY FIVE EAST TRINITY LANE HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY PROVED ON CONSENT AGENDA HOWEVER THERE SEEMS TO BEEN. SOME MISCOMMUNICATION ABOUT THAT BEING PINNED TO COMPLIANCE WITH FLYING APARTMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS WITH REGARD TO THE SIDEWALK VARIANTS. AS A RESULT — THEY DO NOT WISH TO GO ALONG WITH THOSE WHO WOULD WISH TO HAVE — HEARING HOWEVER BECAUSE WE’VE ALREADY THIS THE SAKE NEED TO HAVE A MOTION TO SET ASIDE APPROVED HERE. HAD IT SET TO A LATER DATE SO THAT ANY OPPONENTS WHO MIGHT HAVE BEEN HERE TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION COULD BE HERE TO DO SO SO WE WILL MOVE SIX FORTY FIVE OFF THE CONSENT AGENDA AND HERE. AT THE A LATER DATE MOST LIKELY THE NEXT MEETING SET. FOR OKAY THAT’S THE MOTIONS OR SECOND SECOND WHICH OF THE MAIN PROPERLY SECONDED ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. AYE THOSE BASSES. ZERO SIX FORTY FIVE WILL BE HEARD AT OUR BOARD MEETING ON DECEMBER THE TWENTIETH MISTER CHAN WE ALSO WANT TO ANNOUNCE THE CASE TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH SIX SEVENTY SEVEN INVOLVING THE PROPERTY AT ONE ONE ONE TWO WEIGHT AVENUE ENCOUNTERED A FEW NUMBER. SEVENTEEN STANDS IN NEED OF A DEFERRAL IS ACID FOR TWO MEETINGS TO OUR HILARIOUSLY LIGHT JANUARY THE THIRD DOCKETS. THINK THAT MAKES IT THE TWELFTH CASE ON THAT BLISSFULLY SURE MISTER CHAIRMAN THIS LIKE. TWO THOUSAND TWELVE TARGETS. RECESSION MARKETS MISTER CHAIRMAN IF A SIX SEVENTY SEVEN WILL BE HEARD ON JANUARY THE THIRD THAT BRINGS US UP INTO OUR NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED CASE WHICH I BELIEVE IS TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH. SIX THIRTY NINE THIS — BCA CASE INVOLVES A PROPERTY AT FOUR SEVENTY SIX MCMURRAY DRIVE YOUR FROM COUNCILMEMBER DID THAT PLAY LOG PREVIOUSLY WITH REGARD TO THIS IT IS A CHURCH NAMELY THE SAME IN A COPTIC ORTHODOX CHURCH SHOWN HERE WITH THEIR AREA ON THE ZONING MAP. SHOWN HERE ON THE AERIAL. THE APPEAL IS TO PART IT IS FOR A SPECIAL EXCEPTION FOR THE RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION USEFUL RESIDENTIALLY ZONED PROPERTY IN THEIR NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS THEY’RE PURSUING. ALSO A VARIANCE FROM SIDEWALK REQUIREMENTS AND IS THE OUR TEENS IN THE DISTRICT IN CONJUNCTION WITH THEIR NEW CONSTRUCTION. THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED GIVE YOU A SENSE OF THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AT THIS LOCATION. VIEW THE CHURCH IN THE UPPER LEFT HAND CORNER AND PROPERTY ACROSS THE STREET AND OTHER RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION IN THE LOWER RIGHT THERE. IN THE VIEWS OF THE SIDEWALKS AND STREET FRONTAGES ALL. IN ALL THE AFFECTED AREAS. OF NOTE — THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT ESTIMATED THEIR RECOMMENDATION – RATHER TRADITIONAL EXTENSION THE R. NONTRADITIONAL RATHER RECOMMENDATIONS INVOLVING AN EXTENSION TO FIVE BOOKS I’D WALK AROUND THE CORNER — DEDICATION RIGHT AWAY ON BOTH MARIE AND CHERRY WOOD AS NOTED YOU PREVIOUSLY HEARD FROM THE COUNCIL MEMBER HER JOURNAL SUPPORTED THIS PROJECT. THE OPPONENTS ARE PRESENT — AND IT’S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY ARE AGREEABLE TO THE TERMS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH REGARD TO THE SIDEWALK COMPONENT THE STICK THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION OF COURSE IS THE TRADITIONAL ANALYSIS THAT WE APPLIED IN ALL. ALL THE CASES UNDER SEVENTY POINT SIXTEEN OF THE ZONING CODE WITH REGARD TO RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION YOU SOME RESIDENTIALLY ZONED PROPERTIES. BECAUSE PATROLS IS THE NAME TO POWER THE CHURCHES THE OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. IS THERE ANYONE HERE IN OPPOSITION TO CASE NUMBER SIX THIRTY NINE AREAS AS A RESULT WE WILL INVITE THE TALENTS TO INTRODUCE THEMSELVES BY NAME AND ADDRESS. YOU HAVE TEN MINUTES TO MAKE THE DESIRED PRESENTATION TO HOLD SOME PORTION OF THAT TIME BACK FOR REBUTTAL IT SHOULD COME OUT OF THIS ORIGINALLY ALLOCATED TEN MINUTES. MAKES WE WOULD HEAR FROM THE OPPONENTS SO AGAIN IF YOU’LL JUST INTRODUCE YOURSELF TO MAKE THE PRESENTATION. GOOD AFTERNOON MY NAME IS WHETHER BOUTROS I AM THE PRIEST OF SENT ME A CUP TO BECAUSE OF TOURISTS LOCATED AT FOUR SEVEN SIX MACMILLAN DRIVE. NATIONAL TENNESSEE THREE SEVEN TWO ONE ONE SINCE SEPTEMBER OF NINETEEN NINETY SEVEN WE HONOR TODAY APPLYING FOR A PERMIT TO TO ENLARGE THE SANCTUARY TO ACCOMMODATE OUR CURRENT NEEDS. AND WE DON’T EXPECT AN ADDITIONAL PUT WE HAVE — POSITION AS A STANDING OUTSIDE IN THE HALL WAYS AND IN THE OTHER ROOM — NEXT TO THE CHURCH THE NEW EXPANSION — SHOULD UPGRADE TO THE THE OLD EXISTING BUILDING OF THE TOWERS. AND WILL GIVE A BUTTER CURBSIDE APPEAL — I KNOW THAT THERE IS SOME OPPOSITION FROM THE NEIGHBORS AND I’M READY — TO REPLY AND WE ACTUALLY TOOK MEASURES MEASUREMENTS — TO TO SOME OF THESE — PROBLEMS. SO. SO THAT THE COUNCIL MEMBER. HAD SAID THAT. THAT YOU ALL HAD AGREED TO I GUESS YOU ALL HAD A PUBLIC MEETING RIGHT TO TALK ABOUT YES WITH IT. AND THAT YOU ALL — IT AGREED — TO DO YOUR YOUR PART IN FORCE NO PARKING ON CHERRY WOOD STREET AND AND YOU’RE OKAY WITH THAT BEING. I WOULD SAY ON ONE SIDE OF THE STREET TO REFINE THE SIDE OF THIS AND THAT THAT THE CHURCH ITSELF. ON THE OTHER SIDE IT’LL BE OKAY. OKAY. SO YOU DESERVE THE YOU ONLY WANT NO PARKING ON ONE SIDE OF THE STREET NOT BOTH SIDES STREET. I I WOULD SAY THIS ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ONE ON BOTH SIDES THE STREET THAT’S WHAT THE COUNCIL PERSON SEEM. TO WELL I THINK THIS BECAUSE BECAUSE THE CUP TO COMMUNITY WE ARE. ABOUT FIVE THOUSAND FAMILIES IN THIS. OUR SERVER WAS MOM EIGHT LOCATIONS IN AS WELL BUT THIS IS THE OLDEST CHURCH AND AS EGYPTIANS. IF WE HAVE FUNERALS OF FIVE WEDDINGS IF WE HAVE — OCCASIONS LIKE THIS PEOPLE COME FROM ALL THESE EIGHT LOCATIONS TO ATTEND SO SOME OCCASIONS WILL HAVE EXTRA PARKING SO IF. IF THE IF WE PREVENTED PARKING FROM ONE SIDE OF THE STREET I THINK THIS WOULD BE SUFFICIENT. FOR A MISSION TO TRY TO ANSWER A FEW PEOPLE HERE IN OPPOSITION I IMAGINE WE’RE GONNA HEAR ABOUT PARKING AND OTHER THINGS TO DO SO — YOU KNOW THEY MIGHT SAY. THAT ONE SIDE STREETS OKAY BUT THEY ALSO MIGHT SAY THAT NO ONE KNOWS SO HOW MUCH PARKING DO YOU ALLOW OR YOU’VE CABLE OF PARKING ON YOUR PROPERTY. COMING HAVE ADEQUATE — PARKING ACCORDING TO HOW MAY I DON’T — TWO HUNDRED AND FOURTEEN FROM THE FIFTEEN SOMETHING LIKE THAT. ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STREET WE HAVE CREATED A AN OFF SITE PARKING — THAT YOU’VE CREATED IT MEANS THAT THE THE YES YES OKAY — AND HAS OVER A HUNDRED TWENTY FIVE PARKING SPACES ALSO ON THE THE SIGN ON THE STREET. NO NO NO NO ALTHOUGH OTHER SIDE OKAY SO YOU HAVE ANOTHER PARKING LOT OF THE THINGS THAT YOU HAVE SO CONTRACTED WITH THAT YOUR MEMBERS CAN PARK THERE OKAY [inaudible] SO. HOW MANY PARKING SPACES DO YOU REALLY NEED? ACCORDING TO CODES TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTEEN OR NOBODY YEAH YOU – BETWEEN THE ONSITE AND OFF SITE MARKING WE HAVE ENOUGH. YEAH. I HAVE MORE THAN ENOUGH QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT. I HAD A NO AND A FILE THAT YOU AGREED — TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT’S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE SIDEWALKS RESTRICT. THAT’S CORRECT YEAH. AND WE JUST CONTINUE AND I THINK I’VE HEARD SOME OF THESE CASES BEFORE WE STILL HAVE COMPLAINTS FROM NEIGHBORS ABOUT A LACK OF GREENERY — LACK OF MAINTENANCE OF THE SURROUNDING BUILDINGS ASSUME WE’RE GOING TO HEAR THAT FROM THEM BUT I’D LIKE TO HEAR YOUR YEAH I WAS GOING TO LEAVE THAT TO LEARN — TO LAST BUT ACTUALLY — WE TOOK MEASUREMENTS — TO RESOLVE OR MEASURES TO RESOLVE THESE PROBLEMS — AS FAR AS PARKING — WE HAVE THE OF SIDE PARKING WHICH IS SUFFICIENT TO THE THAT THE THAT CHURCH HOUSES. WE ARE GOING TO WE ALREADY CLEANED ALL THE SHRUBBERY IS AND AND THE TREES AND CUT THE BRANCHES AND STUFF LIKE THAT ACCORDING TO THE RECOMMENDATION. BUT ALSO WE’RE GOING TO WORK ON THE AT THE APPEARANCE OF THE HOUSES OF THE PAINT AND STUFF LIKE THAT WE’RE GOING. TO WORK ON THAT — AS FAR AS THEY HAVE COMPLAINED ABOUT CUTTING TREES WE DON’T COOKIES FOR NO REASON BECAUSE CUTTING TREES ACTUALLY A FEW AS YOU KNOW IS VERY EXPENSIVE — THING TO DO. BUT WE CUT DIDN’T IN THE TREES AND ONE THREE BECAUSE IT HAS A TO A HOUSE. FOR EXAMPLE LESSONS THIS SUMMER A NEIGHBOR CALLED THEM AND ONE IS IT THREE TO BE CUT DOWN COST IS TWELVE HUNDRED DOLLARS TO CUT IT. BECAUSE SHE WAS AFRAID THAT IS GOING TO HURT HER HOUSE IF YOU FALL IN THE HOUSE. SO THEY READ IT ALSO SEEMS LIKE THERE’S YEAH I THINK ONE OF THE LETTERS. WE GOT SAID — THAT THE PREVIOUS HEARING — I MADE A YOU KNOW YOU ALL ARE YA COME HERE A LOT BECAUSE YOU’RE GROWING AND YOU’RE ALWAYS CHANGING AND YES IS THINGS THANK GOD ONE OF THE PREVIOUS PREVIOUS HEARING JUST SAID THAT. THE THAT YOU ALL SAID THE PART OF THE PLAN WOULD BE SUBSTANTIAL GREENERY. SUGGESTED BY THE DIVISION OF URBAN FORESTRY THAT WOULD FRONT MAKE MARINE DRIVE. AND THAT THERE HASN’T BEEN ANY SHRUBBERY YOUR GREENERY. BETWEEN THE PARKING LOT AND MAKE MARINE DRIVE WE DIDN’T ACTUALLY PLANNED TREES ALONG THE CHERRY WOOD AND MY QUITE A DRIVES BUT MODE MIKE MADE A DRIVE. BUT SOME OF THEM DID NOT — YOU KNOW OR ACTUALLY AS OF THIS MORNING WE PLANTED MORE TREES ALONG WITH MY MY CREDIT DRIVE. HOW MANY G. PLAN — EIGHTIES I’M CALM. ABOUT THE FOR USE ON THE TWELVE SIGNS THAT WE DID NOT TO PLACE THEM BEFORE BUT ACTUALLY OVERLY THIS IS THESE ARE YOUR YEAH PROFFERED APPOINT TREES LISA MUCH BIGOTRY IS AND AND SO I HOPE THEY ARE GOING TO SURVIVE. AND ANYTHING ELSE TO ADD BEFORE WE HEAR FROM THE OPPOSITION FRO. YOU TOO THANK YOU. LET’S HEAR FROM THE OPPOSITION PLEASE COMEFOR YOU’LL HAVE TEN MINUTES COLLECTIVELY. SO DIVIDE YOUR TIME EQUAL YOU DO NOT HAVE TO TAKE TEN MINUTES IF YOU. DO NOT WISH TO BUT PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME OR ADDRESS WHY YOU’RE OPPOSED TO THIS. MY NAME IS CARES I LIVE AT FIVE ZERO SIX HI CHRIS DRAWING JUST AROUND THE CORNER FROM THE CHURCH. I HAVE ON THIS PROPERTY FOR OVER THREE YEARS I HAVE LIVED IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD FOR OVER — TEN I’M OPPOSED TO THE EXPANSION OF THE CHURCH GIVEN — SAFETY ISSUES — EARNS WITH WALKABILITY — WITH A LOT OF YOUNG — FAMILIES MOVING INTO THE AREA AND WE’RE SEEING A LOT OF PEOPLE ON THE STREETS. THE EXISTING PLANS ARE BRINGING THE TURKS VERY CLOSE TO CHERRY WOOD ITSELF AND I BELIEVE IT’S GOING TO HINDER. THE VISIBILITY FROM PEOPLE TURNING OFF AND ON MCMURRAY ONTO CHERRY WOOD. WE’VE HAD NUMEROUS ACCIDENTS OVER THE YEARS OF CAR ACCIDENTS PEDESTRIANS BEING HIT THERE’S EVEN BEEN A FATALITY — THAT WAS BEFORE I HAD MOVED INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD — WE KNOW THE PARKING ISSUES CURRENTLY EXIST HANDS AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CHURCH IS GOING TO CREATE EVEN MORE PARKING ISSUES I KNOW THEY DON’T ANTICIPATE. A GATHERING ANYMORE PRISONERS BUT IT’S IT’S INEVITABLE IT’S CONTINUING TO GROW. THE AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC — IN THE PAST THROUGH ON TO CHERRY WOOD HAS — NOT ALLOWED EMERGENCY VEHICLES IN THE PAST TO GET THROUGH. IN TWO THOUSAND FOURTEEN THEY WERE ASKED TO PUT UP NO PARKING SIGNS — AND ALL OF THIS HAS JUST HAPPENED WITHIN THE LAST WEEK THE TREES BEING PLANTED THE SHRUBS BEING REPLACED THE NO PARKING SIGNS BEING PUT UP. BECAUSE THEY’RE COMING IN FROM THE BOARD TODAY BUT THAT WAS IN TWO THOUSAND FOURTEEN WHEN THIS WAS ADDRESSED. THERE’S BEEN MULTIPLE CODE VIOLATIONS OVER THE YEARS THE MOST RECENT — WAS A PERMIT THAT WAS NOT FILED FOR EXPANSION OF A PARKING LOT. THAT WAS IN JANUARY OF TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN THEY PURCHASED RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES AND TURN INTO A CONCRETE PARKING LOTS. TO CREATE MORE PARKING FOR THE PRISONERS — AND THEY’RE CONTINUING TO DO THIS I DID HAVE SOME DISCUSSION WITH THEM ABOUT TEARING DOWN TREES — COUPLE THOSE PROPERTIES WERE — IN COMPANIES BEHIND MINE EXISTING PROPERTY — I HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS AND I HAVE VIDEO OF THEM TEARING DOWN THE TREES THAT DAY — THERE WAS ONLY ONE DEAD TREE THAT NEEDED TO BE CUT DOWN AND THEY CUT DOWN A FEW OF THEM. I THINK THERE’S A LOT OF POOR PLANNING AND GOING ON WITH. THE EXPANSION OF THE BUILDING ITSELF EIGHTY EIGHT IS A HANDICAP PARKING PLACES THAT EXIST ALONG SURE WOULD — IT’S IT’S RIGHT ON THE STREET YOU’RE GONNA HAVE CARS COMING OUT OF A OF A HANDICAP PARKING PLACE. CARS COMING AROUND THE CORNER FROM MEMORY ON A CHERRY WOOD AND THIS IS GOING TO CREATE. A VERY DANGEROUS SITUATION NOT ONLY FOR THE PEDESTRIANS BUT MOSTLY FOR THE VEHICLES. SO MY ISSUES ARE REALLY JUST POOR PLANNING PARKING ISSUES THAT ALREADY EXISTS — DILAPIDATED STRUCTURES THAT THEY OWNED THEY DON’T TAKE CARE OF TRASH. CONSTANTLY VISIBLE. WE’VE — ADDRESSES THE NEIGHBOR AS SEVERAL NEIGHBORS HAVE ADDRESSED THIS WITH THEM ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS I’M NOT THE ONLY. ONE DURING A HEAVY DOWN A DOWN POUR MANY OF THE OF THE OF THE ITEMS OF TRASH THAT ARE IN THE YARDS THAT ARE PART OF THE SCHOOL PROPERTY. OR IN THE CREEK AND GET WASHED DOWN TO THE OTHER NEIGHBORS THEY’RE FORCED TO GO OUT AND CLEAN UP THIS MESS THEY ADDRESS THIS OVER THE YEARS. IT’S STILL NOT BEING TAKEN CARE OF SO MY OPINION SO I LOOKED OU. OF THE QUESTION FOR YOU YEAH. I DON’T SEE A SITE PLAN AND OUR BOARD PACKET AND SAUCE THE APPLICANT WHEN THEY COME BACK U. BUT WHERE IS YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF WHERE THE ADDITIONS WILL BE DO YOU HAVE A DRAWING OR SOMETHING YOU CAN — I BELIEVE THEY WERE ON THE DRAWINGS THAT WERE OWNED ORIGINALLY. I HAD COPIES OF THOSE — THEY PRESENTED IT TO OTHER NEIGHBORS WHO WANTED TO COME BY THE CHURCH AND HAVE A NEIGHBORHOOD DISCUSSION ABOUT I. SO THE CHURCH ITSELF — IS GOING TO BE EXPANDED I THINK TWELVE TO THIRTEEN FEET ON EITHER SIDE. BRINGING UP PART OF THE STRUCTURE IN THE BUILDING VERY CLOSE TO CHERRY WIDE. SO IT WAS DESCRIBED TO ME DURING THAT MEETING THAT THE ADA PARKING WOULD ACTUALLY BE UNDERNEATH SOMEWHAT OF AN OVERHANG. SO THE BUILDING WOULD COME OUT AND ADA PARKING WOULD BE UNDERNEATH THIS OVERHANG CREATING EVEN MORE OF A VISUAL IMPAIRMENT FOR THOSE TRYING TO EXIT. THE PROPERTY IS CHERRY WOOD ON ONE OF THESE PHOTOS. THE BOTTOM ONE OF US IS FROM MAKE MARTYRS CHERRY WOOD. AND DESTRUCTION COME OUT OVER THOSE CARS IF YOU SEE PART. OF MY NAME’S ANDY LOPEZ I LIVE AT FIFTY FIFTY SEVEN CHERRY WOO- JUST A COUPLE — THE REASON I’M OPPOSED TO IT IS UNDER ZONING CODE — SEVENTEEN POINT — ONE SIX ONE SEVEN ZERO THE APPLICANT SHALL DEMONSTRATE A PARKING STUDY REVIEWED BY THE MET METROPOLITAN. TRAFFIC ENGINEER THAT THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED BY CHAPTER SEVENTEEN DOT — TWO ZERO AS TAPPIN STATED YOU KNOW THEY DON’T THEY KNOW THEY’RE NOT GONNA HAVE ENOUGH PARKING ON OR OFF SITE PARKING THAT’S WHY THEY DON’T WANT TO CLOSE OFF THE ROA. COMPLETELY — THE OFFSITE HAVING IS ON THE BOTTOM PHOTO IF YOU WOULD BE TO THE RIGHT IF THE PICTURE WOULD GO TO THE RIGHT. IS ACTUALLY TWO HOUSES THAT THE CHURCH HAS PURCHASED AND FRONT AND NOW BACKYARDS HAD BEEN CHANGED INTO. A PARKING LOT SIR IS NO YARD WHATSOEVER — ALSO UNDER THE SAMEZONING CODE UNDER THE J. — WHEN NOT IN USE BY THE PLACE OF WORSHIP? THE PARKING AREA SHALL BE SECURED BY LOCKED BERRIER THAT PRO PRECLUDES. THE HILL VEHICULAR ACCESS BUSES OR OTHER VEHICLES SHALL NOT BE STORED IN THE PARKING AREA — THERE’S TAXI CABS THAT GETS STORED IN THE CHURCH PARKING LOT OVERNIGHT TO INCLUDE BUSES AND OTHER VEHICLES — IN MY ONE LAST — THING. IS — UNDER. SEVENTEEN DOC ONE SIX DOT — ONE FIVE ZERO UNDERSEA THE INTEGRITY OF ADJACENT AREAS — SPECIAL EXEMPTION USE PERMIT SHALL BE GRANTED PROVIDED THAT THE BOARD FINDS THAT THE USES SO DESIGNED LOCATED IN PROPOSED TO BE OPERATED THAT THE PUBLIC HEALTH SAFETY AND WELFARE BE PROTECTED. AND SHE STATED THAT ON INDIVIDUAL HAS BEEN HIT ON THE ROADWAY CROSS AND DURING SUNDAY TRAFFIC THE THE CARS THE CROSSWALKS THERE IS NO PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY — IT’S A IT’S ACTUALLY JUST TURNED INTO ONE GIANT — COMMERCIAL PROPERTY. WHERE THE STREET IS NO LONGER A PUBLIC ACCESS STREET IS JUST A FREE FOR ALL SO? THOSE ARE MY NEXT. I AM ROBERT NASH I LIVE IT TO THE FIVE ZERO ONE EIGHT ACTUALLY DRIVE. IN A SERVICE CHAIRMAN OF THE MEMORY HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. WE ARE A FLEDGLING NEIGHBOR GROUP TO PERFORM IN JANUARY OF THIS YEAR TO PROVE BUT OUR BYLAWS AND HELD ELECTIONS IN MA. FIFTY EIGHT REGISTERED MEMBERS SEVERAL WHICH LIVE AND CHERRY WOOD DRIVING EXPRESSED CONCERNS ABOUT THE PROPOSED PROJECT. NO ALL OF ME HIS NEIGHBORS AND VALUE THE FACE CULTURE AND MISSION OF THE CHURCH. THEY WANT TO BE SUPPORTIVE BUT WITH THAT SAID THEY HAVE EXPRESSED CONCERNS TO US THAT YOU’VE HEARD ABOUT TRAFFIC SAFETY LITTER WATER RUN OFF AND MAINTENANCE. OF THE CURRENT PROPERTY — THEY WORRY THAT THE EXPANSION WILL ONLY EXACERBATE THESE CONCERNS. THIS GROUP — OUR NEIGHBORS SAY SHE JUST BECAME AWARE OF THESE CONCERNS THIS PAST WEEK AT OUR DECEMBER – MONTHLY MEETING THEREFORE I WOULD NOT. TO NOT HAVE A CHANCE TO FULLY DISCUSS THE ISSUE IN ANY — TRANSPARENT WITH A WE WOULD ASK THE BOARD IF YOU’RE CONSIDERING CONSIDERING PASSING THIS VARIANCE THAT MAYBE WE COULD DO. FOR ANOTHER MONTH OR SO WE’D LIKE THE OPPORTUNITIES ASSOCIATION MEET WITH THE THE CHURCH LEADERS. AGAIN AND SEE IF WE CAN’T WORK ON SOME MORE OF THESE ISSUES MAKE SURE WE’RE AL ON THE SAME PAGE — GOING FORWARD. SO THE OTHER THE APPLICANT SAID THE THE AGREED TO NO PARKING ON ONE SIDE OF THE STREET NOT BOTH SIDE STREETS WHAT DO YOU ALL THINK ABOUT. FROM WHAT I’M HEARING FROM THE THE MEMBERS WE HAVE TO LIVE THERE AND THEY WOULD LIKE NO PARKING ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STREET — TEN TRULY IT’S PROBABLY NOT A BAD IDEA. NOT JUST FOR CHURCH SERVICES BUT YOU YOU’RE PROBABLY AWARE THEY HAVE A SCHOOL THERE TOO AND SO WE’VE GOT. A LOT OF PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC YOUNG PEOPLE — FROM A SAFETY STANDPOINT PROBABLY WOULD BE BETTER NOT TO HAVE PARKING ON EITHER SIDE RIGHT THERE. SO YOU’VE ALREADY HAD A RECENT PUBLIC MEETING WHAT DO YOU THINK ANOTHER ONE’S GOING TO MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE. BECAUSE I’M A HALF. GLASS AT HER WITH A FULL HALF GLASS KINDA GUY ACT I THINK — OFTENTIMES A LITTLE MORE CONVERSATION CAN LEAD TO A LITTLE MORE COOPERATION. AND IT’S MY OPINION ACTUALLY OF THE THIS IS BEING PUSHED A LITTLE TOO QUICKLY A LOT OF THE NEIGHBORS WERE EVEN ACTUALLY. OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING. THEY WERE UNAWARE OF THE ZONING EVEN THOUGH THE SIGNS ARE OUT — WE’VE TAKEN TO SOCIAL MEDIA AND HAVE REACHED THE NEIGHBORS IN THE AREA SOME OF WHOM ARE ARE ELDERLY AND ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND SOME OF THESE MEETINGS — IF WE CAN HAVE MORE TIME I’D I WOULD KIND OF BE IN AGREEMENT TO THAT AS WELL. ALTHOUGH I WOULD CERTAINLY BE OPPOSED TO THE SAFETY ISSUES — I THINK IT’S JUST BEING POOR. THREE TO QUICKLY. OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE OPPOSITION. ARE YOU YOU’RE OBJECTING TO THE ADDITIONS OR THE SIDE WHAT WERE YOU OBJECTED — MY MAIN CONCERN IS THE ADDITION TO THE CHURCH ITSELF MAKER IS GOING TO COME VERY CLOSE TO THE ROAD IT’S GOING TO HINDER SIGHT LINES COMING IN AND OUT AROUND THIS AND THEY’RE VERY BUSY INTERSECTION — YEAH I MEAN WE AND WE DON’T HAVE A SITE PLAN BUT THEY’RE NOT ASKING FOR ANY. DON’T THINK THEY’RE ASKING FOR VARIANCES ALTHOUGH IN A SPECIAL EXCEPTION YOU DON’T ASK FOR A VARIANCE ON THE VARIANCES FOR THE SIDE LOT WAS VERY SUICIDAL BUT SPECIAL EXCEPTION WOULDN’T. IN IN A SPECIAL EXCEPTION OF WOODEN SAYING AND WE DO HAVE HOUSE YOU DEVIATE FROM COACH IN TERMS OF SEPP ACTION THAT KIND OF THING JOHN MICHAEL TELL US ABOUT THE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM LAWS PASSED FEDERALLY AND STATE. ONE WAS A CONCEPTUAL THERE’S THE FEDERAL ON THERE’S THE STATE LAW THE FEDERAL LAWS CALLED THE RELIGIOUS LAND USE AND INSTITUTIONALIZED PERSONS ACT OR LUPUS THE AKRON AND WE REFER. TO IN SHORT CREATES A LOT OF PROTECTIONS FOR RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS TO USE PROPERTY WHETHER IT BE RESIDENTIALLY ZONED COMMERCIALLY ZONED OR OTHERWISE IN A WAY THAT. IF IT’S THEIR RELIGIOUS PRACTICE AND THE SHORT VERSION IS LOCAL GOVERNMENT STATE GOVERNMENT SHALL NOT IMPEDE UPON SUCH RELIGIOUS PRACTICE WITHIN ZONING LAWS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES IN A WAY — UNLESS I MEAN YOU WOULD HAVE TO GO TO SOME. ON QUESTIONABLE FAIRLY SEVERE OVER RISK TO HUMAN HEALTH LIFE SAFETY IMMEDIATE CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER KIND OF A STANDARD. IN ORDER FOR A LOCAL OR STATE GOVERNMENT AGENCY TO CURTAIL THE LAND USE IN A MATTER THE CURTAILED THE RELIGIOUS PRACTICE BY THE PRACTITIONERS IN QUESTION WHETHER THAT BE AGAIN A RESIDENTIALLY ZONED AREA COMMERCIALES ANDHERI INDUSTRIES ANDHERI OR OTHERWISE. THE STATE LAW THAT IS APPLICABLE HERE IS CALLED THE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RESTORATION ACT BECAUSE OF ALL THOSE HORRIBLE — IMPINGEMENT ON RELIGIOUS FREEDOMS HERE IN TENNESSEE THAT WE’VE ENCOUNTERED FOR SO LONG I SUPPOSE — THE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM REFEREE RESTORATION ACT OR REFERENCE. AS A VERY SIMILAR GUIDELINES IN TERMS OF PROTECTIONS RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS TO USE PROPERTY REGARDLESS OF WHAT IS OWNING MAY BE. FOR CHURCH USE FOR RELIGIOUS OUT REACH WHATEVER THE CASE MAY BE — THE NETWORK THE COMPONENT OF REFER – IS THAT — IF A GOVERNMENT A RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION IN ITS ATTEMPT TO UTILIZE LAND IN A WAY OTHERWISE PROTECTED BY STATE LAW. ATTORNEY FEES APPLY TO THOSE CASES AS EVIDENCED BY THE TEEN CHALLENGE CASE HERE. ARE ACTUALLY LOOP LOOKED RELIEVED BY CASE WAS PART OF METROS LITIGIOUS HISTORY BACK A NUMBER OF YEARS TEN OR FIFTEEN YEARS AGO. WE’VE SEEN SOME OF THESE WERE IN TERMS OF RUBBER MEETING THE ROAD AND IT IS PART OF THE FORCE ANALYSIS AS HAS BEEN NOTED HISTORICALLY HERE IN BC A MEETING SO WE HAVE TO BE SMART ABOUT HOW WE APPLY THE LAW UNDER THOSE FEDERAL AND STATE LAW GUIDELINES OUR TEEN. CHALLENGE WAS WITH METRO COUNCIL WILL NOT US THAT’S CORRECT IT WAS NOT AN ACTION BY THE BCA THAT LED TO ANY LITIGATION OR LOTS AND LOTS AND LOTS AND LOTS OF DOLLARS — ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE OPPOSITIO. OKAY THE THING ELSE THEN THINKING. LET’S HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT AGAIN PLEASE COME FORWARD YOU’LL HAVE TIME FOR REBUTTAL. BEFORE WE GET STARTED HAVE A COUPLE QUESTIONS THAT CAME UP DURING THE REBUTTAL PERIOD. THEY TALKED ABOUT BUSES TAXI CABS AND OTHER VEHICLES PARKED ON YOUR PROPERTY AT NIGHT. IS THAT TRUE AND THAT’S NOT EXACTLY TRUE — NOT EXACTLY TRUE — YES BECAUSE ONE TIME A BUS SPEND A NIGHT OVER BECAUSE WE HAD A TRIP NEXT DAY SO ONLY YOU [inaudible] YEAH TENTATIVE. SEE I THINK ONE OF THEM THE TENANTS OF THE HOUSES HAS A TAX- SORT OF SO THAT COULD BE THAT KNOW HIM THEY’RE DIFFERENT TO THAT WHAT ABOUT SECURING THE PARKING LOT AFTER HOURS WITH LIKE A GATE A LOCKED GATE OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT WE CAN ACTUALLY WORK WE HAVE SERVICE TO HAVE SERVICES DURING THE THE THE DAY OF THE WEEK DAYS. ALSO THAT MADE BUT ALSO THAN THE THAN THE HOUSES ARE RENTED AND PEOPLE — YOU KNOW HAVE THEIR OWN CARS SO- I’M I’M TALKING ABOUT THE MAIN RELIGIOUS PART NOT THESE OTHER HOUSES THAT YOU HAVE A WAY OF THE GATE FOR THAT PARKING LOT. AND THIS IS THE ONLY THE MAIN PARKING LOT HAS A MORE THAN ONE ENTRANCE. AND ALSO WE HAVE SERVICE DURING WEDNESDAY MORNING FRIDAY MORNIN- TUESDAY AFTERNOON WHEN THEY WERE GONNA JUST OVER. NINE EIGHT O’CLOCK AT NIGHT TILL SEVEN O’CLOCK AND WE CAN WORK ON THAT OF THIS IS A SOMETIMES HAVE SERVICE FIVE O’CLOCK IN THE MORNING BE VERY — WHENEVER I MEAN FOR CRYING INTO THAT YOU KNOW FIND A SITE PLAN. I DON’T THINK EVERY WEEK I MEAN THERE’S AN ELEVATION IN THE THERE’S NOTHING THAT SHOWS HOW CLOSE IT IS. TO CHERRY WOOD LOOKING AT THIS – PICTURES HERE WHERE THE BUILDING IS ABOUT FORTY FIVE FEET FROM THE EDGE OF THE STREET ON THE EDGE OF THE PAVING OF MY OF ATTORNEY WOULD DRIVE. AND WHAT IT WAS ANTICIPATING GOING OUT ON THE SIDE ONLY WAS TWELVE TO THIRTEEN FEET WHICH IS GOING TO PUT THIS ON THE FRONT OF THE EXISTING ON THE CAR THAT SYSTEM IS ON THE PICTURE. WHICH IS GOING TO IS JUST TO THE EXISTING CURB — SO IT’S NOT GOING — TO AFFECT THAT MUCH THE THE PARKING. AT LEAST THIRTY FEET FROM CHERRY WOOD I WOULD SAY TO THE FACE OF THE CURRENT — TWENTY FIVE TO THIRTY FEET. OKAY SO WE HEARD FROM YOUR COUNSEL FOR SOME OF THE TOP OF THE HOUR AND SHE WAS SUPPORTIVE OF THIS VARIANTS BUT SHE SAID. SHE DIDN’T WANT PARKING ON EITHER SIDE OF THE STREET MATTER FACT THE SIGNS WERE BEING ORDERED ABOUT THOSE WE FIND THAT THAT’S FINE — AND WE CAN WE CAN — TO TELL US WHY YOU WANNA VARIANCES OF THE SIDEWALK FARMS- THE SIDEWALK — I THOUGHT THAT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT SAID THAT THIS IS A UNIQUE PROBLEM OF THE YEAH CAN YOU ALL AGREED TO IT AND A MINUTE AGO. ALSO COMING SOON ONE THING ABOUT THE THE THE THE SHE MENTIONED SOMETHING ABOUT — ACCIDENT INFIDELITY THAT HAPPENED ONE TIME OVER TWENTY TWO YEARS. OF BEING THAT IS — ONE PERSON DOES NOT ON SUNDAY IT WAS SAID TODAY THE STREET WAS EMPTY OF THE OTHER GUY WAS DRIVING TOO FAST AND DANGEROUS – NOT PAYING ATTENTION BUT SO WE KNOW YOU’VE JUST RECENTLY HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING THE OPPOSITION STILL WANTS TO MEET AGAIN THERE’S A NEW NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION ALL THAT WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT. LET ME SAY SOMETHING ABOUT THAT I I I ATTENDED THE PUBLIC HEARING WE HAD OVER NINETEEN NEIGHBOR ATTENDED SO IT WAS NOT LIKE AN EMPTY MEETING WE HAVE NINETEEN PEONS WE STAYED THE WHOLE TWO HOURS. THEY MOSTLY CAME ON TIME AND WE HAD A VERY GOOD CONVERSATION AND THAT’S WHY WE ACTUALLY DID ALL THAT SINCE A PUBLIC HEARING UNTIL TODAY NOT BECAUSE OF THE MEETING TODAY IT’S BECAUSE THIS WAS ARE. CONCERN THAT THE NEIGHBOR HAD THEN WE HAD TO WE CAN WORK ON THE LADY WAS THERE FOR THE USING THE INTERNET IN THE WHOLE MEETING YES — ONE MORE THING ABOUT IT WAS THA- THE NEIGHBOR SAID ABOUT THE PARKING A NO PARKING SIGN YES IT WAS IN — TWO THOUSAND FOURTEEN COMMENDED AND COMES ON THE THE THE VET CONTACTED GOING TO PROTECT THE CONTROL TO PUT — SIGNS AND THEY DEFUSE — HERE IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS AND WE DID AS A CHURCH OF PROVIDE SOME TEMP ASSIGNED TO PUT — AND CANCEL THE DEBATE CONDUCTED TRAFFIC CONTROL AGAIN. TO PROVIDE SIGNAGE SO WHAT WE DON’T KNOW IF THEY WOULD AGREE THIS TIME OR NOT BUT WE ALREADY PUT US ON THE PARKIG SIGN THERE — TEMPORARY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT WELL IS IT YOUR POSITION THAT YOU DON’T WANT TO CONTINUE. OUR DECISION AND MEET AGAIN WIT. WITH YOUR NEIGHBORS WE WOULD LIKE WE CAN TAKE A DECISION TODAY WE MAY I THINK YOU’RE READY TO COME INTO FOR APPROVAL AND WE ADDRESSED ALL THE CONCERN THAT TOURED WITH THEIR OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT. OKAY. ANYTHING ELSE THEN. WE’RE GONNA CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING DISCUSSIONS. WELL I’VE BEEN ON THE BOARD LONG ENOUGH TO HAVE HEARD THIS. THAT WE HAVE BEFORE US MANY TIMES. AND IT — THERE IS A COMMON THEME IN THE COMMON THEME IS YOU KNOW THAT THEY’RE PRO AND THEY HAVE NEEDS- TO TO GROW AND THEY BRING A PLAN AND AND THAT THE NEIGHBORS — BIG COMEBACK WITH THE THE ISSUES THAT THEY ARE COMING BACK WITH THE DAY. AND AT DO YOU THINK IT’S I THINK IT’S A GOOD THING FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT THERE IS A NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION NOW THAT GIVES UP MAYBE MORE FORMAL OUTLET — TO HAVE A DIALOGUE RELATIONSHIP WITH — WITH DISH SO RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATION – BUT I HAVEN’T SEEN ANYTHING THAT WOULD THAT BE COMPELLING ENOUGH TO DENY THE FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION BASED ON THE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM LAWS THAT WE HAVE AND THE PLAN. IS PROPOSED THAT YOU KNOW IT’S BEEN ABOUT THE FREE BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND BOTH IN TERMS OF THE SIDEWALK IN IN TERMS OF THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION SO — I DO HOPE THAT IF THEY DO COME BACK – WITH FURTHER GROWTH THAT — WE DON’T HAVE THE NEIGHBORHOOD OPPOSITION AGAIN WHICH WOULD SIGNAL THAT THEY WERE WORKING HARD TO BE — YOU HAVE BETTER NEIGHBORS. BUT THAT’S YOU KNOW. THAT’S JUST MY HOPE AND I DON’T THINK IT HAS ANY. REAL RELATION TO FORT DOWN. THE SPECIFIC REQUEST IS IN TERMS OF THE ADDITION. AND THE SIDEWALK DURING. OTHER BOARD MEMBERS COMMENTS. A LITTLE CONCERNED ABOUT THE ADDITION. AND WE DON’T HAVE A SITE PLAN THAT WE CAN LOOK AT AND WE JUST RELY ON ORAL TESTIMONY. AND IT JUST CONCERNS ME BECAUSE IT IS. IT IS CLOSE TO THE ROAD. WE CLOSE TO BOTH GROUPS AND I’M [inaudible] I GUESS. DURING THE PROCESS WILL HAVE TO PRODUCE THAT TO METRO BUT THERE WERE SAFETY CONCERNS CITED TODAY SOME CONCERN ABOUT THAT I DON’T KNOW THAT WE CAN. ANYTHING WE CAN DO AOUT THAT GIVEN THE EARLY BUTTON. AND ALL THOSE REGULATIONS BUT BUT YOU COULD STILL ASK FOR RECORDS THAT DOESN’T HAVE. THAT DOESN’T CONFLICT WITH THE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM NATION AND I DO THINK IT’S FAIR ENOUGH TO ASK FOR SITE PLAN — IF THAT IS A CONCERN BASED ON THE SAFETY ISSUES THAT THE NEIGHBORS AND IT WILL ALSO GIVE THEM MORE TIME TO TALK SO IF THAT’S ONE OF YOUR CONCERNS AS IT. THAT’S MY CONCERT FOR FREE TO SEE A SITE PLAN ALTHOUGH. YOU HAVE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE PLANNING. TO I KNOW WE’RE NOT AND THE TRU. AGE SO YOU BUT I WOULD STILL PREFER TO SEE IT — OTHER MEMBERS FOR YOUR OPINIONS. I WAS JUST SE ADMITE. CONSIDER THIS MOTION FOR GIRLS THOUGHTS. IF WE WERE GOING TO HAVE BELIEVED THAT THE STAFF PUSHED GROUNDS FOR THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION — FOR THE CHURCH. DUE TO THE CONDITIONS OF NO PARKING SIGNS ON BOTH SIDES OF CHERRY WOOD. WITH THE SECURITY GUARD TO ADDRESS TRAFFIC DURING CHURCH SERVICES. THAT THEY WOULD DENY ACCESS TO THE LIVE FROM TEN PM TO SIX AM ALSO JOKED TIMON. FIVE AM WITH AT FOUR THIRTY FOUR THIRTY ALSO BE TO PLANNING’S APPROVAL AS TO THE EDITION SIZE ETCETERA. BE AGREEABLE TO CONSIDERING IF WE DID IT THAT WAY. YES I WOULD JUST SAY THAT ALL METRO AGENCY. VIEW FOR THE SAFETY CONCERNS THAT WERE CITED TODAY I DON’T KNOW THAT. IT COULD BE PUBLIC WORKS THAT’S LOOKING AT THE INTERSECTION AND JOHN IS THE COLONEL COLONEL AND FORTY ALL THINK ABOUT THAT WE PUT THOSE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS. ON THIS SECTION AND I WOULD ALSO SAY THAT WE WILL THEN MAKE A MOTION SICK WOULD HAVE. I WOULD LIKE — TO PUT ALL THE LANGUAGE I JUST I’M HAPPY TO REPEAT IT FOR THE RECORD IF WE NEED. TO WHICH IS — PLACE NO PARKING SIGNS ON BOTH SIDES OF CHERRY WOOD. HAVE A SECURITY GUARD ASSIST. WITH TRAFFIC DURING CHURCH SERVICES. THE PARKING LOT WILL HAVE A DENIAL OF ACCESS FROM TEN PM TO FOUR THIRTY AM. AND THE SITE PLAN WOULD BE SUBMITTED TO ALL. APPROPRIATE METRO AGENCIES FOR APPROVAL. AS CONDITIONS TO THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION. HAS THAT PART AND THEN SEPARATELY DO. AS TO THE SIDE WALL GRANTS I WOULD — MAKE A MOTION THAT WE AGREE WITH [inaudible] PLANNING’S RECOMMENDATION. MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AS THEIR SECOND. ALSO IN MOTION’S BEEN MADE AND PROPERLY SECONDED INSPECTION. SEEING NONE ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE — THOSE PASSES UNANIMOUSLY GOOD LOT. JOHN MICHAEL LET’S TAKE A BREAK HERE. REPORTER RECONVENE AFTER A SHORT BREAK. THE FIRST OF JANUARY THIRD TWENTY NINETEEN ADDITIONALLY THE FIRST SHORT TERMINAL CASE — ON THAT PORTION OF YOUR DOCKET I’M NOT SURE WHAT PAGE THAT IS THIRTEEN MAYBE — THAT’S CASE TWENTY EIGHTEEN AS FIVE NINETY FIVE INVOLVING THE PROPERTY FOURTEEN FOURTEEN BASKETBALL. HAS ALSO ASKED TO DEFER TO JANUARY THE THIRD TWENTY NINETEEN SO AGAIN THAT’S K. SIX FIFTY SIX JANUARY THIRD. IN CASE FIVE NINETY FIVE JANUARY THIRD THE NEXT CASE TO BE PRESENTED THE BOARD’S CASE TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH. SIX FOUR ZERO THAT INVOLVES A CASE THE PROPERTY AT NINETEEN ELEVEN BE ISM BOY NINTH AVENUE NORTH AND COUNTED ISSUE NUMBER. TWENTY ONE THE REQUEST IS FOR A SIDEWALK VARIANCE IN THIS BAR SIX IS ONLY DESCRIPTION HERE ON THE ZONING MAP SHOWN HERE ON THE AERIAL. THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED SHOWS PROPOSE LAYOUT FOR THE DOORS ON THE PROPERTY REGIME DEVELOPMENT. PHOTOGRAPH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IN THE VIEW ACROSS THE STREET AND IN THE VIEW THE SIDEWALKS IN THE CURRENT CONDITION. YOU SEE THE BEEZY NOTICE ON THE ON THE UPPER LEFT HAND PHOTO. THE APPELLANT’S ALISON DAWKINS ON BEHALF OF JESSE BOIL THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY GOT — TALENTS PRESENT AND ACCOUNTED FOR IS THERE ANYONE HERE IN OPPOSITION THE CASE NUMBER. SIX FOUR ZERO SEEING ON THE FIVE MINUTES MAKE DESIRED PRESENTATION. WE WOULD ASK THREE BECOME THE ORDERS STOP TALKING MAKE ZERO NOISE AS WE HAVE TO ASIAN ON THAT MATTER. MISTER CHAIRMAN WILL HAVE THE APPELLANT INTRODUCE HIMSELF BY NAME ADDRESS MAKERS ARE PRESENTATION. OF DUTY TO MY NAME IS A D. DAWKINS AND DAWKINS CONTRACTING LLC. A FIFTEEN YEAR OLD RECORD SOME PARKING GOODLETTSVILLE ENNESSEE- REFERENCES IN THE I’M A CONTRACTOR FOR THE OWNERS TO SEE A BIT MORE ON THAT PROPERTY. WE’RE REQUEST AN ACE OUT WHILE BEARS AND BEARS PHONE — IN LIEU OF THE SIDEWALL PHONE. CURRENTLY THERE’S ABOUT A NINE FOOT SIDEWALL THERE IT IS IN [inaudible] EXCELLENT CONDITION. AND ALSO. I WAS EXCELLENT CONDITION. THE PITCHES THE SLEEVE AND SO ON AND NOT LOOK LIKE HIS. MAYBE. GOOD CONDITION PROBABLY FAIR CAN AND I WERE NOT CLASSIFY THAT IS EXCELLENT. THAT FALL THERE THEN — WE WERE REQUESTED BY THE RETAINING WALL IT’S ALL HISTORICAL FACTOR IN THAT COMMUNITY ALL ALONG THE STREET SO. WE’RE GONNA MY REQUEST AND LIEU OF THE SIDEWALL ORDINANCE AND DOWN THE STREET FROM JONES FOR DATA. ON THAT AREA — PENCIL CERTAIN. SO — WHY DON’T YOU THINK YOU SHOULD BUILDING THE SIDEWALK AT THESE EXCELLENT CONDITIONS AND WHY SHOULD WE HAVE BEEN THROUGH THE PHONE? CURRENTLY THERE’S A A MAN FOR THE SIDEWALL DARE THAT. REALLY — DEALS. PLENTY — SITE WHILE OUTSIDE THE RIGHT AWAY — VERSES CLOSE TO THE STREET WHERE THIS IS ALMOST A PARABLE TO THIS IS FOR THE GREEN AND THE SERVICE WAS — WALL. SO AS YOU KNOW THE METRO COUNCIL LAST YEAR PASSES SIDEWALK ORDINANCE REQUIRING ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION SEE THE BUILDING THE SIDEWALK OR PAY INTO THE FUND. SO PART TWO WEREN’T SHIPPING TO THE ISLAND. WHAT THE LOSES A REQUEST? OKAY. FEZS WHAT COURSE OF ACTION FOR THE APPLICANT NO I THINK THE PLANNING BOARDED UP. HAD APPROVED US BUT I’M NOT HAD RECOMMENDED IT FOR PROOF THAT YOU GET PAID TO THE FRONT DESK THEY RECOMMENDED IT. OKAY [inaudible] DISCUSSION. WHEN I CLICK TAKE ON THESE AS I DO THINK THE SIDEWALKS IN GOOD CONDITION — UNDERSTAND WHAT WE WANT TO RETAIN THE WALL IN PLANNING IS AGREEABLE TO THAT BUT THEY DO HAVE RECOMMENDED. RECOMMENDED HE CONTRIBUTE IN LIEU OF WE DON’T HAVE A COUNCIL PERSON TELLING US OTHERWISE. SO I’M OPEN TO OTHER PEOPLE’S [inaudible] SUGGESTIONS. WELL YOU KNOW HOW I FEEL IF THE COUNCIL PERSON IS HERE THIS ONE STORY BUT WE DON’T HAVE A COUNCIL PERSON HERE IN PERSON THING. SOMEBODY SHOULDN’T PAY INTO FINDER BILL THE SIDEWALK SO — SAYING WE SHOULD FOLLOW THE LAW [inaudible] EVERYBODY SHOULD. I MOVE THAT WE DENY THE REQUEST FOR THE SITE COOL THEY COULD MAKE A PAIN. TO THE CONDITIONS ARE PLANNING AS IT IS AT THE CENTER [inaudible] NINE WHAT THE CONDITIONS ARE PLANNING JUST BASICALLY SAYING THAT PLAY INTO THE FUND. MISTER CHAIRMAN OF IMPORTANT NO THEY ALSO KNOW THAT HE IS NOT FUN ELIGIBLE DISLOCATION APPARENTLY JUST IN CASE IT HAS ANY EFFECT. OKAY — I KNEW THAT WE APPROVE THE VARIANCE WITH THE CONDITION THAT THEY BE ELIGIBLE TO PAY INTO THE FUND IF THEY DO NOT WISH TO BUILD NEW SIDEWALK. SECOND COULD MOTION BEEN MADE THEM PROPERLY. SECONDED ANY DISCUSSION. SEEING NONE ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE — POSE PASSES. ABOUT. THE CASE TO MICHAEL. MISTER CHAIRMAN NEXT CASES TWENTY EIGHTEEN AT SIX FORTY THREE INVOLVING TE PROPERTY SEVEN THIRTY FIVE TWENTY NINTH AVENUE NORTH SHOWN HERE ON THE ZONING MAP SHOWING HERE ON THE AERIAL. THAT RUNS RIGHT ALONG THE INTERSTATE THERE TO THE WHICH IS TO SAY ALL OF THEM. FRONT SETBACK IS PRESENTLY SET AT TWENTY THE REQUEST IS TO REDUCE THAT TO TWELVE FOOT THREE INCHES ON THIS UNUSUALLY SHAPED LOT. THE REAR SETBACK IS SET AT TEN THE REQUEST IS FOUR ZERO AND THE SIDE SETBACK REQUIREMENT IS THREE REQUESTED TO REDUCE THAT TO TO THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED GIVE YOU SOME IDEA OF THE POST LAY OUT. WE DO SHOW ON THIS DOCUMENT THE REQUEST IS REDUCED TO READ FROM TWENTY TO TEN SO INVITE THE APPELLATE TO CLARIFY THAT AS YOU MAKE YOUR PRESENTATION. THE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SUBMITTED HERE GIVES YOU SOME IDEA OF THE PROXIMITY TO THE INTERSTATE THE OVERPASS AT THAT LOCATION. IF YOU OPEN ON THE SIDEWALK IN THE EXISTING LOCATION SIDEWALKS OF COURSE ARE NOT PART OF HIS APPEAL JUST SET BACKS IS THERE ANYONE HERE IN OPPOSITION CASE. SIX FORTY THREE SAYING ON ONE BY THE BELGIAN TRADITON SELF BY NAME AND ADDRESS AND MAKE THE INTERPRETATION. HI THANK YOU FOR SEEING ME TODAY BOARD MY NAME IS ALEX CROSS MY ADDRESS IS SIX OH FOUR BASS WHAT AVENUE NASHVILLE TENNESSEE — THREE SEVEN TWO OH NINE I’M HERE AT FIRST MORE THANK JOHN MICHAE. FOR FIND THAT IT LOOKS LIKE THERE WAS A LITTLE BIT OF A MISCOMMUNICATION MISUNDERSTANDING — TO SOME OF THE FACTS OF THIS CASE I I AM JUST REQUESTING — THE FOLLOWING SET BACKS OF A TWENTY FOOT FRONT SET BACK. ORIGINALLY — THE CONTEXTUAL SITE BACK WAS TWENTY SEVEN POINT NINE SO THIS IS A REDUCTION OF SEVEN POINT — NINE THE REAR SETBACK IS CURRENTLY TWENTY FEET I’M REQUESTING IT TO BE TEN FEET WHICH IS A REDUCTION OF TEN FEE. AND THE SIDES OF WE EACH FIVE FEET AND FIVE FEET AND I’M REQUESTING THREE FOOT AND THREE FOOT. SO ITS REDUCTION OF TWO FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF WHAT DO YOU NEED THE ON THE RIGHT HAND SIDE THREE FOOT. WHEN YOUR HOUSE IS DRAWN [inaudible] THE SIX OR MORE. CAN YOU SAY THAT ONE MORE TIME WELL I MEAN ON THE ON THE ELEVATION PLAN THAT. THIS PROVIDED. IT HAS ON THE LEFT HAND SIDE OF THREE FOOT BECAUSE SET BACK IN MY HOUSE IS KIND OF ON THAT. ONE BUT THEN IT HAS A THREE FOOT RIGHT HAND. SET BACK BUT THE HOUSE IS PROBABLY ANOTHER THREE FOOT FROM THE OTHER SIDE OF THAT IT’S GOT LIKE SIX FEET FROM WHAT LINE WELL I BELIEVE IT’S BECAUSE THE THE THE BACK PROPERTIES ANGLED. IT’S KIND OF PIZZA PIE SHAPED — INTO IT THIS PROPERTY BACKS UP INTERSTATE FORTY AND IF THAT RIGHT HAND SET BACK WERE WHAT WERE TO BE FIVE FEET THAT ANGLE WOULD BE A LOT SHARPER AND WOUL. CUT INTO THAT HOUSE CORNER RIGHT THERE. YES SIR BUT YOU’RE NOT ACTUALLY GOING TO BUILD INTO THAT THREE FOOT THAT’S CORRECT WE’RE OFFICE CORRECT IT’S JUST IT’S JUST FOR THE ANGLE OF THE BACK YES SIR AS FOR THE ANGLE THE BACK AND UP I’VE PURCHASED IN ON THIS PROPERTY FOR SEVERAL YEARS. AND WAS WELL AWARE THAT A HOUSE DID EXIST THERE THAT WAS DEMOLISHED IN THE NINETIES — OF I DO NOT HAVE A NEIGHBOR ON THE RIGHT SIDE THOSE SMALLER RIGHT TWO PARCELS I’M TOLD ARE OWNED BY METRO AND THEY’RE ON BUILDABLE LOTS — THERE UP TOWARDS THE CORNER BY TAPE STAN CIVILLY WITH MY NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR TO THE LEFT RICKY AND CYNTHIA NELSON. AT SEVENTY SEVEN TWENTY SEVEN B- AND THEY’RE IN FULL SUPPORT OF THIS WE HAD A COUPLE OF ISSUES WE NEEDED TO RESOLVE WITH — DRIVE WAY THAT THEY HAD BUILT ON MY PROPERTY AND THEY’VE JUST BEEN VERY COMPLIANT AND FOR ALL ON THE SAME PAGE I ACTUALLY MET WITH THEM. YET — THIS MORNING TO GO OVER SOME TREES THAT ARE ON THE ON THE BORDER THAT THEY BOTH WANT REMOVED AND WE WANT THEM REMOVED AS WELL SO- THERE IN FULL SUPPORT OF OF THIS PLAN AND IT’S IT’S IT’S FOR A ONE STORY HOUSE WE FELT LIKE THAT WOULD. MATCH THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND ALSO YOU KNOW HELP ELIMINATE A LITTLE BIT AND ALWAYS BEING NEXT TO INTERSTATE. FORTY ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT. OKAY ANYTHING ELSE THEY’RE NOT THINKING SORT OF CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. SO THIS IS RIGHT NEAR [inaudible] FOR FORTY NEAR — JEFFERSON STREET AREA [inaudible] AND AS HE SAID THE MEASURE OWNS THE VACANT LOTS. LOOKS LIKE TO THE NORTH. AND HE’S TALKED TO THE NEIGHBOR. NEXT DOOR USE AGREED SO [inaudible] IN A THE DISCUSSION [inaudible] AND IT. BUT IT DEFINITELY IS PUTTING AS MUCH HOUSES YOU CAN A LOT BUT IT’S I RECENTLY MODEST HOUSES OR A ONE STORY HOME AND SO IT IT DOESN’T APPEAR TO BE — TRYING TO TO COMPLETELY OVER BUILD A LIFE IT IS DEFINITELY AN UNUSUALLY SHAPED LOT — VERY HAPPY. TO KNOW THE FACTS SET PAKISTAN V.. C. ROAD RIGHT WELL HE IS GOING TO HANDLE THE INTERSTATE SO MANY PURSE — WORLD — UNSURE OF GOVERNOR HAS SOME OBJECTS OR NOT. OR SHIPS THERE. THE EVOLUTION. OF THE THAT WE WILL APPROVE A TWENTY FOOT FRENCH SET BACK AND A TEN FOOT WE’RE SET BACK ALONG WITH — THREE FOOT SIDE SETBACKS FOR THIS PROPERTY BECAUSE OF THE UNUSUAL SHAPE. WHY AND THE — WORKING WITH THE NEIGHBORS AND NO OPPOSITION CURRENT MISSIONS REMAINS OUR SECOND. WHICH HAS BEEN MADE IN PROPERLY SECONDED ANY DISCUSSION. THING NONE ALL THOSE IN FAVOR MOTION SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. THOSE PASSES GOOD LUCK THANK THANK YOU SO MUCH JOHN MICHAEL. MISTER CHAIRMAN NEXT CASE TO BE PRESENT TO THE BOARD IS TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH SIX FORTY SIX AM ON THE PROPERTY AT THREE FIFTY FIVE HEY WOULD LANE JIM GILKEY IS THE NAME THE PALETTE. FOR THE CHURCH THAT’S FILED THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUEST AGAIN FOR RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION — RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION WE USE IN RESIDENTIAL HIS OWN PROPERTY THE R. S. FORTY PROPERTY ALONG A WOOD LANE SHOWN HERE. ON THE ZONING MAP IN HERE ON THE AERIAL MAP IS PROPOSED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW TEMPLE. AS REQUIRED THIS COMES THE BOARD FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION WITH A RECOMMENDATION FROM PLANNING. THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED SHOWS A PROPOSAL LAYOUT FOR THE CHURCH AT THIS LOCATION. REASON SIDEWAYS IT SHOWS THE PROPERTY FROM THEY WOULD NEVER LEFT AN ACROSS THE STREET LOWER RIGHT VIEW UP AND DOWN HE WOULD LINE AT THIS LOCATION AS WELL. THE BELTS REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL MISTER HOME IS PRESENT ON THEIR BEHALF TO THERE IS AS A RESULT THE APPELLANT’S WILL HAVE TEN MINUTES TO MAKE THE DESIRED PRESENTATIONS IN THE OPPONENTS WILL HAVE OF COURSE A SHARED TEN MINUTES TO MAKE THEIR PRESENTATION — ACCOUNT FOR ALL THOSE WHO WANT TO SAVE ANY PORTION FOR ABOUT A LOT OF US ORIGINALLY ALLOCATED TEN MINUTES. THE PARTIES ARE JUST INTRODUCE THEMSELVES BY NAME AND ADDRESS TO MAKE THE DESIRED PRESENTATION THE BOARD. GOOD AFTERNOON MEMBERS OF THE BOARD MY NAME IS JASON HOLLOM IN FORTY EIGHT HUNDRED CHARLOTTE AVENUE AND I’M HERE TODAY ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT THE EYES TO SO CONVOCATION — WOULD LIKE TO RESERVE FOR MINUTES FOR REBUTTAL AT THE END OF THIS — I’LL BE BRIEF — SOME OF YOU MAY RECALL THE CHAIRMAN YOU PROBABLY RECALL THIS SAME BODY CAME BEFORE THIS ENTITY TWO YEARS AGO SLIGHTLY OVER TWO YEARS AGO — TO MAKE A REQUEST IT IS — ESSENTIALLY THE SAME REQUEST AS WAS MADE BEFORE — AS MEMBERS OF THIS BOARD ARE AWARE — ONCE YOU RECEIVE APPROVAL FROM THIS BOARD YOU HAVE TWO YEARS TO ACT UPON THAT PERMIT — DURING THAT TIME THIS CONGREGATION ANTICIPATED — THEY THEY THEY WERE IN THE PROCESS OF PURCHASING THE PROPERTY AT THAT TIME. THEY BELIEVE THAT THEY COULD DESIGN IN ORDER PRIOR TO THE TWO YEARS — THEY DID RUN INTO SOME DESIGN ISSUES — I WILL NOTE THAT ONE OF THE DESIGN ISSUES THAT THEY CAME ACROSS — IS THAT THEY ATTEMPTED TO MAKE THIS BUILDING A LITTLE MORE OR A LITTLE LESS EASTERN IN ITS DESIGN I SHOULD SAY — AND THOSE REVISIONS TOOK THEM A FEW MONTHS AND AS A RESULT THE TWO YEARS RAN OUT SO I I JUST WANNA LET YOU KNOW THAT THERE I& NOTHING DIFFERENT OR ADDITIONAL. ABOUT THIS PROPOSAL IN FACT THE ULTIMATE SITE PLAN — THAT YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU HERE TODAY WHICH I’LL ALSO SAY IS A LITTLE MORE DETAIL THAN WHAT WE HAD BEFORE BECAUSE THEY’RE FURTHER ALONG IN THE PROCESS — DOES SHOW A SMALLER FLOOR PLATE THAN WHAT WAS THERE BEFORE — THEY STILL ARE ASKING FOR FIVE HUNDRED SEATS WHICH IS WHAT’S RELEVANT TO YOU IN THIS DECISION THEY MEET ALL THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS THEY MEET THE BUFFERING REQUIREMENTS. AND THEY ARE IN THE PROCESS OF STORM WATER APPROVAL ONE THING I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT IS THAT ONE OF THE CONDITIONS OF THE PREVIOUS SPECIAL EXCEPTION. WAS THAT THERE WOULD BE NO ACCESS TO RAY WOULD LANE AS PART OF THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION THAT’S THE NEIGHBORHOOD STREET — BEHIND HEY WOULD LANE AND AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THIS PROPOSAL — THAT ROAD IS DEAD ENDED AS IN FACT — PERHAPS NOT SHOWN SPECIFICALLY ON THE SITE PLAN — BUT BECAUSE OF THESE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF STORMWATER DESIGN WILL ACTUALLY BE SIGNIFICANT TO PONDER FREE CHANGE FROM THE PARKING LOT TO RAY WOULD. ESSENTIALLY MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE RIGHT WHICH BEHIND THREE WHAT IS BEHIND YES EIGHT WOULD I’M. COULD RUN PERPENDICULAR IF IT WAS CONTINUED OUT TO HEY WOULD LINE THERE AND YOU CAN ACTUALLY SEE IN THE UPPER LEFT HAND CORNER OF DESIGN — AND JUST FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE. WE HAVE PROVIDED SOME SIDE ELEVATIONS SO THAT YOU CAN SEE THOSE AS WELL — WITH THAT — JUST RESERVE THE BALANCE OF MY TIME OR ANSWER QUESTIONS AS THEY MAY BE. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT FOR HERE FROM THE OPPOSITION. OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT HAVE. FEW CONDITIONS TO THEIR APPROVAL HAVE YOU READ THE IBM BELIEVE SIDEWALKS IS THE MAIN ONE AND THEY ARE WILLING TO CONSTRUCT SIDEWALKS AS PART OF THIS — WE HAVE WE HAVE A COMMUNITY MEETING ON MONDAY NIGHT — WE SHARED WITH THE NEIGHBORS THERE THERE ARE NO OTHER SIDE WALKS ALONG THIS AREA — AND WE REALLY LEFT THAT TO THE PURVIEW OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD IF THE NEIGHBORHOOD WOULD. STRONGLY SUPPORT NOT HAVING THE SIDEWALKS BECAUSE IT IS JUST GOING TO BE YOU KNOW SIDEWALK ON THE FRINGE OF THIS PROPERTY ONLY WE MAY CONSIDER COMING BACK FOR THAT REQUEST. BUT ONLY IF THAT’S SOMETHING THEY SUPPORT OTHERWISE WE’LL SIMPLY CONSTRUCTED. A ROSE — PROVIDE ONE CANOPY TREE FOR EVERY FIFTEEN PARKING SPACES FOR THE ZONING CODE I GUESS YOU’RE GONNA DO THAT ABSOLUTELY [inaudible] AND I DON’T KNOW. FOR THE ORDER FROM THE LAST HEARING THIS ON OUR FAQ — IS LOOKING FOR THAT BUT DO YOU HAVE THAT AND WAS THERE ANYTHING ELSE THAT WE I WAS THERE ANY OTHER CONDUCT I DON’T HAVE THAT AND MY RECOLLECTION WAS THAT THE ONLY SUBSTANTIVE CONDITION WAS THE RATE WOULD LANE. CONNECTION AND AND THAT’S WHAT WE HEARD A LOT AGAIN FROM THE NAME. LIST OF THE OPPOSITION PLEASE COME FOR ALL THOSE WHO WERE HERE IN OUR POSITIONS YOUR TIME TO SPEAK. YOU’LL HAVE — TWO MINUTES COLLECTIVELY TO SPEAK MAXIMUM SO DIVIDE YOUR TIME UP. STATE YOUR NAME ADDRESS AND WHY YOU’RE HERE COMPOSITION [inaudible] AND THEN . GOOD AFTERNOON MY NAME’S MILIEU WORK MAN I’M PRESIDENT OF THE HIGH WOULD LINE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. AND WE ARE HERE FIRST I WANTED TO BRING UP THE POINT THAT — EVEN THOUGH WE’RE BACK HERE ON THE SECOND. ROUND OF THIS PARTICULAR — CONGREGATIONS DESIRE TO BUILD — THE TIMING OF THE NOTICES TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD — WERE NOT GOOD — AND THIS COUNCIL THAT WAS HERE TWO YEARS AGO YET HE DIDN’T CONTACT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD GROUPS — WE HAD THE PUBLIC MEETING FOUR DAYS AGO IN THE EVENING AND AND I KNOW YOU’VE SEEN THIS LETTER BECAUSE I ASKED. FOR A DEFERRAL AND I DIDN’T HEAR A DEFERRAL AT THE BEGINNING — AND HONESTLY I MEAN WE COULDN’T CONTACT PEOPLE I’M NOT WITHIN SIX HUNDRED FEET AND I ONLY FOUND OUT ABOUT THIS — APPROXIMATELY TWO WEEKS AGO — WE WOULD PREFER TO HAVE A DEFERRAL SO THAT WE COULD HAVE A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING TO COME TOGETHER AND TALK ABOUT THIS. WE ARE NOT DISPUTING THIS CHURC. THIS CONGREGATION BUILDING ON THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY. THE ISSUE WE HAVE IS THE SIZE OF THE TEMPLE — AND CHRIS WILSON ATTORNEYS THAT I WORK WITH IS GOING TO HELP ME WITH SHOWING YOU SOME BLOW UPS THAT I MADE THAT YOU HAVE COPIES OF AND I WANTED. TO I WANT YOU TO SPECIFICALLY LOOK. HERE IS THE TEMPLE PROPERTY WHICH IS THE TWENTY SEVEN THOUSAND SQUARE FOOT TEMPLE. AND I WANT TO DO WITH THE DIFFERENT SQUARE FOOTAGES OF THE BUILDINGS INCLUDING. A CHURCH HERE THAT YOU APPROVED. TWO TO THREE YEARS AGO. AND HOW MUCH LARGER THIS TEMPLE IS. COMPARED TO THE REST OF THE PROPERTIES IN THIS RESIDENTIAL AREA — ACROSS THE STREET IS THE LATTER DAY SAINTS THE CHARGES. FOURTEEN THOUSAND SQUARE FEET BIGGER OR SMALLER PIECE OF PROPERTY — AND THE OTHER TWO CHURCHES SIX THOUSAND SQUARE FEET LARGER CHRYSLER THREATENED AND THEN THE NEW A COPY MISSION. WHICH I KNOW YOU GUYS CAN’T REALLY DEAL WITH THIS BUT THEY SHOWED YOU A PICTURE. AND THEN THEY BUILT SOMETHING THAT WAS NOT WHAT. WE AGREED WITH AND I’M NOT SURE. I GUESS WE TAKE HIM TO COURT WE HAVEN’T DONE THAT. AND THEN WE HAVE THE OTHER TWO HINDU TEMPLES WHICH ARE ALSO SMALLER AND SQUARE FOOTAGE AND ON LARGER PIECES PROPERTY SO. THIS IS A VERY TIGHT RESIDENTIAL AREA IT SITS AT THE TOP OF THE HILL — THIS TIME AROUND THEY HAVE SHOWN US SOME ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS BUT WE HAVE YET TO SEE A PICTURE OF THE ENTIRE BUILDING. AND THIS CAN BE ON A DRAMATIC EFFECT ON OUR NEIGHBORHOOD I’M NOT GOING TO SPEND A LOT OF TIME TALKING ABOUT TRAFFIC BECAUSE I DID TWO YEARS AGO WHEN I WAS HERE. BUT WE DO ACCORDING TO T. DOT HAVE TWENTY TWO TRAVELING HANG WITH MINE THIS IS AT THE CREST OF THE HILL WE BELIEVE THERE SHOULD BE A CERTIFIED TRAFFIC. STUDY DONE. A WE AS A NEIGHBORHOOD MAY EVEN BE WILLING TO JOIN IN THE COST OF THAT TO DETERMINE WHETHER THERE’S GOING TO BE ISSUES HERE THAT NEED TO BE MITIGATED. BECAUSE OF THE LOCATION OF THEIR EXIT ON TO HANG WOULD — HEY WOULD IS HAS NO TURN LINE IT HAS NO SHOULDERS — THERE’S NO STOP SIGNS IS THE COUNTRY BETWEEN NOT. TWENTY FOUR AND KNOWN FOR PIKE [inaudible] SO — THIS CHURCH. IS TWENTY SEVEN THOUSAND SQUARE FEET. ARM FIVE POINT SEVEN ACRES AND WE’RE JUST ASKING THAT THEY DECREASE THE SIZE OF THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE TWENTY THOUSAND SQUARE FEET. ARE WE WOULD ALSO LIKE TO SEE A BETTER RENDITION OF WHAT THEY INTEND TO BUILD — WE HAVE HAD ISSUES IN THE PAST IN THE LAST TWO YEARS ABOUT NOISE COMPLIANCE WITH THE ACTIVITIES HAD THEIR AND I REALIZE ARE GOING TO BUILD A BUILDING. SO HOPEFULLY THOSE WILL GO AWAY- THEY SEEM LIKE NICE PEOPLE — WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE MORE OF AN OPPORTUNITY TO TALK WITH THEM ABOUT WHAT THEY’RE GOING TO BILL BECAUSE I WILL BE. SOMETHING THAT’S GOING TO CHANGE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD IN A DRAMATIC WAY. TOO MANY QUESTIONS. QUESTIONS OF THE DO YOU RECALL ANY CONDITIONS WE PUT ON THE APPROVAL LAST TIME. OF FOR THE RIGHT WOULD LANE — WHERE THEY COULD NOT CUT THROUG- FROM RAY WOULD OVERHANG WOULD HOWEVER THAT HAS BEEN HAPPENING AND AND I KNOW THEY TRIED TO BLOCK IT. BUT YOU KNOW IT DIDN’T REALLY WORK BUT THAT IS THEIR RESPONSIBILITY TO DO THAT — WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE SOME CONDITION AS THE SIZE WE’D LIKE TO SEE A BIGGER LANDSCAPE — FOR BECAUSE IT’S SO CLOSE AND AND AS YOU CAN SEE. I MEAN AND PLUS IS A SPECIAL LAND USE POLICY WHICH I KNOW WAS A PLANNING THING THAT WE WENT THROUGH YEARS AGO BECAUSE WE WANTED. TO TO MAINTAIN THAT BUT I UNDERSTAND HOW SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS WORK BECAUSE WE DO HAVE CHURCHES — BY. THE ADDITION OF THIS ONE WILL BE SEVEN TENTHS OF A MILE WE’RE GOING TO HAVE. ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE FIVE CHURCHES. REMAINED. WE WE DON’T WE ARE OPPOSED TO CHURCHES WERE JUST THINKING THAT YOU KNOW THE AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC THAT GENERATES. BY CLAIM TO GROW — HAVE A FIVE HUNDRED SEAT YOU KNOW WHAT I’M SAYING I MEAN WE’RE JUST WE’RE ASKING FOR SOME CONSIDERATION. AND INSTEAD OF OUR RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS HAPPENS RIGHT IT SEEMS LIKE A SUPERMAN POWER TO COME IN YOU KNOW AND AND WE WANT TO BE GOOD NEIGHBORS. BUT WE FEEL LIKE THAT THIS IS TOO LOW — FOR THIS PARTICULAR. I CRINGE AND WE’RE ASKING FOR CONSIDERATION IN REDUCTION THAT OUT IF YOU CAN PUT THAT IN YOUR ORDER OR NOT — AND I’M NOT SURE HOW YOU ENFORCE ORDERS BECAUSE THOUGH I MEAN I GUESS SAID THE QUESTION IS ON IN TERMS OF SIZE IS [inaudible] IS. HERE AND AND YOU HEARD THE THE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM ACT AND OUR LOOK BACK — KIND OF OVERVIEW A LITTLE BIT AGO WITH ANOTHER CASE THAT WE HAD AND YOU KNOW IS THERE A COMPELLING GOVERNMENT INTEREST THE WHERE THE SIZE HERE — DOES. HAVE AN IMMEDIATE AND DETRIMENTAL IMPACT ON PUBLIC SAFETY. IT COULD BUT WE DON’T KNOW BECAUSE WE ARE HAD A CERTIFIED TRAFFIC ENGINEER. TELL US THAT MY HUSBAND AND I DID A TRAFFIC THING TO HERE’S AGO YOU KNOW AND AND THERE’S A FIRE ALL RIGHT DOWN AT THE END AND AND WE KNOW BECAUSE WE LIVE IN THIS COMMUNITY THE ISSUES THAT WE HAVE. IN THE IN THE WAYS WE STRUGGLED BUT WHETHER THAT SO COMPELLING THING I DON’T REALLY KNOW I MEAN WE YOU KNOW WE STRUGGLE AS IN MANY PARTS OF NATIONAL WITH. WITH TRAFFIC SO — THEY’RE NOT UNDERSTAND THAT — BUT YOU HAVE THERE’S A I UNDERSTAND THAT LAW AND HOW DIFFICULT IT MAKES IT FOR YOU GUYS I MEAN AND SO — FROM THERE ON THAT BUT I WANT TO DEFEND OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. YOU KNOW I’VE LIVED THERE FIFTY YEARS AND AND WE WANT TO BE GOOD NEIGHBORS BUT WE FEEL LIKE THAT SOMETIMES WE WE AREN’T HER. AS FAR AS YOU KNOW THE EFFECT OF THAT COMES INTO OUR NEIGHBORHOODS. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS THROUGHOUT. THE LAND. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER YOU MENTIONED A FEW. THEY’RE DOING THE MINIMUM WE WOULD WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE A LITTLE BIT MORE WORK SINCE IT’S SO CLOSE TO THE RESIDENCE FOR I. SO YOU’RE TALKING OUT THE SIDE – THE PROPERTY LINE SIDE NOT RUNNING THE ROAD. RIGHT. RIGHT. THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE WE’RE GONNA HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT — YES PLEASE SPEAK. MY NAME IS JOE SEXTON A LIVE AT FIVE THOUSAND THREE CROSBY LANE- THE DIRECTOR OF THE FAIRLY PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION — IN RESPECTFULLY WOULD ASK THAT YOU REALLY TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION — DIFFER IN THIS AND GIVEN US SOME TIME IT’S BEEN TWO YEARS OVER TWO YEARS WHAT’S WHAT’S WHAT’S A COUPLE MORE MONTHS. TO SIT DOWN AND GO OVER THIS — NOT EVERYTHING HAS BEEN DISK THERE HAS BEEN MANY ISSUES — DURING THIS TWO YEARS THE POLICE HAVE BEEN CALLED — BECAUSE THE GATHERINGS — THERE IS AN ONGOING. OF POLICE — THEY THEY LOOK AT THE CUT THROUGH OFF OF HOW YOU WOULD LANE THROUGH THEIR PROPERTY — TO RAY WOULD NAIL THEY HAVE DONE NOTHING AT ALL TO STOP THAT — THIS WAS THEIR RESPONSIBILITY THEY SAID THEY WOULD BE TRANSPARENT AND TALK TO THE COMMUNITY INTO OVER TWO PLUS YEARS WE’VE HAD NO COMMUNICATIO- THE SIZE OF THE BUILDING B. AND B. AND SCALE DOWN AND WE HAD IN THE MEETING THEY DISCUSSED HOW THEY WANTED TO BUILD FOR THE FUTURE. ARE THERE ARE OPTIONS FOR THEM TO FIND A MORE SUITABLE LOCATION THAT WOULD GIVE THEM THE ACCESS THEY NEED TO SIZE FOR GROWTH. MARKET CERTAIN THEY’RE GOING TO BE BACK DOWN HERE WITHIN JUST A FEW. YEARS WITH THE SAME PROBLEM OF ASKING FOR MORE VARIANTS TO GRO. TWENTY TWO THOUSAND CARS DAILY OWN HEY WOULD LINE WITH NO SHOULDER A FIRE TRUCK. YOU’RE LOOKIN AT COMMUNITY SAFETY. AT A VERY HUGE RISK — THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAS BEEN MORE THAN WELCOMING TO CHURCHES HAVING THREE ALREADY BEFORE THE BURMESE TRUCK CHURCH WAS JUST ALLOWED. IN THE PAST YEAR — IT WHAT WE’RE GONNA DO IS IS WE’RE GOING TO PUT OUR ENTIRE COMMUNITY AT RISK FROM SAFETY AND FAR IN MEDICAL — BECAUSE OF THE TRAFFIC EXCESS. I WOULD I WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU IF YOU COULD — COME OUT AND SAY THAT TRAFFIC — IF YOU HAVE THAT OPPORTUNITY. ALL AND SEE EXACTLY WHAT IT’S LIKE FOR A FIRE TRUCK TO TRY TO GET OUT. I TALKED TO THE DISTRICT FIRE CHIEF. WHERE THEY HAVE TO WAIT ANYWHERE FROM TWO TO THREE MINUTES ON A CALL THAT COULD BE THE DIFFERENCE OF A DEFIBRILLATOR GETTING TO SOMEONE FOR ALL HEART ATTACK? OR A HOUSE BURNING DOWN. SO WE ARE LOOKING DIRECTLY AT COMMUNITY SAFETY. WITH THE FIFTH CHURCH GOING IN. IT WOULD NOT MATTER TO ME IF IT WAS A POLICE STATION. IT’S NOT THE RIGHT PLACE IT DOESN’T MAKE SENSE AND IT WILL CONTINUE TO PUT THIS COMMUNITY AT RISK. AND SO YOU SEE IT YOU BOTH MENTIONED GATHERINGS NOW WHAT WHAT KIND OF GATHERINGS HAPPENED AT THIS — BUILDING THERE NOW OR SO. THERE ARE TWO HOUSES THERE WHICH WILL BE DEMOLISHED MOURNED STAY BUILDER. THEY’RE BUILDING THAT JUST RAN IT LARGE TENTS. AND AND THERE’S A GREAT GREEN IT HALF ACRES OF LAND. AND SO THAT WAS WHAT TO GET AND SO THE SOME NEIGHBORS WERE CALLING BECAUSE THE MUSIC WENT ON FOR A LONG TIME AND IT WAS LOUD. SO. AND I THINK I REMEMBER THIS THIS IN THIS THE STRIP OF LAND THAT HAS. RESTRICTIONS ON WHAT YOU CAN DANCE FOR THE VIEW AND I KNEW THAT I REMEMBER FROM THE LAST TIME THAT BECAUSE THE RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATION IS. IS — ONE THAT — AND AGAIN — THIS NOT SPECIFIC TO THIS ONE IS REALLY SPECIFIC ALL OF THIS IS YOU REALLY DON’T HAVE. THERE’S NOT A LOT OF OF LEEWAY THAT WE HAVE TO IMPOSE SOME OF THOSE CONDITIONS — THAT THE FOLKS ARE TALKING ABOUT BUT I REMEMBER THE DISCUSSION LAST TIME ABOUT THE THE EFFORT YOU WANTED TO TO TRY TO PROTECT THE V.. AND THAT MORE OF THE MONEY WE TRY TO DO THAT PLUS SEPARATE AND APART FROM THE OTHERS PRODUCT RESTRICTIONS ON ALL THESE LIGHT. AND A COURSE THAT DOESN’T APPLY TO THE CHURCH BUT IT DOES APPLY TO ANYONE ELSE TRIED TO BUILD HOMES — WE JUST TERM. WE WOULD LIKE ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY TO BECAUSE IT’S MY UNDERSTANDING WHEN YOU LOSE YOUR SPECIAL EXCEPTION YOU HAVE TO START ALL OVER AGAIN IS THAT CORRECT. THE DIDN’T BUILD THAT IS IN THERE ACTUALLY YOUR PERIOD SO THEY HAVE TO COME BY BACK AND DO THIS ALL OVER AGAIN YEAH. SO. HAVING THE PUBLIC MEETING FOUR DAYS BEFORE HERE AND AFTER THE NOON DEADLINE SO THAT. YOU KNOW WE DIDN’T HAVE TIME TO FILE ANYTHING DIFFERENT AND AND I WENT TO THE MEETING MONDAY NIGHT BUT I MEAN THERE WAS ONLY A FEW OF US THERE. ME. WE HAVE CONNECTIONS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND WE COULD HAVE GOTTEN THIS MEETING IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD BUT COUNCIL DID NOT CONTACT US. AND SO IT MAKES OUR FOR OUR OUR PEOPLE AND SUSPICIOUS RIDE AND I HEAR THAT SAID YES WE’RE GOING TO BILL THE* AND THEN THEY BUILT THAT. AND IT’S NOT TO SAY THAT THEY’RE NOT UNDERSTANDING BUT WE WOULD LIKE. AN OPPORTUNITY TO WORK WITH THIS TEMPLE TO SEE IF WE CAN COME TO SOME COMPROMISE OF SOME DEGREE. WHETHER IT’S LEAKING ONTO. CORDING TO THE APPLICANT IS BASICALLY THE SAME BUILDING THAT THEY DID TWO YEARS AGO SO WHAT WOULD TWO MONTHS OR MONTH YOU KNOW KIND OF YOU YOU’VE SEEN WHAT THEY PROPOSED IN THE PAST. YOU HAVE AN OPINION ON IT WHAT WOULD A MONTH OR TWO DO WITH. ALL OF THIS WELL I THINK THAT IF YOU ARE LIVING LIKE WE LIVE IN A COMMUNITY DON’T YOU WANT THE PEOPLE TO BE GOOD AND BE. COMFORTABLE WITH THESE PEOPLE I MEAN AND MANY OF THEM HAVE NOT MET THEM WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY THESE PEOPLE. BY THE CONGREGATION THAT’S COMING IN. MORE WITH THEM AND THERE’S A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT LIVE OUT NEAR ST WHY WOULD THEY BE COMFORTABLE WITH THIS HUNGER NOT UNCOMFORTABLE WITH IT. PLEASE DON’T MISUNDERSTAND WHAT I JUST SAID IT’S JUST THAT DAY WE HAVE NEW PEOPLE WHO HAVE MOVED INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THEY DON’T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THIS IT WOULD BE VERY INSTRUCTIVE IF SINCE THE ROOM BE PART OF OUR COMMUNITY THAT THEY ACTUALLY COME TOGETHER WITH THE COMMUNITY THAT’S GOING TO BE SURROUNDING THEM. WELL THEY HAD A PUBLIC MEETING THAT WAS YOUR CHANCE TO GET TOGETHER AND SEE THAT WAS A FOUR DAYS AGO MISTER YELLING FROM THEM BUT THAT WAS NOT TIMELY. TO WIN WITH ONE SHOULD HAVE BEEN AND I FILED FOR THIS OCTOBER THE TENTH. YOU GRANTED IT OCTOBER THE THIRTIETH SO WHETHER GINSENG WORRIES AGO OR NOT. THESE SAID THEY’RE VERY SHOULD BE PEOPLE SHOWED UP SO. THESE PEOPLE DIDN’T HAVE ENOUGH TIME WE HAD A WEEK I MAILED THE LETTER THE DAY BEFORE THANKSGIVING. MISTER CHAIRMAN OF NO IT’S ABSOLUTELY TRUE THAT THE DATE OF THE NOTICE LETTER WITH REGARD TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING ORGANIZED BY THE APPELLANTS IS DATED NOVEMBER TWENTY ONE WHICH I THINK IS EXACTLY RIGHT THAT WAS THE DAY BEFORE THANKSGIVING. OF EQUALLY IMPORTANT NOTE THE NOTICES OF THE BCA CASE WERE MALE BY MY STAFF ON NOVEMBER THE TWELFTH OF TWENTY EIGHTEEN THIRTY DAYS AGO FROM TODAY’S DATE MEANING THAT ALL THE PEOPLE WHO OWN PROPERTY WITHIN SIX HUNDRED FEET OF HIS PROPERTY. RECEIVE NOTICE OF THE CASE WAS COMING UP WE FILLED IN MULTIPLE INCREASE DURING THAT TIME NOTICE OF THIS MEETING WILL BE A MISUNDERSTANDING AMONG THE BOARD THAT SOMEHOW NOBODY KNEW THE CASE EXISTED AND I GOT ONE NOTICE FROM YOUR LETTERS OF THIS MEETING TODAY AND THAT THEY COULD. EMAIL OR MAIL ANY RIGHT JUST DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE BOARD HEARING NOTICE VERSUS THE NEIGHBORHOOD ME SECTION. IF I MAY IF I MAY UM I THINK THAT WE WE WERE NOT ADDRESSED IN A TIE — OVERALL NOW WHAT WE’RE ADDRESSING IS IF IT’S BEEN TWO YEARS WHAT’S TWO MONTHS ALSO TO A DAY DIRECT TO THE POINT IS. WITH THE WITH THE CURRENT OF RELIGIOUS ACT IN PLACE. I PERSONALLY AS AS AS MANY DO AND I THINK WITH ALL METRO — FAR AND MEDICAL WOULD WOULD AGREE IF THEY COULD BE INVOLVED THERE IS A DIRECT SAFETY ISSUE TO THE COMMUNITY. THERE IS A YEAH I MEAN IT’S IT’S IT’S A VERY DIRECT. BECAUSE SAFETY ISSUE TO THE COMMUNITY. THERE IS NO CENTER LINE THERE’S NO FUTURE PLANS FOR CENTER LINE THERE’S NO SHOULDER. YOU HAVE NO WAY FOR A MEDICAL AMBULANCE TO GET THROUGH THERE. HEAD EITHER MORNING AFTERNOON OR EMERGENCY TRAFFIC YOU OF ALL WE HAVE ALREADY SAYING THAT FAR IN MEDICAL CANNOT GET OUT. WE HAD OVER TWO THOUSAND THE LAST TIME WE WAS IN FRONT OF THIS BOARD. THAT WAS VERIFIED BY METRO POLICE. ARE CALLED FOR MORE AND MORE NEAR OWN HEY WOULD LIKE TWO THOUSAND CALLS FOR SERVICE. BECAUSE THIS IS A THIS IS A DIRECT. TO RISK TO THE COMMUNITY TIME IS ANYONE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS BEFORE HERE AGAIN FROM THE APPLICANT. OKAY THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE THANK YOU. TABLET IN THIS IS REBUTTAL TIME YOU COULD RESPOND TO WHAT YOU’VE HEARD. YES MISTER CHAIRMAN I’LL START OFF BY ASKING THEY WANT TO MORE TIME TO TALK RESPOND TO THAT. AS THE GERMAN I BELIEVE IS AWARE THERE WAS EXTENSIVE COMMUNITY CONVERSATION ABOUT THIS EXACT PROPOSAL TWO YEARS AGO. I BELIEVE THAT THIS CONGREGATION HAD AT LEAST TWO LARGE GROUP MEETINGS AND I THINK SEVERAL MORE INFORMAL CONVERSATIONS WITH TALK ABOUT WHAT’S HAPPENED RECENTLY THAT — WE HAVE MET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS BOARD — OBVIOUSLY TO TO COMMIT TO THE PUBLIC NOTICE THAT WE’RE ALL REQUIRED TO DO BUT IN ADDITION WE ORGANIZED — ANOTHER MEETING — TO SHOW THE ELEVATIONS TO SHOW THE FACADE WORK THAT HAD BEEN DONE AND ALL OF THAT WAS ORGANIZED AS AS QICKLY AS POSSIBLE I WILL I WILL SAY I GOT INVOLVED. AFTER THE APPLICATION WAS FILED A SECOND TIME AND I SCHEDULED A MEETING AS SOON AS I COULD AS YOU CAN IMAGINE WITH THANKSGIVING HOLIDAYS AND TRYING TO FIND A LOCATION — IT IT TOOK A FEW DAYS BUT WE HAVE A MEETING AS QUICKLY AS WE COULD HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO THEIR TRAFFIC AND SAFETY CONCERNS. WELL WITH REGARD TO TRAFFIC I UNDERSTAND THE HEY WOULD LANE BUT UNDERSTAND THIS CONGREGATION ACTUALLY MEETS ON SATURDAY AFTERNOON WHICH IS THE LOWEST TIME FOR TRAFFIC ON A WOOD LANE SO COMPARED TO JUST ABOUT ANY OTHER USE FOR THIS PROPERTY — THE CONGREGATIONS IMPACT IS IS GOING TO BE AT THE LOWEST FLOW TRAFFIC TIME AND THERE’S NOT REALLY A VOLUME CONCERN HE WOULD LANE ON A SATURDAY URGENCY VEHICLES AND ALL THE THINGS OBVIOUSLY ALL THESE THINGS HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED BY PUBLIC WORKS AS THEY AS THEY PULL PERMITS AND FINISH. DEVELOPING THEIR SITE PLAN AND THEY’VE WORKED CLOSELY AND MET ALL THOSE REQUIREMENTS. IF I COULD ADDRESS ALSO THE THE QUESTIONS ABOUT LANDSCAPE BUFFER AND ALSO WITH THE QUESTION ABOUT THE SIZE OF THIS FACILITY. COMPARED TO SOME OTHER FACILITIES — AS I’M SURE THIS BOARD IS AWARE. THERE ARE SPECIFIC GUIDELINES SET UP BY THE METRO COUNCIL IN PLACE FOR SEVERAL YEARS THAT DESCRIBE THE SCOPE OF OF LAND REQUIRED FOR VARIOUS SIZES OF CONGREGATIONS. THIS IS A REQUEST FOR A MAXIMUM OF FIVE HUNDRED SEATS IN THIS BUILDING UNDER THAT CONTACTS THEY WOULD BE REQUIRED TO HAVE ABOUT TWO AND A HALF ACRES OF LAND. IN ORDER TO SEEK A SPECIAL EXCEPTION OF THAT SIZE AND AS YOU CAN SEE FROM FROM THE OPPONENTS ON SITE PLAN — THEY HAVE FIVE POINT SEVEN EIGHT ACRES ON THIS SITE SO THEY ACTUALLY HAVE TWICE AS MUCH MORE THAN TWICE AS MUCH LAND AS WOULD BE REQUIRED UNDER THE STANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE METRO COUNCIL ZING. WELL WITH REGARD TO LANDSCAPE BUFFERS LANDSCAPE OFFERS ARE SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED AND SET OUT AS A CLASS B. LAND OUR CLASS B. LANDSCAPE BUFFER. AT FOR A CHARGE OF THIS TYPE AND THAT’S WHAT’S DRAWN INTO THE SITE PLAN WHAT’S PLANNED TO BE INSTALLED. QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT. CAN YOU EXPLAIN THE CONDITION WITH. RAY WAS AGAIN THEY SHORE AND I DID GO LOOK BACK AT THE ORDER I FOUND IT AND AND THAT WAS THE ONLY CONDITION THAT WAS ADDED — A THE CONDITION IS SIMPLY THAT THE THAT. CONNECTION BE DEAD ENDED AS PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT AND THEY’RE STILL COMMITTED TO THAT AND HAPPY TO ADD THAT TO THIS AS WELL AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THE SITE PLAN. NOT ONLY DO THEY INTEND TO DAD AND RAY WOULD NOT HAVE VEHICULAR ACCESS OUT OF THEIR PARKING LOT. BECAUSE OF THE STORM WATER FEATURES OF THEY’RE GOING TO IMPLEMENT — IN THE REAR OF THE LOT IT WOULD ACTUALLY BE TOPOGRAPHICALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO GET A A REGULAR VEHICLE FROM THEIR PARKING LOT TO RAY WOULD DRIVE SO THAT THAT WILL. PHYSICALLY AND ONCE THE CONSTRUCTION THE STARTED NO MY UNDERSTANDING IS DURING THIS INTERIM TIME — THE OLD CONDITION HAS CONTINUED TO EXIST THERE WAS A VEHICLE CONNECTION AND FOR A PERIOD OF TIME PEOPLE. NOT NECESSARILY CONGREGANTS CONTINUE TO USE THAT AS A CUT THROUGH — AND THEN MY CLIENTS ACTUALLY PLACED A PHYSICAL BARRIER THERE TO PREVENT IT FROM CONTINUING — THERE WAS ALSO A MENTION I THINK I WANT TO BE CLEAR AS PART OF THEIR RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE THEY DEDICATED THIS PROPERTY. THEY HAD IN THE VAN WHICH THEY HAD A PERMIT FOR A TENT AND WENT THROUGH ALL THE PROPER METRO PROCEDURES TO OBTAIN THAT — TO ESSENTIALLY BLESS THIS PROPERTY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS FACILITY AND THEY ALSO HAD A NEW YEAR’S FACILITY OR A NEW YEAR’S EVENT RELATED TO THEIR RELIGIOUS ACTIVITIES. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE I DO HAVE YOU DONE ANYTHING WITH OBTAINING A TRAFFIC STUDY AS SOON NOT THAT WE HAVE WE HAVEN’T BEEN REQUESTS AND LIKE I SAID — I MEAN I UNDERSTAND GENERAL CONCERNS ABOUT TRAFFIC BUT HONESTLY BECAUSE OF THE THE HOURS OF USE OF THIS PROPERTY IT’S NOT ANTICIPATED TO HAVE. AN IMPACT ON ON TRAFFIC WHEN WHEN CONGESTED TRAFFIC EXISTON A WOOD LANE — THEY’LL BE AT ABOUT THE MOST OFF PEAK TIME — IN IN IF THERE ARE ANY — IF THEY WERE DISCUSSING THE SIDELINE VISIBILITY OBVIOUSLY THAT’S SOMETHING THAT PUBLIC WORKS FULL. TIME AS THEY MAKE THEIR CONNECTION A WOOD LANE WILL REQUIRE THEM TO MEET THE MATTRESS STANDARDS FOR THAT. AND CERTAINLY SATYR IS POLISH AND SAY THIS BUT THIS SATURDAY THE ONLY DATE WILL BE IN OPERATION DO HAVE OTHER EVENTS OR I LET A LET HIM TO SEXUALLY – MY NAME IS KHAN CHAMBER TELL. I RESIDE AT ONE FORTY FOUR HOSPITAL ST KATIE’S KENTUCKY [inaudible] OF WE WOULD HAVE. THAT IS THE MAIN. CONGREGATION THEN — THEN THERE WOULD BE OKAY AND PURGES AS FAR AS IF YOU RESIDE WITHIN THAT AREA THEY WOULD GOA. DO THEIR PRAYERS AND DO THEIR OF YOU KNOW FORM OF TRYING [inaudible] THEY COULD. DO IT IN BETWEEN SEVEN IN THE MORNING — TO TWELVE AND THEN. FROM — TWELVE TO FOUR WE HAVE — BASICALLY RESTING OUR FOR THE GOD. AS THE FROM — FOUR TO EIGHT OR SEVEN THIRTY DEPENDS ON THE WEATHER — USUALLY THE TEMPLE STAYS OPEN TO PUBLIC. AND PEOPLE WOULD COME IN AND DO THEIR ON INDIVIDUAL BASED ON THE INDIVIDUAL BASIS — HOW MANY DAYS A WEEK OF IS THAT- ACTUALLY — EIGHT TEMPLE IS OPEN SEVEN DAYS A WEEK THAT SAME TIME FRAME. OF WHICH ARE EXPECTED VOLUME ON DAYS OTHER THAN SATURDAY. SATURDAY AND SUNDAY BECAUSE USUALLY SUNDAY WOULD BE IT WOULD BE THAT WOULD BE MORE LIKE EVENING HOURS. BECAUSE MOSTLY E. L. CONGREGATION. WHOEVER ATTEND THE CONGREGATION THEIR BUSINESS — ORIENTED PEOPLE AND THEY USUALLY WORK MONDAY THROUGH SATURDAY. AND HAVE A LITTLE BIT TIME OR BREAK ON SUNDAY. SO THEY TOO COULD DEDICATED TO THE DOT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT. I JUST HAVE A QUESTION FOR COUNSEL ABOUT HIS OPINION ON WHAT THIS DOES SEEM TO BE A MASSIVE FACILITY — COMPARED TO WHAT THE COMMUNITY IS DEALING WITH A I MEAN WHAT SIZE IS SUFFICIENT TO NOT CURTAIL. THE RELIGIOUS ACTIVITY. I MEAN IS IS THE APPLICANT SAYING YOU’VE GOT TO BE THIS BIG IN ORDER TO PROMOTE. THEIR RELIGIOUS I’M GIVEN THE THE WAY THE METRO CODE IS SET UP AND I TRY TO ANSWER QUESTION THINK THIS IS THE WAY THE MENTOR KIND OF SET UP DEALS — NOT WITH YOU KNOW HOW MUCH SORT OF ENTRY WAY AND THAT KIND OF SPACE IS BUT HOW MUCH SEATING I. ANDAS I SAID BEFORE THIS IS YOU KNOW. TWICE AS BIG A PIECE OF PROPERTY IS REQUIRED FOR THE THERE THERE WILL BE ADDITIONAL FACILITY THERE I THINK THAT’S JUST THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE OF THEIR HOUSE OF WORSHIP. IS TO HAVE THAT ADDITIONAL YOU KNOW SORT OF GRAND ENTRY SPACE I WILL POINT OUT THAT PART OF WHAT THEY DID THAT THEY CAUSE THEM. TO HAVE THEIR PERMIT LAPSE IS TRY — TO BRING DOWN SOME OF THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING MOST OF THIS BUILDING IS ONLY GOING TO BE — TWENTY FOUR TWENTY FOUR FEET HIGH THERE THERE ARE SOME PARTS THAT ARE TALLER THAN THAT BUT FOR THE MOST PART THIS BUILDING IS. FRANKLY NO TALLER THAN AVERAGE TWO STORY HOUSE. OKAY ANYTHING ELSE. OKAY WILL — CLOSE BUT CARRY [inaudible] DISCUSSION. SO LET’S TAKE UP THE THE ISSUE OF PEOPLE WANTED TO THE FOR THE WEEK BOARD MEMBERS YOU FEEL COMFORTABLE THAT. THIS IS THE TIME. TO IF YOU’VE HEARD ENOUGH INFORMATION. TO YEAH I MEAN UP AT I THINK I COULD MAKE A DECISION. WHAT ARE PEOPLE’S THOUGHTS ABOUT THIS? MOST CONCERNED WITH THE THE SAFETY ISSUES AS I’M SURE EVERYONE ELSE’S BUT I DON’T KNO. WHAT TO DO? ABOUT THE FACT THAT HE WOULD LANE IS A TWO LANE ROAD WITH NO TURN LANE AND SHOULDER AND HOW DO THE EMERGENCY VEHICLES IF THERE IF THERE IS TRAFFIC I DON’T. IT SEEMS LIKE SOMETHING METRO HAS TO DEAL WITH NOT NECESSARILY THE TEMPLE FOR ME THAT OTHER GROUP MAYBE WE SHOULD. ASK HER NEW LEGAL COUNSEL — MISTER POLL FORTY THINKS ABOUT I MEAN HOW ARE DO YOU HAVE ANY ADVICE ON HOW WE SHOULD THINK ABOUT LIKE. YOUR LUPIN THE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM ACTION AND AS IT RELATES. TO TRAFFIC IN THIS TYPE OF THING I MEAN IS IT IS A COMPELLING ENOUGH IS IT NOT — HERE WHAT POINT IS IT TRIGGER A SAYING WAIT A MINUTE WE REALLY DO NEED TO GO RETHINK THIS FROM A SAFETY PERSPECTIVE. WHAT THANK? WHATEVER THE IS. BOTH IF THAT’S A CONCERN AND I THINK. YOU YOU YOU WOULD HAVE TO HAVE SOME TYPE OF ACTUAL TRAFFIC STUDY — I BELIEVE THE WAY THE LAW IS WRITTEN AS YOU YOU. YOU CAN’T BASE YOUR DECISIONS OFF OF THE OUTDOOR OR GENERAL FEARS THAT THAT TRAFFIC IS GOING TO BE A PROBLEM I THINK YOU HAVE TO SET UP IN A WAY. THAT YOU HAVE A STUDY THAT EXIT AND EXAMINING THE TOWN WITH THE CHURCHES WITH THE FACILITIES CAN BE USED MOST OFTEN. AND SEEING WHAT. OR HOW THAT RELATES — TO THE PROBLEMS THAT MIGHT COME COME FROM THE ADDITIONAL TRAFFI. IS A BURDEN ON THE APPLE CENTERS AROUND THE OPPOSITION IN THE RELIGIOUS CASE — DRUG TRAFFICKERS DEAD IN THE PREVIOUS — SAY. THE GOVERNMENT HAS A DEMONSTRATED ABILITY TO ENTER GOVERNMENT. I’M SORRY. SAY WAS LOOKING AT THE LAWN THIS THE COMPELLING GOVERNMENTAL INTEREST TO FIND. OTHER THAN APPROVAL IS JUST THAT THE GOVERNMENT RESPONSIBLE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT. SO WE WOULD NEED TO SEE SOMETHING TO JUSTIFY NOT GRANTED A SPECIAL EXCEPTION VIS A VIS THE FEDERAL AND STATE PROTECTIONS RELIGIOUS LAND USE IN THAT CONTEXT. AT THE END OF NOTE ALSO PUBLIC WORKS REVIEWS CONCISELY THESE QUESTIONS WITH REGARD TO THE MUNICIPAL UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROLS GUIDELINES WITH REGARD TO CHIEF TRAFFIC ENGINEER HAVING AN EYE ON THESE ISSUES. IN NO WAY DO WE SAY THAT — TO DIMINISH THE NEIGHBORHOOD CONCERN — TWO LANE ROAD I’VE WALKED THAT ROAD TRYING TO DECIDE IF IT’S OUT THERE IN THE PAST FOR SOME OF THESE CASES AND I WILL ABSOLUTELY CONFIRM FIRST AND ITS NARROW. IT’S NOT EASY TO GET AROUND OUT THERE BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY MISS CARBON EXITED CORRECTLY TO CITIES RESPONSIBILITY PRIMARILY THROUGH ITS PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY. TO MAKE AMENDMENTS TO THE ROAD CONDITIONS THE BROKE WITH THROW FRONTAGES THE CARTEL WHICH OR ANYTHING ELSE ASSOCIATED WITH THAT AT THAT LOCATION. AND I KNOW THIS — VERY TWO VERY ACTIVE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS I DO NOT DOUBT HAVE WORKED WITH THEIR COUNCIL MEMBERS TO THE YEARS AND WITH THEIR STATE REPRESENTATIVES TO TRY TO MAKE THE CHANGES NEEDED. THAT SAID. IT’S NOT A ZONING ISSUE ULTIMATELY AND SO NOT. TECHNICALLY PART OF I MEAN CERTAINLY SOMETHING TO GIVE CONSIDERATION TO BUT ULTIMATELY NOT SOMETHING THE BOARD ASTERS OFF. SO IF WE GRANT THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUEST THAT ALL. THE NORMAL PERMITTING PROCESS AND THAT’S WELL THERE THAT IS WHEN THEY WILL RUN INTO PUBLIC WORKS THAT’S CORRECT IT TO THE SAME EXTENT THAT THE BUILDING WOULD HAVE TO BE INSPECTED BY BUILDING INSPECTORS IN TRADES INSPECTORS IN THE FIRE MARSHALL’S INSPECTOR. SIMILARLY THE SITE PLAN WOULD HAVE TO BE REVIEWED APPROVED BY ALL THE REVIEWING AGENCIES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO METRO PUBLIC WORKS IN THE ENGINEERS WHO WORK WITH THEM. AND I GUESS AT THE SIZE OF THE BUILDING IS NOT SO I MEAN I KNOW THAT THE THE THE NEIGHBORS I AM I GUESS WHAT I’M HERE AND I’M HERE A LOT OF CONCERNS FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT. YOU KNOW WHAT I’M I’M I HAVE WITH OUR NEIGHBOR UNDERSTAND IT ACT AND I WAS US WITH THAT BUT IT ALSO. THEY SEEM TO BE THINGS THAT — A REALLY OUTSIDE OF OUR OUR PURVIEW I MEAN IF THE IF THE IF THE I MEAN IT’S A SPECIAL EXCEPTION AND WE’RE LOOKING AT THAT BUT I GUESS I’M NOT SURE HOW AND ON A RELIGIOUS — INSTITUTION — WE COULD BRING. COMPELLING SAFETY INTERESTS AND IN TERMS OF SIZE OTHER THAN ITS AS IT RELATES TO TRAFFIC. THE IMPORTANCE OF THEIR MISTER TAYLOR IN YOUR OWN PROBABLY THE RIGHT LINE OF ANALYSIS IS THE SIZE OF THE STRUCTURE IS REGULATED BY THE METRO ZONING CODE SEVENTEEN POINT TWELVE ALONG WITH OTHER ASPECTS OF THE BOOK REGULATIONS. SO THE SIZE OF THE STRUCTURE THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE THE SET BACKS ALL THOSE THINGS ARE ALREADY BEING GOVERNED. THEY HAVE NOT THEY THE APPELLANTS HAD NOT SOLVE VARIANCES FROM THOSE BALL GRADUATIONS WHICH MEANS THEY INTEND TO MEET OR EVEN EXCEED THE MINIMUMS ARE SET FOR THAT WAS THE TESTIMONY OF THEIR COUNSEL TO WAS THAT THEY WERE GONNA EXCEED THE THAT’S OUR STORAGE. OR THE ACREAGE REQUIRED FOR THAT SIDE THAT’S RIGHT AND AND COUNCIL SAID IT CORRECTLY THAT BOTH THE SIZE SIZE AND EVEN THE PARKING COUNTS ARE PINNED. TO THE NUMBER OF SEATS IN THE SANCTUARY — HOWEVER. SIZE OF THE STRUCTURE DOESN’T NECESSARILY FOLLOW THE SAME PATH WHICH IS GOVERNED BY THE BALL CRACKS WHICH IN THIS CASE I THINK I LOOKED AT THE DOUBLE CRAIG’S TABLE FOR THIS FOR NON RESIDENTIAL USE AND RESIDENTIALLY ZONED PROPERTY OF THIS SIZE — THE BALL CRAIG TOLD THE FAURIA RATIOS POINT. FOR A WHOLE LOT OF BUILDING IN A THREE PLUS ACRE LOT RIGHT. WELL AND AND AND IN THE TEMPLE DON’T HAVE THE SAME TYPE OF CONGREGATION OVER SANCTUARY TYP- AREA THAT THAT OTHER RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS DO AND BUT THEY ALSO DON’T HAVE THIS THE TYPE OF YEAH MASS GATHERINGS NOW IN THERE SOME EVENTS LIKE THAT BUT IT’S IT’S IT’S IT’S MORE AS IT WAS DESCRIBED IN. ROBERT. WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS? FOR HE WOULD HAVE A MOTION. I’VE MET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A SPECIAL EXCEPTION THAT WE GRANT THE REQUEST. MOTION BEEN MADE IS THERE A SECOND — I KNOW IT’S A SUBJECT TO THE RESTRICTIONS THAT WE PLACED IN OUR PRIOR OR BUT NO ACCESS TO RAVEN CORRECT OKAY WHEN WOULD ASSESS. MOTION’S BEEN MADE OF THEIR SECOND. OKAY MOTION TO ME PROPERLY SECONDED ANY DISCUSSION. SEEING NONE ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. AYE THOSE PASSES UNANIMOUSLY JOHN MICHAEL. THANK YOU MISTER CHAIRMAN NEXT CASE THE BOARD CONSIDERATIONS TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH SIX FIVE ZERO INVOLVING THE PROPERTY AT SIXTY THREE FIFTY THREE B. ONE B. AVENUE IN COUNCIL DISTRICT NUMBER. TWENTY RICKY SCOTT IS THE APPELLANT ON BEHALF OF THE OWNERSHIP GROUP OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN HERE ON THE ZONING MAP. THE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH YOUR SHOW- CONDITION THE PROPERTY AND SHOWS OUR SITE PLAN. THE REQUEST IS FOR A VARIANCE LOT SIZE REQUIREMENTS IN THIS THE R. EIGHT ZONING DISTRICT EIGHT OF COURSE MEANS EIGHT THOUSAND SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM LOT SIZE. THE REQUEST IS FOR APPROVAL OF THE SEVENTY SEVEN TEN PLUS SIZE AGAIN 700-070-010 SQUARE FEET. SUCH THAT THE R. A.’S OWN DISTRICT WOULD ALLOW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A SECOND RESIDENCE ON THE PROPERTY. THE PEOPLE THERE LEAVING PLEASE QUIETLY X.. THE BALANCE PRESENT IS ANYONE HERE IN OPPOSITION TO CASE NUMBER SIX FIVE ZERO PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND SO THAT I CAN SEE YOU SEEING NO OPPONENTS. THE APOLLO AT FIVE MINUTES TO MAKE THE DESIRED PRESENTATION JUST INTRODUCE YOURSELF BY NAME AND ADDRESS FIRST — RICKY SCOTT FORTY SEVEN OH FIVE ALABAMA AVENUE — AND I’M HERE WE JUST TO GIVE A LITTLE BACKGROUND AND LITTLE MORE — FRAME THIS A LITTLE MORE WE PURCHASED A SINGLE FAMILY LOT — THAT WAS ORIGINALLY PARCEL THIS. TO WIN THE ORIGINAL SUBDIVISION SOMETIME AGO. WAS PUT TOGETHER — REVISED TO QUIT QUIT CLAIM DEED IT BACK TO THE ORIGINAL SO YOU CAN SEE THERE THAT THE HOUSE SPANS OVER. TWO SEPARATE LOTS — IN WHEN WE CLICK QUIT CLAIM DEED DEEDED IT. BACK — THAT’S WHEN WE FOUND THAT ONE WAS SMALL AND THE ONE ADJACENT WAS LARGER SO. TOGETHER THESE TWO LOTS STILL REPRESENT — AND AS MORE. SIXTEEN HUNDRED AND I THINK SOME SORT OF 1-600-020-0402 SQUARE FEET. SO WELL OVER — TOGETHER WELL OVER THE EIGHT THOUSAND DOLLAR EIGHT THOUSAND SQUARE FOOT REQUIREMENT — WE WHEN WE FOUND THAT OUT WENT – TO MERRY CAROLINE — OR LOCAL COUNCILWOMAN AND HAD HER COMPLETE SUPPORTS HER RECOMMENDATIONS ARE WE TRYING. FIGURE OUT A WAY TO DO IT — TO GET TO GET TAKEN CARE OF ADMINISTRATIVELY — PLANNING WAS IN SUPPORT OF US MAYBE RELOCATING. THE LOT LINE — CHANGING THE ANGLE — INDOOR RE RELOCATING THEM BECAUSE WE HAD FOR THE FOR THE ZONING REQUIREMENTS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. I THINK FIFTIES REQUIREMENT WE HAVE SIXTY ON EACH OF THOSE TWO WHAT’S — WHAT WE FOUND — WHICH BROUGHT US HERE WAS THAT – IN DOING IN REPLY ADDING IN THE IN TRYING TO MOVE THAT LINE WE WOULD RUN INTO SOME ORDINANCE WHERE I DON’T KNOW THAT. PARTICULAR NUMBER HELP ALL JUDGE BUT WE’RE IN REPLANTING YOU LOSE DUPLEX ELIGIBILITY — AFTER NINETEEN EIGHTY FOUR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. NO SIR WE’RE HERE WITH — HER SUPPORT AND OBVIOUSLY WERE ONE OF THE NEIGHBORS BUT ARE ADJACENT NEIGHBORS — HATCHER’S — WE HAVE THEIR FULL SUPPORT AS WELL — IN HAVING MET WITH THEM AND AND SPEND TIME WITH BOTH OF SO THAT’S THAT’S OUR CASE. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT AS HE NOTED WE DO HAVE AN EMAIL FROM. CAROLINE ROBERTS THE COUNCIL A FROM THAT AREA AND WE HAVE ONE LETTER OF OPPOSITION FROM SOMEONE ALSO AS WELL. YOU KNOW THE YOU KNOW THE NEIGHBOR IN OPPOSITION. I DO NOT IT IS THE FIRST I’VE HEARD OF ANY OPPOSITION IT’S A MISS JANICE FOSTER I JUST DIDN’T KNOW IF YOU KNOW WHERE SHE MAY I HAVE I’M SORRY I HAVE NO NO IDE. SHE’S OKAY SIX THREE THREE COLUMBIA. SUSHI WORSE — SIX THREE FIVE THREE SO. I’M SORRY SIX SIX THREE THREE THREE THREE COLUMBIA. OKAY I’M NOT I’M I’M NOT EXACTLY SURE WHERE SHE WOULD BE I THINK. THEY’RE OPPOSITION WAS THE AGAINST THE DISEASE. BUT WE’RE NOT. THEY WERE OUT OF LINE FOR YOUR TERMINATION. WELL AS YOU CAN SEE THE SEVEN LOTS ON THIS ONE CITY BLOCK HAVE THREE OF THE SEVEN ALREADY HAVE DUPLEXES. I HAVE ONE OTHER OF THE SEVEN THAT IS — BY RIGHT ZONE FOR DO PUT WELL THEY’RE ALL. ZONE FOR DUPLEX — SO I THINK IT IS WELL WITHIN THE IT’S THAT IT ACTUALLY MAYBE FIFTY FIFTY AT THIS POINT AND COME. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT. A NEW GIRL CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. DISCUSSION WELL I MEAN THIS IS ONE OF THOSE CASES WHERE YOU KNOW THE THE ANGLE OF THE THE LIVE. BUT IT IS A COUPLE THINGS ONE IS IT’S AN OLD HOUSES ON TO WATCH BUT THERE’S NO LEGITIMATE BUILDING WATCHING. THAT’S WHAT PEOPLE ARE DOING THEY’RE JUST THEY’RE AND THEN THAT’S HOW THE CODE WRITTEN. AND SO THE ONE LINE THAT SNARE OF HIS — I THINK IT’S IT IS BECAUSE OF THE SHAPE OF THE STREET AND I THINK IT’S THE OVER THOSE CLOSE. TO ME THOSE LOTS THAT ARE WITHIN 5% — THE ISSUE OF THE OF THE MINIMUM BUT HAVE THAT DIAGONAL ISN’T IN AND OUT THEY WORK FOR THE ODD SHAPE WATCHED IT MIGHT — WARNER VARIANTS ON OTHER THOUGHT THEY COULD IS CLOSE ENOUGH THAT YOU HAVE A MOTION. YEAH I MEAN I’LL I WILL MOVE THAT. THEY BASED ON THE THE THE SHAPE OF THE LIFE AND THE THE ANGLE OF THE REAR PROPERTY LINE — WHICH CUSES THE LINE TO BE. SLIGHTLY LESS THAN EIGHT THOUSAND REQUIRED THAT THE THAT IS — WHAT SHAPE HARDSHIP THAT THAT WOULD WARRANT A VARIANCE — IN THIS CASE WHICHEVER — MOVED TO APPROVE. OKAY MOTION IS BEEN MADE IS OUR SECOND. MOTIONS IN MAINE IMPROPERLY SECOND AND AND I WILL NOTE THAT THE APPLICANT DID WORK WITH THE COUNCIL MEMBER WHO IS IN SUPPORT OF THE S. AND GOT IMMEDIATE NEIGHBOR SUPPORT. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION. SEEING NONE ALL THOSE IN FAVOR MOTION SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE — THOSE PASSES COME OUT THINKING. A LOCAL THREE MISTER CHAIRMAN NEXT CASE TO BE PRESENTED TO THE BOARD IS TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH SIX FIFTY SEVEN THIS OCCASION ALSO PROPERTY A SEVENTEEN FOURTEEN TWELVE AVENUE NORTH AGAIN CASE. SIX FIFTY SEVEN RIGO SHOWN HERE ON THE ZONING MAP IN OUR S. RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY R. S. FIVE ZONE PROPERTY ON TWELFTH AVENUE NORTH SHOWN HERE ON THE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS — ROBERT ROGERS IS THE APPELLANT AND OWNER OF THE PROPERTY THE REQUEST BEFORE THE BOARD IS FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE MULTIPLE CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH A DETACHED GARAGE IN THE R. S. FIVE ZONING DISTRICT MORE SPECIFICALLY A RETIRED — AND ATTACHED OR DETACHED RESIDENCE AS YOU KNOW RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY MEANS EXACTLY ONE RESIDENTIAL UNIT UNDER THE BASE ZONING CODE HOWEVER. ZONING CODE IN SEVENTEEN POINT SIXTEEN TALKS ABOUT ACCESSORY DWELLING STRUCTURES IN THIS CASE YOU WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO HAVE A DETACHED ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT BEGIN BECAUSE OF THE ATTACHED — WITHOUT MEETING — NUMBER IS VERY SPECIFIC CRITERIA BUT BECAUSE IT IS IN FACT ARE AS OWNING — HOWEVER THE NOTION OF WHAT WE CALL COLLOQUIALLY THE MOTHER IN LAW SUITE IS POTENTIALLY ALLOWABLE IF YOU MEET ALL THESE CONDITIONS OUTLINED CONDITIONS ONE THROUGH EIGHT UNDER SEVENTEEN SIXTEEN POINT TWO FIVE OF THE ONE THAT SEEMS TO BE IN PLAY HERE FROM MISTER ROGERS AND HIS APPEAL. IS THE REQUIREMENT NUMBER TWO THERE’S A FREE AND CLEAR ACCESS BETWEEN THE HOUSEKEEPING UNITS WITHOUT GOING OUTDOORS STATED ANOTHER WAY THE MOTHER IN LAW SUITE NEEDS TO BE PART OF THE MAIN HOUSE CONNECTED TO IN SOME WAY WITHOUT HAVING TO GO OUT DOORS TO GET TO IT. NATURALLY AND EXTERIOR OR DETACHED ACCESSORY DWELLING DOESN’T MEET THAT CRITERIA PLUS THE REQUEST FOR THE VARIANCE. IS THERE ANYONE HERE IN OPPOSITION THE CASE NUMBER. SIX FIFTY SEVEN OKAY THAT’S A PRETTY CONCISE OVERVIEW OF WHAT THE CASES IN TERMS OF STAFF AND ALSO IS THE BASIS FOR THE DENIAL AT THE STAFF LEVEL THE SETTING UP THE APPEAL FOR THE ROGERS TO COME IN TODAY. IF YOU WOULD PLEASE INTRODUCE YOURSELVES BY NAME ADDRESS AND YOU HAVE FIVE MINUTES TO MAKE THE DESIRED PRESENTATION — YES MY NAME IS ROBERT ROGERS I LIVE ON NOW 1-714-12 AVENUE NORTH. AND WHAT THIS IS A LITTLE BIT OF A HARDSHIP SITUATION — MY MOTHER IS COMING TO MOVE IN WITH ME BECAUSE OF HER ELEMENTS- KNEE SURGERIES AND ACCEPT OR UNFORTUNATELY HAVE THE SPACE ABOVE THE GARAGE IS — AN AREA THAT IS TWO FLOORS UP SO MY MOTHER IS MOVING INTO THE SPACE OF THE HOUSE. AND I’M KIND OF GIVING HER A LITTLE BIT OF HER OWN INDEPENDENCE AND I’M GONNA BE MOVING — IF I’M ABLE TO TO MOVE INTO THE SPACE ABOVE THE GARAGE WALL ACCOMMODATING MY MOTHER SHE NEEDS. WE’VE BEEN IN THIS WHAT IF YOU HAD IF THEY IF THEY IF THEY WERE ATTACHED TO ME IF YOU HAD A SOME KIND OF CONNECTION TO THE HOUSE AT ALL THEN. THEN WE WOULDN’T BE HERE SIR — AND THEN SO. THIS ISN’T BOUND TO YOU THIS IS YOUR YOUR YOUR PLANNING TO LIVE HERE — WE DON’T WORK. JOE WE DON’T HAVE THE ISSUES OF LIKE SUB DIVISION YOU KNOW THE HE HAD A DAY. TO TO TRY TO SELL ON BOTH I MEAN YOU CAN’T DO THAT THERE’S NO EACH. ONE OF THE OTHER CONDITIONS IS COMMON OWNERSHIP OF THE STRUCTURE OF THE RESIDENCES A COURSE NORMALLY THESE ARE ATTACHED WITH VERY OBVIOUS THAT YOU CAN’T DIVIDE OWNERSHIP OF THE INTERIOR OF MOTHER AND ALSO WE ARE KIND OF CONCEPT. THEY’D HAVE TO MEET ALL THE OTHER CONDITIONS BUT IT WOULD BE IN PLAY HERE LIKE YOU SAID MISTER TAYLOR. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT — IF THEY WERE TO SELL THE PROPERTY THIS DOESN’T TRANSFER TO THE NEW OWNER CORRECT. THE APPROVAL WOULD RUN WITH THE LAND ALL THE SAME CONDITIONS WOULD SUCH AS THIS HAS TO BE ACTUAL SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED FAMILY MEMBER THAT’S A REQUIREMENT. UNDER SEVENTEEN SIXTEEN TO FIFTY EIGHT JUST THE SAME THE SAME — SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS THE SINGLE METER — COMMON OWNERSHIP ALL OF THOSE CRIED IT’S THE SAME WAY BUT I BELIEVE THAT THE ON I BELIEVE THAT THE VARIANCE APPROVAL WOULD TRAVEL WITH THE LAND. SO YOU’RE YOU’RE SAYING THAT IF WE APPROVE THIS VARIANCE IT NATURALLY. THE COMES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FOR A FAMILY MEMBER YES LETTER THAT EXACT SECTION OF LAW FOR YOU. SEVENTEEN SIXTEEN TO FIFTY A. AS IN ADAM UNIT OUR ITEM NUMBER SIX THREE TO THE SECOND UNIT MUST BE OCCUPIED BY A FAMILY MEMBER DEFINED AS GRANDMOTHER GRANDFATHER MOTHER FATHER SISTER BROTHER SON DAUGHTER. MOTHER IN LAW FATHER IN ALL SISTER IN LAW BROTHER IN LAW SON IN LAW DAUGHTER IN LAW AND FOR UNCLE SORRY COUSINS [inaudible] THE AND ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT. MMHM MMHM CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING [inaudible] DISCUSSION [inaudible] OUR GRANT THE VARIANCE — AS TO THE CONDITION FOR THE DETACHED GARAGE BASED ON THE HARDSHIP THAT WAS DISCUSSED. IN THE TESTIMONY OF THAT. TOO WHICH IS WHAT MADE AS THEIR SECOND. ALSO THE COMMISSION’S THE NAME PROPERLY SECONDED INDISCRETION THING NONE ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE — POST. PASSES UNANIMOUSLY GOOD LUCK THANK YOU THANK YOU. JOHN MICHAEL TO TRIM IT LOOKS LIKE THE NEXT CASE THE BOARD CONSIDERATIONS TWENTY EIGHTEEN THERE SIX SIXTY FIVE THIS INVOLVES A PROPERTY AT SEVEN TWO ONE GROSS PARK ROAD. IN COUNCIL DISTRICT NUMBER SIX I BELIEVE YOU HAVE — CORRESPONDED TO THE DISTRICT COUNCIL MEMBER WITH REGARD TO HIS PROJECT STEPHANIE SHIP IS THE APPELLANT DANIEL SEVEN SHIPS OWNERS THAT SUBJECT PROPERTY. REQUESTS FOR TWO VARIANCES FIRST FROM SIDEWALK REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN THERE ON THE ZONING MAP HERE ON THE AERIAL AND FROM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS IN THE R. SIX ZONING DISTRICT. ALSO HAPPENS TO BE IN A CONTEXTUAL OVERLAY DISTRICT THE ZONING BUGABOO FOR MUCH OF THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED GIVE SOME AT INDICATION OF THE INTENDED LAY OUT OF THE RESIDENTIAL STRUCTUR. THE RECENT SITE VISIT SHOWS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY THE VIEW ACROSS THE STREET. THEN THE VIEWS AT THIS CORNER LOT YOU ALREADY HAVE RECOMMENDATIONS IN YOUR CASE FILE FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH REGARD TO THE RECOMMENDATION SPECIFICALLY ON THE SIDEWALK VARIANCE. YOU’VE HEARD FROM THE DISTRICT COUNCIL MEMBER WITH REGARD TO THE SETBACK VARIANCE REQUEST AS WELL AS HIS THOUGHTS ON THE SIDEWALK. IS ANYONE HERE IN OPPOSITION THE CASE NUMBER. SIX SIXTY FIVE SING ON THE BILLS WHAT FIVE MINUTES TO MAKE THE DESIRED PRESENTATION PLEASE INTRODUCE YOURSELVES BY NAME AND ADDRESS. AND STEPHANIE SHIP — LIVE. OUT [inaudible] HELLO [inaudible] OKAY. HI STEPHANIE SHIP AT I LIVE AT SEVEN TWENTY ONE GROWS PARK ROA- WE’RE REQUESTING A VARIANCE FROM THE REAR SETBACK — AND ALSO THE SIDEWALK WERE AND REQUESTING A SIDEWALK VARIANTS AS WELL. WE DID RECEIVE THE RECOMMENDATION FROM PLANNING WHICH WE REQUESTED TO GO AHEAD AND BE HEARD HERE WE ARE GOING TO BE HERE ANYWAY FOR THAT AND FOR THE SET BACK AND I GUESS. OUR ISSUE WITH THE SIDEWALK IS THAT WE’RE ON A CORNER LIES A WE’RE ALREADY — YOU KNOW WHAT THE RECOMMENDATION WAS THAT WE PAY THE IN LIEU OF FEE FOR IT THE TOMAN LINE SIDE ONLY — WE’RE BUILDING THIS THIS OPTION IN NASHVILLE RIGHT NOW OUR CURRENT HOUSE IS LITERALLY FALLING APART ON THE INSIDE — AND SO WHAT WE’RE AT BECAUSE THERE’S BEEN SO MUCH NEW CONSTRUCTION IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD WE’RE KIND OF CONCERNED ABOUT. CONSTRUCTING A SIDEWALK — AND THAT THERE IT WON’T GO ANYWHERE BECAUSE AL THESE NEW HOUSES HAVE BEEN BUILT WITHOUT THE SIDEWALKS AND SO. YOU KNOW WHERE WHERE WILL OURS GO WELL I JUST END. THAT’S KIND OF WHERE WE WE STAND ON THAT AS FAR AS THE SET BACK IS CONCERNED ARE LIGHT IS SHAPED A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT — AND WE ARE WE WE HAVE A PLATTED NEIGHBORHOOD AS WELL WHICH REQUIRES THIRTY FOOT SETBACKS FOR ON BOTH STREETS WHICH KIND OF PUSHES US INTO THIS LITTLE BACK CORNER — DOES SET THE OUR PLAN RIGHT NOW ONLY GOES BACK INTO THAT REAR TWENTY FOOT SET BACK BY — AROUND SIX FEET AND IT’S NOT EVEN CONSISTENT ALL THE WAY BECAUSE OUR HOUSE WILL KIND OF BE DIAGONAL AGAINST THAT REAR SETBACK FOR THE REAR PROPERTY LINE SO THAT. THAT’S KIND OF WHERE WE STAND RIGHT NOW. ANY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT [inaudible] YEAH. I HAVEN’T LOCATED WITH THE SOUTHWARK. WELL IT WOULD SET BACK REQUESTING I KNOW IT’S THERE. IT’S THE REAR SETBACK — IT’S SHOULD BE TWENTY FEET FROM THE BACK OF OUR LOT — I DON’T KNOW ARE YOU CONFUSED ON WHICH ONE IS THE BACK SORRY NO NO AND WHAT ARE YOU REQUESTING AND THAT WE THAT WE ACTUALLY GO INTO THAT. WE’RE REQUESTING THAT WE GO INTO THAT SET BACK JUST A LITTLE BIT BY SIX FEET. OUR HOUSE WILL BE BUILT. WITHIN THAT SET BACK TO WHERE WE SHOULD BE SET BACK TWENTY FEET. VERSION OF ACTING A FOURTEEN FOOT SET BACK. WE DO HAVE. OUR NEIGHBORS OHIO STATE YOUR NAME IN THE JOBS ARE DANIEL SHIP SEVEN TWENTY ONE GRAMS PARKER — OUR NEIGHBORS BEHIND US ARE FOR IT AS WELL — WE HAVE A LETTER FROM YOUR COUNTY ACTIONS MAN OUR NEIGHBOR ACCOUNTS AND WE DO ALSO HAVE A OUR NEIGHBOR FROM ACROSS THE STREET AS OPPOSED TO THE SIDEWALK AS WELL. HE’S HERE TODAY WITH US. OKAY VERY GOOD — ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. OKAY CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING DISCUSSION. WELL THAT AND I DON’T REALLY HAVE AN ISSUE WITH THE THE SET THE SET BACK IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION — ACTUALLY SAID THEY UNANIMOUSLY SUPPORTED THIS. APPROVING A SETBACK IN. APPROVING THE SUBTLE VARIANTS WITHOUT PAYING THE COUNCIL MEMBERS SAID THE PAPER — FOR FOR THE I GUESS THE PLANNING PAY ON A PAY ONLY ON ONE SIDE WHICH IS SO WHEN I THINK IT’S THE SHORTEST. BUT YOU KNOW THIS IS A CASE WHERE. YOU KNOW YOU’VE GOT THIS [inaudible] ENGINEERING DRAINAGE DITCH. CHALLENGE WERE THEY ACTUALLY YOU KNOW IF WE SAY YOU HAVE. WORSENING THAT IT SAYS PROBABLY CHEAPER TO PAY INTO THE FUND THE BILL THE SIDEWALK BECAUSE OF THE LOGISTICS BUT IF THEY ACTUALLY DO CHOSE — TO BUILD THE SIDEWALK IT PROBABLY IS A LESS SAFE — SOLUTION FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THEN THAT’S I THINK ONE OF THE DILEMMAS AT THIS SIDEWALK BILL CREATURE NEIGHBORHOODS LIKE THIS SO. YOU HAVE A MOTION [inaudible] WELL. I MEAN MY MOTION WOULD PROBABLY BE THE BEST THE VARIANCE AND A YOU WAIVE THE FEE BUT AT THE END DON’T KNOW THAT THAT’S WHAT. WILL WORK ON THAT ONE TOO CLEANING RECOMMENDATION. THE THE PLANNING IS THE IS THE THE SILENT FILM AND SO. I’M IN AND OUT I’LL LET SOMEBODY ELSE WORRY AND AND MANY THAT BECAUSE AT AND OTHERS WHAT WE THINK. I AGREE CAREFUL WITH THOSE ON THIS FORM THAT. THEY OUGHT TO GET THE CHOICE. TO BUILD ON UNTIL MANNER PAY INTO THE PHONE — I’M NOT OPPOSED TO THAT VARIANCE REQUEST AS TO THE SAT. WELL INTO ONE OF MY GO TO ONE OF MY QUESTIONS. I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE ALLOW GRANT A VARIANCE TO ALLOW — THE OWNER TO DECIDE WHETHER TO BUILD THE SIDE WALL FOR PAY INTO THE FUND AS UNTIL MEN AND THAT WE GRANT. THE VARIANCE FROM TWENTY FEET TO FOURTEEN EIGHT ON THE REAR SAT SETBACK BASED UPON THE SIZE OF THE LOT. IN THE THING AT THE VERY EDGE OF THE WITHOUT. YEAH ASIDE YES AND I GET — THE VARIANCES GRANT AS THE OTHER SIDE TO NEGRIL NET PAY GOOD. MOTIONS REMAINS OUR SECOND. AS I MENTIONED WOMEN PROPERLY SECONDED ANY DISCUSSION SEE NONE ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. THOSE PASSES UNANIMOUSLY GOOD LUCK YOU OKAY JOHN MICHAEL. MISTER CHAIRMAN AFTER A COUPLE OF OTHER THE FOR CASES IT LOOKS LIKE OUR NEXT CASE TO BE HEARD IS TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH. SIX EIGHTY ONE SCROLL UP TO THA. ONE TWENTY MCKAY IS THE APPELLANT ON BEHALF OF WILLIAM ARMS TO FELLOW. AT ALL OWNERS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IN TEN TWENTY SEVEN THIRTY FIRST AVENUE NORTH FOR A FEW MINUTES. THE REQUEST IS AN ITEM MAY APPEAL WHICH WILL ADDRESS JUST SHORTLY INVOLVING THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S DETERMINATION [inaudible] THE THERE. MISTER MISTER CHAIRMAN OR POLICIES I’VE SKIPPED OVER ONE CASE. SOME OUT OUR FIFTY FOUR CASE DOCKET I MADE A APOLOGIES. IF WE CAN GO BACK TO TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH [inaudible] SIX EIGHT ZERO THE TRIAL. THE THIRTY SIX INCH. AND MY PLEASE. REMEMBER THERE WITH. MY CONFUSION MISTER CHAIRMAN ALL APOLOGY SIX SAITO WAS PREVIOUSLY RECOMMENDED FOR CONSENT AGENDA BUT WAS PULLED OFF EARLIER IN THE DAY. CASE SIX A ZERO INVOLVES A VARIANCE REQUESTS FROM THE FRONT SETBACK REQUIREMENTS IN THE R. AS FIVE ZONING DISTRICTS OF WHO’S WHO’S HERE FOR SOME REASO. FREEZES THE ELLIS TEACHER IDEA. PROPERTY. BUT FOR THE PROPERTY ON SHARP AVENUES ACCOUNTS OF DISTRICT NUMBER FIVE AGAIN THE AS I UNDERSTAND THESE — SETBACK REQUIREMENT HERE’S THIRTY FEET FIVE INCHES YOU AND I WAS THIS FOR TWENTY OKAY WE WAIT TILL THE OPPOSITION. OKAY. THE AERIAL MAP HERE THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED GIVES AN INDICATION THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WITH THAT REDUCE SET BACK. THE RECENT SITE AS IT SHOWS THESE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY BECAUSE THERE’S OPPOSITION PRESENT IN THE CALL AT TEN MINUTES MAKE THE DESIRED PRESENTATION PLEASE INTRODUCE YOURSELF MY NAME AND ADDRESS. OKAY THANK YOU AND A AND WALTERS A BOWL OF ART — HERE REPRESENTING — WITH ME — IS STEVE ASIDE FROM PRISON PROPERTIES — WILL BE BRIEF — THIS WAS ON CONSENT AS MENTIONE- JUST TO CLARIFICATIONS ON THE DESCRIPTION — THIS IS ACTUALLY OUR AND TWENTY ZONE PROPERTY IT SAYS R. S. — FIVE IN THE IN THE LANGUAGE THERE BUT IT IS — NORM TWENTY AND WE ARE. ACTUALLY LOOKING TO DO ATTACHED- WOULD BE CONSIDERED — TOUCH TOWN HOMES WHICH REALLY CROSS WAS MULTI CATION — AS MENTIONED THIS IS ON CONSENT SO WE’RE HAPPY TO DO FOR THE REST OF OUR AND WE ALSO HAVE GILSON SCOTT DAVIS — YEAH THIS IS HIS DISTRICT YOU BEEN SITTING HERE FOR HOURS KNOW YOU WANT TO WEIGH IN ON YOUR NEIGHBOR HERE. ONE AND SHE TELLS OF THE HARDSHIPS ARE. ZERO ONE COME FORTH. BUT WHILE WE’RE WAITING ON SOLDIER OF FORTUNE SURE AND IT’S ALL IN THE BACK IT IS UNIQUELY SAY PROPERTY — A GOOD PORTION OF THE PROPERTY IS — ENCUMBERED BY THE STREAM SET BACK — AND SO — WE ARE. WE ARE LIMITED TO HOW MUCH DENTAL RECORDS PARTLY BY THAT — BUT BUT IF WHAT WE’RE DOING IS FALLS INTO THE EXISTING ARM TWENTY ZONING TO THE REZONING EFFORT OR ANYTHING YOU JUST. THAT THIS IS JUST ON THE FRONT SET BACK. HAS BEEN. CONFIRMED DAVIS. HELLO EVERYONE DONE OKAY — ANYTHING ELSE. OTHERS FOR A TIME HIS RESPONSE WE WE WE’VE BEEN TRYING. TO CONTACT THEY WERE TALKING IN THE BACK BUT THEY WANT TO BE CIVIL OKAY. LET’S HEAR FROM OUR POSITION PLEASE COME FORWARD FIX YOUR NAME ADDRESS WHY. HI MY NAME IS ADAM GROVER I LIVE AT EIGHT SEVEN ZERO SHARP AVENUE WHICH IS THE LAW ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE PRETTY MUCH RIGHT NEXT DOOR. TO WHERE THIS DEVELOPMENT IS PLANNED — IT JUST SEEMS LIKE THAT THIS WA- IT’S KIND OF THE VARIANCE WAS SET AS BEING A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE BUT IT CLEARLY LOOKS LIKE. THAT THIS VARIANCE IS AN ATTEMPT TO YOU CAN JUST ADD IN A BUNCH OF EXTRA UNITS — ONTO THIS LAW THAT IS ALREADY. KIND OF SMALL IF YOU WILL — AT THE END OF THIS BLOG IS REALLY NOT A LOT OF TRAFFIC AND I THINK THAT YOU KNOW ADDING ALL THESE OTHER TOWN HOMES AT THE END OF THE LINE IS GONNA. BECAUSE A LOT OF OTHER TRAFFIC IN KIND OF OFFSET THE WHOLE YOU KNOW ARCHITECTURE THE NEIGHBORHOOD — AS EVERYTHING ELSE IS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN THIS IS GOING TO ADD FIVE TOWN HOMES — TOWARDS THE END OF THE STREET [inaudible] SO [inaudible] YEAH — I AM THE LOCKER ROOM LITERALLY NEXT DOOR ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STERLING PICTURE AT ALL IN ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET OR THE CROSSES THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET THAT LITTLE SQUARE TO THE RIGHT OF THAT. SHEAR THE IMMEDIATE NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR YES [inaudible] RIGHT THERE. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE OPPOSITIO. AND YOUR HOUSES THIRTY FEET FROM THE STREET AND THEY’RE WANTING TO BUILD THAT THEY’RE GOING TO HAVE OUR DRIVEWAY I GUESS BETWEEN YOU AND THE NEXT HOUSE BUT IT LOOKS LIKE THEY’RE GOING TO BUILD [inaudible] TWENTY THREE FROM THE STREET. SO THEY WOULD BE TO BE CLOSER TO YOU I KNOW WE’RE NOT HERE TO TALK ABOUT WHETHER THEY CAN BILL SIX OR NOT BECAUSE A THE IT WE’RE JUST HERE TO SAY HOW CLOSE COULD THIS THAT ALL THEY’RE ASKING FOR US TO DO THIS. IS GIVEN PERMISSION TO BE CLOSER TO THE STREET THAN [inaudible] YEAH THAN. THE THIRTY REQUIRED. SO I MEAN I CAN WE CAN SAY HEY YOU CAN ONLY BUILD FOR OR WHATEVER I MEAN WE SURE THAT’S ALREADY EVERY THIRTY FEET OR YEAH HE CAN BE [inaudible] TWENTY SO. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF THE OPPOSITION [inaudible] OUR THANK YOU WITH YOUR FOR ME I’M GOING TO GIVE. DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE — FOR THANKS. OKAY THIS IS REBUTTAL RESPOND TO IT HE SAID OKAY. SURE AND ONE THING I WAS MENTIONING TO THE MANSION FOR ITS IN THE PACKET BUT THERE’S A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE MAKING — JUST TO EXTEND THE ROW WHICH YOU CAN SEE THERE WE ALSO HAVE TO EXTEND A NEW COLD — SO THERE’S SOME THERE’S A METRO CREW MINSITER INVOLVED IN ADDITION TO A WATER LINE EXTENSIONS IT’S EXISTING EXTENDED A PARCEL SIMPLY OR A ONE INCH SERVICE LINES WERE AN UPSIZED AT TWO SIX INCH MAIN — SO THERE’S THERE’S A SIGNIFICANT INVESTMENT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS – TO KIND OF COMPLETE THIS BLOG — FOR FELT LIKE THAT WAS A FAIR. TRADE OFFICE POSE FOR OUR FOR OUR SMALL REQUEST FOR A LANDSCAPING DO WHAT YOU HAVE OR YOU HAVE ANY LANDSCAPING ON THE PROPERTY LINE THERE ARE REQUIRED BY OFFERS — THAT YOU’RE SHOWING THEIR ON SITE PLAN — AND HAVE TWO GROWN MEN THIS LISTED AS A BUFFER ON THE SITE PLAN I SEE RIGHT OF WAY ACTUALLY WORKS. WELL THERE’S A REQUIRED. YEAH THERE’S REQUIRED STORMWATER BUFFER ON ON THE CHANNEL ITSELF. IT WHAT IT IS IS DRAINAGE FEATURES AT SOME OF THE STORY THERE INTO WHAT WHETHER CONVEYANCE IS NOT IS NOT DEFINED TO STREAM BUT WE ARE. WE ARE LOOKING AT DOING A BUFFE. FORMAT IS BASED ON MEASURES MAPS FOR A DRAINAGE BASIN SIZE. THERE IS A DRAINAGE FEATURE PARTY THIS ON THIS SITE PLAN YES ARE ALREADY THERE. YES THERE’S AN EXISTING CONVENTION. SO THERE’S ALREADY A DITCH AND SO. SHOWS THE FIVE FOOT BUFFER ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE DITCH IS WHAT YOU’RE [inaudible] PROPOSING. IS THERE GOING TO BE ANY FENCING [inaudible] THERE’S A THERE’S A FIVE FOOT BUFFER FROM THE TOP OF THE BANK. THAT WE’RE KEEPING. WHAT ARE YOUR SOURCES ARE? AND WE’RE NOT WE WE DON’T INTEND TO DO ANY IMPROVEMENTS FROM THAT BUFFER POINT. TO THE EAST. IN THE EAST JUST ORDER NATO TOWARDS THE NEIGHBOR CORRECT. AND SO IS THERE ANY FINANCING ARE YOU GOING TO PUT UP A FENCE SIR — WE HAVEN’T GOTTEN TO THE POINT OF DETAIL IN AT ONCE A PRICING IF THERE IS A SMALL DECORATIVE FAN. SOME KIND BUT IT WOULD BE IT WOULD PROBABLY NOT BE ANYTHING THAT’S BUT I WOULD I WOULD I WOULD I MEAN I THINK THAT I MEA. IS THAT WHERE THE NEIGHBOR SPOKE TO TO DENSITY AND AND AND WE HAVE I GUESS SOME. WE HAVE OUR OUR DECISION TO SOME IMPACT ON THE DENSITY IN THE SENSE THAT YOU KNOW WE GIVE YOU IF WE PUSH IT FURTHER MAY OR MAY NOT MAKE IT POSSIBLE FOR YOU. TO TO MAKE IT AS DESPERATE IT IT MAY OR MAY NOT I MEAN THAT’S NOT THAT’S MESSED UP I MEAN THAT’S NOT OUR DECISION — YOU YOU COULD SQUEEZE SIX UNITS IN THEIR PLATFORM TWENTY ALLOWS YOU. WITHOUT THE SETBACK BUT IT SEEMS LIKE THE THERE SHOULD YOU KNOW. YEAH AND AND I SHOULD SPEAK TO THIS TO THE THE THE THE SET BACK REALLY HELPS US ACTUALLY ACHIEVE A MORE MARKETABLE FOOTPRINT AND WE FEEL LIKE FOR THIS NEIGHBORHOOD WE COULD DO THE SIX UNITS WITH A SLIGHTLY SMALLER. YOU KNOW ENCOURAGEMENT — IF WE HAD TO GO TO A THIRTY FOOT YOU JUST DID WE WE FEEL LIKE THAT WOULD ACTUALLY BE A LITTLE BIT MORE OUT OF CHARACTER WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD — JUST FROM THE SIZE OF THE UNITS- AND SO YOU KNOW WE HAD IT OR YOU KNOW OR AS AS I WAS YOU KNOW JUST AGAIN THINKING AND IT’S NOT UP TO US NECESSARILY TO SOLVE ALL THE ISSUES BETWEEN. YOU’RE THE NEIGHBOR BUT IT SEEMS LIKE A LOT OF TIMES WE HAVE ISSUES LIKE THIS. YOU KNOW APPLICANTS AGREE TO PUT UP A YOU KNOW SURE RIGHT RIGHT FOOT FENCE DOWN THE PROPERTY LINE SO THAT IT IT’S A PRIVACY FENCE THAT — THE KIND OF HELPS HELPS [inaudible] YEAH THE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES — DO A LITTLE BIT BETTER MAYBE WITH THE MULTI FAMILY LOTS BUT I DON’T HAVE THE SAME THING BIASES OWNING BIASES MINDER. RIGHT — I THINK WE’RE CERTAINLY OPEN THAT DIALOGUE IT’S ACTUALLY PARTLY WHAT WE WERE WANTING TO TRY TO ATTEMPT TO DO AND AND AND SAVE US A LITTLE BIT OF TIME THIS AFTERNOON BUT YOU KNOW. AT THIS POINT WE HAVEN’T BEEN SUCCESSFUL IN. BEEN ABLE TO HAVE A DIALOGUE SO. LEAVING — STAFF GAP THAT MEANS YOU TRY TO HAVE A CONVERSATION OR DON’T HAVE. ONE ANYTHING ELSE THAT APPLICAN. A NEW. FEAR FROM COUNCILMAN SCOTT DAVIS AND MAYBE GET SHIPPED MORE LINE ON THANK YOU — MISTER TAYLOR THANK YOU READ MY MIND OVER THERE — YOU KNOW BECAUSE BY RIGHT THEY DO HAVE. THE THE NATIONALS ARE IN THERE TO BUILD THE UNIT. YOU KNOW OF COURSE I WANT THEM TO BUILD A BETTER LOOKING. YOU KNOW THEY CAN PUT SIX ON THERE AS A STAND I THINK. YOU KNOW BUT THIS WE BETTER DESIGN. ORIGINALLY I GOT CALLS AND SOME EMAILS FROM NEIGHBORS. BECAUSE THE FIRST THEY REFUSE BECAUSE THEY THOUGHT IT WAS OUR. FIVE A LOT BUT IT WAS NOT IRIS. FIVE ONE AFTER THAT NINE TO MANNY. AND WELL I WOULD ASK. YOU KNOW THAT YOU REQUIRE. BUILD A FENCE. YOU KNOW SO THAT HE KNOWS MIGHT YOU SAID BEFORE MAIN TIMES IN THESE NEIGHBORHOODS. YOU KNOW WHEN WE HAVE THIS SHOW AND THAT THEY HAVE A FRIEND SO THAT THE SO THAT THE NEIGHBOR CAN. HAVE SOME SENSE OF PRIVACY. YOU KNOW SO THAT YOU KNOW NOT EVERYBODY. GETS WHAT THEY WANT. BUT AT LEAST YOU KNOW THERE’S A SENSE OF PRIVACY BECAUSE AS YOU SAID BEFORE HE HAS A ZONING AND IF YOU GET IF YOU BUILD REGULAR. YOU KNOW WITHOUT THIS VARIANCE THAT. JUST TO BE FRANK WITH ME BECAUSE I’VE SEEN PEOPLE DO THIS BEFORE. AND YOU KNOW. IT’S IT’S IT’S WHAT’S WHAT’S WHAT’S GOING TO HAPPEN BUT BUT I WOULD LIKE THOUGH IS — FOR THE AFTER THE REQUIRED TO PROTECT THE NEIGHBOR. WITH THE PART OF A PRIVACY FENC. YOU KNOW ALONG THE BORDER OR HOWEVER CODES. FIGHTS YOU KNOW WERE NEEDS TO G. BUT I’M BESIDES THAT I’M IN SUPPORT [inaudible] AND OF OF THE DEVELOPMENT YOU KNOW ONCE MOSTLY NEIGHBORS SAW THAT IT WAS NOT OURS FIVE A LOT. YOU KNOW AND SOLVE THE STORM WATER AND ALL THE STUFF THE MITCHELLS REQUIRING FOR THAN THE FOOD. AND REPAIRS YOU KNOW SO WOULD YOU BE — AGREEABLE BILL SINCE. YES THAT WOULD BE FINE. WE CAN WE CAN GO THAT LONG OUT FRONT OF THE BUFFER PRODUCTS MOST ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM COUNSEL. CANOE SPORTS POKER [inaudible] GOSH. YEAH THAT WAS THE SIZE OF THE THEY WERE ABLE. TO HEY ONCE YOU’RE OUT OF THE FRONT SET BACK [inaudible] RIGHT [inaudible] YEAH [inaudible] OKAY. WELL YEAH I MEAN THAT IT. I THINK THAT THE THE DENSITY IS NOT I MEAN THIS IS R. M.. SIX AS RIGHT THE BUILDERS — BECAUSE IT’S ON THE DATA BY THE ROVER TRACKS — DO YOU HAVE ONE NEIGHBOR THAT THERE ARE TIMES I MEAN I’M WILLING — TO ENTERTAIN A SET BACK. ALTHOUGH I DO THINK THAT A REQUIREMENT WOULD HAVE TO BE. YOU KNOW AND A PHONE OPAQUE FENCE — WOODEN FENCE — RUNNING FROM WHERE THE THE LINK TO THE PROPERTY LINE — FROM — I WOULD SAY FIFTEEN FEET SET BACK AT LEAST — BY. IN A WAY THAT THAT’S REALLY THE THE LINK TO THE PROPERTY UNLESS I MEAN I THINK YOU CAN DO IT TEN FEET BACK BUT ARE YOU. WHAT DO YOU ALL THINK ABOUT WHERE YOU? I LIKE WHAT YOU’RE ALL DOING BUT I DIDN’T SEE THE HARDSHIPS OF THAT MAKE A MOTION AND MOTION. WELL I MEAN THAT THAT THE I MEAN THE I MEAN I THOUGHT I DO THINK IT IS A IT IS A STRANGE SHAPE [inaudible] WHY? AND I GUESS THE QUESTION. IS — STRANGE SHAPE WATCH WHERE YOU’R. YOU KNOW HE’S NOT ASKING FOR A VARIANCE IN TERMS OF HOW MANY OF YOU CAN ALLOW OWNERS ARE IN TWENTY FOOT JUST GO AROUND MAKE THE MOTION RELATE TO THE PHONE YEAH JOE THOUGH THEY SHOWED. ME THAT IS IT’S IT’S JUST AN ODD SHAPED WHITE — SO IT’S A BASED ON THE THE ODD SHAPE. OF THE WHY — I’LL MOVE THAT WE APPROVE THE THE TWENTY FIRST — SETBACK VARIANCE WITH THE CONDITION THAT THE APPLICANT — CONSTRUCT A WOODEN FENCE EIGHT FOOT TALL — IS IT OKAY. YEAH OPAQUE BUT I DO THINK THAT YOU KNOW I DO THINK THIS WOODEN AND NOT AT THE END OF THE CHAIN LINK THAT HAS THE STUFF IN IT OKAY. AND AND THAT THAT FIT FENCE — BE AT LEAST — FIFTEEN YEAR DID WITH IT — FIFTY FEET FROM THE ROAD ARE FROM THE SET BACK — SO THAT IS IT ITS PROFIT IN FRONT OF THE LINE OF HIS — BUILDING CITIES OKAY WISHES FOR MADE IT THEIR SECOND. OCEANS BEEN MADE IN PROPERLY SECONDED ANY DISCUSSION. NONE ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. I SUPPOSE. ROOM. THREE TO TWO WHAT HAPPENS WITH THREE TWO JOHN MICHAEL BERGEN ENTERTAIN A MOTION IF THEY WISH IF THEY DO NOT WISH THAN THE CASE STAYS OPEN ON THE BOARD STOCKING UP ON THE BOARD SO WE WILL INTERNET [inaudible] DECEMBER TWENTIETH. WE DON’T RENT. BILL WITHOUT THE BEER AND SO WE DON’T CAN’T PRINT THE VARIANCE PEONS TO BUILD AND THE NEIGHBOR DOESN’T GET A FAN’S MIND UP THAT RIGHT. WELL THAT’S THAT IS TRUE BUT THEN HE ALSO GETS A SET BACK AT THE LINE OF HIS HOME WHICH IS. WHAT HE MADE HER FIRST SO THAT [inaudible] YEAH. ANY OTHER MOTIONS OR SHOULD WE MOVE ON TO THE NEXT CASE. LET’S LET THE OTHERS HAVE SOME FUN AND DECIDE. OKAY HER A MISSING BOARD MEMBERS A MINUTE AND I WHO’S TO JOHN MICHAEL TELLS WHAT HAPPENS NOW.& IF THERE’S NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN BY THE BOARD IN THIS CASE STAYS ON THE BOARD STOCK IT’LL BE HEARD AGAIN ON DECEMBER THE TWENTIETH. AND ANY BOARD MEMBERS WHO WERE NOT PRESENT TODAY HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THIS CASE- THEM PARTICIPATE IN THE VOTE ON THE NEED NOT BE ANOTHER PUBLIC HEARING ON THE SUBJECT UNLESS FOR SOME REASON THE BOARD — CHOOSES TO REOPEN IT BUT THE BOARD BUT WILL TAKE PLACE ON THE TWENTIETH. MIXED CASE. MISTER CHAIRMAN THE NEXT CASES TWENTY EIGHTEEN THERE SIX EIGHTY ONE OF ALL THE PROPERTY AT TEN TWENTY SEVEN THIRTY FIRST AVENUE NORTH SORRY FOR THE FALSE START EARLIER FOLKS. TO MCKAY’S THE APPELLANT ON BEHALF OF WILLIAM ARMSTEAD BELOW THE THIRD AND OTHERS OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY AT THIS LOCATION. REQUEST BEFORE THE BOARD IS AN ITEM MAY APPEAL MEANS A CHALLENGE TO THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR CONCERNING SANSA TERMINATION. THAT THIS IS NOT A LEGALLY NONCONFORMING TRI PLEX PROPERTY IN THIS IN OUR S. FIVE ZONING DISTRICT. THAT IS ALWAYS THE CASE WITH TRADITIONAL I TO MAKE CASES STAFF PRESENCE — BASIC OVERVIEW OF WHAT THEIR DETERMINATION WAS AND GIVES THE APPEAL OF THE OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE THEIR CASE PRESENTATION IS THERE ANYONE HERE IN OPPOSITION THE CASE NUMBER. SIX EIGHTY ONE SCENE ON THE ACCOUNTS WILL HAVE FIVE MINUTES AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME HERE’S THE OVERVIEW MISTER CHAIRMAN. THE REQUEST IS BASICALLY TO GET TO AN END RESULT THAT ALLOWS A TRI PLEX USE AT THIS ADDRESS — I DO NOT DOUBT THAT THERE IS A TRI PLEX USE PRESENT HOWEVER THE ANALYSIS THAT WE HAVE TO GO THROUGH LEGALLY SPEAKING. AT THE ZONING LEVEL IS IS A LEGALLY NONCONFORMING TRI PLEX AS YOU SEE YOU IN OUR S. FIVE ZONING DISTRICT. ZONING RESTRICTIONS TO ONE RESIDENTIAL USE HOWEVER THAT’S ONLY BEEN IN PLACE SINCE TWO THOUSAND SIX FROM NINETEEN SEVENTY FOUR FORWARD THAT WAS IN OUR ZONING DISTRICT ALONG ONE OR TWO FAMILIES. SO WHAT WE DO IN EVERY IN — OR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICANTS AS THE CASE MAY BE SAY BRING US ANY US RECORDS BRING US OTHER UTILITY RECORDS BRING US RENTAL RECORDS BRING US. ANYTHING YOU CAN THAT SHOWS NUMBER ONE THAT THERE WAS IN FACT A TRI PLEX USE — VERY HELPFULLY THE APPELLANT SUBMITTED PHOTOGRAPHS THAT SEEM TO DEMONSTRATE THREE DISTINCT KITCHENS THREE DISTINCT LIVING AREAS — AND ANY OTHER DOCUMENTATION YOU CAN OUR STAFF OF THESE IN THE EXAMINER LEVEL. REVIEW THE ANY S. RECORDS THAT WERE SUBMITTED FOR THOSE IN THE S. RECORDS DID NOT DEMONSTRATE CONCLUSIVE. CONTINUITY OF TRI PLEX USE FROM PRE NINETEEN SEVENTY FOUR FORWARD SEVENTY FOUR BEING NOTEWORTHY BECAUSE IT WAS ON FOR TWO FAMILY USE IN SEVENTY FOUR NOT. THREE AND APPARENTLY FROM OUR RESEARCH THE HOUSE WAS CONSTRUCTED IN NINETEEN SEVENTY FOUR SO WE’RE ALWAYS LOOKING FOR SOMETHING THAT WILL GET HIM TO THE THREE WE FOUND NOTHING TO THAT EFECT IN TERMS OF THE RESEARCH THAT’S BEEN DONE. BOTH BY THE APPELLANTS AND BY US WE MAY BE ABLE TO GET THEM TO TO AS A LEGALLY NONCONFORMING USE IF IN FACT THE DOCUMENTS TELL THAT STORY IN TERMS OF A CONTINUATION OF OF DUPLEX USE AT LEAST OUT OF LEGALLY NON ILLEGALLY BUT LEGALLY NONCONFORMING NATURE. FROM PRE TWO THOUSAND SIX TO PRESENT DAY BUT AGAIN MORE DOCUMENTATION MIGHT TELL THAT STORY. BUT OUR REVIEW SHOWED NO DOCUMENTATION SUPPORTING A LEGALLY NONCONFORMING TRI PLEX USE — WE AND THIS IS OF NO FAULT FOLKS LOTS OF PEOPLE BUY PROPERTIES AND SAY HEY IT’S A TRI PLEX USE THAT’S A GREAT BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY FOR IN HERE AND THAT OR WHATEVER THE CASE MAY BE. BUT IT DOESN’T MEAN IT WAS A LEGALLY. NONCONFORMING TRI PLEX SO YOUR COUPLE QUESTIONS BEFORE CONTINUES UNTIL NINETEEN SEVENTY FOUR THEY COULD BUILD THREE WE DON’T KNOW THAT FOR SURE BUT AS I DON’T HAVE ANY RECORDS FROM. WE DON’T KNOW WHAT IT WAS BUT BUT WE KNOW AT LEAST AND TEETH AND SEVENTY FOUR FROM SEVENTY FOUR TO TWO THOUSAND SIX TICKET THEY COULD BUILD TO CORRECT. AND IN TWO THOUSAND SIX I COULD ONLY BILL ONE AND THAT’S THE CURRENT ZONING. THAT’S THE CURRENT AND CORRECT AND THEN — AND SO. YOUR RECORD SURE THE HOUSE WAS BUILT IN SEVENTY FOUR AT THE TIME THAT’S THE BEST INFORMATION WE HAVE YES OKAY ONE OTHER NOTE IT’S PERMANENT HERE THERE WERE PERMITS APPLIED FOR AND OBTAINED IN NINETY FOUR NINETY FIVE IN SOME SORT OF RENOVATION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. INDICATING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE EXCESS RESTRUCTURE — SOMEWHAT ■SENIOR ON THE AERIAL SEE MORE CLEARLY HERE WITH A POLY GONE ON THE ZONING MAP TO THE REAR OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ALONG THE ALLEY. THE APPLICATION FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT AND THE SUBSEQUENT APPLICATION FOR THE TRADES FOR MEDICALLY WAS THE ELECTRICAL BOTH STATED IN THE PERMIT SCOPE CODE. NOT TO BE USED FOR RESIDENTIAL USE OR COMMERCIAL USE SO IF ANY OF THE THREE RESIDENTIAL UNITS CONTEMPLATED HERE ARE IN THAT — REAR EXCESS RESTRUCTURE BASED IN IN VIOLATION OF THE PERMITS THAT WERE ISSUED TWENTY THREE YEARS AGO DURING THE CONSTRUCTION THAT LED TO THE CREATION OF THAT BUILDING. FURTHER EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATING NOT ONLY THAT WE DON’T HAVE ENOUGH TO SHOW THAT THERE IS A LEGAL TRI PLEX USE. BUT OVERTLY SHOWING THAT THERE IS SOMETHING OTHERTHAN PERMISSION TO HAVE TRI PLEX USE. BEST CASE SCENARIO THERE SOME RENTAL RECORD THERE’S SOME SOMETHING THAT SHOWS THAT SINCE NINETEEN SEVENTY FOUR THIS IS AT LEAST BE OUR BROTHERS SINCE PRE. TWO THOUSAND SIX THERE’S AT LEAST BEING CONSISTENT DUPLEX USE OF THIS PROPERTY NOT INCLUDING ANY DO ANY RESIDENTIAL USES AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE THAT WOULD DEMONSTRATE LEGALLY NONCONFORMING DUPLEX USE. AND SAFE TO RESIDENTIAL USES IN DISTRICT SHORT OF THAT — YOU CAN SEE HOW THE ZONING STAFF GOT TO THE DENIAL ND MY WE HELP THEM FATHER IDA MAE AND BRING THE QUESTION BEFORE THIS BOARD TODAY. THAT’S OUR OVERVIEW NATURALLY I’M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS WHETHER NOW OR LATER IN THE HEARING BUT ABSENT AT THE MOMENT HANDED OVER TO THE APPELLANT’S THEY CAN INTRODUCE THEMSELVES BY NAME AND ADDRESS. HI TONY MCKAY SIX TO SEVEN CREEK ROAD AND SEAN MCKENNA SIX OH FOUR CLAIBORNE COURT — SO THIS — THE BUILDING WAS CONSTRUCTED AS A A TRI PLEX I THINK BY THE LADY THAT LIVED IN THE FRONT. AND IT WAS MAINTAINED AS A TRI PLEX THROUGHOUT — ACCORDING TO THE FAMILY SHE GOT TIRED OF HAVING RENTER’S IN THE BACK SOMETIME IN THE MID TWO THOUSANDS. AND DIDN’T DIDN’T REALLY SURPRISE ME BACK OUT AND THEN ANY ESPECIALLY CAME IN AND TOOK THE METERS OFF — IT LIKE HE SAID IT DOES HAVE THREE DISTINCT HAS BOTH ALL UNITS HAVE A FRONT AND BACK DOOR THEY HAVE — ALL HAVE KITCHENS AND THE ACCESS FOR DRAWING I BELIEVE IS OUR OUR REAR DETACHED GARAGE. WITH A WHEN DID SHE GET STARTED YOU SAID YOU GET TIRED OF THE TWO THOUSAND THEY’RE RUNNING IT WHEN DID SHE JUST STOP RIGHT NOW HOW LONG SHE STOPS YOU LIVE IN THE FRONT AND ACCORDING TO HER FAMILY SHE HAD ENOUGH MONEY. DISH AND SHE DEFINITELY SHOULD OUT ANYMORE THE AUDITOR SHE DID NOT SHE SHE PASSED AWAY AND HER HEIRS THE ONES THAT THAT ONLY THAT I’VE. THAT GAVE US THIS INFORMATION BUT I THINK THEY THEY HAD RECORDS UP UNTIL TWO THOUSAND SIX AND ONE OF THE UNITS — YEP AND WE THERE’S QUITE A BIT OF PARKINS POINT SPOTS THERE — THERE’S SPOTS IN THE FRONT IT’S A TOTAL OF FIVE DIFFERENT SPOTS THROUGHOUT THE LIVE — JUST ADD THAT IN THERE — THERE’S THREE SEPARATE VERY DISTINCT SEPARATE METERS WHICH OF COURSE I PULL TO A MALL BUT THAT IS INTACT — JUST ADD AS WELL WE WERE ON A TALK TO ALL THE NEIGHBORS — FOR AS MANY AS ONE HOME NOT EVERYBODY ONE WAS THERE — FORGETS INJURES EVERYBODY’S IN SUPPORT TO PEOPLE RIGHT NEXT DOOR SAID HE ACKNOWLEDGED THE FACT OF THE LEGAL CHECK WHAT THE IT ALWAYS BEEN A TRI PLEX AND THAT HE HE’S HIS WIFE’S FAMILY OWNED THE PROPERTY NEXT DOOR HE INHERITED THAT. AND HE SAID THAT AS LONG AS HE KNEW IT ALWAYS BEEN — I’M NOT SURE HIS TOTAL TIME THERE I KNOW THE FAMILY HAS HAD IT FOR OVER TWENTY YEARS I BELIEVE. THE PERSON YOU TALK. TO YES YES SIR OKAY. WELL WITH THE TESTIMONY THAT WAS IT. IT WENT FOR SEVERAL YEARS IN FACT. THE MID TWO THOUSANDS UNTIL. MINUTES SOUNDS LIKE IT WENT FOR OVER TEN YEARS WITHOUT. BEING RENTED IS A MULTI FAMILY [inaudible] UNIT. AND SO TO ME I’M NOT SURE. WAVE THAT NOT. I MEAN I THINK THIRTY MUCH IS THE MOST YOU CAN HAVE. BAKE IN A NON CONFORMING UNIT BEFORE IT GOES BACK. DID MISTER TAYLOR YOU HIT IT RIGHT ON THE HEAD UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SEVENTEEN POINT FORTY POINT SIX FIFTY SUBSECTION SEE LEGALLY NONCONFORMING USES. ANY INTERRUPTION OF A LEGALLY NONCONFORMING USE FOR PRE TO THIRTY MONTHS OR MORE THIS IS SPECIFIC TO RESIDENTIAL USES BUT IT’S THE SAME UNDER STATE LAW FOR COMMERCIAL USES. INTERRUPTION TO HAVE YEARS OF THIRTY MONTHS OR MORE VACATES THE LEGALLY NONCONFORMING USE — TO USE A MORE COLLOQUIAL PHRASING YOU’RE GRANDFATHERING RIGHTS EXPIRE. AND WE WE UNDERSTOOD THAT IN IN SPEAKING WITH RICHARD DIMOPOULOS HE HE WAS THE ONE THAT — GAVE US THE IDEA THAT HE FELT LIKE — IT WAS A GOOD IDEA TO MOVE FORWARD EVEN KNOWING THAT — AFTER LOOKING AT ALL THE PICTURES AND YOU KNOW OBVIOUS FROM ALL THE PHOTOS THAT THE HOUSE IS ONLY EVER BEEN A TRI PLEX IT WOULD EVEN BE STRANGE TO TRY. TO MAKE IT INTO SOMETHING ELSE LIKE IT HAS FRONT AND BACK DOORS EVERYWHERE EVERYTHING HAS ITS OWN AGE MAC UNIT. AND I MEAN IT IT JUST IT WOULD BE ODD HE HE ALSO SAID THAT — I DON’T THINK THEY’RE PERTAIN TO THIS RIGHT NOW BUT HE FELT LIKE A HIGHER DENSITY IN THAT AREA ACROSS FROM THE PARK WAS WAS — A GREAT IDEA AND THERE ARE MULTIPLE OTHER — NONCONFORMING TRI PLEX IS ON THAT STREET THERE. LIKE WITHIN LIKE THIRTY TWO MORE DOORS YEAH. THE I. NEXT DOOR IT’S A IT’S A SINGLE FAMILY BUT IT HAS A RESIDENCE ABOVE THE GARAGE AND THEN THE NEXT ONE DOWN IS A TRI PLEX AND THERE’S A VICTIM ON ANOTHER TRUCK. X. WITH THAT I MEAN THAT. I MEAN TO ME IT IT SEEMS LIKE. IT MAKES SENSE THAT IT SEEMS THAT THAT TO ME IT LOOKED YOU KNOW IT LOOKS LIKE IT WAS BUILT THAT WAY INSTEAD OF THAT WAY. BUT IT ALSO ME WHAT YOU’RE ASKING FOR WITH US IS. HE HAS TO SAY THAT. THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AIRED AND IT SOUNDS LIKE EVEN BY YOUR TESTIMONY TODAY THAT HE DIDN’T CARE I MEAN THAT THAT IT WAS VACANT FOR MORE THAN THIRTY MUC. AND THEREFORE IT’S NOT. YOUR LEGAL COMPLEX AND IT SOUNDS LIKE. I MEAN THERE MAY BE OTHER PASS TO GET A TRI PLEX THERE I MEAN CAN YOU WOULD YOU HAVE TO REZONE IT JUST BE YOURSELF AND AND GO THROUGH THE MULTI FAMILY AS P. CERTAIN MIXED USE DISTRICTS MIGHT ALLOW BUT IT WOULD BE A REZONING BECAUSE THE ZONING ABSOLUTELY. DOES NOT ALLOW TRI PLEX YEAH AND I MEAN IN IN THAT MAY MAKE PERFECT SENSE FOR THIS THE PROPERTY I MEAN IT BASED ON WHAT YOU SAID AT THE GET IT. BUT I GUESS WHAT. WHAT I’M LOOKING FOR AN ITEM MAY WHICH BASICALLY YOU OR COME IN AND SAY IN THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR MADE A MISTAKE? WAY THAT THAT’S THE THAT THAT’S OUR CRITERIA FOR I’D JUST THE WAY YOU ALL. YOU KNOW APPLIED FOR THIS APPEAL AND YOU MAY AND MAY NOT HAVE A HOME THAT IS. DEFINITELY NOT. A LOT OF PEOPLE DON’T YEAH — BED AND AN ITEM MAY APPEAL BASICALLY SAYS HEY THERE’S ONLY MINISTRY — SAID WE CAN’T DO IT — YOU CAN ASSUME AND TELL US WHETHER ANY MINISTRY WERE STRONG AND SOMETIMES THEY ARE AND SOMETIMES THERE’S A REASON BUT BUT SINCE YOU ALL HAVE. HIS FAMILY IS SAID AND YOU CONFIRM THAT WITHOUT BEING — YEAH. RENTED THEN I DON’T I DON’T THINK WE HAVE A ROOM READY FOR YOU. DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER INFORMATION THAT SO I GUESS THE FUTURE THIS BUILDING IS JUST. IS WHAT I MEAN I KNOW THAT SOME RELATED NORTHERN. TALKED TO THE STANDPOINT OF YOU JUST I MEAN TALK TO I MEAN EVEN. WHEN IT’S ON THE BACK OF IT FOR PERPETUALLY? NO THERE OKAY ON TO NO WE WOULD HAVE TO REVIEW THE NE AS RECORDS AGAIN BUT IF THERE’S BEEN A DISCONTINUATION OF TWO OF THE UNIT SO IT STILL HAD ONLY ONE HAS BEEN MAINTAINED THEN IT’S ONLY ELIGIBLE FOR SINGLE FAMILY AS THE DISTRICT DETAILS. UNLESS THEY REZONE THE PROPERTY SO — UNLESS THERE IS ON THE PROPERTY USE VARIANCES ARE NOT ALLOWED UNDER THE ZONING CODE YEAH SO I MEAN IT WOULD TAKE THE LEGISLATIVE BODY THE METRO COUNCIL TO KIND OF CHANGE WAS ONLY THEIR THIRD THEY DO ZONING SORT OF ANYTHING ELSE TO ADD. IT’S NOT OKAY TO TALK TO TALK TO JOHN EMILY LATER EITHER TOMORROW OKAY YEAH AND THEY CAN TELL YOU WHAT PATH. COULD POSSIBLY GET YOU TO WHAT YOU NEED TODAY BUT I DON’T THAT IS NOT SOMETHING. WE’RE GONNA CLOSE PUBLIC HEARIN. DISCUSSION. WELL I MEAN I THINK BY THE TESTIMONY OF WHAT WE JUST SAID WAS THAT — THE TESTIMONY SUPPORTED THE FIGHT THAT THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR WAS CORRECT AND THEREFORE — YOU MAKE EMOTIONAL MOVE THAT THE JENNY ADMINISTRATOR DID NOT AIR- IN THE DETERMINATION BASED ON THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED — IN WITHOUT THE EXISTING THAT OR ANYTHING YOU ANY NEW EVIDENCE — WHICH FOR VERSION WILL ONLY BE DONE AT THE STAFF LEVEL THIS THIS — APPEALS DENIED OKAY MOTION FOR MADE IS OUR SECOND. WHICH IS THE MAIN PROBABLY SECOND IN THE DISCUSSION. SING NONE ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SIGNIFY BY SAYING ON THOSE CHAIRMAN EXCUSE TO BE PRESENTED AS TWENTY EIGHTEEN THERE SIX EIGHTY SIX PURSER ARCHITECTURES THE APPELLANT ON BEHALF OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY FOURTEEN THIRTEEN RIVERSIDE DRIVE. SHOWN HERE AN H. P. R. DEVELOPMENT IN EAST NATIONAL COUNCIL DISTRICT NUMBER SEVEN THE REQUEST IS FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REAR SETBACK REQUIREMENTS IN THIS CARTOONS OWNING DISTRICT SHOWN HERE ON THE AERIAL MAP. SHOWING HERE ON THEIR SITE PLAN FOR POST LAYOUT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT. THREE OR SET BACK SAID HERE’S TWENTY THE REQUESTS FOR REDUCTION — THREE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NINE HUNDRED SQUARE FOOT DETACHED EXCESS REBUILDING SHOWN TO THE REAR OF THE LOT THE FAR RIGHT OF THE SCREEN. SEPARATE PROPERTY SHOWN HERE ON THE FACE AND ACROSS THE STREET AS WELL. UP AND DOWN RIVERSIDE IN THIS SLIDE. AT THE POLLS PRESIDENT IS THERE ANYONE HERE IN OPPOSITION CASE. SIX EIGHTY SIX SAYING ON THE BILLS WILL HAVE FIVE MINUTES MAKE THIS IS OUR PRESENTATION JUST INTRODUCE YOURSELVES BY NAME ADDRESS. DATE PURSER WITH PURSER ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN — ADDRESSES TWENTY EIGHT NINETEEN COLUMBINE PLACE NASHVILLE TENNESSEE. THREE SEVEN TWO ZERO FOUR MY NAME IS PAUL ANDREWS I’M AT FOURTEEN THIRTEEN EST RIVERSIDE DRIVE CORRECT WHERE WE HEAR — SO MY CLIENT DESIRES TO BUILD AN ASSESSOR STRUCTURE — IN THE REAR OF HIS YARD FOR USE AS A HOME RECORDING STUDIO [inaudible] THE HARDSHIP HERE IS THAT THERE IS A WET WEATHER CONVEYANCE IN THE BACKYARD. THAT SEVERELY. RESTRICTS THE BUILDING AREA. AND SO WE’RE ASKING FOR A REDUCTION IN THE REAR SET BACK. A REDUCTION SEVENTEEN FEET FROM THE REQUIRED TWENTY FEET SO. A SET BACK OF THREE IS WHAT WE’RE REQUESTING IN ORDER — TO CONSTRUCT THE FACILITY. IS AT LEAST THIS NINE HUNDRED SQUARE FEET — WHICH WOULD MAKE THE PROJECT FEASIBLE [inaudible] IT’S SO. IS IT A ONE STORY — CORRECT [inaudible] UHHUH. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT SOSA AND RECORDING SYSTEM. A BUSINESS OR WHATEVER I MEAN WHAT IS. IT’S IT’S PRIVATE WE’RE IN MUSIC CITY. AND SO I MEAN I I GUESS I MISS I SEE [inaudible] THE I’M JUST SO WORRIED ABOUT OR WHATEVER IT IS HIS OWN IT’S A WET WEATHER CONVEYANCE — IS MY UNDERSTANDING. WITH OUR NEIGHBOR BEHIND YOU. KNOW THERE’S NOT A FROM THAT — EASTERN PROPERTY LINE THERE’S ACTUALLY AN ALLEY BEHIND THE PROPERTY — IT. IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT WAS DETERMINED TO BE AN IMPROVED AND IT’S I THINK OVERGROWN. ECHOES BENDER SO WE HAVE A WALK WE WE GOT IT SO YOU HAVEN’T YOU HAVEN’T AND UNIMPROVED ALLEY WHICH GIVES YOU BASICALLY ANOTHER. TEN FIFTEEN FIFTY CORRECT THERE’S NO NEIGHBORING PROPERTY TO THE REAR SO YOUR NEIGHBORS ARE THEY FOR THEY ARE OKAY SO THAT MEANS YOU’RE COMES VERSUS FOUR YES I THINK WE HAVE ON RECORD THAT THE CALCIUM HAS SAID THAT THE NEIGHBORS ARE FOR HE’S. FORTY NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR. UNDER IF THERE ARE OTHERS THAT YOU KNOW OF BECAUSE OF HIM WITH. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT AND THAT AND I GUESS THAT’S IT WAS H. B. OR SOMETHING NEAR THERE’S TWO ON THE PROPERTY AND SO YOU HAVE THAT. KIND OF IN. CORE AT LINE BEHIND YOU THAT’S WHY YOU CAN’T TURN IT THE OTHER WAY BECAUSE I’M GOING TO THE NEIGHBOR’S PROPERTY YES. OKAY. AS CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING DISCUSSION. FOR THE MOTION. I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE GRANT THE VARIANCE REQUEST. BASED UPON THE REQUEST OF SADDAM THE PALM SIZE OF THE PROPERTY AND THE DITCH THAT RUNS THROUGH. THE BACKYARD AND COUNSELING TO PRAISE THE NEIGHBOR’S PROPERTY OKAY EMOTION AND IMPROVE ALLEY BEHIND IT WHICH LISTS AS WASHING KRETSCHMANN AND THE NEIGHBOR. THANK YOU. WHICH HAVE BEEN MADE AS THEIR SECOND. MOST OF THE MAIN PROPERLY SECONDED INDISCRETION SING NONE ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. AYE THOSE PASSES UNANIMOUSLY GOOD LUCK THANKS THANK YOU JOHN MICHAEL. NEXT CASE FOR THE BOARDS OF USE CASE TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH. SIX EIGHTY EIGHT THEY’VE EVER CAMPUS THE APPELLANT A WATTERSON THE OWNER THE PROPERTY SEVENTEEN OH FOR BLAIR BOULEVARD AND COUNSELOR SHOULD NUMBER EIGHTEEN THE REQUEST IS FOR TWO VARIANCES ONE FROM THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE REQUIREMENTS. IN THE ARE IN TWENTY ZONING DISTRICTS SHOWN HERE. ON THE PROPERTY SHOWN HERE ON THE AERIAL MAP SECOND OTHER IN SOME SIDEWALK REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON A PARCEL WITH AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY UNIT ALREADY IN PLACE. THE SITE PLAN SHOWN HERE SHOWS PROPOSE LAYOUT FOR THE EXISTING HOUSE IN THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE WITH TWO UNITS. YEAH I THINK BASED ON THE OTHER HAND YOU CAN ACCUSE MYSELF AS A PART OF THE ARCHITECT VERY WELL AS MISSION REFUSES HIMSELF WILL STILL HAVE FOUR MEMBERS READY — TO TO HEAR THE CASE. THE RECENT SITE VISIT PHOTOGRAPHS HERE SHOW THE SUBJECT PROPERTY UPPER LEFT HAND CORNER THE VIEW ACROSS THE STREET IN THE LOWER RIGHT IN THE U. UP AND DOWN THE STREET WITH THE EXISTING SIDEWALK CONDITION SHOW HERE. AGAIN NO WERE THE HERE THAT THIS IS A REQUEST FOR A LOST CAUSE FOR INTO THE ARE IN TWENTY ZONING DISTRICT IN THE PAST COUPLE OF MEETINGS WE SEEN SOME OF THESE WORDS WOULD NEVER SEEN THEM IN THE PAST. THE ARE IN TWENTY THE TWENTY PART OF COURSE INDICATES TWENTY RESIDENTIAL UNITS PER ACRE. IT’S RARE THAT WE SEE A LOT SMALL ENOUGH THAT THAT’S NOT REALLY THE ANALYSIS IN TERMS OF WHAT SIZE OR HOW MANY UNITS GO IN BUT INSTEAD THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE WHICH IS SEVENTY FIVE HUNDRED SQUARE FEET. HERE WITH THAT SEVENTY FIVE HUNDRED REQUIREMENT THAT THEY’RE SHY BY HAVING SEVENTY ONE THIRTY SEVEN SO WHAT’S THAT A REDUCTION OF THREE HUNDRED SIXTY THREE I BELIEVE. IN TERMS OF THE VARIOUS SOUGHT THE SIDEWALK REQUIREMENT IS ADDRESSED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN THEIR WRITTEN RECOMMENDATION TO YOU MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS. CM BOTH OF THOSE PIECES OF INFORMATION IN FRONT OF YOU — ARE THERE OF OPPONENTS PRESENT FOR K.. SIX EIGHTY EIGHT THERE ARE NONE SO THE UPPER LEVEL HAVE — FIVE MINUTES TO MAKE THE DESIRED PRESENTATION THE BOARD PLEASE INTRODUCE YOURSELF BY NAME AND ADDRESS AND TAKEN UP WITH BOARD MEMBERS. THANK YOU — MY NAME’S DAVE PAPER CAMP — I LIVE AT SEVEN HUNDRED TWELFTH AVENUE SOUTH — HERE IN NASHVILLE — I’LL BE TAKING YOU THROUGH — MY REQUEST TODAY THERE’S TWO PARTS ON THE SIDEWALKREQUEST AS YOU SAW FROM PLANNING — THE EXISTING SIDEWALK THERE’S IN REALLY GOOD CONDITION — IT’S PART OF THE HISTORIC NEIGHBORHOOD IT’S ONLY OFF BY ABOUT A FOOT FROM MY UNDERSTANDING OF THE THE NEW GUIDELINES IN WITH AND IT HAS THE PROPER — GREEN STRIP — FROM THE CURB TO THE SIDEWALK — SO THE RECOMMENDATION WAS TO KEEP THAT SO THAT IT MATCHES THE REST OF THE SIDEWALK GOING THROUGH THE STREETS AS LONG AS IT’S MAINTAINED AND THE IDIOT COMPLIANCE — IS IS MET — SO I I DIDN’T SAY THAT I WOULD AGREE TO THOSE TERMS — AND I THINK THAT MAKES SENSE SO THAT THE SIDEWALK CONTINUES TO MATCH THE NEIGHBORHOOD — ON THE REQUEST FOR THE ZONING VARIANCES SO WE’VE BEEN DOING PLANNING ON ON THE PROPERTY THEY’RE TRYING TO FIGURE OUT THE BEST USES — FOR THE EXISTING STRUCTURE WHICH IS HISTORICALLY PROTECTED UNDER METRO STORED — GUIDELINES AND ALSO A LOT THERE- WE CAME ACROSS THE THE SQUARE FOOT LIMITATION ON THE MINIMUM SIZE SITE LOT SIZE FOR THE THE PROPERTY THERE AND THAT’S WHERE THIS REQUEST CAME FROM — IF YOU LOOK AT THE THE SATELLITE IMAGES THERE YOU CAN SEE — THE HOUSE ITSELF IS SURROUNDED BY A MULTI PLEX IS ON BOTH SIDE- WHICH IN THE CURRENT ITERATION IF YOU LOOK AT THE BACK OF EACH OF THOSE LOTS INCLUDING — SEVENTEEN FOR THE ENTIRE BACKYARD IS IS EITHER PAVED OR GRAVELED IN EACH OF THESE AND JUST USE THIS PARKING LOTS WHICH YOU KNOW A GUEST’S ADDRESSES THE PARKING FOR FOR THE MULTIPLEXES THERE. AND THE STERLING COURT APARTMENTS — BACK THE BACK OF THE LOT SO THAT’S THE THREE STORY PLUS A FULL BASEMENT — OLDER APARTMENT COMPLEX THAT THAT MEETS THE BACKLIGHT PLOT LINE THERE — SO — WHAT WE’RE REQUESTING THERE’S TO TO BE ABLE OF A LOT BUT THE OR THE ANGLE OF THE BACK LOT LINE OR WHAT BECAUSE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE SHOULD DROP JUST BELOW THE MINIMUM — AS IT GOES TO THE THE APARTMENT COMPLEX THERE — AND THEN ALSO THERE’S A SEWER LINE EASEMENT IF YOU SEE IT’S KIND OF HARD TO SEE UNDER THOSE THREE CARS THERE THERE’S A FIFTEEN FOOT WIDE SEWER EASEMENT THAT RUNS KIND OF THE OPPOSITE OF THE DAGNALL THE BACK OF THE LOT — WHICH WHICH KIND OF LIMITS AND AND AND WE HAVE TO GET CREATIVE ON ONE WHERE WE PLACE THE STRUCTURE BASICALLY — SO THOSE ARE KIND OF THE HARDSHIPS ON THE ON THE ON THE PLACEMENT OF THE THE NEW STRUCTURE [inaudible] QUESTIONS [inaudible] YEAH. QUESTIONS FOR THE OFFICE. REPORTER THE HARDSHIPS ON THE EXISTING STRUCTURE THE SEWER LINE UP SO THERE’S A SEWER LINE EASEMENT THE BACK IF YOU LOOK AT THIS CURRENT — THIS UP ON THE SCREEN THAT THE TO FIFTEEN FOOT WIDE WATER AND SEWER EASEMENT — THAT WAS JUST PLACED IN FAIRLY RECENTLY ACTUALLY — FOR I GUESS — MODERNIZATION OF THE SEWERS AS MY UNDERSTANDING AND THEN ALSO – KIND OF THE HARDSHIP ON THE LAW- IT’S KIND OF AN ODDLY ANGLED BACK LOT LINE AND I’M GUESSING BECAUSE OF THE APARTMENTS THAT WERE BUILT BACK THERE THERE’S A BUNCH OF GREEN SPACE THERE THAT KIND OF GOES BETWEEN THE APARTMENTS AND AND AND MY LOT THERE — AND IF THAT LOT LINE WAS STRAIGHT I THINK WE’D BE JUST OVER THE SEVENTY FIVE HUNDRED SQUARE FEET BASED ON OUR CALCULATIONS. OVER TO THE FIFTEEN IN THE FIFTEEN FOOT EASEMENT ON THIS DIAGRAM IS THE SEWER EASEMENT YES SIR THE ONE THAT YOU CAN SEE RIGHT UNDER THOSE THREE CARS. AND WE DID I MEAN OBVIOUSLY YOU KNOW. UNDERSTANDING THAT ALL OF THE PLANNING THAT WE DO FOR THIS NEW BUILD AND AND ANYTHING WE WOULD CHANGE AN EXISTING HOUSE WHICH WHICH WOULD BE FAIRLY MINOR OTHER THAN UPDATING — AND AND REPAIRING THEIR ALL HAS TO GO THROUGH MAJOR STORK RIGHT AND AND BE APPROVED BY THEM SO THE FOOTPRINT THERE OF THE NEW STRUCTURE COULD CHANGE DRAMATICALLY BASED ON WHAT THEY WILL APPROVE AND AND AND AS WE WORK CLOSELY WITH THEM — TO TO GET THAT DEVELOPED IN AND KIND OF SCOPED OUT — I’VE WORKED IN SEVERAL HISTORIC HOMES — IN HASBRO EAST NASHVILLE AT CETERA- AND SO — I UNDERSTAND THAT THAT PROCESS IS KIND OF A IT’S A BACK AND FORTH GREAT SO THIS WOULDN’T BE THE FINAL SITE PLAN THIS IS JUST TO GIVE AN IDEA OF KIND OF WHERE PARKING COULD GO. AND HOW THAT WOULD FIT WITHIN THE EASEMENT. BOARD MEMBERS YOU HAVE A LETTER A PAPER LETTER FROM — ROBIN ZIGGLER THERE’S A STORY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR IN OPPOSITION TO THIS — SHE SAYS. IT’S KIND OF AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PILE. CAME IN TODAY. THIS WITH THIS LETTER. AND THEY SAY STAFFED WITH HISTORIC ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS DISPROVE THE REQUEST FOR THE THREE UNITS. TO SEVENTEEN OH FOR PLAYER BOULEVARD WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE BELMONT HILL FROM NEIGHBORHOOD. CONSERVATION ZONING OVERLAY THE PROPERTY IS ZONED R. M.. TWENTY BUT THE LAW DOES NOT MEET THE SQUARE FOOTAGE REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL THREE OF THESE UNITS IN SAYS ALTHOUGH WE TYPICALLY DO NOT COMMENT ON THE USE OR DENSITY RELATED TO REQUEST. WE HAVE DONE SO FOR THE QUEST CAN RESULT IN A FIND GUIDELINES SO THEY’RE SAYING THAT GIVEN THE SIZE OF THIS. IN THE CONSERVATION OVERLAY THERE WAS NOTHING THAT. THEY THINK COULD BE BUILT TO LOOK LIKE THEIR GUIDELINES SO THAT’S JUST FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION AND I’D LIKE TO POLITELY DISAGREE IF I COULD — I DID NOT I DID JUST ALSO RECEIVE THAT LETTER THIS MORNING SO UNFORTUNATELY I DIDN’T HAVE A LOT OF TIME TO PREPARE FOR THAT OR TALK WITH HISTORIC FURTHER. AMENDED HAVE A VERBAL CONVERSATION WITH THEM INITIALL- WITH SHAUN ALEXANDER NOT WITH ROBIN — BUT SO I DID SPEAK WITH ROBIN BRIEFLY BEFORE THIS MEETING AND YOU KNOW MY OPINION WOULD BE THAT THE M. HER FEARS THAT THEY WOULD GET STUCK WITH BASICALLY AS OWNING REQUIREMENT THAT WOULD MAKE THEM A PERSON AND THEY WOULDN’T WANT TO APPROVE. AND AND MY TAKE ON THAT IS THEY THEY HAVE THE FINAL SAY ON WHAT THE EXTERIOR DESIGN SCOTT — SCALE SCOPE — HEIGHTS YOU KNOW SET BACKS THAT SO — I FEEL LIKE PUTTING THREE UNITS WITHIN- THE FOOTPRINT HERE AS LONG AS THEY AGREE TO ALL OF THE EXTERIOR LOOK AND FEEL — IT SHOULDN’T REALLY MATTER TO HISTORIC WEATHER THERE’S TWO UNITS INSIDE OF THAT SPACE OR THREE AS LONG AS WE’RE WE’RE FITTING WITHIN THE THE FABRIC OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD FROM FROM AN EXTERIOR STANDPOINT — AND I SPOKE WITH — MICHAEL WARD THE ARCHITECT TO AS HELPED WITH THE INITIAL PLANNING HERE AND AND HE’S HE AGREED WITH THAT HE SAID THE PLAN WOULD BE TO MAKE THIS. EITHER ADDITION TO THE BACK OF THE HOUSE OR SEPARATE STRUCTURE DEPENDING ON WHAT HISTORICAL ALLOW BASICALLY — BE WOULD NOT LOOK LIKE THREE SEPARATE — UNITS FROM THE EXTERIOR WOULD LOOK LIKE. TO OTHER QUESTIONS OF THE AFRICAN — AND I ALSO DID SPEAK WITH BERKELEY ALAN THE COUNCILMAN FOR THIS DISTRICT — ABOUT THIS — SEVERAL TIMES AND HER MAIN CONCERN WAS REGARDING — AFFORDABLE HOUSING WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT’S ONE OF OUR BIGGEST CONCERNS FOR HER SPECIFIC DISTRICT — AND AND TO ME BEING ABLE TO DO INHERENTLY BECAUSE MORE AFFORDABLE — HOUSING BECAUSE THE UNITS WOULD BE SMALLER AND PRICED MORE AFFORDABLY THAN IF WE HAVE TO DO ONE LARGER SECOND UNIT WHICH WE CAN DO WITHIN THE EXISTING — ZONING GUIDELINES AND I DID SPEAK WITH — CJ HEADS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION — PROMOTE HILLSBOROUGH AND SHE ALSO SUPPORTED THAT ONCE EXPLAINED TO HER THAT THE PLANS. QUESTIONS OF THE AFRICAN. OKAY. I SEE YOUR PROPOSED TREASURES TWO UNITS — IT’S ONE SINGLE STRUCTURE WITH TWO UNIT RESTAURANTS BUT AGAIN HISTORIC IS GOING TO MAKE THE FINAL DECISION THERE ON WHETHER THAT CAN BE A STANDALONE STRUCTURE OR IT HAS TO BE AN ADDITIONAL OFF THE BACK OF THE EXISTING HOUSE — BUT IT WOULD NOT BE — MORE THAN TWO STRUCTURES IN THE EXISTING HOUSE IS ONE AND THEN THE NEW STRUCTURE COULD BE A SEPARATE STRUCTURE OR IN ADDITION TO THE EXISTING. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT. OKAY — ANYTHING ELSE STAND. THAT’S OKAY WE’RE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING [inaudible] SO DISCUSSIONS — YEAH THIS IS A LITTLE DIFFERENT BECAUSE WE HAVE THIS LETTER FROM THE STORE BUT WE HAVE — A LETTER IN SUPPORT SOME COUPLE IN OPPOSITION. SO — ROSS THIS IS YOUR DISTRICT. YOUR YOUR YEAH — MA’AM — CONCERN THE HISTORIC IS CONCERNED ABOUT IT AT THAT CONCERNS ME — MORE THAN A LITTLE BIT — HIS. HIS — CANCEL PERSON ALAN. GIVE ME A LETTER OR SHE PUT IT SHE IS SHE IS SHE IS SHE IS TOLD YOUR NOTION OR YOU KNOW THE INITIAL COUPLE CONVERSATION SHE WAS ON THE FENCE AND SO THEN YOU KNOW SHE TOLD ME THAT HER PRIMARY CONCERN EVERY TIME WE SPOKE WAS AFFORDABLE HOUSING. AND SO YOU KNOW AS WE TALKED ABOUT TODAY SAID THE EXISTING ZONING ALLOWS ME TO ADD A UNIT SO TWO UNITS FOR SURE ARE ALLOWED WITHIN THE ARM TWENTY ON AN UNDER SEVENTY FIVE HUNDRED SQUARE FOOT LOT — BUT IT WOULD JUST BECOME YOU KNOW PROBABLY THE SAME SQUARE FOOTAGE OF AN ADDITION OR NEW STRUCTURE WITH ONE LARGER SECOND UNIT IN PLACE THAT WOULD COST MORE WORK ME IF WE DO THIS AND AND AND AND GET THE VARIANCE TO ALLOW FOR THE TWO UNITS BACK THERE. IT WOULD BE TO SMALLER UNITS OF A TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE THAT WOULD BE VERY SIMILAR BECAUSE THAT’S WHAT METRO HISTORICAL ALLOW BASICALLY IN TALKING TO ROBIN AND SEAN AND AND AND THE GROUP OVER THERE. YOU KNOW EDITIONS AND AND AND SUCH TO AN EXISTING HISTORIC STRUCTURE THEY DON’T LIKE THE NEW FOOT PRINT TO BE ANY LARGER THAN THE EXISTING. SO THE EXISTING HOUSES ABOUT TWENTY SIX HUNDRED TOTAL SQUARE FEET — WE WOULDN’T GO THAT LARGE BUT BUT YOU BASICALLY IN GENERAL THAT’S WHAT THEY LOOK AT FIRST FROM A SIZE AND AND AND SCALE STANDPOINT — AND SO YOU KNOW WE WOULD EITHER HAVE ONE LARGER SECONDARY UNIT LET’S SAY TWO THOUSAND PLUS SQUARE FEET FOR TWO SMALLER UNITS THAT ARE SAY A THOUSAND SQUARE FEET EACH — AND AND THAT WOULD CREATE MORE. BERKELEY WAS ON BOARD WITH IF IF THAT WAS THE THE OPTION AND CJ ALSO WHICH IS THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION PRESIDENT — THAT WAS HER BIGGEST CONCERN ALSO AND THEN ALSO PARKING FOR HER SO SHE WANTED TO SEE THE THE WAY OUT HERE WITH THE THE SITE PLAN WITH THE PARKING SPACES OFF STREET. SO. AND AGAIN TO REITERATE YOU NO MATTER HISTORIC HAS ALL FINAL SAY ON ALL OF THE EXTERIOR AND YOU KNOW SORT OF SCALE AND SCOPE I CAN’T IT’S NOT LOOKING TO GET A BUILDING PERMIT IF THEY DON’T GIVE. PROCESS IS AFTER. WE WEIGH IN ON THIS AND IF WE GIVE SOME SORT OF APPROVAL THEY STILL HAVE TO GO TO THE STORE EXAMINING. TO WEIGH IN AND YOU’VE. READ THEIR STRONGLY WORDED LETTER SO YOU KNOW THEY GET TO COME AWAY AND THEN DECIDE. HOW THIS BUILDING LOOKS AND THEY GET FINAL SAY I DON’T GET A BUILDING PERMIT IF THEY DON’T SIGN OFF ON IT BASICALLY SO IT’S NOT JUST THAT THEY CAN RECOMMEND THE UNLESS I? CAN’T STOP. IF HE DOESN’T GET THE BILL NO PERMIT THEY WON’T GIVE ME A BUILDING PERMIT WITHOUT HIS WORKS SIGN OFF BECAUSE SO THEY WILL STOP ME FOR MANY NEW BUILDING I CAN RENOVATE EXISTING HOUSE BUT I CAN’T ADD ANYTHING OR STRUCTURE WAS NEW OR A SEPARATE WERE. ATTACHED WITHOUT SO EVEN IF WE APPROVE THIS — THEY GET TO COME AND HAVE THE FINAL SAY EXACTLY. OKAY SO WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO START. TO THAT CHANGE ANYTHING LIKE I SAID THEY STILL IS HE’S GOING TO MAKE AN ARGUMENT TO THEM ABOUT THE IN A LOOK OF THIS BUILDING IN EVEN THE SIZE OF THIS BUILDING AND THEN. THEY FOR MORE YEAH SCIENCE. ALL OF THE STORES WERE. THE WHICH IS. BASED ON THE EXISTING HOUSE OF THE EXISTING HOUSES A CERTAIN SIZE. THEY COULD SEE THE OUR BILLING HAS TO BE SMALL [inaudible] THIS CONSERVATIVE. IF I REALLY DO HAVE FILES — IT. WHILE THEY FIND THAT. IT WAS. ARE YOU THERE ARM BECAUSE THESE THINGS THEY WILL THEY WON THIS IS RARE THEY USUALLY DON’T WAY AND THAT’S THE LETTER SAID. BUT YOU KNOW THEY OBVIOUSLY HAVE CONCERNS ABOUT IT SO BUT THEY GET TO RAISE THEIR CONCERNS AT THEIR MEETING. TO BUT WE WANT TO DISCUSS WITH THEIR CONCERNS ARE BUT WE GET TO KIND OF DECIDE BASED ON OUR RULES AND OUR PROCEDURES [inaudible] APPLE. SURE OF COURSE. GIVEN THAT YOU HAVE TO HAVE A UNANIMOUS APPROVAL TODAY BECAUSE THERE ARE ONLY FOUR MEMBERS LAUGHED — AND GIVEN — MY COLLEAGUES CONCERNS ABOUT AND YOU HAVEN’T HAD A LOT OF TIME TO TALK WITH MUSICAL OR AT AT HISTORICAL I WONDER IF YOU WOUL. THINK ABOUT DEFERRING YOUR CASE TO MAYBE HAVE FURTHER DISCUSSION WITH HER. I’D I’D BE HAPPY TO I SUGGESTED THAT TO TO ROBIN AND SHE’S BASICALLY TOLD ME THAT THAT. HER OPINION WON’T CHANGE ABOUT THIS THAT I CAN’T LIKE BUY A PRESENT A PROJECTED DESIGN EVEN BECAUSE I I SAID WHAT IF I WERE TO HAVE YOU KNOW WE DIDN’T HAVE THE ARCHITECT DROP — ELEVATIONS OR ANYTHING YET BECAUSE WE WE WANTED TO SEE IF THE ZONING APPROVAL WOULD HAPPEN AND THEN IF SO DESIGNED THAT WAY AND IF NOT DESIGN A DIFFERENT WAY — MAYBE THAT WAS THE WRONG — TAKE BUT THAT’S THE WAY THE PATH WE WENT DOWN — AND BUT ASTRA SAID WHAT IF WE YOU KNOW DELAYED THIS AND THAT IF WE DID SOME SOME SOME MORE YOU KNOW FURTHER DESIGNED TO SHOW WHAT IT COULD LOOK LIKE ON THE LOT. AND AND SHE SAID THEY WON’T MAKE A COMMENT ON POTENTIAL DESIGNS BECAUSE THEY’RE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING YET SO. I FEEL I’M KIND OF IN A SPOT WHERE I CAN’T GO ONE WAY OR THE OTHER SO WE HAD A CHANCE TO JUST COME AND OVERSEE DOES GIVE A TODAY AND THEN GET. FOUR VOTES AND ANOTHER BOARD MEMBER CAN REVIEW ABOUT THE NEXT MEETING SO I GUESS THAT’S THE OTHER OPTION. HOW DOES THAT WORK I’M SORRY SO YOU NEED FOUR OF US SO ONE MEMBERS ACCUSE THEM BUT ALSO WE HAVE SIX REMAINING PEOPLE THERE TO PEOPLE THAT ARE ON HERE TODAY OF? THEY CAN WATCH THIS ON THE METRO NATIONAL NETWORK AND THEN THE NEXT MEETING IN TWO WEEKS THEY CAN VOTE ON THIS MEETING THEM ELIGIBLE TO VOTE. SO THAT WOULD BE THE PROCEDURE IF YOU DON’T GET FOUR VOTES TODAY CASE STAYS OPEN THEY GET TO REVIEW IT AND THEN THEY CAN QUOTE. THE NEXT MEETING IF THEY CHOOSE TO REVIEW OKAY OKAY [inaudible] SO. SHOULD WE THE OKAY ANYONE HAVE A MOTION. WELL I’M GONNA MAKE A NATION THAT — BASED UPON THE SHAPE OF THE LIFE IN THE SEWER EASEMENT. WE SHOULD GRANT THE REQUEST FOR AIR. MOTION BEEN MADE AS THEIR SECON. CAN I ASK ABOUT THE SIDEWALK THING WITH TWO VERY. DECIDE WHAT. TO DO TO SEPARATE MOSTLY OVER [inaudible] FIFTY WELL HE YES BUT I THOUGHT HE WAS A VERY ABLE TO FOLLOWING PLANNING RECOMMENDATION AS A SIGN OFF THIRTY ONE MAKE A FOR YOUR MOTION ALMOST. FOUR DOLLARS. REFORMATION. MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AS THEIR SECOND [inaudible] ALL SECOND. GOOD MOTION BEEN MADE IMPROPERLY SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION [inaudible] I’LL. ALTHOUGH IN FAVOR BUT I WISH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTUALLY HAVE THEM PAY THE INCOMING FUNDS BECAUSE I THINK IT. THAT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE HERE BUT SINCE THEY DIDN’T RECOMMEND THAT I WON I THINK IT’S REALLY A VERY MEAN RECENTLY DONE. FIVE ONE IT IS IT’S IN VERY GOOD REPAIR — BUT I VISUALLY INSPECTED IT AGAIN OKAY I JUST FEEL THAT THEY RECOMMEND THAT FOR MANY PROPERTIES IN NASHVILLE I’M NOT SURE WHY THEY DIDN’T DO ANYTHING THIS ONCE YOU’VE LEFT OUT. THEY WERE VERY WELL ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. HIGH. OKAY YOU GOT YOUR FOUR VOTES COME GRADUATION THANK YOU. REALLY APPRECIATE IT THANK YOU GUYS FOR YOUR TIME I I DO. A LOT I REALLY APPRECIATE MODERN HISTORY MICHAEL. MISTER CHAIRMAN AS WE RE GATHER MOVE TO THE NEXT CASE WHICH IS OUR LAST REAL CLONING SINCE OUR LAST ZONING CASE FOR THE NIGHT CASE TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH SIX EIGHTY NINE ANIMALS A PROBLEM. THREE FOURTEEN DUKE STREET THE APPELLANT IS I NEVER PRESLEY. ALSO THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY THIS LOCATION THE COURSES FOR A VARIANCE FROM MINIMUM LOT SIZE REQUIREMENTS THIS BE OUR SIX A ZONING DISTRICTS SHOWN HERE. TENSION HERE ON THE AERIAL. IN ORDER TO PURSUE A SUBDIVISION TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TWO H. P. OURS ON EACH OF THE TWO SUBDIVIDED LOTS THEY WOULD NEED THIS LOT SIZE RANGE FROM THE BCA. QUICK VIEW OF THE STREET AT THIS LOCATION SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM ITS BASE. THIS MAY BE THE MOST HELPFUL THING. SO BECAUSE THERE IS AN INTEREST IN SUBDIVIDING THESE TO THIS HUNDRED FOOT WIDE LIGHT AND YOU SEE ALL THE OTHER FIFTY FOOT LOTS ALONG THIS STRETCH — IT STILL WOULD NOT MEASURE UP TO THE MINIMUM. SIX THOUSAND SQUARE FOOT LOT SIZE PER LOT ONE SUBDIVIDED. AND THUS THERE IS THE REQUIREMENT TO OBTAIN THIS LOT SIZE VARIANCE IN ORDER TO EQUIP THEM TO DO THAT SUBDIVISION WITHOUT THE VARIANCE THERE IS NO SUBDIVISION. SO THE REQUEST FOR THE BOARD IS JUST NOT ABOUT THE NUMBER OF UNITS NOT ABOUT THE POTENTIAL SUBDIVISION JUST ABOUT THE LOT SIZE VERY AND SO — WITH A MINIMUM OF SIX CERTAINLY THAT WOULD BE IT REQUIRES SIX THOUSAND PER THE IN AN UNUSUAL POSTURE OF A CASE THIS IS EFFECTIVELY A PREEMPTIVE REQUES. FOR REDUCTION IN WHAT WOULD BE – REDUCED SO INSTEAD OF SAYING IT THERE’S A LOT OF THOUSAND SQUARE FEET THEY NEED TWELVE REALLY SAYING THEY’LL BE FIFTY FIVE HUNDRED AND FIFTY FIVE HUNDRED ONTO SUBDIVIDED LOTS WHERE THEY WOULD NEED SIX FORGIVE ME FOR MAKING THAT KIND OF A ROUND ABOUT WAY OF EXPLAINING IT. NEVERTHELESS IT IS A LOT SAYS VERY IT’S ALL THE SAME CERTAIN OPPOSITION CASE NUMBER. SIX EIGHTY NINE SEEING NONE THE APPELLANT IS PRESENT WITH A REPRESENTATIVE ALSO THE DISTRICT COUNCIL MEMBER FROM DISTRICT FIVE SCOTT DAVIS WHICH INCLUDE – ENCOURAGED INTRODUCE YOURSELVES BY NAME AND YOUR FIRST. IT’S GOOD — FOR MERRY PRESLEY. UNDER HER LETTER AND IT FORTY THREE NINETY SEVEN THE OPTION OR IT IS GOING TO BE KIND OF ODD BECAUSE THE TECHNO PLEASE PRESS A BUTTON. TO THE POPE THEY’RE THE TWO NEW BILLS THAT IS BEHIND US ON THIS BUILDER IS GIVEN A STANFORD ALS. THAT WE ALREADY HAVE RODENTS AND IT’LL BE. THEN WE WILL HAVE ENOUGH FOR THE LOT. BUT WE WILL NEED IS TO BE ABLE TO BUILD ON IT. WHEN I PUT? YEAH JOHN WHAT IS IT. DID YOU HEAR THAT. OF PREVIOUSLY AND AGAIN TONIGHT YES — THE INCLUSION OF OTHER LAND FROM A NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNER IS SOMETHING THAT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WILL — MAKE A DETERMINATION UPON WITH REGARD TO EXACTLY HOW MANY SQUARE FEET ARE THERE. TODAY IF THEY HAD A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR TEN FEET. THIS PUT HIM OVER TWELVE THOUSAND SQUARE FOOT WOODEN THA. IT’S STILL A MATTER OF WHETHER OR NOT THEY GET THIS A THIS MAY BE CONSIDERED A BELT AND SUSPENDERS APPROACH BUT A LOT SIZE VARIANCE IS THE BEST WAY FOR THEM TO GO FORWARD. BECAUSE AS I’VE NOTED BEFORE A PROPERLY EXECUTED EASEMENT WHICH HAD BEEN IN PLACE AT ONE TIME BUT IT’S NOT BEEN MANIFESTED AS OF THE DAY WE ORIGINALLY DISCUSSED IT. I EXPLAINED — IT’S KIND OF LIKE WHAT SOME UNFORTUNATE LAWYERS MY SAY IS ALLOWING THE LAW UNTIL IT’S THE LAW SIMILARLY THE NEGOTIATED EASEMENT THAT MAY HAVE BEEN DRAFTED UP BUT NOT FULLY EXECUTED IN RECORDED. IS A VALID YES SO THE IDEA WAS PROCEED WITH YOUR REQUEST FOR A LOSS AS VARIANTS. CAN I ASK WHY ARE THEY GIVING YOU THE THE PROPER WAY THEY GIVING YOU THEIR PROPERTY BECAUSE IF YOU LOOK AT THE LOT BESIDE IT THE SMALLER LINE WHERE IT GOES BACK. THERE WAS A FENCE THERE THAT SINCE.STRAY TO COUGH CROSSED- NINETEEN FORTY FIVE AND HE OWNED A LINE ALSO AND HE WANTED TO MOVE HIS PANTS BACK SO FOR US TO GO AHEAD AND REMOVE THE FANS AND THE THE BUILDING THAT WAS IN THE YARD. HE OFFERED TO GIVE THE OTHER TEN FEET SO WE WOULDN’T HAVE TO HAVE THE VARIANCE. IS WHAT HAPPENED AND WE HAD A ROAD UP. BUT HE DID NOT FILE THAT. SO NOW IT’S BEEN AN ISSUE SO WE HAVE GOT IT SIGNED TO GET IT OUT AGAIN. AND RECORDED WHAT ARE YOU PLANNING ON BUILDING THESE — I HAVE THESE AND CONTRACT WITH A BUILDER TO BUILD THE FOUR ON THE LOT. BUT WE HAVE A CLOSE LIKE IT’LL BE ONCE WE FINISH ALL THIS IT’LL BE ANOTHER THIRTY TO FORTY FIVE DAYS THEN WE CLOSE YEAH. WELL I MEAN I COULD. I’D LOVE TO MOVE LIKE TO SEE. YOU KNOW WHAT SITE PLANS AND YEAH WE JUST TO SAY YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN I GET CONCEPTUALLY CENTER THE DO [inaudible] BUT WE GOT THE CONCEPT BUT IT JUST SEEMS LIKE THAT YOU’VE YOU’VE GOT. I GUESS I’M NOT SURE AGAIN WHIL. TO ME IT SOUNDS LIKE WE’RE HERE JUST TO SAVE A LITTLE BIT OF TIME BUT NOT REALLY NECESSARY. TO I GUESS. DO YOU HAVE THE DRAWINGS HERE THAT WE CAN [inaudible] MISTER TAYLOR I AM FOR YOUR FOURTH. I MEAN IT’S A FAIRLY GENERIC CONCEPT PLANS HOOKED. ON IT BUT I MEAN. I YOU KNOW I DON’T KNOW I MEAN IT JUST SEEMS LIKE IT. IT FEELS LIKE IT’S A LITTLE BIT. CART BEFORE THE HORSE BUT AND YET AT THE ARC I GET IT I KNOW IT IS IT MAKES. YOU KNOW I KNOW WHAT THEY’RE TRYING TO DO BUT IT IT JUST SEEMS LIKE ONE OF THOSE THINGS IF YOU GET A TEN FOOT EASEMENT YOU COULD SOLVE IT YOURSELF AND ARE WE HERE. BUT I MEAN I’D RATHER MISS THAT OTHER THAN THIS IS AN EASY ANSWER TO SAY WHEN I WERE CLOSE BUT YOU KNOW MEAN DESERVE. IS THERE A HARDSHIP BESIDES. WE’RE CLOSE BUT NO CIGAR. FORGIVE ME — TIS CASE MAKES ME VERY ANGRY NOT WITH THEM. OKAY — IS THAT YOUR AUNT WHO’S BEEN A LONG TERM CONSTITUENT MAYA. AND THIS AND THIS IS MY FEELING- PLEASE DO NOT POST AFRICA FOR MY FEELINGS PLEASE. OKAY BUT WHAT IS HAPPEN HERE I FEEL LIKE A DEVELOPER TOOK ADVANTAGE OF THAT. AND WHAT THEY DID WAS THEY WERE LIKE HEY ARE WE LIVE IN A SALARY BY ONCE BEEN NEIGHBORING FRIEND. BECAUSE OUR RATES PROPERLY. AND WHAT HAPPENED. YOU KNOW WAS THAT WHEN. WHEN THEY WHEN THEY WERE WHEN THEY AGREED TO GIVE THEM THE TEN FEET? WHICH WE KEPT THEM IN COMPLIANCE [inaudible] YOU KNOW. THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO GIVE THEM THE THE TEN FEET IN THE REAR. YOU KNOW AND THE PEBBLE WAS DRAWN UP. BUT THE BELT FOR BE IT INTENTIONALLY OR NOT DIDN’T FIL. AND SO PORTION — WE COME DOWN TO OUR OUR GREAT CODES OFFICE WHO DOES EVERYTHING TO HELP PEOPLE. YOU KNOW MORE THAN THE BUY KNOW. ALBEIT WE’RE TRYING TO FIGURE OUT THE BEST WAY THE HARDSHIP HERE IS. THAT THEY ARE HOOD. ONE AND THE PROBLEM IS NOW I WOULD NOT SPOKE TO THE BELL FOR MEAN COUNCILMAN DAVIS. YOU KNOW I’M NICE TO YOU WONDERFUL PEOPLE BORN SOMEONE TAKES MAN’S MY CONSTITUENTS IDEA VERY UPSET. AND SAW MY DUDE YOU NEED TO FIX THIS SO. SIGN THE PAPERWORK AND WE STARTED GIVE. YOU KNOW INITIALLY I DID NOT KNOW HE WAS GOING. TO SIGN OR NOT SOMETIMES THEY TELL ME GO FLY A KITE IN SOME BAR SOMETIMES THEIR CONSCIOUSNESS BESTIVAL [inaudible] RIGHT. AND HE’S IN FINDING THE RIGHT. EVERYTHING WAS SIGNED BUT HE DID NOT — I MET WITH THEM AND JUST TO GET IN FOR THE CITY SO AS IT IS FILED NOW OR WHAT YOU KNOW HE SAID IT WILL BE FOUND ONCE WE DO THIS. NO WAY IF IF HE EVEN GAVE IT TO US HE SAID THAT WAY THERE’S NO WAY THAT WE WOULD BE ABLE TO BUILD ON THE PROPERTY. AND LAST WEEK CAME TO YOU ALL AND THAT’S WHEN I WENT TO THE COUNCIL MY BECAUSE THAT IT MAKE ANY SENSE TO ME. BECAUSE HE IS SO DID BACK TO PROPERTY NOW AND EVEN IN THE PAPER WORK FOR HE SEWED IT HE HAD GAVE US THE PROPERTY. BUT NOW THE PROPERTY OWNERS WON’T SIGN IT AND TO WE COME HERE TO GET IT REZONED AND THEN THEY’LL GET CHANCE. AND INSTEAD OF ME. RESULTING NOT RESIGN AND BUT WE DO WHAT YOU REQUEST AND YOU DON’T HAVE THEY DON’T HAVE TO HAVE THE TEN FEET SO I MEAN I GUESS THAT’S WHY I’M CONFUSED THAT’S WHY THEY’RE TELLING US DO YOU TO COME HERE BECAUSE THEY WANT. US TO DO SOMETHING SO IS THAT ALL YOU DON’T NEED TO TEN FEET NOW. RIGHT NOW WE’RE DARLA’S WE’VE ALREADY TALKED TO TERRY HE’S GIVEN UP TO TEN FEET REGARDLESS SHE’S ALREADY TALKED TO THE ATTORNEY. I GUESS YEAH I MEAN WITH US THAT THAT’S WHERE I THOUGHT WE HAD A CONTRACT TO SAY — WE WERE SUPPOSED TO CLOSE ON THIS PROPERTY SO HE’S OUT OF THE WHOLE PROCESS — HER MOVE AND SHE LOST TO HOW SHE WAS VAN A TREMENDOUS JUST. MASS. WHAT I’M REALLY NOT HAPPY ABOUT IT IS IT WAS GOVERNMENT PROPERTY THAT HE GOT ON THE BACK IN AND HE FOUND THE PAPERWORK TO TURN AROUND AND HE GOT THE PROPERTY? AT NO COST TO HIM WITH SELLING THE PROPERTY TO PAY HALF OF IT BACK. TO THE STATES. BUT I I GUESS YOU KNOW IT STILL GOES BACK TO THE ORIGINAL QUESTION IF IF. IF AND WHEN I MEAN IF YOU THINK YOU’RE GOING. TO I I GUESS I’M JUST CONFUSED ON THE TEN FEET AND AND THE BOTTOM LINE THOUGH IS. YOU’RE ASKING FOR ALMOST AN EIGHT NINE FOOT OR NOT PERCENT – VARIANCE. WITHOUT A DEAD STRANGELY SHAPED LOT IN A IN A WHICH IS CLOSE BUT IS. BUT YOU ALSO ADD THE LOT NEXT DOOR. WE COULD STILL DO MULTIPLE BUILDS ON IT LIKE IF WE COMBINE THOSE TWO LIVES. WHICH WHAT NEXT DOOR YOU TELL ME THE WORST MAULER WHEN THEY’RE BUT THAT’S NOT HOW WE WERE SELLING THE PROPERTY. WELL I MEAN I GUESS YOU KNOW I MEAN AND I’M JUST I’M JUST TALKING IT THROUGH ONE OF THE THINGS I ALWAYS LOOK FOR IS IT IS OUR SOLUTION. THAT THE OWNER CAN CONTROL THAT DOES OR CARS. TO MAKE A DECISION AND IT I MEAN THEN THAT SHOULD KEEP SOUNDED LIKE THERE IS AND THAT’S WHAT I’M SAYING IF YOU CAN FIX IT. IF THERE’S A WAY FOR YOU TO FIX IT ALTHOUGH I THINK OUR SOLUTION MIGHT BE THE MOST CONVENIENT FOR YOU AND I AND I GET THAT — TOO I’M JUST TRYING TO SORT IT ALL OUT [inaudible] THE OTHER QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT. I’M NOT SURE HOW TO HER WHAT TO ASK BUT SO THERE’S THIS BUILDER& OWN SOMETHING ON PRINCE AVENUE HERE THE TWO PROPERTIES THAT ARE DIRECTLY BEHIND IT. HERE. AT HOME. YES HE OWNS THE DS. AND HE AGREED TO GIVE YOU TEN FEET. ALONG HERE. THE REAR PROPERTY YES BECAUSE OF SOMETHING SO THAT WE CAN RAISE THE FANS. ON THAT SLASH LISTEN BECAUSE THEY WERE IF YOU LOOK AT THE LOT WITHOUT LOOKING AT THE TAX RECORDS BOTH OF THEM WOULD GO TO THE SAME DEFENSE GOES ALL THE WAY ACROSS IT DON’T GO WAY UP TO THAT OTHER HOUSE AND IT’S BEEN. SO WE COULD HAVE FOLLOWED HIM IN COURT ON LAND SO THAT HE COULDN’T MOVE TO FINANCE. SO TO MAKE THAT EASIER FOR HIM WE WENT AHEAD AND MOVED IT AND WE LET HIM MOVE THE FANS AND HE DID THE PAPERWORK WE SIGNED THE PAPERWORK. AND THEN WE PUT THE FREE UP FOR SALE WE HAVE A BAR ON THE PROPERTY SO WHEN NAME WOULDN’T PULL THE DADE THAT’S WHEN THE SAYING THAT IT WAS NOT ON THERE [inaudible] YEAH [inaudible] ISSUE. OKAY SO FOUR MEMBERS ANY OTHER. CAN I MAKE A SUGGESTION FOR YOU BEFORE FOR YOU FOR BOARD DELIVER SOON. AND I’M BALLS ON THE MOUNTAIN. A LAWYER OR ANYTHING. BUT THE KEY HERE IS. YOU HAVE THE THE NEIGHBORS THE NEW NEIGHBORS WAR WE WERE BEHIND THEM. WHO WERE KIND OF LIKE WELL WE UP TEN FEET EVEN THOUGH WE DID- SIGN IN THE? PAPERWORK ON THE CLOSING. DAY YOU KNOW. AND THEN I DIDN’T WANT TO PUT MY NEIGHBORS AGAINST MY NEIGHBOR YOU KNOW. AS AGAINST THEM. AND THEN LOOK AT WHAT HAPPENED WITH WHEN. THE DEVELOPER NEAR THE FENCE. YOU KNOW MY SUGGESTION WAS DUDE YOU NEED TO SIGN THIS TO FIX IT [inaudible] BUT THEN. I DON’T KNOW IF A LESS WITHOUT EVEN IF HE DOES THAT WHICH ARE WHICH IS DONE NOW. IS GOING TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM. YOU KNOW ME HOPEFULLY DOES BUT I DON’T KNOW IF YOU GUYS CAN MAKE A A MOTION. THAT THIS IS APPROVED PENDING. THAT EVERYTHING IS FINE ASSIGNMENT FILE WITH THE WITH THE PROPER EVEN THOUGH I LOVE THIS RACE SHOULD NEED OR THE THANKS ALL THING IS THAT I DON’T THINK IF. IF THEY GET THAT I DON’T THINK THEY NEED A SOCIAL POINT RIGHT THAT’S ONE THE THEIR INTENTION WAS TO GET US TO APPROVE IT AND THEN THEY’LL SAY ARE YOU DON’T NEED THE TEN FEET JUST GO DO WHAT YOU NEED. I DON’T THINK THEY HAVE AN& INTERNET WASN’T EXPLAINED TO ME THAT WAY. LIKE THE WAY YOU’RE SAYING THAT’S HOW I FIGURED IF YOU SIGN IT OVER THEN IT’S OURS WE CAN DO IT BUT ONE I WENT TO CODES ARE SAYING NO. SIGNING AND FILING AND THEN TELL YOU — COME TO US FIRST. THEY WANT TO KEEP THEIR TEN FEET AND THEY’RE JUST HOPING AND THEY’LL SAY — YOU DON’T NEED A TUNE FOR YOU WILL JUST KEEP IT. CAN I GET AN APPROVAL FOR A COUPLE MONTHS UNTIL [inaudible] FORK OUT. WELL. I MEAN ARE YOU THERE FOR A MONTH AND JUST SAY COME BACK IN JANUARY IF YOU HADN’T. WORKED IT ALL OUT. IS THE CLOSE IN FORTY FIVE DAYS THAT. STILL GIVE THEM TIME TO GET THIS BEFORE THAT IF THAT’S THE CASE I MEAN I’M NOT. JUST BEST NUMBER [inaudible] RICHARD. BECAUSE I FEEL LIKE I DON’T WAN. TO NO WE REALLY ARE JUST — OUR WHAT OUR JOB IS TO DO IS MAKE SURE THAT DUE PROCESS OCCURRED AND I DON’T WANT TO GET IN THE BUSINESS OF SOMEBODY THINKING. WELL WE’LL GO THIS ROUTE IN CASE WE NEED IT. AND THEN WE’RE GOING TO HAVE PEOPLE COME IN AND WE’LL BE DOING THE SAME THING WILL. WELL WE THINK WE’RE GOING TO BE ABLE TO WORK IT OUT BUT IF WE CAN’T JUST IN CASE CAN YOU GIVE US THIS REALLY. I DON’T THINK THAT’S REALLY. HOW WE OUGHT TO BE CONSIDERING OUR CASES BUT I’M NOT OPPOSED TO DEFERRING IT? TO SEE IF IT GETS REAL WELL IN THAT AMOUNT ON A PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO YOU BUT I ALSO THINK ON SOME THINGS LIKE THE SHIP YOU’RE IF YOU’RE RIGHT IF YOU’RE ASKING FOR A VARIANCE IN. WOULD YOU REALLY NEED TO BORE DEVELOP. I MEAN I THINK THE NEIGHBORS DESERT AND ALL THAT KIND OF STUFF I MEAN YOU’RE SAYING SORRY PLAN YOU’RE SAYING WELL YES I MEAN IT SO WELL I MEAN. MY MY FIRST THING IS EXACTLY. YOU KNOW WHAT WAS SAID AND THAT IS THAT. YOU HAVE YOU HAVE YOU TRULY EXHAUSTED ALL YOUR OPTIONS TO SOLVE THIS BEFORE COMING TO US AND THEN THAT. I THINK THEY’RE BEING PROACTIVE BUT IT. WHAT THEY SAID IS NO THERE’S ALL THE STUFF IS STILL OUT THERE? AND THEY’RE GETTING THEY’RE GETTING MIXED SIGNALS I DON’T THINK THAT. THEY YOU KNOW I MEAN AND I GET IT. THEY’RE CONFUSED IF THEY’RE CONFUSED AND OBVIOUSLY WE WOULD CONTINUE TO USE. OKAY. BOARD MEMBERS FOR YOUR RECOMMENDATION. WELL THAT THAT’S WHAT I THOUGHT YOU KNOW I MEAN. INDEED TO FOR A MONTH AND THEN AND LET HIM TRY TO FIGURE IT ALL OUT AND GET THINGS FALL IN. AND HOPEFULLY NOT EVEN HAVE TO COME BACK [inaudible] OKAY. SOMEONE MAKE A MOTION. SO — I’LL MOVE THAT WE DEFER THE CASE — TO THE FIRST MEETING IN JANUARY. TO GIVE THEM A CHANCE TO WORK OUT THE DETAILS OF BEFORE I WOULD COME BACK. EMOTION FROM MADE. ANY DISCUSSION SEEING NONE ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE ON THOSE PASSES [inaudible] THE OKAY SHORT SHORT BREAK JOHN MICHAEL. THAT IS. COMPLETELY FINE WITH ME. ONE IS THAT THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DID NOT AIR. THAT THEY DID — READ WITHOUT — A PERMIT. AND THAT BASED ON THE SPECIFICS OF THE CASE THAT THEY WOULD BE ALLOWED TO APPLY FOR A PERMIT — THREE MONTHS AFTER THE LAST — KNOWN RENTAL WHICH WAS SEPTEMBER SEVENTEENTH SO THEY’D BE ABLE TO REPLY ON DECEMBER. SEVENTEENTH [inaudible] READ OUR WE CAN DO ANYTHING FROM A YEAR DOWN — EDGE OF WHEAT AND THE WEIGHT — FALLS. WELL WHAT AND WHAT THE WHAT WE THERE ARE PEOPLE THAT YOU KNOW IT’S VERY COMMON THAT WE HAVE FOLKS IT’S LIKE I SHOULD HAVE A CLUE [inaudible] AND FOR THOSE FOLKS IN A AND IF THEY IMMEDIATELY WHEN THEY FIND OUT THEY CANCEL. THEY THEY SEND PEOPLE AWAY — THEY IMMEDIATELY SAY HEY OUT OF SCREWED UP — IT’S NOT UNCOMMON FOR US TO SAY YOU KNOW THAT’S THE BEST STORY IF THEY DIDN’T CANCEL THAT SOMEWHERE BETWEEN [inaudible] YOU KNOW. THREE AND NINE IF THEY REALLY ARE BAD ACTORS THEN THEY GET YOU KNOW THE FULL YEAR BUT INDICATIONS LIKE THIS FOR YOU ONLY HAVE A THAT. SIX TO A SIX REAL HISTORY [inaudible] AND AT SIX REAL KNOWN HISTORY NOW THEY MAY HAVE OTHERS AND THEN — YOU PUT IN A YOU KNOW ABOUT THAT FOR REVIEW. BUT IT WOULDN’T HAVE ANY THAT’S THAT’S SOMETHING THAT WE HAVE ALL THAT BUT AGAIN WE CAN TALK ABOUT WHAT WHAT THAT SHOULD BE BUT IT — TYPICALLY AT THE YOU KNOW IT’S A IT’S A IT’S A GOOD ACTOR IS ONE THAT WHEN THEY’RE NOTIFIED TO SAY HEY YOU NEED A PERMIT THING LIKE. OKAY– SO. WHAT I DO WELL DO HERE’S HERE’S THE PROCESS AND THEY DO EVERYTHING RIGHT THEN? THEN THAT’S A SITUATION WHERE. WE GENERALLY SAID AFTER ABOUT THREE MONTHS AND YOU CAN GO AHEAD AND APPLY AND GET RIGHT WITH THE SYSTEM AND THEY KEEP DOING. WHAT YOU’RE DOING? BUT I MEAN IT’S AGAIN IT’S A OBVIOUSLY AFTER FOUR VOTES AND SO [inaudible] YOUR YEAH WELL RIGHT RIGHT SO IF WE JUST SAYS NO THAT THEY AND AND I DON’T KNOW IF IT I THINK THAT THE THE SPECIFIC LANGUAGE IS UP TO TWELVE MONTHS NOT — THAT WE HAVE A WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO TO KNOW SOME PEOPLE NEED AGAIN YOU’RE YOU’RE GONNA DIFFERENT — DIFFERENT PEOPLE HAVE DIFFERENT- THAT KELSO PEOPLE HAVE DIFFEREN- PROTECTION SOME SAY AFTER TWELVE AND SOME SAY NO IT STARTS AT TWELVE WHEN YOU GO TO HIM. WILL. HOWEVER EACH OF US GET TO THE ANSWER THAT’S RIGHT THAT’S THAT’S THE RUMOR THE PROCESS I MEAN GETS A ONE IDEA I MEAN I I THINK ALL OF US HAVE SAID. IN OUR WAY WILL YOU KNOW THEY THEY ORIGINALLY SAID IT WAS. A YEAR AND THEN IT COULD BE LESS AND AND WHAT ARE THOSE CAT WATER THOSE CRITERIA — FOR FOR BEING IN DIFFERENT CATEGORIES AND AND AGAIN IF WE HAVE ANY BOARD BECAUSE WE HAVE ANY BOARD MEMBER — BUT IN THE PAST WE SAID WELL THEY KIND OF DIVIDED INTO FOUR QUADRANTS YOU KNOW THREE SIX NINE TWELVE IT MAKES IT EASIER YOU KNOW. THEN SAYING YOU KNOW WHAT’S A ONE WHAT TO DO WITH IT YOU KNOW WHAT WHAT’S A TWELVE OF AT TWELVE POINT THE PENALTY. BOX YOU KNOW IT’S REALLY NO WE’LL LOOK AT IT MAYBE ON A FOUR POINT. AND THEN FOR THE WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENT AREAS I MEAN IS THERE SOME THAT ARE ACTUALLY ZERO BECAUSE THE OTHER SITE WENT LIVE THEY NEVER RENTED. BUT THE SITE WENT LIVE TO GET THE INSURANCE AND THEY DIDN’T DO ANYTHING I MEAN THEY HAVEN’T DONE ANYTHING NEVER READ IT AND FOR SOME. FOLKS LIKE THAT WHICH I WANT NO YOU’RE YOU’RE FINE. IMMEDIATELY BECAUSE YOU REALLY DON’T DO ANYTHING WRONG. BUT WE DON’T. THEN THEY HAVE TO WAIT A YEAR. RIGHT. I’M PRETTY SURE I’M REMEMBERING CORRECTLY THAT THE ORDINANCE WAS CHANGED. TO SAY UP TO TWELVE MONTHS BRIGHT [inaudible] AND SO YEAH TO TWELVE MONTHS ONCE IT GOES TO THE BC A IT’S ONE MONTH IF NOBODY APPEALS TO THE B. C. A. B. C. IT CAN GO UP TO TWELVE MONTHS. YES ARE ONE YEAR WITHOUT COMING THE BCA UP TO TWELVE WEATHER HERE AND IT WAS SOMETHING WAS CHANGED FROM THE ORIGINAL ORDINANCE CORRECT. BUT THE S.. THAT’S MY RECOLLECTION. SO I THOUGHT THAT THAT WAS MY MOTION WAS — TO TO A KNOWLEDGE OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DID NOT THERE. AND BASED ON THIS SPECIFIC CASE- PROVIDE A PENALTY OF THREE MUCH PAST THAT FROM THE LAST KNOWN RENTAL WHICH IS — WHEN THE THE? OFFENDING BEHAVIOR — ENDED WHICH WAS SEPTEMBER SEVENTEENTH ACCORDING TO THE TESTIMONY. OF THE THE THE RENTAL RECORD ACCORDING MR OSBORNE WAS IN JULY AND AUGUST BUT THE THE APP VISIT THEY TOOK DOWN THE SITE AND AND ON THE SEVENTEENTH AND THAT’S WHY I SAID THE SEVENTEENTH IS THE START DATE — WHICH WOULD PUT ELIGIBLE TO APPLY FOR A PERMIT. ON THE SEVENTEENTH OF DECEMBER TENDED I GET IT WAS OUR SECOND OR NOT I CAN SECOND. OKAY IT IS — IS THERE DISCUSSION ANY DISCUSSION. ALL RIGHT — THEY’RE ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SAY AYE. OPPOSED NO — THE MOTION PASSES SO YOU’RE ELIGIBLE TO APPLY ON DECEMBER SEVENTEENTH YOU DON’T HAVE A PERMIT YOU HAVE TO APPLY FOR A PERMIT DON’T READ ADVERTISE ANYTHING UNTIL YOU GET THAT PERMIT. AWESOME THANK YOU VERY MUCH. A MISTER CHAIR MISTER VICE CHAIRMAN EXACTLY CASES TWENTY EIGHTEEN DASH FIVE NINETY EIGHT JOY GOOD ONE IS THE APPELLANT THIS IS A SHORT TERMINAL CASE PRIOR OPERATION FOR PUTTING THE LEGALLY REQUIRED PERMIT. AT THE FIVE TEN MCDONALD DRIVE pE FORWARD. YOU HAVE FIVE MINUTES MAKE THE DESIRED PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD PLEASE BEGIN BY INTRODUCING YOURSELF BY NAME AND ADDRESS AFTER MR OSBORNE MAKES A PRESENTATION ON BEHALF OF STAFF. WE FOUND OUT ABOUT THIS ONE THROWS COMPLIANCE WE SENT A NOTICE ON JUNE FIRST — TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN THEY WERE OPERATING FROM DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND SEVENTEEN TO MAY OF TWO THOUSAND EIGHTEEN ABOUT TWENTY RENTALS — THE ADVERTISERS REMOVED AROUND SOME OF THE INFORMATION IN THE EMAIL — BECAUSE WE HAVE A LITTLE BIT CONCERNED. CLAIM TO FIND OUT FROM FRIENDS PLUNDERED RESEARCH THE ORDINANCE AND BEEN CONFUSED — AND THEN THE ADVERTISERS REMOVED ABOUT THE SAME TIME THAT SHE WAS RECEIVED THE LETTER. I MEAN WHAT I’M SORRY DID YOU SAY THERE WAS. RENTAL HISTORY AFTER. NOT AFTER JUNE. SHOULD UNIVERSAL LAST REAL HISTORY THAT YOU KNOW — RIGHT BUSINESS WHEN THEY ADVERTISE MILITIAMEN. AND SO WHEN WAS THE FIRST TIME THAT WE CONTACTED THEM. IS THAT NOTICE IN JUNE JUNE OKAY THIS IS SO I’M SORRY WHAT WAS THE CONFUSIONS AND YOU JUST THOUGHT THAT THE FATHER WAS A SIGNAL THAT THEY SAID THEY MAY HAVE KNOWN THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO HAVE A PERMIT OR SHE SAID SHE LOOKED ONLINE AND WAS CONFUSED AND TOOK. INFORMATION FROM FRIENDS& [inaudible] OKAY. AND ALSO MENTIONED COME IN AND APPLY FOR A PERMIT AND GETTING DENIED FOR YEAR — YEAH THAT’S NOT THE CASE [inaudible] OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR FOR RESTAURANTS MORE. HI COULD YOU TELL US WHY YOU’RE HERE AND TELL ME WHAT HAPPENED – JOY GOOD WHEN I’M AT FIVE TEN MCDONNELL DR — I MEAN WHAT HE SAID WAS. ACCURATE — I DID DO SOME RESEARCH BEFORE I STARTED MY ERROR BEING BI. ONLINE — AND I DID SPEAK TO SEVERAL FRIENDS THAT I HAVE THAT OWN AND OPERATE SHORT TERM RENTALS — MOST OF HIM. OPERATE IN THEIR HOME WHICH MINE IS AS WELL — I LIVE UP STAIRS THE UNIT IS IN THE BASEMENT — I WAS LED TO BELIEVE UNFORTUNATELY THAT I DIDN’T NEED A PERMIT SINCE IT WAS IN MY HOM. SO I BEGAN OPERATING — LOVED IT WAS VERY SUCCESSFUL I HAD A REALLY FUN TIME — GOT THE LETTER IN JUNE TOOK THE LISTING DOWN TOOK MY SOCIAL MEDIA DOWN — DID — GO MEET WITH THE GENTLEMAN AT THE CLOSE OFFICE TO FIND OUT ABOUT GETTING THE PERMIT — AND HE SAID HE DID TELL ME AT THAT POINT. BUT I HAVE TO WAIT. A YEAR TO GET A PERMIT — START ABOUT THE PROCESS OF GETTING IT — STARTING THE APPEAL — AND I’M HERE JUST [inaudible] TO ASK. FOR SO THE LISTING WAS HONESTY RENTED THE SO I DID HONOR SOME RESERVATIONS THAT I HAD PASSED THAT JUNE DATE — THERE WAS ONE THE LAST ONE WAS IN EARLY — SEPTEMBER — I IT’S SOMETHING ELSE AND I WASN’T AWARE OF WAS CONFUSED ABOUT — NOTIFICATION THAT THEY WERE SO. SUBMITTING TAXES ON OUR BEHALF SO ALL OF THAT STUFF IS SO CONFUSING TO ME BUT I HAVE SINC- GONE AND AND PAID ALL OF MY RICHER TAXES FOR ALL OF THE ALL OF THIS DAY THAT I HAD FOR THE WHOLE TIME FOR THIS YEAR I HAVE PROOF OF THAT — WITH THE LATE FEES AND ALL OF THAT — I GOT THE BUSINESS LICENSE THAT I NEEDED — I DID EVERYTHING THAT I MISSED THE FIRST TIME TO MY OWN — ERROR. BUT I WANT. TO I WANNA OPERATED AGAIN I LOVED IT IT WAS SO FUNNY PEOPLE FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD COME AND STAY I’M NEVER HAD COMPLAINTS FROM MY NEIGHBORS — AND I JUST I WANT TO DO IT RIGHT I DID NOT — TRY TO CHEAT THE SYSTEM MAY NOT GETTING A PERMIT I JUST REALLY FELT LIKE I WAS TOLD I DIDN’T NEED ONE OR MIS READ IT OR IT WAS MY OWN ERROR — BUT I WANT TO DO IT RIGHT OBVIOUSLY MOVING FORWARD SO. THAT’S WHY I’M HERE. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT. WHY DID WHY DID YOUR HONOR THE RENTALS AFTER YOU GOT THE LETTE- A SINGLE MOTHER AND I WAS VERY MUCH WILLING ONLINE INCOME. THAT’S MY ANSWER. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. THEY WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING DISCUSSION. WELL IT’S A LITTLE BIT MORE SEVERE THAN. THE LAST ONE BECAUSE THE SHE DID HONOR. THAT WAS IT WHEN WAS IN SEPTEMBER — I’D HAVE TO LOOK AT THE DATE IT WAS SOMEWHERE MID EARLY TO MID SEPTEMBER [inaudible] SO I’M. I WAS THINKING WELL THE APPLICATION DAY IS. SEPTEMBER TWENTY FIFTH. SO I’M THINKING MORE LIKE A FOUR MONTH PENALTY FROM SEPTEMBER TWENTY FIFTH. IF I CAN MAKE THAT INTO MOTION ANYONE — SO I MOVE THAT THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR TO NOT HERE AND THAT THE APPLICANT BE ABLE TO RE APPLY FOR THE PERMIT FOR MONTHS FROM THE APPLICATION DATE. TO THE BCA WHICH WAS SEPTEMBER TWENTY FIFTH. TWENTY EIGHTEEN WE HAVE A MOTION WE HAVE A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION. ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED. OR IF YOU’RE ABLE TO APPLY FOR A PERMIT ON JANUARY TWENTY FIFTH KAY THANK YOU VERY MUCH [inaudible] I MR VICE CHAIRMAN WE WILL LOSE ONE MORE MEMBER AT THIS HOUR AND THAT WILL RUIN OUR QUORUM WITHOUT REDUCTION FROM FORTY THREE THE BOARD IS NO LONGER LEGALLY ELIGIBLE TO CONDUCT ANY FURTHER BUSINESS. FOR THOSE WHOSE CASES ARE STILL DOCUMENT IF NOT YET BEEN HEARD SPECIFICALLY THE SHORE CRIMINAL CASES THESE ARE CASES. 606-618-6586. 616-626-6967 ZERO SIX SEVENTY ONE THREE SIX SEVENTY THREE AND THEN SIX SEVENTY FIVE THOSE THE CASES THAT WERE NOT PREVIOUSLY DEFERRED WITHDRAWN WE ARE GOING TO CALL A SPECIALLY CALLED MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ON THURSDAY — DECEMBER THE THIRTEENTH ONE PM THIS ROOM THIS LOCATION SAME TIME AS USUAL THE ONLY CASES ON THAT DAY DOCKET LISA PRESENT WILL BE THE SHORT TERMINAL CASES THAT WERE NOT DEFER OR WITHDRAWN FROM TODAY’S DOCKET. ALTHOUGH IT WILL NOT BE A FAIRLY LONG MEETING WE WANT TO CLEAR THE A QUORUM — MEETING IN ELIGIBLE TO CONDUCT THAT BUSINESS THAT WE PROPERTY THAT PROPERLY NOTICE TO THE METRO WEBSITE — INFORMATION HE SAID THE COUNCIL OFFICES WELL SO THAT THOSE FOLKS WILL BE A PRICE TO FIX IT YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS COME SEE OUR STAFF EMAIL OR OFFICE WOULD BE A HELP AS BEST WE CAN. WITH THAT WE CONCLUDE TODAY’S BE EASY A MEETING WE ANNOUNCE ONCE AGAIN THE SPECIAL CALLED MEETING FOR THAT LIMITED DOCKET ON THURSDAY DECEMBER THE THIRTEENTH OUR NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED BCA MEETING WILL BE THURSDAY DECEMBER THE TWENTIETH. HAVE SAFE. NINE THIS IS FOR THE SERVICE AT THE METRO NATIONAL NETWORK. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS PRESENTATION AGAIN. OR FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THIS AND OTHER PROGRAMS. VISIT NASHVILLE DOT

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *