Israel Palestinian Conflict: The Truth About the Peace Process



بعدما كشفنا عن الحقوق ألشرعيه لاسرائيل في الضفه الغربيه والآن سوف نتركز بعملية السلام الكثيرون يعتقدون ان تواجد اسرائيل بالضفه الغربيه, وما يسميه البعض "بالاحتلال", هو السبب للعدوان الفلسطيني تجاه اسرائيل, والسبب انه لا يوجد سلام ولكن هل حقا هذا صحيح؟ لو ان تواجد اسرائيل هو السبب للنزاع فهذا يعني انه لم يكن نزاع قبل العام 1967- عندما لم تكن اسرائيل بالضفه الغربيه, اليس صحيح؟ دعنا ننظر الى الحقائق م.ت.ف- منظمة التحرير الفلسطينية تأسست سنة 1964 – عندما كانت الضفة الغربية وغزة بالكامل تحت سيطرة عربية لماذا اقيمت م.ت.ف في 1964 عندما لم تتواجد إسرائيل بعد بالضفة الغربية وغزة؟ اية "فلسطين" كانوا يحررون؟ شعار م.ت.ف يعطينا الجواب م.ت.ف اقيمت لازالة دولة اسرائيل باكملها بالقوة من خارطة الشرق الاوسط وهو هدف ينص عليه ميثاقها بوضوح هذا الهدف لم يكن جديد م.ت.ف استمرت بتاريخ عربي طويل بالقول "لا" لا- لتقرير المصير القومي للشعب اليهودي لا- للاعتراف بوطن الأجداد لليهود دعنا ننظر للتاريخ في العام 1937 أوصت لجنة "فيل" على تقسيم البلاد… دوله يهودية و…دوله عربية الحصه العربية ضمت 96 بالمائه من ألمنطقه التي خصصتها في الاصل عصبة الامم للوطن اليهودي هذا يحوي اكثر بكثير من الضفه الغربية ولكن بدلا ان يقبلوا اليهود كشريك سلام اجاب الزعيم الفلسطيني, حاج امين الحسني ب-"لا" ووجد له شريكا ذو رؤيه قريبه من رؤيته

0:02:02.000,0:02:11.000
في العام 1947 اوصت الامم المتحده على خطة التقسيم والتي مره اخرى عرضت على العرب اكثر بكثير من الضفه الغربية اليهود قالوا "نعم" الزعماء العرب مره ثانيه قالوا "لا" واطلقوا "حرب الإباده" اسرائيل انتصرت بتلك الحرب, اسست الدوله ولكن لم تشهد يوما من السلام بالرغم من ان جيرانها العرب سيطروا على الضفه الغربيه باكملها العرب استمروا بالقول "لا" هاجموا اسرائيل بدون رحمه… مستغلين الضفه الغربيه كقاعدة اطلاق حتى سيطرت عليها اسرائيل في حرب للدفاع عن النفس عام 1967 بعد الحرب… رفضت الجامعه العربيه جميع محاولات السلام ففضلوا استعمال القوة بدلا من المفاوضات وفي قمة عقدت بمدينة الخرطوم سمعنا مره اخرى: "لا لا لا" دعنا ننتقل بسرعه الى سنة 1993 … اسرائيل والفلسطينيون وقعوا على اتفاقيات اوسلو هل أخيرا قال الفلسطينيون "نعم"؟ بدا الامر هكذا اسرائيل قالت "نعم" واعطت السيطره لحكومه فلسطينيه ساعدت على تاسيسها لكن على الرغم من الاتفاقيات التي عقدت, الافعال الفلسطينيه قالت "لا" فخلال الاعوام الخمسه المقبله شهدت اسرائيل ازديادا كبيرا في الهجمات الارهابية التي قتلت مئات الاسرائيليين في العام 1996 صرح الزعيم الفلسطيني ياسر عرفات: "نحن نخطط للقضاء على دولة اسرائيل وتاسيس دوله فلسطينيه نقيه" لكن اسرائيل لم تتخلى عن قولها "نعم" العام 2000 عرض رئيس الحكومه الاسرائيلي اهود باراك %93 من الضفه الغربية مره اخره كان الجواب "لا" مع ارهاب متزايد في العام 2005 انسحبت اسرائيل من قطاع غزة واقتلاع 8500 مواطن إسرائيلي آملة في دفع السلام والفلسطينيون؟ مره اخره قالوا "لا" هذه المره زادوا الهجمات الصاروخيه من غزه ضد مواطني اسرائيل بأكثر من خمسة اضعاف في العام 2008 محاوله اسرائيليه اخرى ب- "نعم" رئيس الحكومه, اهود اولمرت, وافق تقريبا على جميع المطالب الفلسطينيه بما في ذلك تسليمهم نحو %100 من الضفه الغربيه والفلسطينيون؟ مره اخرى قالوا "لا" إذا… ماذا نستنتج؟ 1. النزاع لم يكن بسبب تواجد إسرائيل في الضفه الغربيه السبب الحقيقي للنزاع حتى اليوم هو التاريخ الطويل لقول العرب "لا" "لا للسلام" "لا لوجود اسرائيل" لان "لا" تتلائم مع السياسه… التربيه… والاعلام الفلسطيني زعماء سياسه ودين يروجون باستمرار لتدمير اسرائيل 2. اسرائيل قالت "نعم" منذ عقود واثبتت ذلك بعقد سلام مع الاردن ومصر إذا… إلى اين نستمر من هنا كيف نتوصل للسلام؟ مع بعض من النيه الحسنه… اعتراف متبادل بحق تقرير المصير وتنازل حقيقي من كلا الطرفين إسرائيل… من ناحيتها… ستستمر بقولها "نعم" من اجل سلام حقيقي ودائم] لكن من اجل إنجاح عملية السلام على الفلسطينيين التخلي عن خيارهم المتعنت للقوه بدلا من المفاوضات واختيارهم "لا" بدلا من "نعم" حان الوقت…

48 thoughts on “Israel Palestinian Conflict: The Truth About the Peace Process

  • watched a minute and half and already came to the conclusion that its a RIDICULOUSLY BIASED VIDEO

  • How about starting these sorts of videos around World War 1? Perhaps around the balfour declaration? Didn't think so.

  • there's only one thing you need to do in order to have peace.Stay away from the Masjid Aksa. and Give up your dream of Solomon temple. That's all Muslims in the world want.

  • this video is strongly affected by an isreali point of view. It is ignorant and does not enlighten people about the real, and far more difficult reality of the middleeastern conflict.

  • Okay, so you are saying that the problem starts with the fact that Palestinians just do not want to accept the 'ancestrial territory' of Israel, but Palestinians were living in this territory when you started buying their land with capital of wealthy European Jews. How can you decide that you are going to found a country in a territory where other people live just because 'your ancestry goes back to this territory'. Well, following this logic, then we the Bulgarians should claim Macedonia, parts of Romania, Greece, Turkey, Serbia, Ukraine even Russia as ours. I am having a hard time trying to understand how both sides think. I am not the biggest fan of Arabs, but my logic supports their side of the story. I still do not have a clear, categorical observation on the matter but Jews have the advantage because they were and are more wealthy.
    And given the fact that one can become 'a Jew' even if they do not have the ancestrial background, and the majority of the Jews do not have anything in their genes that connects them to the 'old Jews' I don't understand how can you play the ''ancestrial territory'' card.
    Someone please explain.

  • Israel must be commended for wanting peace, however to expect peace is out of innocent ignorance because evil doesn't care for peace, and the Bible foretells that there will be no peace, but rather an all out war which leaves the planet uninhabited.

  • You want peace? Give to Israel the entire Middle East for ONE YEAR and you gonna see peace and prosperity everywhere. Islam destroys everything it touches… here in Brazil we don't understand how the denial had endured for so long. (Sorry for the bad english…)

  • Israel is justified in taking every precaution against Iran threats. It must also be considered that Iran is threatening Israel to lead the Palestine state campaign against the Western colonialism of human rights at the UN. So in defending itself against Iran, Israel would do well to remember that Iran's bigger priority is to defeat Western human rights colonialism at UN by establishing a Palestine state. Israel could shift Iran's problem and target to Western human rights colonialism at UN, and with the correct identification of the problem an appropriate answer can be found.

  • The Arabs rejected European Jews not Middle Eastern Jews.
    Really what the Palestinians should do is say yes to giving Israel 2% of the entire land. Then take that from the and say yes to offering 98% if the confiscated from the 2% Israel

  • I'm indonesian and you cannot find this kind of news in indonesian media. our media never told us that Palestinian attack Israel first, they only say that Israel is evil because they kill civilians intentionally, thank you Danny for open our eyes. I hope someday I can visit israel

  • "why create the plo in 1964?" not even going to mention the war in 1948-1949. spead those half facts like wildfire.

  • It highly irrational video, only blaming palestine. Previously I consider westerner has a rational thinking.. It is never mentioned in the video about millions o of Palestinian refugee hv to leave their home.. Israel never aggre to accept this refugee.. Why the original resident of arabs hv to leave their home?

  • There already IS peace in Israel. I don't know if there is peace in Gaza and other places but in Israel there is:
    a) de facto peace (no war with the PLO DE FACTO)
    b) terrorism (which the PLO has NO leverage to stop even if they can encourage it less)
    c) Hammas is no real threat to Israel and although there isn't really peace even de facto with Hammas, Israel is a threat to Hammas to the extent it wants to be but Hammas is not an existential threat to Israel

    Therefore, the PLO has absolutely NOTHING to offer Israel in terms of peace by signing a ceremonial and just symbolic peace treaty which cannot give Israel more peace it has from them. The only thing the PLO theoretically could do is try to fight Israel and thus change the peace status, which is so against their own interests that they don't (and would be in a similar position to Hammas, except in that case Hammas would also take over them so they would disappear).

    I don't want to discuss the morality of these facts, but these are the facts.

  • Jesus was a Judian Jew, so why dont the Jews recognise him as a mesenger of God? he did many miracles and brought a heavenly scripture. Palestine is in the canaan region, where Abraham lived and the Ishmael/Ismail was born. This land was forbidden to the Jews as they disobeyed and rebelled God and his messengers and even slew many. Also the current state of israel is no way near Jewish, it is outright zionist, ie aim to bring about a new world order of oppression and total dominance. Current evidence of this the way Arab countries are being systematically destroyed through sponsoring militants and the creation and support of isis.

  • India is with Israel. Israel is not at all evil it is being portrayed evil to hide the black souls of demonic countries like Pakistan. India atnall times is with Israel

  • Dear Palestinians,
    Israel is far stronger than you. The Jews are far smarter than you. You can't destroy the Jewry.
    Regards,
    An Indian.

  • All these sources explicitly describe "Mandatory" not as the owner, but the one who "engages to do some act without reward" and "to be when one undertakes, without recompense, to do some act for the other in respect to the thing bailed".

    Thus the lawful owners of all Palestine and the lawful owners of Mandate for Palestine are the Jewish people. Jewish ownership of Palestine is based NOT on some "Great Powers" imperialistic decision (as traitorous Israeli officials teach us), but on Arab-Jewish Treaty on Jewish Homeland in Palestine.

    Jewish Mandate for Palestine is one of the essential international ratification's of this ownership. The ratification's was done by the official Arab delegation and by all the nations of the world including Turkey (former sovereign of this territory). Official Arab delegation ratified Arab-Jewish Treaty during Paris Peace Conference. Turkey ratified Arab-Jewish Treaty together with Jewish Mandate for Palestine via the Treaty of Sevres and Lausanne.

  • Do you know why they said no because if they say yes they will have peace with an enemy who kill everyday children and innocent people

  • The problem with israel they don't want peace!!it is not hard to change policy against palestians.and give them there rights!We lived together in andulisia and instead of keep fighting.1 country can give both much opportunities.and even give israel friends rather an enemies

  • ZIONISM  = NAZISM.     "COHANIM GENE"  =  "ARYAN GENE".    Early in 1935, a passenger ship bound for Haifa in Palestine left the German port of Bremerhaven. Its stern bore the Hebrew letters for its name, "Tel Aviv," while a swastika banner fluttered from the mast. And although the ship was Zionist-owned, its captain was a National Socialist Party member. Many years later a traveler aboard the ship recalled this symbolic combination as a "metaphysical absurdity."/1 Absurd or not, this is but one vignette from a little-known chapter of history: The wide-ranging collaboration between Zionism and Hitler's Third Reich.Common AimsOver the years, people in many different countries have wrestled with the "Jewish question": that is, what is the proper role of Jews in non-Jewish society? During the 1930s, Jewish Zionists and German National Socialists shared similar views on how to deal with this perplexing issue. They agreed that Jews and Germans were distinctly different nationalities, and that Jews did not belong in Germany. Jews living in the Reich were therefore to be regarded not as "Germans of the Jewish faith," but rather as members of a separate national community. Zionism (Jewish nationalism) also implied an obligation by Zionist Jews to resettle in Palestine, the "Jewish homeland." They could hardly regard themselves as sincere Zionists and simultaneously claim equal rights in Germany or any other "foreign" country.Theodor Herzl (1860-1904), the founder of modern Zionism, maintained that anti-Semitism is not an aberration, but a natural and completely understandable response by non-Jews to alien Jewish behavior and attitudes. The only solution, he argued, is for Jews to recognize reality and live in a separate state of their own. "The Jewish question exists wherever Jews live in noticeable numbers," he wrote in his most influential work, The Jewish State. "Where it does not exist, it is brought in by arriving Jews … I believe I understand anti-Semitism, which is a very complex phenomenon. I consider this development as a Jew, without hate or fear." The Jewish question, he maintained, is not social or religious. "It is a national question. To solve it we must, above all, make it an international political issue …" Regardless of their citizenship, Herzl insisted, Jews constitute not merely a religious community, but a nationality, a people, a Volk. /2 Zionism, wrote Herzl, offered the world a welcome "final solution of the Jewish question."/3

  • Let the jews lie to themselves here. Id like me kill ur family and take ur land and u say yes yes yes. Yes yes yes.

  • !ISRAEL IS THE ONLY REAL VIBRANT DEMOCRACY IN THE MIDDLE EAST
    ! IT IS A BEAM OF LIGHT IN A DARKNESS OF AN ISLAMIST TURMOIL

  • Love and Peace to Danny Ayalon. First time i saw this one and i love his work. Self explenatory and easy to understand. I stand with Israel. Peace!

  • Thanks to the outstanding SailorSteve, the original poster of this!

    Lies and Truth about Israel and Palestinians

    Lie: Jews conquered Palestinians and displaced their Palestinian state or polity with Israel

    Truth: Israel was created peacefully by the world community via The League of Nations and the UN. This is the 3rd Jewish
    state on this land, the only 3 to have ever been there. There has never been an Arab state.

    Lie: This was Palestinian land

    Truth: This land was last owned by Arabs in the year 1099, when they lost it back to those from whom they had conquered it
    about 450 years earlier – Christians. It had belonged to the Ottomans since 1516. With their fall in 1917 it passed to the British, who deferred to the world community as to its dispensation. The world community gave about 93.5% of
    the Ottoman Empire to Arabs, of which Palestinians ultimately got about 25% (Jordan, Gaza and the West Bank, which they self-govern and over which will have complete sovereignty when they agree to peace in exchange), and Jews about 6.5%.

    Lie: Palestinians are the native people
    Truth: The majority of Palestinians are disparate Arabs from disparate Arab regions who poured into the area in the early to mid-1900’s. Their last names disclose from where they came. Most Muslim Arabs are descendants of the 7th century Arab invaders from Arabia. Most Druze, Bedouins and Christians, whom Arab Muslims conquered (and have persecuted into
    fleeing for their lives in recent decades), are native to the region.

    Lie: There is no Palestinian state
    Truth: Jordan (then known as trans-Jordan) was created to be the Palestinian state, and the clear majority of its citizens
    are Palestinian.

    Lie: The West Bank is Palestinian land

    Truth: The West Bank was designated for Jews under the terms of the still legal Palestine Mandate, but was illegally given
    to Jordan by the British. Thus Israel is “occupying” its own land, which it won back in yet another war of self-defense.

    Lie: Israel keeps invading and taking Arab land

    Truth: Five Arab armies invaded Israel on its very first day in 1948, intending to annihilate the nation and commit
    another Holocaust. They coerced war to destroy Israel in 67 and invaded yet again in 73. In between and after these wars they’ve maintained a terrorist, rocket/missile, kidnapping war against Israel.

    Lie: Israel keeps all the land it has won defending itself against annihilation

    Truth: Israel is the only nation ever to return land to the aggressors who lost it in an effort to destroy those it invaded. In fact Israel has returned about 96% of that land.

    Lie: Israel gratuitously destroys or takes Palestinian homes

    Truth: Only homes of terrorists or their direct relatives are destroyed (or those built by Arabs or Jews in Israel or west Jerusalem without a building permit). But Egypt has destroyed hundreds, maybe thousands, of Palestinian homes to create a buffer between itself and Gaza because of Hamas attacks on Egyptians.

    Lie: Israel is committing genocide or ethnically cleansing Palestinians

    Truth: Since 1967 the Palestinian population has exponentially grown to something like, by their own count and that of the
    UN, 5 times what it was.

    Lie: Israel will not agree to a second (Jordan is the first) Palestinian state

    Truth: Israel is the first nation (and Jews the first people) to give Gaza to Palestinians. No Arab nation offered them
    Gaza. And Israel maintains a standing offer to Palestinians of about 97% of the West Bank in exchange for recognition of Israel and a real peace. But Palestinians will only accept a state that sits on Israel’s ashes, so thus far have chosen war over a state of their own and peace.

    Lie: Jews hate Arabs

    Truth: Israeli Arabs are active in all walks of life, even the military, and are elected to parliament and sit as Supreme
    Court judges

    Lie: “Settlements” are THE obstacle to peace
    Truth: Before there were any settlements, Arabs had invaded Israel twice and the PLO (Palestine Liberation Army) had already been established

    Moreover:
    * settlements are principally suburbs of Jerusalem, in fact taking up little land
    * settlements haven’t been expanded geographically in many years
    * Israel has repeatedly offered Palestinians East Jerusalem in talks

    Lie: Israel is a theocracy

    Truth: Israel is a modern, secular, multi-ethnic, multicultural, western-style democracy where Arabs are elected to parliament and sit as Supreme Court judges

    Lie: Israel won’t share Jerusalem

    Truth: Between 1948 and 1967, when Israel won Jerusalem back from Arabs about to launch yet another war to destroy
    Israel, Jews and non-resident Christians were barred from visiting Jerusalem. But as soon as Israel took control, Muslims (and Christians) were given control over their sites. Moreover, Israel has repeatedly offered East Jerusalem to Palestinians as part of peace deal proposals.

    Lie: Ashkenazi Jews are Khazar converts

    Truth: DNA proves they are of Middle East origin for certain on the paternal side (there’s some dispute whether this is
    true on the maternal side as well), with the same ancestors as Sephardi and Mizrahi Jews

    Lie: Israel gratuitously kills Palestinians

    Truth: Israel cares far more for Palestinian lives than do Palestinians themselves
    Show less

  • I take your point, but the PLO have changed there minds since then and would happily accept just the West Bank and Gaza. So I thin today the source of the problem is still the occupation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *