PBS Documentary 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out Final Edition, 60min

♪>>I don’t want to be involved in conspiracy theories. You know, there are lots of ’em that could go on. We could speculate on that forever. What we really need to know is how, how those buildings came down. ♪>>My husband, Steve, was 48 years old when he was killed on September 11, 2001. He was in the North Tower on the 104th floor. There are so many unanswered questions and that’s scary to me. We never had answers. Nobody ever stopped to have a scientific investigation. A scientific investigation. A scientific investigation. ♪>>Tribute lights in the New York skyline. An annual memorial to the lives lost on 9/11. Yet there’s still more light that needs to shine revealing truths that their family members deserve to know. September 11, 2001, a day that changed history. Four planes went silent and off course. Two of those planes crashed into the World Trade Center Twin Towers. Several columns were severed and the jet fuel ignited fires that spread over several floors. About an hour later, millions watched in shock as both towers were suddenly and rapidly destroyed, killing almost 3,000 people for whom truth and justice may have yet to be served. ♪ Hi, I’m Richard Gage, A.I.A, licensed architect of over twenty years and member of the American Institute of Architects. I’m founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a non-profit organization of well over a thousand technical and building professionals. According to official government reports, the fires weakened the structural steel framing of both Twin Towers, leading to sudden, progressive, and total collapses. Unknown to most people, a third steel-frame high-rise, World Trade Center 7, was also destroyed. Critical questions have been raised by more than 1,500 architects and engineers about the official explanations for the destruction of all three of these buildings. Along with more than 10,000 other concerned individuals, these professionals, collectively comprising more than 25,000 years of experience, have signed our petition. They’re calling for a new investigation into the destruction of these three World Trade Center high-rises. This call is based on evidence that reveals a very different destruction scenario than reported by government engineers. As coherent sets of scientific facts are brought into focus by the experts, the data, and the witnesses in this film, you’ll come to a much greater understanding of the events of 9/11, and will be in a position to draw your own informed conclusions. ♪ ♪ The new World Trade Center Building 7 looms above the site of its original. Building 7 was a 47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane. Yet it was the third modern steel-frame skyscraper to collapse rapidly and symmetrically on 9/11. It was a football field away from the North Tower and sustained minor damage from falling debris. Building 7’s precipitous collapse was blamed on normal office fires.>>I’m Steve Barasch, founder and president of Barasch Architects and Associates, Inc., a 33-year-old architecture planning and engineering firm. One of the things that, that really interested me is how quickly that Tower 7 fell. It fell within seven seconds, approximately, from top to bottom. This building was built in the mid ’80s and met all the codes at the time.>>From about 1965 until about 1985, my– Most of my experience has been in high-rise, multi-story steel buildings. NIST would have us to believe that these were– Was a typical office fire. Scattered office fires, if you will, that brought this building down. Since the mid ’60s, I’ve tried to follow high-rise fires because they’re something we worry a lot about as we design these buildings, and I’m not aware of any high-rise building that have come down as a result of fires.>>The coup de grâce for me was when I found out that Building 7 had collapsed later that day, and when I saw Building 7 come down, to me, the fact that it looks like a perfect controlled demolition of an intact building. ♪ I mean, that’s what I call a smoking gun. ♪>>Was the structural steel from World Trade Center 7 preserved, documented, analyzed according to standard procedures for investigating engineering failures?>>Four hundred truck loads per day of material were taken away from the World Trade Center site and sent to China for recycling.>>There were laws violated in the destruction of that evidence, and for the American Society of Civil Engineers to ignore those events is extremely disturbing and is a violation, in my opinion, of their professional code of ethics.>>It was contrary to the way all investigations are done. If an airplane crashes, they seal off the entire area. Nobody touches anything. They move it to a secure location and they reconstruct an aircraft.>>Normally when you have a structural failure, you carefully go through the debris field looking at each item. Photographing every beam as it collapsed and every column where it is on the ground, and you pick them up very carefully and you look at each element. We were unable to do that in the case of Tower 7. You can’t do science when you are deprived of the evidence and when your hypothesis is the least valid instead of the most likely. When the most likely hypothesis, in the case of Building 7, wasn’t even mentioned, this is not science. It’s trying to prove preconceived ideas. ♪>>Was a proper investigation performed that might’ve revealed the use of accelerants or explosives in World Trade Center 7’s destruction?>>NIST concedes that they found no evidence for explosives. So then we ask them, “Well, did you look?” And they said, “No, we did not look for explosives or residues of explosives.”>>Big explosion. Blew us back into the eighth floor.>>I’m okay, all right?>>Here, hold on.>>You wanna call your mother or something? Just the fact that there were explosions means they need to be investigated.>>Oh my God.>>Did you hear that?>>Move it back.>>We are walking back.>>We don’t have the real story on what happened because there wasn’t a proper investigation done. ♪>>World Trade Center 7 collapsed because of fires fueled by office furnishings. It did not collapse from explosives or from fuel oil fires.>>As reported by the “New York Times”, engineers were baffled by the collapse of Building 7. Since no steel-frame high-rise has ever completely collapsed due to fire, how are we to understand this mysterious event?>>High-rise buildings simply do not collapse due to fire. There has never been, until 9/11, an experience where a high-rise building that was steel-frame completely collapsed. There have been fires burned longer in similar structures without any collapse.>>This claims the fires were very large, very hot, and long lasting. When in reality, observation, which has been researched by many people, shows these fires that were– Did not last very long. They were not in the locations where NIST claims they were at given times.>>I’m a fellow of The American Institute of Architects. For the forty plus years that I’ve been practicing architecture, I have designed a variety of buildings from small houses to high-rise office buildings. Some of the high-rises that I’ve worked on are One Shell and Two Shell here in Houston. I was project manager for a 22-story office building in Akron, Ohio. Later in the day, when World Trade Center 7 collapsed, they had already showed us pictures of a few fires in that building and I mean, they weren’t even raging, and how could that cause a building to collapse as if it were imploded? Couldn’t happen. ♪>>According to lead investigator Shyam Sunder of the National Institute for Standards and Technology, NIST, World Trade Center 7 collapsed at free-fall acceleration for more than 100 feet of its fall. What does the speed of the collapse reveal to us?>>Essentially, in less than seven seconds Tower 7 came down upon itself.>>So it’s like taking your car keys out and just dropping ’em. That’s how fast the building came down for over a hundred feet. Which– And the only way you can get that is when there’s zero resistance. And so, what we’re looking at is a building just coming straight down, falling right through itself, with zero resistance. Buildings don’t have zero resistance which is why you feel comfortable walking into a building.>>This building had 40,000 tons of structural steel in its structural system and that is intended to keep it from going anywhere.>>NIST is telling us that the building below it ceased to exist for the first few seconds of the collapse of the building. Well, things in physics just don’t cease to exist and cease to resist the forces that are on them. The building didn’t disappear so the building can fall for a hundred feet at free-fall speed. That’s impossible. That’s a violation of the fundamental law of physics that says that for every action there’s an equal and opposite reaction.>>If floors fall, they tend to fall and are braced by the floor directly beneath it and there’s some delay there.>>Because of redundancy, because of all the other columns in the building that were not affected.>>Even if a floor were to collapse, it still wouldn’t be able to collapse all of the connections simultaneously at the rate that it did without a secondary explosions. ♪>>We might anticipate that an unevenly damaged building would fall over. Yet videos of the collapse of Building 7 show a fairly symmetrical fall. How do we make sense of this?>>If the buildings had come down by fire, we would’ve seen a more natural progression of collapse.>>And clearly a more asymmetrical pattern should have been present. ♪>>The symmetry is the smoking gun. It cannot happen that when you have asymmetric damage, you will get a perfectly symmetrical collapse.>>The exterior columns on the outside, on the outside, as well as on the inside at the bottom, would have to be severed almost at the same time.>>I worked for Controlled Demolition Incorporated, C.D.I., the top rated explosive demolition firm in the world. What I saw it was a classic implosion. The center of the core, the penthouse area, starts to move first and then the building follows along with it. That’s another indicator that this report is very suspect.>>When it’s all finished, the outside walls are piled one on top of the other right in the middle of the building. Just like a house of cards if it were coming down.>>According to NIST, the failure occurred at column 79 on level 12. This means, basically, they’re talking about a single column collapse, or failure, that resulted in a total collapse of the building. That just does not make any sense. ♪>>The explanations from FEMA and from NIST don’t add up. But there is enormous circumstantial evidence, circumstantial and actually physical evidence as well, that would lead us to a different conclusion, and the conclusion is controlled demolition.>>[speaking foreign language] ♪>>Building 7, to me, is really what gives it away because that’s a classic case of controlled demolition. ♪>>This is the original site of the World Trade Center Twin Towers. Construction is now underway where dramatic new facilities are being erected. Just ten years years ago, the planes hit the towers, cutting through some exterior and interior supporting structural steel columns. The fuel from the planes ignited office fires across several floors. According to the official reports, the structural steel frame was weakened and failed, causing a total progressive collapse of each tower. Does the official explanation make sense? Was there a comprehensive investigation that examined all of the evidence?>>I walked into the office and the first words that I heard was, “A plane’s just run into the World Trade Center.” And my initial thought was, “Well, that’s okay. It’s built to withstand a 707.>>It did not seem possible that these towers that were designed to withstand the impact of a 707 could possibly collapse in such a short order of time from the time that they were hit.>>The majority of the jet fuel was burnt up instantly in the big fireball and it was gone. ♪ The fires that were left were office furnishings and carpet and things like that. A lot of things in these kind of buildings have to be fire-resistant by nature. It’s required by code. So there really isn’t a whole lot of fuel in there to begin with.>>The media portrayed these fires as being extremely hot, but the fires were not that hot in World Trade Center 1 and 2. If you look at the NIST’s own data, you can see this. And to use our own powers of observation, you could tell by seeing these fires and seeing black smoke come out the windows. That means that the fires were oxygen starved and there was incomplete combustion. And so, it was a low-temperature fire.>>The heat from the fire supposedly softened the steel and thereby brought the buildings down. You have a flame at 750 degrees, you can hold that flame under a steel beam forever and you’ll never reach a high enough temperature to bend steel, let alone melt it. So immediately I knew at that point that the official explanation was dead wrong. ♪>>Rather than a slow groaning collapse that we might anticipate, the Twin Towers show in the videos a very rapid, sudden onset of destruction. What does this imply?>>This claim that the upper section of each of the towers crushed the lower section. However, when you watch video closely in the case of World Trade Center 1, you’ll see that the upper section disintegrates itself. It appears to be a controlled demolition of its own of the upper section.>>The top section pushing on the bottom section it’s gonna meet equal forces as it goes. Both sections are gonna be demolished at the same rate. So by the time you’ve crushed up 15 stories below it, the top 15 stories are also gonna be crushed, and so there’s nothing left now to crush the rest of the building. You’re looking for a jolt that this thing, if it actually comes down and hits, you should be able to see the point at which they actually impact because it would actually slow down the motion of the falling block.>>Before the tower started collapsing from the top, the antenna started to fall and the antenna, of course, was over the middle of the elevator shafts. I’m very familiar with the interior structure that surrounded the elevator shafts and the accessibility which the elevator companies had 24/7.>>It wouldn’t be a problem once you gained access to the elevator shafts. Then a team of loading experts would have access to all the core columns and beams. The rest could be accomplished at that point by just the right kind of explosives for the job at hand.>>The only way that I can see that the towers could have collapsed is that the interior columns were compromised. ♪>>Over a hundred first responders reported sounds of explosions and flashes of light at the onset of destruction of both towers. These were not discussed in the NIST report. What did these eyewitnesses actually see and hear?>>As we were getting our gear on and making our way to the stairway, there was a heavy-duty explosion.>>Inside the lobbies.>>And we stuck on the stairs for a while. We finally got down to the lobby, and then we get to the lobby there was this big explosion.>>There were numerous secondary explosions taking place in that building. There were continuous explosions.>>Floor by floor it started popping out.>>It was as if they had detonators that were planted to take down a building. Boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom.>>And it just started going pop. It just started going boom, boom, boom, boom, boom. And he goes, “How fast?” And I go, “Like firecrackers.”>>They’re reporting exactly what I would expect. You’re hearing boom, boom, boom, boom, boom. Waves of explosions going off. Not one massive, big boom.>>There’s so many videos of witnesses from that day that report explosions. There’s radio transmissions from the F.D.N.Y. We have the transcripts that were recorded, you know, back in 2001 of all these firefighters and first responders reporting explosions.>>This testimony should’ve caused the presumption that there was a good chance explosive residue would be found and justified testing for it, rather than the opposite.>>It doesn’t look like a collapse. It’s like a huge mushrooming, billowing kind of an event. That whole thing looks nothing like a building falling down. It’s a building being blown up. That’s what the physics shows.>>Yet they refuse to consider the possibility of explosives, or some other form of demolition device, could’ve been used to cause the collapses of the towers, and the fact that controlled demolition is consistent with all the available technical evidence, and the response to that request for correction is this simply saying, “They’re unable to provide a full explanation for the total collapse.” Even though that was their task given to them by Congress. ♪>>FEMA documents a 1,200 foot diameter debris field around each tower. Videos show multi-ton steel sections of hundreds of individual steel pieces ejecting out of the towers at sixty miles an hour for a distance of 600 feet. They also show clouds of debris pulverized in midair. An isolated explosive ejections as many as sixty stories below the so-called “crush zone”. Videos also show the near total destruction of both towers. What does all this tell us about the forces and energies involved in the destruction?>>Large multi-ton beams were hurled hundreds of yards laterally. Gravity works vertically, not laterally. ♪>>So something’s happening to throw these things horizontally at those kinds of speeds, and here it is trailing white smoke the whole time. It really is indicative of some kind of explosion.>>The individual explosions that I had noticed twenty and thirty and forty stories below the collapsing structure.>>And naysayers tend to say, “Well, that’s just air being blown out the windows.” I mean, it doesn’t really work to say it’s just air pressure. Some of these are coming out faster than a hundred miles an hour.>>As an architect, I would expect to see larger portions of the building floors, the decking, the steel decking, the concrete topping. Much larger remnants of what the structural components of this building was.>>What happened to the–>>The concrete was pulverized and I was down here at Tuesday and it was like you were on a foreign planet. All of lower Manhattan, not just this site, from river to river there was dust powder two, three inches thick. The concrete was just pulverized. ♪>>In its report on World Trade Center 7, which came out in May of 2002, F.E.M.A. documents in Appendix C, steel that has been melted and even partially evaporated resembling Swiss cheese. What are we to make of this?>>I would like to know why NIST excluded the evidence of melting steel. Why is this not included? Why is this forensic evidence not being included in the report? ♪>>First of all, let’s go back to your basic premise that there was a pool of molten steel. I know absolutely nobody, no eyewitnesses who said so, nobody who’s produced it.>>You’d get down below and you’d see molten steel, molten steel running down the channel rails. Like you’re in a foundry.>>Yep.>>Yeah. Like lava almost.>>Like lava.>>There are actually melted beams where it was molten steel that was being dug out.>>Underground it was still so hot that molten metal dripped on the sides of a wall.>>This is fused element of steel, molten steel, and concrete and all of these things all fused by the heat into one single element. ♪>>Many witnesses, firemen and lots of people, described the flowing molten metal, iron or steel, at extremely hot temperatures, and John Gross categorically denied their observations. So that because their observations don’t fit his preconceived notion, he not only ignored evidence, he denied evidence. ♪>>In an office fire, you cannot generate enough heat to melt steel, and yet we have evidence of molten iron in the microspheres, in the rubble pile, and the metal pouring out of the side of the tower.>>So what is this molten metal? It’s a direct evidence for the use of thermite.>>An incendiary used by the military, thermite is a compound of iron oxide and aluminum which when ignited, sustains an extreme heat reaction, creating molten iron. In just two seconds, thermite can reach temperatures over 4,500 degrees Fahrenheit. Quite enough to liquefy steel. We know that open air fires cannot burn hot enough to melt steel, but metal had melted at the base of the towers.>>I found a pore in the steel that had pure sulfur.>>There’s a government theory that calcium sulfate from gypsum boards was the source of sulfur and that’s wrong. Calcium sulfate cannot undergo any kind of a chemical reaction that produces the element sulfur, and we’re not dealing with any kind of compound of sulfur when we’re talking about sulfurization. We’re dealing with the element sulfur.>>There’s a version of thermite, called thermate, which has sulfur in the thermate, and what the sulfur does is it’s sort of like salt on ice.>>And it just basically makes the steel melt at a lower temperature.>>And if you do a search on Google for thermite and building demolition, you can find devices that have been fabricated and invented that use thermite for building demolitions.>>In the case of thermite cutting charges, you would’ve heard far less noise since they are worked by thermal heating, melting of the steel, rather than explosive cutting as in R.D.X. charges.>>Over flights had detected, with infrared camera, 1,400 degree Fahrenheit hotspots on the surface of Ground Zero, and that being, therefore, a week, you know, indicates that there was something very hot going on below the surface.>>So thermite would also explain, potentially, the fact that the fires could not be put out at Ground Zero. The fires lasted for quite a while, but most importantly, they were deep within the pile where people would expect that the environment was oxygen starved, and thermite could explain this because it has its own oxidant within. It’s actually the metallic oxide that provides the oxidant to allow the incendiary thermite reaction to occur even under water. ♪>>As much as six percent of the World Trade Center dust consisted of tiny previously molten iron spheres. What does this tell us about the temperatures generated in the towers’ destruction?>>When the U.S.G.S. collected samples of the World Trade Center dust, they found the iron microspheres. Insofar, the U.S.G.S. does not have a valid explanation for the presence of these iron microspheres.>>So what do the microspheres contain? Iron is the main element and then it has smaller portions of aluminum, sulfur, a trace of manganese. Most of ’em are less than about a tenth of an inch in diameter and they’re spherical and they’re found in all of the dust blown out of the buildings during collapse, no matter where in Manhattan that dust is picked up.>>You must’ve had a much hotter heat source for you to get 2,700 degrees Fahrenheit in order to melt the iron to get these molten spheres. Your heat source must be something like a chemical reaction. An exothermic chemical reaction that reacts, in the case of thermite, reacts at 4,500 degrees Fahrenheit.>>My contention based on finding thermite residue in the dust is that it happened before. It didn’t happen after in the fires that ensued in the rubble pile afterwards. All the characteristics of the microspheres along with what I see in the attack of the beams that were actually found, tell me that thermite was involved in melting those steel beams. ♪>>Out of the ashes of the World Trade Center devastation rises the Freedom Tower, whose foundation, however, is shrouded in question. For example, in the World Trade Center dust an international team of scientists find an advanced form of highly energetic nano-thermite composites. What is it? And where does it come from?>>In the dust we found what we characterize as unreacted thermitic material in the shape of some very tiny red/gray chips, and in the reaction, they produce molten iron which is the prime indication of a thermitic reaction, and such a reaction can be used to destroy steel structures. What we have found is a modern version of thermite which we call nano-thermite, which is produced in a different way. It is not just two powders being mixed. The material is actually built from the atom scale up. We call it the bottom up procedure which is what you do in nanotechnology. The ingredients are much smaller which means they’re reacting faster and they are more easily ignited.>>The primary elements in the red material are aluminum, iron oxide, as well as silicon and carbon. The iron oxide appears in fasted grains, approximately a hundred nanometers across. The aluminum appears in thin platelets about forty nanometers thick. This is discussed in our paper in “The Open Chemical Physics Journal” published in April of 2009. So far none of these papers have been refuted in the literature, the scientific literature. So that means they are unchallenged in the scientific sense. They stand as an indictment, really, of the official story of 9/11.>>We also took paint that came off of the W.T.C. steel and looked at that in the S.E.M. and did a compositional analysis of that and found that it was not similar to the red/gray chip or the red layer of the red/gray chips.>>This cannot be paint. Paint does not have these exotic properties. That’s impossible. This is material that is, is of military use that really shouldn’t be there. ♪>>You don’t need to be an engineer or an architect to see what happened to those buildings. ♪>>Any honest investigator would be looking at this and looking for explosives and so forth. The NIST investigation didn’t go there. They just would not look for explosives. This has been the work of independent researchers, not NIST.>>So the preconceived notion of NIST is that there’s no evidence for explosives and so there’s no point in looking. That is the most unscientific thing that you can possibly think of not to look because you don’t expect to find evidence, and in fact, the evidence is overwhelming that these red/gray crystals are very high temperature incendiaries. They state these conclusions for which there’s virtually no evidence, and then they ignore conclusions that can be drawn from the evidence. ♪>>The only way that a building can accelerate as it collapses is by having pre-engineered precisely timed and precisely placed explosives. In other words, controlled demolition.>>We have a professional responsibility, and I urge every engineer and architect and demolitions expert, and anybody that has any knowledge in this field, to examine the evidence and stand up and be counted, because the rest of the world is depending upon us.>>We know we’ve been lied to about 9/11. We don’t know for sure who did it. We don’t know exactly how they did everything and that’s why we need a new investigation to find out. We do know that there was a massive cover up. That there was evidence hidden and destroyed. The American people absolutely need the truth of 9/11. ♪>>It took some kind of consciousness raising on my part before I was willing to look at the possibilities, and really you need to go where the evidence leads.>>Let’s look at it objectively. Let’s look at the evidence, not these fabricated computer models and hearsay and all these predetermined conclusions. Let’s really open it up again and investigate this thing properly and then come to conclusions.>>I strongly support an independent investigation that would be independent of the government. Independent of all of the influences that, obviously, were in effect during the NIST investigation.>>What happened on 9/11 is not something that is just gonna go away. This is very pertinent to us today. I wish to further the investigation, and I want to make a difference because I want this to be a safe and better place for my children.>>Sign the petition on the Architect and Engineers 9/11 Truth website mainly because I wanted to stand behind the families that lost people on 9/11. The 9/11 Truth Movement was started by the families that lost loved ones on that day, and they were all out there alone screaming for help, and our own country was ignoring them and ignoring their needs and not taking care of them the way we should have after that happened. ♪>>Most of us who have lived with the events of 9/11 have, as a result, experienced some kind of trauma. It can be very difficult to come to terms with what actually happened at the World Trade Center. In fact, someone told me recently, “I wouldn’t believe what you’re telling me even if it were true.” Our petition signers with psychological expertise have stepped forward to offer their insight. While this segment is clearly outside the knowledge base of The Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, these experts in psychology highlight their valuable experience for us as to why this evidence can still be so difficult for people to accept.>>As we know, the horrors of what happened on 9/11 were televised all over the world and they were televised, in fact, live. We witnessed the deaths of almost 3,000 of our fellow Americans. We know this had a very severe and traumatic impact on a large majority of the population. At this point, we have nine years of hard scientific evidence that disproves the government theory about what happened on September 11, and yet, people continue to be either oblivious to the fact that this information exists or completely resistant to looking at this information. So the question becomes why? Why is it that people have so much trouble hearing this information? From my work, I think we would be remiss not to look at the impact of trauma.>>Many people respond to these truths in a very deep way. Some have a visceral reaction like they’ve been punched in the stomach. To begin to accept the possibility that the government was involved is like opening Pandora’s box. If you open the lid and peek in a little bit, it’s gonna challenge some of your fundamental beliefs about the world.>>If we can think of our world view as being sort of our mental and emotional home, I think all of us will do just about anything to defend our homes, to defend our families. And so I see that with people and I saw that with myself when my brother tried to talk with me about it. Of don’t mess with me. Don’t mess with my home. Don’t mess with my comfort with how things are. About a week later, I read a lengthy article by Professor Griffin about why he believes the official account of 9/11 cannot be true, and it was a very well researched article. It was in my office at the time. I sat there and I felt my stomach churning. I thought maybe I was going to be sick, and I leaped out of my chair and ran out the door and took a long walk around the block, around several blocks, and just broke down. I understand now that what was happening was my worldview about my government being in some way my protector, almost like a parent, had been dashed, and it was like being cast out into the wilderness, I think is the closest way to describe that feeling, and I sobbed and I sobbed. Felt like the ground had completely disappeared beneath my feet and, and I knew at some point during the walk that I knew that I was going to have to become active in educating other people about this. That there was– That for me to retain any sense of integrity, I was going to have to take some action. I couldn’t just let something like this go.>>When we hear information that contradicts our worldview, social psychologists call the resulting insecurity “cognitive dissonance”. For example, with 9/11 we have one cognition which is what the official story of 9/11. What our government told us. What our media repeated to us over and over that 19 Muslims attacked us. On the other hand, we have what scientists, researchers, architects, engineers are now beginning to tell us which is that there is evidence that shows that the official story cannot be true. So now we’ve lost our sense of security. We are starting to feel vulnerable. Now we’re confused.>>9/11 Truth challenges the beliefs that our country protects us and keeps us safe and that America is the good guy. When your beliefs are challenged, fear and anxiety are created. In response to that, our psychological defenses kick in and they protect us from these emotions. Denial, which is probably the most primitive psychological defense, is the one most likely to kick in when our beliefs are challenged.>>And it’s a very, very uncomfortable state to be in, and eventually our mind shuts off. Just like when a computer is overloaded, our minds get overloaded. We can’t handle it anymore and we shut down.>>And what some of us will tend to do is deny the evidence that’s coming our way and stick to the original story, the official story, and to try to regain our equilibrium in that way. Another thing we can do is decided to look at the conflicting evidence and be sincere and be open minded and look at both sides of the issue, and then make up our own mind about what reality is. Here are a few of those, those spontaneous initial reactions to hearing the contradictory evidence about 9/11.>>”I don’t want to know the truth or I become too negative and psychologically go downhill. I’m not sure I want to know. If this is true, then up would be down and down would be up. My life would never be the same.”>>”Fran, I refuse to believe that that many Americans could be that Satanically treasonous. Someone would have talked.” But these are beliefs. They are not scientific facts. But these beliefs do keep us from looking at the empirical evidence. Whenever we say, “I refuse to believe.” We can be sure that the evidence that’s coming our way is not bearable and that’s it’s going– It’s conflicting with our worldview much too much. As I thought about all of these responses, I realized that what is common to everyone of them is the emotion of fear. People are afraid of being ostracized. They’re afraid of being alienated. They’re afraid of being shunned. They’re afraid of their lives being inconvenienced. They’d have to change their lives. They’re afraid of being confused. They’re afraid of psychological deterioration. They’re afraid of feeling helpless and vulnerable, and they’re afraid that they won’t be able to handle the feelings that are coming up. None of us want to feel helpless and vulnerable.>>Healing comes through facing the truth, experiencing it, allowing the feelings to come in so that if there are feelings of fear that perhaps these events were caused by something that we haven’t thought about yet, dark elements within our society, for example, we let that come in and explore it. Let the light shine on whatever happened. This will be the most healing process.>>After World War Two, part of the way that Jewish people honored the dead was by making sure that the truth was known and that the value of these people was respected. Not pursuing the truth about 9/11 disrespects the value of the life of the people that died. Thinking that we’re above such things. That it could happen in other countries but it couldn’t happen here, that’s a lack of humility and that’s excessive pride, and so not being able to see our dark side, or our weaknesses, is the most dangerous thing.>>A feature of American history that makes us particularly liable to this pride is this notion that’s called exceptionalism. That America is the exceptional nation, and that began from the beginning as this country was formed. The people would say, “Well, there was so much evil in the European countries. So much cheating. So much lying. So much using the people for the ruler’s purposes, but not in America. We have leaders that are free from those sins.” So I think this has made 9/11 particularly difficult for Americans.>>So we need to understand that questioning is, is patriotic. Questioning is what we’re supposed to do as citizens. That’s our duty.>>When something like 9/11 happens, we need to be sure that we have a real investigation into who the perpetrators are and then we need to be sure that those perpetrators are held legally accountable. It’s part of the healing process on the individual level as on the collective level. We need the truth in order to heal. ♪>>My name’s Bob McIlvaine. I’m from right outside the Philadelphia area and I’m the father of Bobby McIlvaine who was killed in the lobby of the North Tower on September 11, 2001. Bobby was one of the first ten bodies found. We took him home that week. We were one of the few. When I finally found a doctor who would examine him, all of his injuries were in the face, the front of his face. His face was blown off. Massive cuts in his chest and his right arm were blown off. To me that means explosion.>>What happened on September 11th, was a tragedy. Where Neal was on Flight 175 and it crashed into the second tower and I can’t imagine what happened to him.>>My brother was my best friend. David has always been a firefighter. My brother went in to save people’s lives. I’m a family member trying to find out the answers to the murder of 3,000 plus people.>>I’m Jane Pollicino. My husband, Steve, was 48 years old when he was killed on September 11th. I have no identification. You know, why is that? It seems to me we should know why over a thousand victims there are no trace for and no identification. No trace of over a thousand victims.>>Just a few years ago they were still finding body parts on the roofs of buildings. What is that?>>We should know why there are over 700 bone fragments found on the top of Deutsche Bank building less than half an inch long. We should have that information. Why were they up there? Why weren’t they found? What kind of explosion was there?>>And the explosions were brought up many a times. Talking to firemen, talking to medics, talking to everyone. Everybody talked about these explosions.>>I want the officials that are in power to ask the questions. I want answers.>>Please look at architects and engineers. People all around the world. Scientists all around the world are questioning this. When you bring science into the equation, that’s so important because you can’t argue against science, and there’s some deep, deep explaining to do.>>The bottom line is that it needs to be investigated properly.>>We will never heal. This country will never ever, ever forget that day. We have to demand a new investigation. I want justice here. ♪>>The forensic evidence that you’ve seen is very real. New light has been shown. A third beam now reaches into the pitch black sky and stands in for the still officially unexplained free-fall destruction of the World Trade Center Building 7. The obvious dark truth about Building 7 may very well provide the key to justice for the victims of family members of the destruction of the Twin Towers. ♪>>The country owns this. We were all victims. You would all– You all should want answers. It’s not just, it’s not just ours. Not just mine. We all lost something that day. ♪>>[singing in foreign language] ♪ ♪ ♪ Captioned by
Video Caption Corporation

100 thoughts on “PBS Documentary 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out Final Edition, 60min

  • In the most simplest terms, our President and Gov’t attacked its own country, its own people to gain support for endless war. And, America signed off on it and welcomed it. I remember 100’s of teens fresh out of high school all pumped up and joining the military immediately to go and bomb all these countries that never lifted an angry hand towards the USA ever.

  • simple. every human that has been trained to complete this task should be lined up,and then we decide who did what. need a license for a cab. need a license to pull buildings. so glad lucky lie ass larry silverstein made it through and his kids. 7 years later economy crashes so lucky could get double pay. 1996 i stood atop trade 1. RESPECT

  • Just words can't indite the Evil persons. As the year's pass, it becomes evident that justice will not be served. We if accepting an inside job learn as never before the ineptitude of our efforts to bring the guilty parties to account. The Evil drains us of our love of humanity and robs us of our abilities to act.
    I for one despair for the future to live with this crime against humanity unpunished an ignored

  • Who were the 19 terrorists involved in the hijackings working for? Nobody asked this question- either because it didn't occur to them or because they have no idea about that can of worms.

  • 🤔 the cowardly selfish lack of interest collectively as Americans citizens we show towards the un- truthful acknowledgement of the events on 9/11 is the ultimate disrespect for the men and women that died to that day

  • We all are stupid, we all know it was a sham but the question is who did it and for what???
    If we start to incriminate the Government who was responsible or a part of Government then we admit the system is flawed and we are the ones who put them in power so we are to blame.
    We use youtube, we use google, we use pepsi, we use and use and put all our money in their pockets and give them the power to Rape, pillage, kill, destroy others now these things will head back home.

  • Amazing. First video that has looked at the strong psychological implications of this. This provoked thought that makes you question the core of reality.

  • What a boring , stupid video . I could not sit through more than 3 minutes before stopping it ! It seems half the Country is brain dead .

  • Most recent (27.03.2018)


    Mmm, thought this might happen.


    Probably not enough time for you to watch the above, but I've checked out a lot of the detail. I didn't think about it originally, but there's no other way to explain the "DUST and FREEFALL". Ignore the background music at the start.


    Barbara Honegger

    Bobby Mcllvaine' son Bobby

    Bobby Mcllvaine Act

    Regardless of what you get round to viewing, Bobby Mcllvaine is a must.


  • But what is the gain that a country can have doing all these intentionally? All the evidence shows that it was all planned but why? Thousands lost their lives.. why?

  • This video is slow and stupid, the music is annoying, unnecessary and distracting. It is fit for 5th graders.

  • Need a Go Fund Me for Independent Investigation . Most people as myself knew from day one these buildings did not come down from Airplanes. I do not trust anything i hear from the top and never will.

  • The government will NEVER, EVER admit, tell or reveal the truth of what they did. "There needs to be an investigation independent of the government". So, LET'S DO IT. INVESTIGATE. There are many, many civilians out there who do this and hundreds of professionals who can carry out an independent investigation and I am sure everyone would avail themselves as "Pro Bono". So, why has this not been done?
    As for the government's "official version" of the whys and hows…what bothers me most is that they believe the American people….that we are so dumbed down and they truly believed WE would ACCEPT and BELIEVE such a ridiculous story! Still today, years later, the same lies, the same bullshit is told about 9-11, regardless of the overwhelming evidence and FACTS that tell us otherwise!!!
    The individuals responsible for murdering these people, the day WILL come when each and every one of them will be held accountable for their actions. Fear not. That day will come. They will have to answer, they will be held accountable.

  • who was the original builder? what did they say? also interesting how the wtc had just not long changed owners

  • Absolutely amazing and so sad that a so called respectable democracy can cover up such a tragedy. Worse than any other corrupt state in the world. So sad for all the victims

  • To :  ALL who are watching … the Lawyers' Committee for 9-11 Inquiry …  has as of April 10, 2018 brought forth a PETITION to the courts demanding a Grand Jury into the affairs of 9/11 .   For all watching go to :https://lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org/sign-the-grand-jury-petition/  and sign the support section.

  • The NIST puppet should be taken out and hung ! The treasonous slime is a poster boy for criminal deceit and pathological lies !

  • In today's society, there must always be an independent investigation of evidence. We as Americans must always seek the truth no matter where it leads us. Yes, sometimes the truth may hurt, we should never have to be lied to especially in times of disaster or tragedy. Most Americans live in an alternate reality than the real world. The ones that shine lights in places that our government doesn't want you to see bad things usually happen to them. Sometimes when I look at all the things I have seen in my life, all the lies and deceit in our own government I get angry. I believe there are more conspiracies than just 911, however, those are other issues that need to be examined. Thanks for sharing this with the world.

  • Why is there not even one person coming out to say, I planted bombs, if there were. Who would keep such a secret?

  • They forgot to talk about the terrorist passport which remained intact and was found a few blocks away…. How would that be possible!??

  • NIST and the Warren Commission report on JFK, have 1 thing in common. BUSH
    Do the research, it's all available it will make you sick and angry..!!!

  • But…. PBS did not broadcast this nationally. Correct me if I'm wrong, but Frontline did not cover this, nor the nightly news show…. for reasons we all know.

    On september 1, 2001 the very day of the events, the so-called "President of the United States, George W. Bush, declared that the events of 9/11 were "an act of war". Doing so before any investigation had taken place, making an assertion with no foundation in fact.
    These assertions by George W. Bush, were that 19 Arab hijackers wielding only box cutters and directed by a mastermind from a cave in Afghanistan had defeated the combined military and intelligence community of the most powerful military establishment to ever burden the planet in all of history.

    What most seemed not to notice at the time is that this story from the Oval Office is in fact a "conspiracy theory"'.,,one of the most absurd and jejune conspiracy theories ever conceived of. George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, Philip Zelikow, et al, are in fact "Tin hatted conspiracy nuts" as is often charged by disninformants against independent researchers of the 9/11 case.

    The fact is that the events of 9/11 were crimes, not an "act of war" as speciously declared by George W. Bush.
    One specific point of fact was discovered early on in our independent investigation. That was that the FBI had not listed Osama bin Laden as a suspect in the attacks of September 11th. When the FBI was queried as to why this was so, the spokesman at the time for the FBI, Rex Tomb explained that the reason was because the FBI had "no hard evidence that bin Laden was involved with the attacks". See:
    . . . . . .

  • In Panettastan … Chris Bollyn's … talk was attacked by two Supervisors of Santa Cruz County, CA. They threatened the providers of the facilities designated for the presentation. Grange Halls, who offer their locations for groups across the political spectrum were intimated by this outright violation of First Amendment Rights. Also involved in shutting down the talk was COPA … a Saul Alinsky operation involving a group and Christian and Jewish (Globalist / Marxist) front.

    The FBI under Jeff Sessions … declined to investigate. California Attorney General Xavier Baccara was a key player with the Wasserman Shultz Pakistani spy ring.

    Espionage collaborator Leon Panetta (Russian colluder) runs a powerful political machine on not only California's coast but Statewide.

    Called California Forward … Ed Griffin's Freedom force has been spiking information about California Forward and Panettagate. Do a search for Panettagate.


  • Its called a government cover-up.. And you can not fight against a entity that big.. Its not the first time,, nor will it be the last..
    So my point is,, you can howl at the moon forever,, it still will not answer.. You will never get the truth or satisfaction.. The government is heartless,, and does not care…

  • America should renovate their constitution, this is not democracy, this is not freedom of speech, if these kind of conspiracy that has legit and scientific evidence, why isnt still no one accountable for this heinous crimes, the people paid for this crimes are the afghanistan and iraqi people, Bin ladin was a terrorist but he was innocent, Sadam was a dictator but he was innocent, gaddafi was innocent how many more would die for america to wake up

  • A chance for Justice to be served is eroding day by day then years by years, what happens now? Will the truth be buried deeper and witnesses and perpetrators die of old age, this bothers me the truth in plane site but here we sit it’s frustrating.


  • A 9/11 TRUTH & FACTS PRIMER CAN BE EXAMINED HERE: http://www.chuckmaultsby.net/id15.html
    RABBI DOV ZAKHEIM'S ROLES IN 9/11 CAN BE EXAMINED HERE: http://www.chuckmaultsby.net/id86.html
    EXAMINE THE INFESTATION OF THE PENTAGON PRIOR TO 9/11 HERE: http://www.chuckmaultsby.net/id102.html
    EXAMINE THE ROLE OF "ISRAELI ART STUDENTS" HERE: http://www.chuckmaultsby.net/id145.html
    THE TRUTH & FACTS ABOUT WTC BUILDING 7 HERE: http://www.chuckmaultsby.net/id72.html
    THE ROLE OF DONALD RUMSFELD on 9/11: http://www.chuckmaultsby.net/id103.html
    THE 9/11 "OMISSION COMMISSION" INVESTIGATION FARCE: http://www.chuckmaultsby.net/id116.html
    9/11 Traitors & Suspects: http://www.chuckmaultsby.net/id90.html

  • Noone from the Warren comission is doing Any further investigations as big as this was .Biggest Terror attact in history but the case is closed..???

  • Thank you PBS for being brave and going against the fray to bring the truth to light. I feel bad for the people who spoke out in the beginning and then "committed suicide"…

  • America lost our wide eyed innocence in 9/11 😢😢😢 they "killed Santa"… That's why it's hard to see. People don't want to see there is no Santa…

  • RUDY GIULIANI NEEDS TO DIE FOR 9/11 NY MAYOR PRICK ANNOUNCE TO THE WORLD THAT THE TOWERS WERE GOING TO FALL THREE BUILDINGS FELL ON 9/11 IT NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE gas board these fucking pricks to death silverstein, giuliani, rumsfeld, bush, cheney etc.

  • no money to Israel ever fucking again They attacked the USS LIBERTY IN 1967 to COMMIT WAR CRIMES AGAINST THE USA…THEN they did 9/11!!!! mossad SPECIAL AGENTS WERE SEEN RECORDING THE EXPLOSIONS AND ARRESTED BUT LATER RELEASED BY A JEW AMERICAN IN THE ADMINISTRATION. NO BLACK BOXES, ENGINES ETC FOUND ALL DAY JEW NETWORKS SHOWED AMERICA FUCKED UP BLACKED OUT VISUALS WITH PLANE NOSES!!!! BULLSHIT no planes just plants and thermite demolitions neocon war mongers and Israel wanted a NEW PEARL HARBOR brought by a new american century. TWO 110 STORY BUILDINGS REDUCED TO 3 STORIES….marvin bush, pres george bush little brother was in charge of the tower this fucking traitor sat in a fl school while we were being attacked but G. BUSH new what was going on because his administration was in on it. dick cheney was running war games of the same thing that happened that day.

  • One thing (because I am old enough to remember this) ONLY "Building 7" came down in a suspicious way. This was a controlled demolition , everyone who knows about explosives knows that. Even if you are not a trained demotons expert, use your eyes. BUT the other building was an inferno of molden steel weakening the structure, it WAS literally melting. EOD.

  • It is all about trust in main stream media. If MSM does not report on it, then it never happened or it is not ligitimate. It is MSM guys. This tells me that the media is crawling with covert CIA operatives. Operation mockingbird is in full effect. This truth will fester until it blows all its putrid puss in the American peoples faces.

  • The People(Americans 911 Drugged) that suffer during the 911 period need to file Class Action Lawsuit(s) for PTSD in the US Federal Courts . To cause a reaction for Trump and the DOJ to open-up True Indictments for Grand Jury Trial against The 911 Traitors and Perpetrators. Heal America First !

  • Why hasn't our government been forced to tell the truth about what happened? We know this so called terrorist attack was perpetrated by our own government so that we could go to war with Iraq. War is big money and a few people made a lot of money off this war. Our government is so corrupt. And I am sick of it.

  • Clearly, the government pulled off a false flag attack and they don't care that we know they're lying. Worse than this tragic crime, are the false wars, killing, wasting of taxpayer trillions, and the loss of freedoms we used to value.
    Glad to see the truth movement continuing. Hope the public doesn't just let this issue go.
    9/11 was a much more sloppy operation than The JFK Hit/Government Coup. This issue, should be the core evidence motivating public revolt. It was so obvious! We must stop the wars, reverse Citizens United and stop the fascists.

  • To all that passed on 911 I am truly sorry for your loss and your families. I don't believe anyone involved in that tragic day will ever see justice or the truth. It's a huge amount of money and power that was gained by the ones responsibil of that day. Some of our country leaders will take the truth to there graves, sad to say…
    I'm am truly sorry for all the family's losses.

  • If the truth about 9/11 ever came out publicly, our government would be crippled. I'd smile that day.

  • A VERY BIG problem for the believers of the 'Official story'
    Dr. S. Shyam Sunder from NIST AND Professor Z.P. Bazant have helped prove that the demolition of World Trade Center One and Two was caused by a controlled demolition.

    There is enough data from the National Institute of standards and technology to calculate the amount of energy that was ACTUALLY USED by the falling building parts, acted upon by gravity, to cause demolition and destruction .

    Professor Z.P. Bazant has calculated amounts of energy needed to pulverize concrete. Professor Z.P. Bazant's calculated amounts to pulverize concrete are conservative compared to energy amounts calculated by others thus his calculations give more credibility to the official story.
    IF the amount of kinetic energy from the falling building parts that is ACTUALLY USED after the onset of global collapse to cause the demolition and destruction of World Trade Center One and Two
    is less than the amount of energy needed to cause the demolition and destruction of World Trade Center One and Two

    THEN the remaining amount of energy needed MUST come from another source.
    The amount of ENERGY ACTUALLY USED to cause the demolition and destruction of World Trade Center One and Two can be calculated as follows:
    The kinetic energy available to a falling object that is accelerating while falling is equal to the amount of potential energy it had at height 'h' before falling
    and is equal to: m x a x h
    where m = mass of object, a = acceleration while falling and h = height of center of mass of object above above ground before beginning to fall.
    IF a falling object of mass 'm' meets NO resistance

    THEN acceleration would be acceleration caused by force of gravity = g = 9.8 m/sec 2


    kinetic energy available would be equal to m x g x h
    IF a falling object meets resistance which decreases the acceleration but still allows it to continue accelerating

    THEN its acceleration AFTER overcoming resistance will be equal to g – ('x'm/sec 2)

    where 'x'm/sec 2 is the amount the acceleration has decreased


    the value m x [g – ('x'm/sec 2)] x h is the amount of kinetic energy that is remaining AFTER the falling object has overcome resistance.
    The same results for remaining amounts of kinetic energy after overcoming resistance can be obtained by using the formula for kinetic energy.
    Center of mass = 1/2 height of WTC 1 or 2
    a = g – 'x' m/sec 2
    v = final velocity from 1/2 height of WTC 1 or 2.
    IF m x g x h is the amount of kinetic energy when the object is meeting no resistance


    m x [g – ('x'm/sec 2)] x h is the amount of kinetic energy that is remaining AFTER the falling object has overcome resistance.


    (m x g x h) minus (m x [g – ('x'm/sec 2)] x h)
    is the amount of ENERGY ACTUALLY USED to overcome the resistance
    Using a collapse times that are in agreement with collapse times stated by Shyam Sunder from NIST it is found that the amount of energy that was ACTUALLY USED by falling building parts, acted upon by gravity, to cause demolition and destruction of World Trade Center One and Two that occurred after the onset of global collapse
    is >MUCH< LESS than the amount of energy needed to pulverize the concrete
    in World Trade Center One and Two that is stated by Z.P. Bazant.
    The paper titled "Analysis of the Mass and Potential Energy of World Trade Center Tower" done by Gregory H. Urich is very well researched.

    In this paper it is stated:
    "The mass and potential energy of one of the Twin Towers is calculated based on available data. …. The calculated mass of 288,100 metric tons … is found to correspond with two other comparable structures in terms of mass per unit floor area, NIST’s SAP2000 model, and the reported amount of recovered debris."

    YouTube did not allow posting this message with a link to this paper but it is easy to find on the internet.
    Using more commonly stated mass of 500,00 tons or 454000000 kg will also show that energy ACTUALLY USED by falling building parts after onset of global collapse is less than amount needed to pulverize concrete as stated by professor Z.P. Bazant.
    There are online calculators to do all calculations shown. YouTube did not allow posting this message with links to these calculators.
    NOTE: 'h' is equal to height of center of mass above ground. For World Trade Center One or Two the center of mass is 1/2 the height of the buildings so the formula for calculating the potential energy of the World Trade Center buildings is: 1/2 (m x a x h)
    for acceleration = g = 9.8 m/sec 2

    mass = 288,100 metric tons = 288100000 kilograms

    height WTC 1 = 411 meters

    potential energy (E) = 580204590000 joule

    = 580.204590000 x 10 9th power joule = 580.205 GJ

    = 138.672 tons of TNT energy equivalent
    Shyam Sunder from NIST states that the collapse time of World Trade Center One was "about eleven seconds" (*1.)
    and David Chandler calculated the acceleration that World Trade Center One experienced during global collapse was 6.27 m/sec 2 which gives a collapse time of 11.4499 seconds (*2.)
    for acceleration = 6.27 m/sec 2 (*2.)

    mass = 288,100 metric tons = 288100000 kilograms

    height WTC 1 = 411 meters

    potential energy (E)= 371212528500 joule

    = 371.212528500 x 10 9th power joule = 371.213 GJ

    = 88.722 tons of TNT energy equivalent
    difference = 208.992 GJ
    = 49.95 tons of TNT energy equivalent
    IF it is ASSUMED that the energy from gravity alone, acting on falling building parts , was the only source of energy used, after the onset of global demolition, to cause the demolition and destruction* of World Trade Center One

    THEN 49.95 tons of TNT energy equivalent IS the amount of ENERGY that was ACTUALLY USED by falling building parts, acted upon by gravity, to cause the demolition and destruction of World Trade Center One
    According to professor Zdeněk P. Bažant (et al) to pulverize the concrete in World Trade Center One:

    " … more than 150 t of TNT per tower would have to be installed, into many small holes drilled into concrete, to produce the same pulverization. …….. "

    What Did and Did Not Cause Collapse of World Trade Center Twin Towers in New York?

    Zdeněk P. Bažant, Hon.M.ASCE1; Jia-Liang Le2; Frank R. Greening3; and David B. Benson4

    Additional energy would also be needed to:

    1. dismember inner core columns
    2. dismember outer perimeter columns
    3. dismember floor truss connectors from inner core columns or outer perimeter columns or dismember floor trusses from floor truss connectors
    4. bend steel beams in addition to dismembering steel beams.
    This also does not account for loss of kinetic energy due to building material being forcibly ejected away from World Trade Center One.
    When the collapse time for World Trade Center Two as stated by Shyam Sunder is used to calculate the amount of energy that was ACTUALLY USED to cause the demolition and destruction of World Trade Center Two it is found that very much less of the destruction was caused by falling building parts acted upon by gravity.
    for acceleration = g = 9.8 m/sec 2

    mass = 288,100 metric tons = 288100000 kilograms

    height WTC 2 = 411 meters

    potential energy (E) = 580204590000 joule

    = 580.204590000 x 10 9th power joule = 580.205 GJ

    = 138.672 tons of TNT
    Shyam Sunder has stated the collapse time for World Trade Center Two was
    "about 9 seconds" (*1.)

    Giving Shyam Sunder as much credibility as possible:

    for time = 9.99 seconds

    acceleration = 8.23646 m/s 2
    for acceleration = 8.23646 m/s 2

    mass = 288,100 metric tons = 288100000 kilograms

    height WTC 2 = 411 meters

    potential energy (E)= 487635907893 joule

    = 487.635907893 joule x 10 9th power joule = 487.636 GJ

    = 116.548 tons of TNT
    difference = 92.569 GJ

    = 22.125 tons of TNT energy equivalent
    IF it is ASSUMED that the energy from gravity alone, acting on falling building parts, was the only source of energy used, after the onset of global demolition, to cause the demolition and destruction of World Trade Center Two

    THEN 22.125 tons of TNT energy equivalent IS the amount of ENERGY that was ACTUALLY USED by falling building parts, acted upon by gravity, to cause the demolition and destruction of World Trade Center Two
    According to Bazant (et al) to pulverize the concrete in World Trade Center One [or two]:

    " … more than 150 t of TNT per tower would have to be installed, into many small holes drilled into concrete, to produce the same pulverization. …….. "

    What Did and Did Not Cause Collapse of World Trade Center Twin Towers in New York?

    Zdeněk P. Bažant, Hon.M.ASCE1; Jia-Liang Le2; Frank R. Greening3; and David B. Benson4

    Additional energy would also be needed to:

    1. dismember inner core columns
    2. dismember outer perimeter columns
    3. dismember floor truss connectors from inner core columns or outer perimeter columns or dismember floor trusses from floor truss connectors
    4. bend steel beams in addition to dismembering steel beams.
    This also does not account for loss of kinetic energy due to building material being forcibly ejected away from World Trade Center Two.

    Support Justice for 9-11- victims!

    Speak up and demand a criminal investigation that includes a net energy study.

    -Blu Crystl –

    God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.
    John 4:24

    [] (*1.)
    World Trade Center Twin Towers: Constant Acceleration

    Shyam Sunder states:

    WTC "about 11 seconds"

    WTC 2 "about 9 seconds"
    [] (*2.)
    David Chandler 64% of free fall = 6.27 m/sec 2

    t = 11.4499 seconds

    wrpoc 1807161940

  • 911 was the beginning of their new world order bullshit, and we do not consent with the official story.

  • V well done for producing a balanced analysis of what happened to 3 of the buildings on that day. Using scientific analysis from independent experts in their fields. The US needs to take a humble and frank demand for short comings in the reports published to be thoroughly addressed.

  • It'll NEVER be investigated again, hell it wasn't the first time because our government would have been in prison

  • This is probably the best program I've seen on the real evidence. Sadly, there will always be those that deny the facts, the truth of the evidence and nothing you say can change their minds. Such people refuse to open their closed minds and believe the obvious until someone in the government, their corrupt government, comes out and tells them what to think and what to believe.

  • What you all need is a DEATHBED CONFESSION. Locate potential conspirators and find out how old they are. Get the real ancianos to come clean with the whole story.

  • Why bring down WTC 7 down?
    As an engineer it makes no sense why it fell unbelievably. That’s obvious the physics is clear.
    It would be seriously cool to know the psychological evidence or logic begin this and why this building 7 would be pulled down. What would be the political motive to do such a thing.
    Obvious evidence does not hood wink anyone interested – why is WTC 7 so important to destroy, what did WTC 7 contain that was imminent to destroy ?

  • american government distroied and killed his own people, america is the biggest mob state there is so when I hear u guys talking about other countries u sound no more that ignorant to me, no country compares to evil u have there in your own house, I saw something is wrong before all those videos appeared on youtube , that's how easy was for other people from outside to see that was a scenario put into play, then this kind of vids just proved that I was sadly right.

  • South Tower SHOULD HAVE toppled over like a tree. You don't need to be a structural engineer to know that. Most, if not all of it's structural integrity was compromised where the 2nd plane hit…most of that tower should have toppled eastbound, not straight down into it's own footprint…all of the upper portion of that building's weight was focused to that weakened point…should have fallen in that direction. Anyone who's ever chopped down a tree knows that.


  • The Zionist cabal of which Silverstein is a member, eliminated asbestos-filled buildings without a demolition permit AT the taxpayer's expense while diminishing our freedoms to the point of global communism & Tyranny now known as the New World Order. It wasn't just the buildings that burned, IT WAS OUR CONSTITUTION! The patriot act was written prior to 9/11.

  • Has there ever been an official investigation since this was aired?This is 2018, are we, as a nation, really that bereft of Truth and a morality we can live with?

  • "In war-time, truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies." – Winston Churchill

  • I've arguments with twats on youtube saying everything they have found here is bullshit conspiracy
    theory, how can you be so ignorant to ignore these people.

  • Silverstein said experts told him they should demolish building 7..Please tell me how, in God's name they wired the building in an hour or two..you cannot wire a building that fast. It takes weeks or months before 911. to Rig this up, therefore it is a planned take down of this building, which means all the rest of the story are lies..when it is proven to be a false story, that means all of the 911 Story is false…This is Horrific for those who lost loved ones.. I am so shocked at this event…..


  • There was the Pearl Harbor Attack and the New Pearl Harbor Attack.  The first was a sneak attack the later was the 9/11 False Flag "Guided Drone" Attack!  There's no way the plane that hit the Pentagon could possibly get through.  That plane was flying for some duration after the grounding of all commercial planes on 9/11.  It was right in the coastal fighter interceptor net of NORAD.  Fighters on alert and capable of being airborne within five minutes.  Fighters capable of flying over twice the speed of sound!  Any commercial plane flying in that zone were essentially "Dead Ducks" in the air after the grounding of all commercial aircraft!  Further…the plane headed for the Pentagon flew unauthorized into Restricted Air Space!!  It was a Dead Duck…Slam Dunk deal to SAMs.  However, Cheney ordered a stand down confirmed by Secretary Mineta.  For those who say he didn't, the authority to shoot down a plane is in the NORAD play book.  It does NOT require a verbal approval from the Vice President!  WHY wasn't the plane approaching the Pentagon shot down by a surface to air missile?? WHY did the young man say to Cheney "Do the order still stand?"    when the plane was 10 miles out from the Pentagon? The young man was challenging his order that was counter to standard operating procedure. Cheney replied "Of course the order still stands.  Have you heard anything to the contrary?" See YouTube "Cheney gave STAND DOWN ORDER"  Another anomaly is that regular Air Force fighters from Langley AFB which is a regular Air Force fighter base were attempting to scramble the plane heading for the Pentagon? The Air Sovereignty Mission was taken over by the Air National Guard from the regular Air Force  in the mid 90s.  So, what were the dedicated Air Defense fighter intercepters under the Air National Guard and (operational component of NORAD)that were on 5 minute alert status doing on the coast??  Apparently, they were on Stand Down!

  • Yup, F15s were tailing and circling that Alaska Airline plane that was hijacked at SeaTac Airport but of course that didn't happen on 9/11.  The only thing that was highjacked on 9/11 was the US Government by Zionist/NEOCON criminal element that perpetrated the 9/11 Attack and displaced the blame on Muslims!   The Attack was NOT masterminded in the caves of Afghanistan!!  Now, how in the hell did low tech bandits realize how to defeat the US Air Defense System and NORAD operational plan in the caves of Afghanistan??  NORAD did not overlook the fact that a commercial airliner can be used as a missile and hit a nuclear power plant in America!!

  • I'm not usually swayed by conspiracy theories but there appears to be compelling evidence to question the integrity and quality of the official investigation.

  • Great video!. Thanks from Ecuador-Southamerica.
    The day will come when it will be obvious to everyone. …Everything will change for sure
    Now we are being bombarded by History Channel and Natgeo´s propaganda…. at all levels they controll the media…..Thanks to the Internet we are spreading the truth….it allowed me and my family to open our eyes and now we feel with a responsability to let others know

  • I’m willing to believe that we are not being told the truth, but how can the govt possibly expect to convince people with such a shoddy cover up? Any one of the main points of this report would be enough to change my mind. It’s hard to understand how they could believe that they would get away with such blatant impossibilities contained in the official report.

  • The truth will set you free. Rest in peace the victims of this tragic event. Their families deserve compensation and the truth.

  • G.BUSH NEVER SHOWED ANY REAL EMOTION Anger, sadness NOTHING whatsoever at ANY point! Even when he was first TOLD! Nothing! 100% inside job

  • Bush again went on TV and said The Faceless Cowhard responsible for these acts" meaning him and the us government, not Bin Laden. Bush & Bin Laden were business partners.

  • Funny the WTC buildings were in SERIOUS need of repairs/renovation, becoming dilapidated and their INSURANCE POLICY was just DOUBLED weeks prior and the Owner Did not show up to WTC that day!!

  • The perpetrators of this hideous crime against the citizens of the United States must be brought to justice before they die of old age. These criminals are, or were, members of our own government, and they engineered 9/11 as a "false flag", or pretense for going into Iraq which had (fictional) "Weapons of Mass Destruction", when in reality it was oil, lots of it, and they wanted it. It seems so clear to an objective, thinking person that this was the case, but half of this country still refuses to believe it. This cognitive dissonance is clearly explained towards the end of the film in the section "Seeking Understanding". However, all one needs to refute the official explanation are two words: CONTROLLED DEMOLITION. That's it. "Boom, boom, boom, boom, boom" , together with the rivers and pools of liquefied steel "like lava from a volcano" which would be impossible in a normal fire. So to the perpetrators, and we know who you are, and more importantly, YOU know who you are, I say: do you hear those footsteps? That's justice coming for you, at last.

  • We have never gotten closure about what happened on 9/11.
    An epiphany came to me this moment while watching the Danish take on 9/11, I realized a truth that I have never heard spoken, a theory, if true, would cast the light of day on how to find the people who committed this atrocity.

    Follow the money.

    The buildings had recently been insured.

    In the early eighties, Larry Silverstein built #7.

    Just months before 9/11, the World Trade Center’s lease was sold to Larry Silverstein. Silverstein took out an insurance plan that ‘fortuitously’ covered terrorism.

    After 9/11, Silverstein took the insurance company to court, claiming he should be paid double because there were 2 attacks. He won and was awarded $4,550,000,000.

    $4.5 billion dollars.

    If you were the insurance company wouldn't it be in your interest to investigate fraud, such as a controlled demolition? Live on television I heard the term "pull the plug", a word used by demolition experts. Yet no investigation of that theory was ever made. All that metal got shipped off to smelters, pronto. No tests for explosives or radioactive residue from a small nuke. None of these avenues were ever investigated. And, the site was closed to any independent investigators, the evidence disposed of quickly before we questioned all the impossible disparities and holes in the narrative. We were numb and the evidence disposed of before we woke up.

    The insurance carrier never investigated fraud and was ready to pay over $4 billion dollars. This insurance company was more than likely involved in the Military Industrial Complex. $4.5 billion was an investment with a much larger payoff.

    The insurance company's Board of Directors all serve on other corporate boards. Say that there are twenty board members… And they all serve on twenty other boards. It's a web of greed.

    It becomes obvious who engineered 9/11.

    We need to find this insurance company, get a list of the Board of Directors, and investigate how many other boards they sit on, the names of the companies, find their products or services, and if they have government contracts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *